You Fall In Love You Lose (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:46 am
Right, let's get this going.
The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
fudge off noob.Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
Get out.Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
Ah, I see - they lose a sense of self respect...Ewinkum wrote:Get out.Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
You're not too bright are you?Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
fudge off n00b.karahi wrote:Yup, even with the new format it's still the crappest thread title on PR.
You can't polish a turd, evidently, though some of the content helps you forget the dreadful feyness of the colours it sails under. For a while.
No - I'm not too brightWorking Class Rugger wrote:You're not to bright are you?Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
Why would care about the thread title when you know the quality of the thread is going to be high? It's not meant to be taken seriously.karahi wrote:Yup, even with the new format it's still the crappest thread title on PR.
You can't polish a turd, evidently, though some of the content helps you forget the dreadful feyness of the colours it sails under. For a while.
Ah fudge...missed that.Will. wrote:No - I'm not too brightWorking Class Rugger wrote:You're not to bright are you?Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
Don't overthink it. Get out.Will. wrote:Ah, I see - they lose a sense of self respect...Ewinkum wrote:Get out.Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
Dewet Pisser wrote:Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
My sentiments exactly. The thread title on the original board irritated me beyond description. Seeing it here is a test of my resolve to try to be nice.
Change the title immediately. "Some pictures of pretty women", should do the trick.
So. Is. Your. Face.Will. wrote:
Stupid thread.
It's a totty thread. Stop over analyzing it.Will. wrote:I'd still like to know what those, who have previously fallen in love with some pictures, have lost?
It is better to have loved a short girl than never to have loved at all.Will. wrote:I'd still like to know what those, who have previously fallen in love with some pictures, have lost?
That would be a lot better than your original title, which suggests you are an introverted teenager whose entire sexual experience consists of masturbation.Dumbledore wrote:Dewet Pisser wrote:Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?
Stupid thread.
My sentiments exactly. The thread title on the original board irritated me beyond description. Seeing it here is a test of my resolve to try to be nice.
Change the title immediately. "Some pictures of pretty women", should do the trick.
How about 'Pretty women and absolutely no fatties' ?
It really does bother me. It's irrational, I know, but I question the maturity of anyone who could "fall in love" with a picture, and what do you lose anyway?Dumbledore wrote: DP, it's a thread title as old as the internet. If it really, really bothers you that much I'll change it.
Anyway
Wicked...Hobo Hooker wrote:So. Is. Your. Face.Will. wrote:
Stupid thread.
Start a different thread, with a proper title, and make it the greatest thread Mark IThis is a balls of a start to one of the greatest threads on the entire internet Mark II.
Oh yes. +1 GSguy smiley wrote:Rank preciousness from old names and new...
here's a tip... if you don't like it, don't open it. Pretty simple really... even your limited imagination should be able to handle the concept.
Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious wit kant. Now start posting.
Isn't 'Tits 101' already back up and running, that pretty much ensures that goal has already fallen by the wayside.guy smiley wrote:Working Class Rugger wrote:Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious wit kant. Now start posting.
I was going to say that, then I thought there's a reasonable chance of confining the totty to one thread this way. Faint though the chance is, it's worth a try.
Much lower class thread that one. This is where the good stuff isWorking Class Rugger wrote:Isn't 'Tits 101' already back up and running, that pretty much ensures that goal has already fallen by the wayside.guy smiley wrote:Working Class Rugger wrote:Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious wit kant. Now start posting.
I was going to say that, then I thought there's a reasonable chance of confining the totty to one thread this way. Faint though the chance is, it's worth a try.
True. Still prefer the original name though.Dumbledore wrote:Much lower class thread that one. This is where the good stuff isWorking Class Rugger wrote:Isn't 'Tits 101' already back up and running, that pretty much ensures that goal has already fallen by the wayside.guy smiley wrote:Working Class Rugger wrote:Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious wit kant. Now start posting.
I was going to say that, then I thought there's a reasonable chance of confining the totty to one thread this way. Faint though the chance is, it's worth a try.
Actually it's not that simple. As any fule kno, if it's the thread title that's annoying, not clicking on the thread isn't likely to help, is it?guy smiley wrote:Rank preciousness from old names and new...
here's a tip... if you don't like it, don't open it. Pretty simple really... even your limited imagination should be able to handle the concept.
Changed it back. They bitches can all stop crying.Working Class Rugger wrote: True. Still prefer the original name though.