Page 1305 of 3641

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 12:40 pm
by Diego
Is it definitely the same lads doing all these jobs?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 12:41 pm
by sewa
The Sun God wrote:How much cash is typically held in an ATM machine ...? anyone ?
If you google it most hold around 10k but they can hold 200k when fully loaded

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 12:44 pm
by The Sun God
sewa wrote:
The Sun God wrote:How much cash is typically held in an ATM machine ...? anyone ?
If you google it most hold around 10k but they can hold 200k when fully loaded
That's what I heard also.......fcuk, thats a few bob for the 'dissidents' that I am assuming are doing these heists.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:03 pm
by lilyw
rfurlong wrote:
Conspicuous wrote:
rfurlong wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:That can never work because our judiciary and Politicians are too soft.

Decriminalise and have safe injecting centres but outside of those centres all dealing and drug taking in the city must be eradicated with aggressive policing.
theres half a dozen dealers lined up outside merchants quay every morning, to trade with the methadone junkies ...... directly opposite the four courts and directly under the gaze of the City managers office

we have the worst of all worlds ..... a 'health system' who's methadone programme keeps tragic drug addicts in a perpetual zombie like state, and a 'criminal justice system' that then abandons them to the fvcking kinahans.

Round the 100 or so poor fvckers up and bus them down to the curragh for a tough love/bootcamp/internment session of approx 6-12 months. Get them clean, get them trained in some skills, give them a path way to a job and back into society ........ oh and let the army snipers shoot anyone trying to catapult drugs over the wall.

much better solution to the drugs problem than current expensive policing of the kinihans, legalisation of drugs, prison for addicts, open injecting centres, or methadone slavery.

of course it will never happen ....... cos civil liberties
I just shared this with everyone in work :thumbup:

The whole place is in stitches :lol:
shooting drug dealers was obviously tongue in cheek ...... but do please let me know whats laughable about the rest of the forced drug rehabilitation idea ..... other than it impinges on the civil liberties of chaotic, tragic people, who would otherwise likely die, and forces them onto a new path for the benefit of all in society, including themselves?

it would be a good debate to have, if you had the wit to conduct it.
It's a load of unmitigated s***e - apart from that there is nothing whatsoever wrong with it.

You quite obviously have little to no knowledge about addiction recovery. Whether you subscribe to the "addiction as a disease" model or not, there is one thing on which all properly carried out studies agree: You cannot force anybody to recover. You can get them clean by force; however that just turns them into a clean junkie (dry drunk in AA terminology) who will relapse at the first bump in the road. Recovery is a long & very painful process and requires the voluntary participation of the addict - it can't be forced externally. By definition a lot of addicts are not ready to recover - no amount of bullying will change that.

There is a lot of really good information about this on the Quitting the Bottle thread - SOTN in particular contributed links to very detailed research. There seems little point in simply rehashing that information over here.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:10 pm
by redderneck
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails
Sooooooo.

How long have you been a humanist celebrant and is there much wedge to be made?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:17 pm
by Nolanator
My cousin had a humanist wedding and it was lovely. Appropriate levels of ceremony, but none of the religious mumbo jumbo. All about family and friends. :thumbup:

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:19 pm
by redderneck
EverReady wrote:You get a go off one of the bridesmaids and 20 smackers from the da
Cool. There must be fair old stories from your wilderness seminary years wha'?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:20 pm
by redderneck
Nolanator wrote:My cousin had a humanist wedding and it was lovely. Appropriate levels of ceremony, but none of the religious mumbo jumbo. All about family and friends. :thumbup:
They might as well have slipped the drive thru cashier at Burger King a twenty and told him to read off a flashcard.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:20 pm
by Bullettyme
I was at a humanist wedding before and it just seemed to be airy fairy type stuff and loving one another. Can't remember any weird shit.

Going to a naming ceremony this weekend, presume it's the same woman officiating, will keep an ear out.

I thought spiritualist ones were the weird ones.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:23 pm
by redderneck
Bullettyme wrote:I was at a humanist wedding before and it just seemed to be airy fairy type stuff and loving one another.
Like that's going to work. FFS, everyone knows a proper marriage needs fear to work...

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:24 pm
by de_Selby
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails
I agree completely about educate together schools having these issues, but that doesn't mean that the church should still be in control of schools. It's not a binary choice.

I also don't see how people can defend the hysterical letter sent by the school either. It was comical.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:26 pm
by Mullet 2
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails

Wait until you get asked to naming ceremony.

Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:26 pm
by Mullet 2
Nolanator wrote:My cousin had a humanist wedding and it was lovely. Appropriate levels of ceremony, but none of the religious mumbo jumbo. All about family and friends. :thumbup:

We're all shocked

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:28 pm
by sewa
Mullet 2 wrote:
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails

Wait until you get asked to naming ceremony.

Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
What is a naming ceremony?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:28 pm
by de_Selby
Also, myself and my wife had a humanist wedding. We just had readings/poems from close family members that we found meaningful.

I'd much prefer what we had than getting life lessons from a representative of the institution that systematically covered up child abuse and spreads bullshit about fairies in the sky.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:30 pm
by nardol
It all went to hell when the flogging stopped.

Lost cause since.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:33 pm
by nardol
de_Selby wrote:Also, myself and my wife had a humanist wedding. We just had readings/poems from close family members that we found meaningful.

I'd much prefer what we had that to getting life lessons from a representative of the institution that systematically covered up child abuse and spreads bullshit about fairies in the sky.
So its ok for a ceremony that you found 'meaningful' but a ceremony that involves traditional elements for someone that attaches meaningfulness to 'fairies in the skies' is bad and must be insulted and spoken about in a derogatory manner?

Nice humanist attitude.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:34 pm
by nardol
sewa wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails

Wait until you get asked to naming ceremony.

Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
What is a naming ceremony?
Christening for wierdos

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:35 pm
by sewa
nardol wrote:
sewa wrote:
What is a naming ceremony?
Christening for wierdos
Weirdos is a term that is not very specific, what sort of weirdos

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:39 pm
by Bullettyme
nardol wrote:
sewa wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails

Wait until you get asked to naming ceremony.

Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
What is a naming ceremony?
Christening for wierdos
Or for people that like the ceremonies but don't want part of an organisation that has a questionable attitude to women and children at best.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:41 pm
by de_Selby
nardol wrote:
de_Selby wrote:Also, myself and my wife had a humanist wedding. We just had readings/poems from close family members that we found meaningful.

I'd much prefer what we had that to getting life lessons from a representative of the institution that systematically covered up child abuse and spreads bullshit about fairies in the sky.
So its ok for a ceremony that you found 'meaningful' but a ceremony that involves traditional elements for someone that attaches meaningfulness to 'fairies in the skies' is bad and must be insulted and spoken about in a derogatory manner?

Nice humanist attitude.
I've read this 3 times trying to figure out what point it is you think you are making. Where did I say anything "must be insulted" FFS?

We had a non-religious ceremony because religion is a load of unmitigated bollocks imo, and that's before you even get into the church's actions in the past in this country.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:46 pm
by nardol
I have zero issue with a non religious ceremony.

I have issue with attacks on others way of life from someone who supports an individuals own right to his own individual beliefs (humanist).


The above statement being 'before you even get into the church's actions in the past'

Not an argument I wish to pursue ... So its all good :thumbup:

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:51 pm
by de_Selby
nardol wrote:I have zero issue with a non religious ceremony.

I have issue with attacks on others way of life from someone who supports an individuals own right to his own individual beliefs (humanist).


The above statement being 'before you even get into the church's actions in the past'

Not an argument I wish to pursue ... So its all good :thumbup:
People can believe whatever they want as far as I'm concerned.

I don't see any contradiction in the fact that I may believe that what they believe is bullshit.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:52 pm
by Duff Paddy
I find the humanist ceremonies grand but you need a pagan to really get a laugh going - they are completely batshit, gets everyone laughing

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:59 pm
by Uncle Fester
With 26% of parents in the area indicating a wish for divestment, I can see why the proposal to divest one school out of eight is causing outrage. It should clearly be two of them.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 1:59 pm
by The Sun God
Mullet 2 wrote:
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails

Wait until you get asked to naming ceremony.

Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
:lol: :lol: You crack me up and you are right. I was at one recently.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:00 pm
by Uncle Fester
The Sun God wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote: Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
:lol: :lol: You crack me up and you are right. I was at one recently.

Did you...ehm...have a nice time there?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:02 pm
by The Sun God
Uncle Fester wrote:
The Sun God wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote: Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
:lol: :lol: You crack me up and you are right. I was at one recently.

Did you...ehm...have a nice time there?
:lol: :lol: :lol: I was just about to edit you plum.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:27 pm
by redderneck
The Sun God wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
The Sun God wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote: Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
:lol: :lol: You crack me up and you are right. I was at one recently.

