The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
I know. Probably will do in the build-up a couple of weeks before. Probably best this way, more surprises.Boobs not Moobs wrote:They're determined not to show any actual footage.tabascoboy wrote:Season 8 will hit our television screens starting on April 14, 2019
Teaser time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... A38GCX4Tb0
Ah he was kind of French anyway. His dad was the first king to have English as their primary language because he wasn't brought up as the crown prince.crash 669 wrote:He looks like his head and neck belong to different bodies.Jay Cee Gee wrote:Even though it's objectively not his fault, I can't not think someone called Timothee is a massive fuckwit.Floppykid wrote:On this, apparently Timothee Chalamet is going to be playing Paul Atreidies.Floppykid wrote:Not that far into Dune, sure Paul effectively becomes God like after consuming more and more spice?Nolanator wrote: Leto 2, surely?
New film just looks better and better crew wise.
I've never even seen a film with him in it, so it's nothing against him. Just his fuckwitted name.
Also apparently he's playing Henry V in a Netflix film - a fucking frenchman playing Henry V! Brexit can't come soon enough.
Crypt isnt wheelchair accessible. Or he is busy using his seer ability to perv on hot wimminAkkerman wrote:why is bran stark not in the trailer ?
Impressively wrong. Edward III is the first monarch to start issuing things in English and Richard II makes it the language of court. Henry V almost exclusively uses English and is the first monarch to play up the notion of an English National identity. If you called him French he'd most likely have piously cut you in half.Ah he was kind of French anyway. His dad was the first king to have English as their primary language because he wasn't brought up as the crown prince.
Nuff said, he's a frog.
And rightly so.Brazil wrote:Impressively wrong. Edward III is the first monarch to start issuing things in English and Richard II makes it the language of court. Henry V almost exclusively uses English and is the first monarch to play up the notion of an English National identity. If you called him French he'd most likely have piously cut you in half.Ah he was kind of French anyway. His dad was the first king to have English as their primary language because he wasn't brought up as the crown prince.
Nuff said, he's a frog.
"He was a cruel man, but fair"crash 669 wrote:And rightly so.Brazil wrote:Impressively wrong. Edward III is the first monarch to start issuing things in English and Richard II makes it the language of court. Henry V almost exclusively uses English and is the first monarch to play up the notion of an English National identity. If you called him French he'd most likely have piously cut you in half.Ah he was kind of French anyway. His dad was the first king to have English as their primary language because he wasn't brought up as the crown prince.
Nuff said, he's a frog.
Akkerman wrote:why is bran stark not in the trailer ?
Cheerful and violent.Brazil wrote:"He was a cruel man, but fair"crash 669 wrote:And rightly so.Brazil wrote:Impressively wrong. Edward III is the first monarch to start issuing things in English and Richard II makes it the language of court. Henry V almost exclusively uses English and is the first monarch to play up the notion of an English National identity. If you called him French he'd most likely have piously cut you in half.Ah he was kind of French anyway. His dad was the first king to have English as their primary language because he wasn't brought up as the crown prince.
Nuff said, he's a frog.
Descendant of the successful French invasion of England.Brazil wrote:Impressively wrong. Edward III is the first monarch to start issuing things in English and Richard II makes it the language of court. Henry V almost exclusively uses English and is the first monarch to play up the notion of an English National identity. If you called him French he'd most likely have piously cut you in half.Ah he was kind of French anyway. His dad was the first king to have English as their primary language because he wasn't brought up as the crown prince.
Nuff said, he's a frog.
Did he not claim the french throne ?Uncle Fester wrote:Descendant of the successful French invasion of England.Brazil wrote:Impressively wrong. Edward III is the first monarch to start issuing things in English and Richard II makes it the language of court. Henry V almost exclusively uses English and is the first monarch to play up the notion of an English National identity. If you called him French he'd most likely have piously cut you in half.Ah he was kind of French anyway. His dad was the first king to have English as their primary language because he wasn't brought up as the crown prince.
Nuff said, he's a frog.
He was quite French actually.
Harold's mum was Gytha Thorkelsdóttir of Denmark.tabascoboy wrote:If we are only talking about post 1066. Harold Godwinson was the last English king
I believe that Alfred's Law Code was written in Anglo-Saxon rather than Latin too.
More English than Joe Cokanasiga though.DOB wrote:Harold's mum was Gytha Thorkelsdóttir of Denmark.tabascoboy wrote:If we are only talking about post 1066. Harold Godwinson was the last English king
I believe that Alfred's Law Code was written in Anglo-Saxon rather than Latin too.
In post-Brexit Britain, she'll pass muster.DOB wrote:Harold's mum was Gytha Thorkelsdóttir of Denmark.tabascoboy wrote:If we are only talking about post 1066. Harold Godwinson was the last English king
I believe that Alfred's Law Code was written in Anglo-Saxon rather than Latin too.
So immigrants who move to a country at the age of 3 can't be part of the country?tabascoboy wrote:More English than Joe Cokanasiga though.DOB wrote:Harold's mum was Gytha Thorkelsdóttir of Denmark.tabascoboy wrote:If we are only talking about post 1066. Harold Godwinson was the last English king
I believe that Alfred's Law Code was written in Anglo-Saxon rather than Latin too.
