The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
AlanBengio wrote:Brace yourself for an even greater odd decision then.....ScarfaceClaw wrote:That fine was an odd decision.Nabberuk wrote:Perhaps they will just give Mercedes a fine.....AlanBengio wrote:Penalty for Hamilton there!
If there is no penalty now - this F1 is F1 Mercedes for sure!
Rules are rules for you only when the team you do not support get caughtNabberuk wrote:AlanBengio wrote:It is not team error - drivers cannot enter box that way otherwise penaltyNabberuk wrote:Perhaps they will just give Mercedes a fine.....AlanBengio wrote:Penalty for Hamilton there!
If there is no penalty now - this F1 is F1 Mercedes for sure!
It's a team sport and that didnt matter before today.
Suggesting it's a Mercedes f1 is laughable, everyone knows Ferrari get it easy
Yes I am - using your faulty logic I could say it is too low 5 seconds related to safety but wathever.Nabberuk wrote:AlanBengio wrote:Brace yourself for an even greater odd decision then.....ScarfaceClaw wrote:That fine was an odd decision.Nabberuk wrote:Perhaps they will just give Mercedes a fine.....AlanBengio wrote:Penalty for Hamilton there!
If there is no penalty now - this F1 is F1 Mercedes for sure!
Happy?
Have a word with yourself.AlanBengio wrote:Rules are rules for you only when the team you do not support get caughtNabberuk wrote:AlanBengio wrote:It is not team error - drivers cannot enter box that way otherwise penaltyNabberuk wrote:Perhaps they will just give Mercedes a fine.....AlanBengio wrote:Penalty for Hamilton there!
If there is no penalty now - this F1 is F1 Mercedes for sure!
It's a team sport and that didnt matter before today.
Suggesting it's a Mercedes f1 is laughable, everyone knows Ferrari get it easy
That unsafe release was fine for the team - no worries.
Now let’s decide what they do with Hamilton (as it is clear he should have done another lap because of his error). Then will see
I agree, but to suddenly change the penalty as they have always given the drive a time penalty smacks of giving Ferrari a helping hand.ScarfaceClaw wrote:Now that I think about it, I can see the rationale for the fine for the unsafe release. Unfair to penalise the driver for a decision that was nothing to do with him.
fishfoodie wrote:I wish Ireland had a GP; we could guarantee you a wet race every year
Be interesting how they call it due to the conditionsScarfaceClaw wrote:And Hamilton under investigation for driving too slowly under the safety car.
Yep. That’s the counter argument to it. It’s a lack of consistency. Unless they’ve gone for the “it’s fecking wet, everyone is coming in, massive queue of cars” angle. Was he meant to wait for everyone to go past?Nabberuk wrote:I agree, but to suddenly change the penalty as they have always given the drive a time penalty smacks of giving Ferrari a helping hand.ScarfaceClaw wrote:Now that I think about it, I can see the rationale for the fine for the unsafe release. Unfair to penalise the driver for a decision that was nothing to do with him.
Yeah. Seems an odd one considering how many issues everyone has had staying on track!Nabberuk wrote:Be interesting how they call it due to the conditionsScarfaceClaw wrote:And Hamilton under investigation for driving too slowly under the safety car.
It is funny you can always make comments like that over Ferrari - never the right penalties applied... always helped by FIA... etc etcNabberuk wrote:I agree, but to suddenly change the penalty as they have always given the drive a time penalty smacks of giving Ferrari a helping hand.ScarfaceClaw wrote:Now that I think about it, I can see the rationale for the fine for the unsafe release. Unfair to penalise the driver for a decision that was nothing to do with him.
Because most of yours make little sense!AlanBengio wrote:It is funny you can always make comments like that over Ferrari - never the right penalties applied... always helped by FIA... etc etcNabberuk wrote:I agree, but to suddenly change the penalty as they have always given the drive a time penalty smacks of giving Ferrari a helping hand.ScarfaceClaw wrote:Now that I think about it, I can see the rationale for the fine for the unsafe release. Unfair to penalise the driver for a decision that was nothing to do with him.
but when I suggest exactly the same environment for Mercedes - I am the one wearing the tin foil hat!
Have you a word with yourself please
AlanBengio wrote:It is funny you can always make comments like that over Ferrari - never the right penalties applied... always helped by FIA... etc etcNabberuk wrote:I agree, but to suddenly change the penalty as they have always given the drive a time penalty smacks of giving Ferrari a helping hand.ScarfaceClaw wrote:Now that I think about it, I can see the rationale for the fine for the unsafe release. Unfair to penalise the driver for a decision that was nothing to do with him.
but when I suggest exactly the same environment for Mercedes - I am the one wearing the tin foil hat!
Have you a word with yourself please
Ah so for you the Hamilton unsafe return to track, firstly cutting straight the track like he was coming from a crossroad, and then his decision to enter the pit where it is forbidden was not penalty?Nabberuk wrote:Because most of yours make little sense!AlanBengio wrote:It is funny you can always make comments like that over Ferrari - never the right penalties applied... always helped by FIA... etc etcNabberuk wrote:I agree, but to suddenly change the penalty as they have always given the drive a time penalty smacks of giving Ferrari a helping hand.ScarfaceClaw wrote:Now that I think about it, I can see the rationale for the fine for the unsafe release. Unfair to penalise the driver for a decision that was nothing to do with him.
but when I suggest exactly the same environment for Mercedes - I am the one wearing the tin foil hat!
Have you a word with yourself please
You're boring me now so I'm going to ignore you. Please don't the this as an acceptance of your rubbish, as its notAlanBengio wrote:Ah so for you the Hamilton unsafe return to track, firstly cutting straight the track like he was coming from a crossroad, and then his decision to enter the pit where it is forbidden was not penalty?Nabberuk wrote:Because most of yours make little sense!AlanBengio wrote:It is funny you can always make comments like that over Ferrari - never the right penalties applied... always helped by FIA... etc etcNabberuk wrote:I agree, but to suddenly change the penalty as they have always given the drive a time penalty smacks of giving Ferrari a helping hand.ScarfaceClaw wrote:Now that I think about it, I can see the rationale for the fine for the unsafe release. Unfair to penalise the driver for a decision that was nothing to do with him.
but when I suggest exactly the same environment for Mercedes - I am the one wearing the tin foil hat!
Have you a word with yourself please
Whereas not giving seconds for the team error is helping Ferrari?
Ok then!
It's great that top 3 is mixed up.maverickmak wrote:I'd kill to see a bit more rain now. Haha
AlanBengio wrote:Fu.ck off - simply as that, nabberuck
It will be an honor being on ignore - coming from someone like you
Always you blaming Ferrari for everything - and then when I use your same logic blaming always Mercedes, you get angry...
Get loose
They are all pumping in the lap times, but place the car a couple inches on the wet and it will throw them off pretty quicklyScarfaceClaw wrote:There goes Bottas.
He was showing good speed, I can see him on 2nd/3rdScarfaceClaw wrote:Interesting to see how Vettel goes from 5th place at the restart.
Yeah he's got lucky with Bottas out.maverickmak wrote:Hamilton is gonna get away from this with his championship lead almost untouched!
He seemed to go just that little bit wider and got the rear left on the water. And that was that.Nabberuk wrote:They are all pumping in the lap times, but place the car a couple inches on the wet and it will throw them off pretty quicklyScarfaceClaw wrote:There goes Bottas.