Chat Forum
It is currently Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:06 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 369 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
OomPB wrote:
Much better performance today. Damian & Lombaard made a huge difference in the backline. I want to see Willemse in 10 but he did well in 12. Curwin Bosch must start.

Willemse cannot tackle. He might be fast but that is not enough. I said the same about the number 15. Both are liabilities


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 5:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
He is a specialist 10. That backline need his flair otherwise they are Kak like the previous game against France.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
OomPB wrote:
He is a specialist 10. That backline need his flair otherwise they are Kak like the previous game against France.

Well then they should play a specialist 12 who can tackle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:14 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8026
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
houtkabouter wrote:
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.

What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:14 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8026
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.

You clearly missed the joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.

What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.


did you watch the game....I doubt it as you were lynlooping as I was......he was atrocious....he would have run f**king fast if I was there to kick his head in with his defence.


Quote:
Number 12 and 15 have absolutely no defence


that was my post in the under20s match thread....


Last edited by Sards on Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
houtkabouter wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.

You clearly missed the joke.


I am not in a good mood today...... :thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
Sards wrote:
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.

What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.


did you watch the game....I doubt it as you were lynlooping as I was......he was atrocious....he would have run f**k fast if I was there to kick his head in with his defence.


Quote:
Number 12 and 15 have absolutely no defence


that was my post in the under20s match thread....

There was that one important try from the wing when he offloaded , ag forget it. You just watch stampkar midfielders. :thumbdown:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.


Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.

What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.


did you watch the game....I doubt it as you were lynlooping as I was......he was atrocious....he would have run f**k fast if I was there to kick his head in with his defence.


Quote:
Number 12 and 15 have absolutely no defence


that was my post in the under20s match thread....

There was that one important try from the wing when he offloaded , ag forget it. You just watch stampkar midfielders. :thumbdown:


And I gave him credit for that. It does not excuse his pathetic tackling ability in a crucial position


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 7:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
You write him off after his first game. Trust me he,ll be your worst nightmare in future.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
OomPB wrote:
You write him off after his first game. Trust me he,ll be your worst nightmare in future.

I have been hearing this time about a number of players in the past.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
Sards wrote:
OomPB wrote:
You write him off after his first game. Trust me he,ll be your worst nightmare in future.

I have been hearing this time about a number of players in the past.

From me? Boet you are losing it lately. Hi


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Much better performance from the number 12..... :thumbup:

Whole team looks more settled


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Baby boks losing focus


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
baby boks pulling ahead again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1448
What was the link to live streaming on YouTube?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:36 pm
Posts: 30
Location: Scandinavia
Masterji wrote:
What was the link to live streaming on YouTube?


I use this link: www.worldrugby.org/video/254566
Works fine i Denmark.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19147
Sards wrote:
Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods


Damian Willemse


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11166
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:
Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods


Damian Willemse

He is trolling OomPB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:
Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods


Damian Willemse



Shush
;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Does no-one watch rugby anymore?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Bit of a hiding really


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 957
missed most of the game ...looks like the argies just want to get to the locker-room


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
echo wrote:
missed most of the game ...looks like the argies just want to get to the locker-room



Don't blame them...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 957
11 tries and with only 14 on the field for last 10 mins to rest the captain. . . . .

:?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2032
Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
sunnybanana wrote:
Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.


Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2032
Sards wrote:
sunnybanana wrote:
Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.


Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before


1pt loss to France and beat Georgia pretty comfortably. They were terrible today though. Gave up early.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 3088
Sards wrote:
sunnybanana wrote:
Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.


Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before


They have been good, very good indeed. Lost by a point to France who scored after the hooter, and 37-26 winners over Georgia in the opening round with the home crowd really pushing their team.

Junior Boks were unrecognisable from the game against France, which they really should have lost. It just shows the value of doing the basics right before trying to be too adventurous.

The semi-final will against England (likely) or New Zealand. Both undefeated, both scoring heavily throughout.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Slider wrote:
Sards wrote:
sunnybanana wrote:
Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.


Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before


They have been good, very good indeed. Lost by a point to France who scored after the hooter, and 37-26 winners over Georgia in the opening round with the home crowd really pushing their team.

Junior Boks were unrecognisable from the game against France, which they really should have lost. It just shows the value of doing the basics right before trying to be too adventurous.

The semi-final will against England (likely) or New Zealand. Both undefeated, both scoring heavily throughout.

Have to agree. They seem to be clicking. Lots of praise for Curwin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
handyman wrote:
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:
Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods


Damian Willemse

He is trolling OomPB.

He can trol all he wants Damian is one of the most gifted players I have seen. His type is rare in SA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 6:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
OomPB wrote:
handyman wrote:
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:
Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods


Damian Willemse

He is trolling OomPB.

He can trol all he wants Damian is one of the most gifted players I have seen. His type is rare in SA.

;)

I will admit when wrong......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 7:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2032
I've never seen a baby Bok side play that type of rugby before. A talented backline, full of ball players, given license to express themselves and playing with confidence. They usually play an overly structured, dour game which underutilises their skills and relies on them simply being more physical and better organised than their opposition (which is how they played against France).

I don't think they'll win the comp but it's a refreshing change. We need to develop players who can think for themselves and back their abilities. The talent is clearly there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 8:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
sunnybanana wrote:
I've never seen a baby Bok side play that type of rugby before. A talented backline, full of ball players, given license to express themselves and playing with confidence. They usually play an overly structured, dour game which underutilises their skills and relies on them simply being more physical and better organised than their opposition (which is how they played against France).

I don't think they'll win the comp but it's a refreshing change. We need to develop players who can think for themselves and back their abilities. The talent is clearly there.

Well Sunny, I wacthed these kids on schoolboy level and know they will bring change to our rugby. Sardyn jump up and down about Bosch because he play for the Sharks.

Vok I have seen him destroy Paul Roos on Markotter on his own playing for Grey High. Lambaard and a whole bunch of Boishaaiers (most are at the Lions) coming through the ranks. Willemse & Vermeulen from Paul Roos is just phenomenal talents.

Papier is a Malmesbury kid, poached by the Bulls since his schooldays.

They are all players of colour and need to get through our systems. Once they at senior level you'll see a much brigher future for our rugby.

Johan Grobbelaar (nr 2) played goalie with my sons hockey team at Prymary school.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 8:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25554
Location: Stellenbosch
If our forwards give them possession, they'll beat any team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 9001
Location: Mzansi
Our No 8. Juarno Augustus is an absolute machine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Baby Boks
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 35947
Location: Innie Kaap
Definitely hope going forward.
Lets see what they bring against England in the Semis.....I hope its more of the same.

:thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 369 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Brumbie_Steve, DOB, Fangle, Google Adsense [Bot], grouch, houtkabouter, JB1981, mikemac, Mr Mike, UncleFB, Working Class Rugger and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group