Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 9:27 am
Didn't our wonderful judiciary not blast a hole in direct provisions recently?
I know they'd pull the manifesto out and their voters are obviously well aware of this. But I'd still be hammering them if I was SDLP / FF.alliswell wrote:To be fair to them it's a totally consistent position. The crazy thing to do would be to vote for an abstentionist party and expect them to do otherwise.Boxcar Ira wrote:I'm only half following the Brexit parliament debacle. But does anyone else feel that Shinners are getting an easy ride from the media in relation to their absenteeism?
I'd be f**king raging if they were meant to be representing me during the borders biggest crisis and they were sitting on their holes. They could at least significantly reduce the DUPs influence
yeah, we want poor paddy in Boston to get a green card 'cause he's been working there illegally for 20 years paying tax but some poor Cnut with IT skills in short supply may be bizarrely entitled to work in Ireland.....Ireland was only 1 of 2 countries in Europe that didn't allow this until last year.....dont worry mr blue shirt, they allow them to work but make it so restrictive that they ensure that they keep them in direct provision long enough to decide that they'll return home and take their chances against Al QuaedaMullet 2 wrote:Nah still on the go.
They bizarrely decided that they have a right to work.
ticketlessinseattle wrote:yeah, we want poor paddy in Boston to get a green card 'cause he's been working there illegally for 20 years paying tax but some poor Cnut with IT skills in short supply may be bizarrely entitled to work in Ireland.....Ireland was only 1 of 2 countries in Europe that didn't allow this until last year.....dont worry mr blue shirt, they allow them to work but make it so restrictive that they ensure that they keep them in direct provision long enough to decide that they'll return home and take their chances against Al QuaedaMullet 2 wrote:Nah still on the go.
They bizarrely decided that they have a right to work.
.camroc1 wrote:A new report from the Dublin Region Homeless Executive has a breakdown of those that presented as homeless in the last year : 21% from outside the EU, 12% from the EU, and 67% Irish. Regarding those from outside the EU many are in Ireland illegally and/or claiming refugee status.
The fact that more than a third of those presenting as homeless are not Irish is not mentioned very often by the professional "homeless" industry and associated politicians. It brings into question whether Ireland is seen as a soft touch in welfare terms internationally, and also the morality of spending a third of the available budget on non-Irish as opposed to sorting out Irish citizens first.
I find the 21% figure very high indeed for such a small country, and would love to know the original country of origin for the 12% of EU origin, as I'm sure most of us could hazard a guess as to where the majority of them are from.
I know this is skirting racial/sectarian themes but surely our SW should be aimed at Irish people (and I include those working in Ireland in that), rather than those who choose to pitch up on our shores because we're seen as an international soft touch ?
https://www.rte.ie/news/2019/0331/10397 ... s-ireland/
ticketlessinseattle wrote:yeah, we want poor paddy in Boston to get a green card 'cause he's been working there illegally for 20 years paying tax but some poor Cnut with IT skills in short supply may be bizarrely entitled to work in Ireland.....Ireland was only 1 of 2 countries in Europe that didn't allow this until last year.....dont worry mr blue shirt, they allow them to work but make it so restrictive that they ensure that they keep them in direct provision long enough to decide that they'll return home and take their chances against Al QuaedaMullet 2 wrote:Nah still on the go.
They bizarrely decided that they have a right to work.
Not remotely normal, its a quote.lorcanoworms wrote:Lads the previous tenant burnt the chimney in the house I just mentioned.
We have Landlord insurance and they want 3 quotes but all the contractors want to charge for this and take it as a deposit.
I don't have this issue in Dublin is this normal elsewhere?
The new owner is happy we are fixing it.
Ehh fudge paddy in Boston.... Get the f out if he is illegal.ticketlessinseattle wrote:yeah, we want poor paddy in Boston to get a green card 'cause he's been working there illegally for 20 years paying tax but some poor Cnut with IT skills in short supply may be bizarrely entitled to work in Ireland.....Ireland was only 1 of 2 countries in Europe that didn't allow this until last year.....dont worry mr blue shirt, they allow them to work but make it so restrictive that they ensure that they keep them in direct provision long enough to decide that they'll return home and take their chances against Al QuaedaMullet 2 wrote:Nah still on the go.
They bizarrely decided that they have a right to work.
Probably a combination of the location and the size of the job.redderneck wrote:Charging for a quote? Fuggit. We're back up our own arses again.
Unfortunately his vexatious actions are effecting Ireland's reputation abroad for this kind of investment ....... personally, I'd like to see CAB involved re: the €22m owed and the transfer of the lands.fishfoodie wrote:The Wanker who objected the Apple DC in Athenry, is now objecting to another DC down in Wickla'
When are we going to fix our fuckawful Planning Laws ??
The laws aren't the issue, it's how long it takes for a case to be heard.fishfoodie wrote:The Wanker who objected the Apple DC in Athenry, is now objecting to another DC down in Wickla'
When are we going to fix our fuckawful Planning Laws ??
We'll know around 8 O' Clock !Leinsterman wrote:There's an English homeless guy on Baggot Street. Do we classify him EU or non-EU?
Who cares. Just beat him to death with his own shoes and be done with itLeinsterman wrote:There's an English homeless guy on Baggot Street. Do we classify him EU or non-EU?
