Re: The best new and returning TV series of 2018?
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 12:54 am
Yep! Very enjoyable. I think it’s a one and done season thoTrue Blue wrote:Russian Doll was a good watch. A bit like a sadistic Groundhog Day.
The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
Yep! Very enjoyable. I think it’s a one and done season thoTrue Blue wrote:Russian Doll was a good watch. A bit like a sadistic Groundhog Day.
going to watch the latest episode tonight, after the rugby. I'm still liking the Orville for being a lot more than just a shallow parody tv show.True Blue wrote:That space battle in the latest The Orville episode....man, that was intense. Last few episodes have been fantastic.
It was pretty amazing. On a par with season 1. Loved the end shot too.tubbyj wrote:Just finished watching the finale of True Detective Season 3.
Wow the whole season was fantastic and they really closed it out brilliantly. IMO The acting, direction, and editing were on par with the first season but it edged it slightly for overall quality of storytelling.
It was not a massive twist ending but it managed to catch me by surprise all the same and I am normally pretty good at predicting what is coming. Its a shame more tv is not of this quality.
Just finished that over the weekend. Ending felt a bit off to me. Not necessarily how the case panned out but how disjointed the final couple of episodes were. Pity Jeremy Saulnier didn't direct more of them.Kid A wrote:It was pretty amazing. On a par with season 1. Loved the end shot too.tubbyj wrote:Just finished watching the finale of True Detective Season 3.
Wow the whole season was fantastic and they really closed it out brilliantly. IMO The acting, direction, and editing were on par with the first season but it edged it slightly for overall quality of storytelling.
It was not a massive twist ending but it managed to catch me by surprise all the same and I am normally pretty good at predicting what is coming. Its a shame more tv is not of this quality.
Saulnier and Pizzolato had a bit of a ding dong I think. The way the truth was revealed was a bit hasty but didn't detract for me. I thought the last 2 episodes were great and it had some of the best cinematography I've seen for ages.hermie wrote:Just finished that over the weekend. Ending felt a bit off to me. Not necessarily how the case panned out but how disjointed the final couple of episodes were. Pity Jeremy Saulnier didn't direct more of them.Kid A wrote:It was pretty amazing. On a par with season 1. Loved the end shot too.tubbyj wrote:Just finished watching the finale of True Detective Season 3.
Wow the whole season was fantastic and they really closed it out brilliantly. IMO The acting, direction, and editing were on par with the first season but it edged it slightly for overall quality of storytelling.
It was not a massive twist ending but it managed to catch me by surprise all the same and I am normally pretty good at predicting what is coming. Its a shame more tv is not of this quality.
CarrotGawks wrote:I've watched a few episodes of The Orville, and after completely ignoring it and avoiding the conversation around it I have to say I'm surprised. Someone put it that Star Trek Discovery is trying to be prestige TV and failing at it, while The Orville is aim for trash TV and doing well at it. It's just a pleasant, brains off television show that has some really good moments whether they're poignancy, morality, humour, character interaction, plot twists, whatever. It's something I've been asking about recently, why we can't have simple, solid TV that's entertaining but also made well, especially with the wave of people talking about TV being at its height artistically. I don't want challenging, nuanced food, beer, wine, whiskey, books, music non-stop, but TV is aiming at that. You can either have absolute shite or something looking to break new ground. There's no in between. The Orville has hit that in-between sweet spot.
And what's surprising to me, as I've been watching a few older shows (The Practice at the moment) is that older shows did that. The way TV is presented now people would have you believe that all shows are like The Simpsons, where every development was reset at the end of each episode and the characters started afresh at the beginning of the next episode. 90s tv wasn't like that at all. There were definitely plots that were confined to each episode, but there was a lot of tv that allowed development over a series, and even had actual story based plot that wasn't resolved in 43 minutes. It's a collective mis-remembering.Nieghorn wrote:CarrotGawks wrote:I've watched a few episodes of The Orville, and after completely ignoring it and avoiding the conversation around it I have to say I'm surprised. Someone put it that Star Trek Discovery is trying to be prestige TV and failing at it, while The Orville is aim for trash TV and doing well at it. It's just a pleasant, brains off television show that has some really good moments whether they're poignancy, morality, humour, character interaction, plot twists, whatever. It's something I've been asking about recently, why we can't have simple, solid TV that's entertaining but also made well, especially with the wave of people talking about TV being at its height artistically. I don't want challenging, nuanced food, beer, wine, whiskey, books, music non-stop, but TV is aiming at that. You can either have absolute shite or something looking to break new ground. There's no in between. The Orville has hit that in-between sweet spot.
Seems that many shows have swung to full season or major arcs, yet my three must-watch shows at the moment are The Orville, Brooklyn 99, and The Rookie... all largely one-and-done eps with some ‘growth’ over the season.
Buffy.CarrotGawks wrote:And what's surprising to me, as I've been watching a few older shows (The Practice at the moment) is that older shows did that. The way TV is presented now people would have you believe that all shows are like The Simpsons, where every development was reset at the end of each episode and the characters started afresh at the beginning of the next episode. 90s tv wasn't like that at all. There were definitely plots that were confined to each episode, but there was a lot of tv that allowed development over a series, and even had actual story based plot that wasn't resolved in 43 minutes. It's a collective mis-remembering.Nieghorn wrote:CarrotGawks wrote:I've watched a few episodes of The Orville, and after completely ignoring it and avoiding the conversation around it I have to say I'm surprised. Someone put it that Star Trek Discovery is trying to be prestige TV and failing at it, while The Orville is aim for trash TV and doing well at it. It's just a pleasant, brains off television show that has some really good moments whether they're poignancy, morality, humour, character interaction, plot twists, whatever. It's something I've been asking about recently, why we can't have simple, solid TV that's entertaining but also made well, especially with the wave of people talking about TV being at its height artistically. I don't want challenging, nuanced food, beer, wine, whiskey, books, music non-stop, but TV is aiming at that. You can either have absolute shite or something looking to break new ground. There's no in between. The Orville has hit that in-between sweet spot.