Did you...ehm...have a nice time there?
:lol: :lol: :lol: I was just about to edit you plum.
Too little too late.

You wouldn't go down well at one of those parties at all, at all.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:38 pm
by The Sun God
redderneck wrote:
The Sun God wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
The Sun God wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote: Gayer than an orgy at Leo's gaff
:lol: :lol: You crack me up and you are right. I was at one recently.

Did you...ehm...have a nice time there?
:lol: :lol: :lol: I was just about to edit you plum.
Too little too late.

You wouldn't go down well at one of those parties at all, at all.
Oh I don't know.... I still know the odd move.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:45 pm
by danthefan
EverReady wrote:Agreeing with Mullet always pains me since I gave up on national socialism but the educate togethers are as big ideologues and as fervent as any other denomination. Their ideology is everything is good. No shades of grey or red lights when some ideology impinges on say a women's rights. It is all cool and you just ignore the shit bits and get down with the head gear. I was at a humanist wedding at the weekend and it is a farce. It mentioned other religious philosophical positions and had some Hindu shite crow barred in. Obviously the RC church wasn't mentioned bar the ceremony being based on that. It was hippy drippy bullshit and I hope the marriage fails
I had a humanist wedding, they will say basically anything you ask them to. The ceremony can last 5 mins where they just do the legal necessities of you like. If there was Hinduism etc in it then it came from the couple, or more accurately the bride.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:46 pm
by Leinsterman
Did you have the ceremony in the place on St Stephens Green, Dan?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:47 pm
by ZappaMan
I got married by a Blues Brothers tribute band in Las Vegas.

Was a very spiritual and moving ceremony.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:47 pm
by Mullet 2
de_Selby wrote:Also, myself and my wife had a humanist wedding. We just had readings/poems from close family members that we found meaningful.

I'd much prefer what we had than getting life lessons from a representative of the institution that systematically covered up child abuse and spreads bullshit about fairies in the sky.
Nah its shit and all that meaningful stuff is a load of shite

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:48 pm
by sewa
ZappaMan wrote:I got married by a Blues Brothers tribute band in Las Vegas.

Was a very spiritual and moving ceremony.
:lol:

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:48 pm
by Mullet 2
de_Selby wrote:
nardol wrote:
de_Selby wrote:Also, myself and my wife had a humanist wedding. We just had readings/poems from close family members that we found meaningful.

I'd much prefer what we had that to getting life lessons from a representative of the institution that systematically covered up child abuse and spreads bullshit about fairies in the sky.
So its ok for a ceremony that you found 'meaningful' but a ceremony that involves traditional elements for someone that attaches meaningfulness to 'fairies in the skies' is bad and must be insulted and spoken about in a derogatory manner?

Nice humanist attitude.
I've read this 3 times trying to figure out what point it is you think you are making. Where did I say anything "must be insulted" FFS?

We had a non-religious ceremony because religion is a load of unmitigated bollocks imo, and that's before you even get into the church's actions in the past in this country.

I can't see why you're struggling

He nailed you tbf

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:58 pm
by danthefan
Leinsterman wrote:Did you have the ceremony in the place on St Stephens Green, Dan?
No had it at the hotel the reception was in.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 3:00 pm
by CM11
Uncle Fester wrote:With 26% of parents in the area indicating a wish for divestment, I can see why the proposal to divest one school out of eight is causing outrage. It should clearly be two of them.
Thought it was two.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 3:05 pm
by de_Selby
Mullet 2 wrote:
de_Selby wrote:
nardol wrote:
de_Selby wrote:Also, myself and my wife had a humanist wedding. We just had readings/poems from close family members that we found meaningful.

I'd much prefer what we had that to getting life lessons from a representative of the institution that systematically covered up child abuse and spreads bullshit about fairies in the sky.
So its ok for a ceremony that you found 'meaningful' but a ceremony that involves traditional elements for someone that attaches meaningfulness to 'fairies in the skies' is bad and must be insulted and spoken about in a derogatory manner?

Nice humanist attitude.
I've read this 3 times trying to figure out what point it is you think you are making. Where did I say anything "must be insulted" FFS?

We had a non-religious ceremony because religion is a load of unmitigated bollocks imo, and that's before you even get into the church's actions in the past in this country.

I can't see why you're struggling

He nailed you tbf
If you like fairy stories maybe

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 3:19 pm
by Mullet 2
This is some amazing self whooshing.

The double down makes it extra special.