The time to process is certainly a significant issue; but if anyone can object to anything, no matter whether they've a valid interest, or not; that's a problem of law.anonymous_joe wrote:The laws aren't the issue, it's how long it takes for a case to be heard.fishfoodie wrote:The Wanker who objected the Apple DC in Athenry, is now objecting to another DC down in Wickla'
When are we going to fix our fuckawful Planning Laws ??
There needs to be a filter before ABP.fishfoodie wrote:The time to process is certainly a significant issue; but if anyone can object to anything, no matter whether they've a valid interest, or not; that's a problem of law.anonymous_joe wrote:The laws aren't the issue, it's how long it takes for a case to be heard.fishfoodie wrote:The Wanker who objected the Apple DC in Athenry, is now objecting to another DC down in Wickla'
When are we going to fix our fuckawful Planning Laws ??
Pay what you owe or GTFODuff Paddy wrote:What do people think about SF’s vulture fund bill? Clearly it’s bad for the Irish banking sector but they will get a lot of support for it. I have some sympathy for the logic behind it - people entered into a contract with their bank and not with a third party. That said, defaulting means they breached the contract first. It all comes down to the difficult Irish banks have in foreclosing on their security “the family home”. Until we address that then these issues are always going to arise.
As an aside the new term cuckoo fund is a hilariously bad analogy - somebody saw the success that the scary term vulture fund had and tried to grab a slice of the action
Only because the Deeply Unpleasant Protestants are fúcking up so royally.Leinsterman wrote:They're in a win-win situation whatever the outcome though.
The Sun God wrote:Only because the Deeply Unpleasant Protestants are fúcking up so royally.Leinsterman wrote:They're in a win-win situation whatever the outcome though.
Duff Paddy wrote:What do people think about SF’s vulture fund bill? Clearly it’s bad for the Irish banking sector but they will get a lot of support for it. I have some sympathy for the logic behind it - people entered into a contract with their bank and not with a third party. That said, defaulting means they breached the contract first. It all comes down to the difficult Irish banks have in foreclosing on their security “the family home”. Until we address that then these issues are always going to arise.
As an aside the new term cuckoo fund is a hilariously bad analogy - somebody saw the success that the scary term vulture fund had and tried to grab a slice of the action
AS I said on the Brexit thread, both of them are enabled in their university level politics by having their economy subsidised to the tune of 20 - 30% per annum. Take even some of that subsidy away and watch the politics change.MunsterMan!!!!! wrote:The Sun God wrote:Only because the Deeply Unpleasant Protestants are fúcking up so royally.Leinsterman wrote:They're in a win-win situation whatever the outcome though.
I wouldn't be 100% sure SF are in a win-win, they might be if they weren't abstaining. Alot of people aren't a slave to a principal esp when it really impacts on the day-to-day stuff, which Brexit has, I think some people see SF are political party that will never budge from their position and poor negotiators, an important treat in a country that doesn't have a reputation for elect single party governments.
That SF bill has no chance of passing. It would be shot down in the ECJ.Mullet 2 wrote:Duff Paddy wrote:What do people think about SF’s vulture fund bill? Clearly it’s bad for the Irish banking sector but they will get a lot of support for it. I have some sympathy for the logic behind it - people entered into a contract with their bank and not with a third party. That said, defaulting means they breached the contract first. It all comes down to the difficult Irish banks have in foreclosing on their security “the family home”. Until we address that then these issues are always going to arise.
As an aside the new term cuckoo fund is a hilariously bad analogy - somebody saw the success that the scary term vulture fund had and tried to grab a slice of the action
I have no sympathy with the Bill
No they didn't.Duff Paddy wrote:What do people think about SF’s vulture fund bill? Clearly it’s bad for the Irish banking sector but they will get a lot of support for it. I have some sympathy for the logic behind it - people entered into a contract with their bank and not with a third party. That said, defaulting means they breached the contract first. It all comes down to the difficult Irish banks have in foreclosing on their security “the family home”. Until we address that then these issues are always going to arise.
As an aside the new term cuckoo fund is a hilariously bad analogy - somebody saw the success that the scary term vulture fund had and tried to grab a slice of the action
That’s what they pay their solicitor for. Should they sue?anonymous_joe wrote:No they didn't.Duff Paddy wrote:What do people think about SF’s vulture fund bill? Clearly it’s bad for the Irish banking sector but they will get a lot of support for it. I have some sympathy for the logic behind it - people entered into a contract with their bank and not with a third party. That said, defaulting means they breached the contract first. It all comes down to the difficult Irish banks have in foreclosing on their security “the family home”. Until we address that then these issues are always going to arise.
As an aside the new term cuckoo fund is a hilariously bad analogy - somebody saw the success that the scary term vulture fund had and tried to grab a slice of the action
How can the bank be blamed for them not reading the mortgage?
For what? What damage have they suffered?Duff Paddy wrote:That’s what they pay their solicitor for. Should they sue?anonymous_joe wrote:No they didn't.Duff Paddy wrote:What do people think about SF’s vulture fund bill? Clearly it’s bad for the Irish banking sector but they will get a lot of support for it. I have some sympathy for the logic behind it - people entered into a contract with their bank and not with a third party. That said, defaulting means they breached the contract first. It all comes down to the difficult Irish banks have in foreclosing on their security “the family home”. Until we address that then these issues are always going to arise.
As an aside the new term cuckoo fund is a hilariously bad analogy - somebody saw the success that the scary term vulture fund had and tried to grab a slice of the action
How can the bank be blamed for them not reading the mortgage?