Seems that many shows have swung to full season or major arcs, yet my three must-watch shows at the moment are The Orville, Brooklyn 99, and The Rookie... all largely one-and-done eps with some ‘growth’ over the season.
I often prefer those types of shows. Sometimes shows with season long plot arcs can get tedious.Nieghorn wrote:CarrotGawks wrote:I've watched a few episodes of The Orville, and after completely ignoring it and avoiding the conversation around it I have to say I'm surprised. Someone put it that Star Trek Discovery is trying to be prestige TV and failing at it, while The Orville is aim for trash TV and doing well at it. It's just a pleasant, brains off television show that has some really good moments whether they're poignancy, morality, humour, character interaction, plot twists, whatever. It's something I've been asking about recently, why we can't have simple, solid TV that's entertaining but also made well, especially with the wave of people talking about TV being at its height artistically. I don't want challenging, nuanced food, beer, wine, whiskey, books, music non-stop, but TV is aiming at that. You can either have absolute shite or something looking to break new ground. There's no in between. The Orville has hit that in-between sweet spot.
Seems that many shows have swung to full season or major arcs, yet my three must-watch shows at the moment are The Orville, Brooklyn 99, and The Rookie... all largely one-and-done eps with some ‘growth’ over the season.
Sorry. Had assumed that people had already seen it.OptimisticJock wrote:Alright mate.. some of us are only on S3
Nae bother. Watching on Amazon think they've only just released 3Nolanator wrote:Sorry. Had assumed that people had already seen it.OptimisticJock wrote:Alright mate.. some of us are only on S3
Welcome to Northern IrelandflaggETERNAL wrote:Anyone watched Origin? Pretty good if you're looking for some sci fi. Also, just watched the first season of Derry Girls, what a fantastic laugh out loud show. My only issue was just how hard it was to understand what people were saying at times.
Monster of the week perhaps, but I was under the impression that the self-contained episode with a bit of season long arc format was well established long before that.Jeff the Bear wrote:Wasn't it X-Files that popularised the 'monster of the week' episodes alongside those that played the 'government and aliens are out to get us' arcs.
He should be thankful it wasn't set in TyroneUlsters Red Hand wrote:Welcome to Northern IrelandflaggETERNAL wrote:Anyone watched Origin? Pretty good if you're looking for some sci fi. Also, just watched the first season of Derry Girls, what a fantastic laugh out loud show. My only issue was just how hard it was to understand what people were saying at times.
It just released on Amazon in advance of season 4. Seasons 1-3 were on Syfy or Netflix (outside the US). Season 3 was released a year ago.OptimisticJock wrote:Nae bother. Watching on Amazon think they've only just released 3Nolanator wrote:Sorry. Had assumed that people had already seen it.OptimisticJock wrote:Alright mate.. some of us are only on S3
Sorry wasn't trying to be a shitbag but man it's frakkin hard to follow some of what they were saying. Still, growing up Catholic osme of the stuff was very familiar and laugh out loud. Anyone know if another season is planned?Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Welcome to Northern IrelandflaggETERNAL wrote:Anyone watched Origin? Pretty good if you're looking for some sci fi. Also, just watched the first season of Derry Girls, what a fantastic laugh out loud show. My only issue was just how hard it was to understand what people were saying at times.
HBO and other cable companies basically.True Blue wrote:I'm sure this has been discussed before, but what has changed in the last 20 years to be make TV shows so much better these days? I mean, compared to the 90s and 80s when I grew up, there is no comparison. Acting, writing, camera work etc is just three rungs above the Miami Vice and Knightriders of the 80s.
Oddly enough I find movies have gone in the opposite direction. (if i see another super hero movie I will shit myself)
Budgets and writers.True Blue wrote:I'm sure this has been discussed before, but what has changed in the last 20 years to be make TV shows so much better these days? I mean, compared to the 90s and 80s when I grew up, there is no comparison. Acting, writing, camera work etc is just three rungs above the Miami Vice and Knightriders of the 80s.
Oddly enough I find movies have gone in the opposite direction. (if i see another super hero movie I will shit myself)
Don't go and see them and save on undie purchases then. I must admit I find it odd that people get shitty with superhero movies as a genre. There are lots of other genres out there that don't attract as much derision. There can't have been more than 10 (including animated ones) out of the few hundred films released last year. I think you can not like those movies but it's not true to say the acting, writing, camera work etc in movies in general have gone the other way.True Blue wrote:I'm sure this has been discussed before, but what has changed in the last 20 years to be make TV shows so much better these days? I mean, compared to the 90s and 80s when I grew up, there is no comparison. Acting, writing, camera work etc is just three rungs above the Miami Vice and Knightriders of the 80s.
Oddly enough I find movies have gone in the opposite direction. (if i see another super hero movie I will shit myself)
Didn't see that plot coming at all, and that space battle must have taken forever for the computer nerds to render! Better space battle scene - at least busier - than the recent ST film releases' ones?True Blue wrote:That space battle in the latest The Orville episode....man, that was intense. Last few episodes have been fantastic.
Watched this last night and it was ruined. Completely ruined for me. I've written to my local paper in disgust.Nolanator wrote:On my Expanse re-watch.Spoiler: show
It does come across as a bit amateur initially but it grows on you. Even my Dad watched the whole series and he's a pia fussy sod.fatcat wrote:I started watching The Mentalist this week. It's shit but I keep watching the next episode.