My read on this is that as a writer it would be much less enjoyable to finish the book series than to write encyclopedias about the Valerian banking system. Finishing the book series at this point is a massive pain in the arse, there is loads of logistics to consider and foreshadowing to come good on. It's nearly like an exercise in project management instead of a creative work. And no matter what, it is going to be ripped to shite by reviewers.tabascoboy wrote:“And most of all, my thanks go out to my fans and readers. I know you want WINDS, and I am going to give it to you… but I am delighted that you stayed with me for this one as well. Your patience and unflagging support means the world to me.
Enjoy the read. Me, I am back in my fortress of solitude, and back in Westeros. It won’t be tomorrow, and it won’t be next week, but you will get the end of A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE. Meanwhile, you have the final season of GAME OF THRONES coming, and the new show that is not yet officially called THE LONG NIGHT being cast, and a couple more shows still being scripted… and a few other cool things in the works as well.
Winter is not the only thing that is coming.”
http://iswindsofwinteroutyet.com/True Blue wrote:Has that fat fudge released the book yet? He's done two books in 19 years.
True Blue wrote:Has that fat fudge released the book yet? He's done two books in 19 years.
I didn't realise
Mullet 2 wrote:Did anybody cave and buy Fire and Blood or whatever it's called?
Someone bought it for my birthday as they 'knew I was into it'. Didn't have the heart to tell themMullet 2 wrote:Did anybody cave and buy Fire and Blood or whatever it's called?
Some reader reviewsMullet 2 wrote:Did anybody cave and buy Fire and Blood or whatever it's called?
Disappointed. Reminds me of my 1960’s History textbook, but without the flair or wit. Cannot believe GRRM contemplated producing this before finishing TWOW. Is this just about money?
You think it's George R.R. Martin it'll be fine - it's not fine George.
I mean I get the premise it's an historical account for those that want all the little bits of Westeros detail they could ever wish for but it's delivered in such a turgid and bland way.
I'd drop it off at the charity shop but I fear it'd be considered a hate crime.
Where is the dialogue? The drama? The characters. It’s like reading battle geek maybe a school history book. £11 i’ve Been conned I want my money back. The blurb talks about a thrilling account, it’s a lie,
This book seems to be about how many different ways you can mangle the human body. Unfortunately, there is no one you care enough about to be in any way involved. Even the dragons are boring.(How can a dragon be boring?) I was so disappointed. As a keen fan of the Ice and Fire books, I was so looking forward to this. Not worth putting off the writing of the last books . It isn’t even tosh. Just infinitely boring.
Missus got it for me as Xmas gift. Haven't opened it.Mullet 2 wrote:Did anybody cave and buy Fire and Blood or whatever it's called?
Same here, although have read a chapter or two. Handy for falling asleep toUncle Fester wrote:Missus got it for me as Xmas gift. Haven't opened it.Mullet 2 wrote:Did anybody cave and buy Fire and Blood or whatever it's called?
Same here. Just finished S1E1. I ate a small bag of pretzels during the viewing.EverReady wrote:Decided to watch it again. On episode 4- it's very good isn't it
think I might have to be doing a bit of a binge watch before the new season is out. I wasn't so sure how it'd fare on second viewing, but there's probably a lot you'll get out of it watching multiple episodes rather than just one a week.CrazyIslander wrote:Rewatching is great, you'd notice a lot of things missed in the first viewing. Especially fvcking Roose Bolton.
The first 3 seasons is so fast paced that on first viewing you don't really know half the characters and storyline Watching multiple episodes makes it easier to put together the stories.Turbogoat wrote:think I might have to be doing a bit of a binge watch before the new season is out. I wasn't so sure how it'd fare on second viewing, but there's probably a lot you'll get out of it watching multiple episodes rather than just one a week.CrazyIslander wrote:Rewatching is great, you'd notice a lot of things missed in the first viewing. Especially fvcking Roose Bolton.
That was a good swap.EverReady wrote:I watched the first three seasons together when my missus went away with kids. I was meant to be moving our stuff into the new house. Didn't expect much and was predictably blown away. It lends itself to bingingTurbogoat wrote:think I might have to be doing a bit of a binge watch before the new season is out. I wasn't so sure how it'd fare on second viewing, but there's probably a lot you'll get out of it watching multiple episodes rather than just one a week.CrazyIslander wrote:Rewatching is great, you'd notice a lot of things missed in the first viewing. Especially fvcking Roose Bolton.
My missus was asked to write a score for a film and part of the brief was that it should feel like the theme music for GoT.EverReady wrote:I watched the first three seasons together when my missus went away with kids. I was meant to be moving our stuff into the new house. Didn't expect much and was predictably blown away. It lends itself to bingingTurbogoat wrote:think I might have to be doing a bit of a binge watch before the new season is out. I wasn't so sure how it'd fare on second viewing, but there's probably a lot you'll get out of it watching multiple episodes rather than just one a week.CrazyIslander wrote:Rewatching is great, you'd notice a lot of things missed in the first viewing. Especially fvcking Roose Bolton.
She's trying not to intimidate you, I bet she liked Hodor's trouser dragonEverReady wrote:My missus likes the boobs but not the dragons. Says something about her
