Page 5 of 11

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:18 am
by Sards
OomPB wrote:Much better performance today. Damian & Lombaard made a huge difference in the backline. I want to see Willemse in 10 but he did well in 12. Curwin Bosch must start.
Willemse cannot tackle. He might be fast but that is not enough. I said the same about the number 15. Both are liabilities

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 5:11 am
by OupaStruisbaai
He is a specialist 10. That backline need his flair otherwise they are Kak like the previous game against France.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:54 am
by Sards
OomPB wrote:He is a specialist 10. That backline need his flair otherwise they are Kak like the previous game against France.
Well then they should play a specialist 12 who can tackle.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:14 am
by houtkabouter
Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:15 am
by Sards
houtkabouter wrote:Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.
Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:59 pm
by OupaStruisbaai
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.
Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.
What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:14 pm
by houtkabouter
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.
Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.
You clearly missed the joke.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:28 pm
by Sards
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.
Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.
What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.
did you watch the game....I doubt it as you were lynlooping as I was......he was atrocious....he would have run f**king fast if I was there to kick his head in with his defence.

Number 12 and 15 have absolutely no defence
that was my post in the under20s match thread....

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:29 pm
by Sards
houtkabouter wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.
Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.
You clearly missed the joke.
I am not in a good mood today...... :thumbup:

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:54 pm
by OupaStruisbaai
Sards wrote:
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.
Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.
What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.
did you watch the game....I doubt it as you were lynlooping as I was......he was atrocious....he would have run f**k fast if I was there to kick his head in with his defence.

Number 12 and 15 have absolutely no defence
that was my post in the under20s match thread....
There was that one important try from the wing when he offloaded , ag forget it. You just watch stampkar midfielders. :thumbdown:

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:00 pm
by Sards
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
OomPB wrote:
Sards wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:Sardy in unabashed "let's put Andre there" post.
Andre....are you on drugs.....hes a senior chubby boy.
You are obsessed.
Used to be a time when the Lions were their usual crapiness when you could be reasonable about judging performance.
What de vok do you want. Stampkar, high kick and charge Kak or a youngster 12 who can step, kick , off load plus have gas? I give up on you.
did you watch the game....I doubt it as you were lynlooping as I was......he was atrocious....he would have run f**k fast if I was there to kick his head in with his defence.

Number 12 and 15 have absolutely no defence
that was my post in the under20s match thread....
There was that one important try from the wing when he offloaded , ag forget it. You just watch stampkar midfielders. :thumbdown:
And I gave him credit for that. It does not excuse his pathetic tackling ability in a crucial position

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 7:47 pm
by OupaStruisbaai
You write him off after his first game. Trust me he,ll be your worst nightmare in future.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:07 pm
by Sards
OomPB wrote:You write him off after his first game. Trust me he,ll be your worst nightmare in future.
I have been hearing this time about a number of players in the past.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:56 pm
by OupaStruisbaai
Sards wrote:
OomPB wrote:You write him off after his first game. Trust me he,ll be your worst nightmare in future.
I have been hearing this time about a number of players in the past.
From me? Boet you are losing it lately. Hi

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:04 pm
by Sards
Much better performance from the number 12..... :thumbup:

Whole team looks more settled

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:11 pm
by Sards
Baby boks losing focus

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:15 pm
by Sards
Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:21 pm
by Sards
baby boks pulling ahead again

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:37 pm
by Masterji
What was the link to live streaming on YouTube?

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:39 pm
by danishfan
Masterji wrote:What was the link to live streaming on YouTube?
I use this link: www.worldrugby.org/video/254566
Works fine i Denmark.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:45 pm
by Jensrsa
Sards wrote:Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods
Damian Willemse

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:54 pm
by handyman
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods
Damian Willemse
He is trolling OomPB.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 1:54 pm
by Sards
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods
Damian Willemse

Shush
;)

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:07 pm
by Sards
Does no-one watch rugby anymore?

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:13 pm
by Sards
Bit of a hiding really

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:15 pm
by echo
missed most of the game ...looks like the argies just want to get to the locker-room

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:16 pm
by Sards
echo wrote:missed most of the game ...looks like the argies just want to get to the locker-room

Don't blame them...

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:22 pm
by echo
11 tries and with only 14 on the field for last 10 mins to rest the captain. . . . .

:?

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:22 pm
by sunnybanana
Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:31 pm
by Sards
sunnybanana wrote:Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.
Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:40 pm
by sunnybanana
Sards wrote:
sunnybanana wrote:Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.
Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before
1pt loss to France and beat Georgia pretty comfortably. They were terrible today though. Gave up early.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:50 pm
by Slider
Sards wrote:
sunnybanana wrote:Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.
Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before
They have been good, very good indeed. Lost by a point to France who scored after the hooter, and 37-26 winners over Georgia in the opening round with the home crowd really pushing their team.

Junior Boks were unrecognisable from the game against France, which they really should have lost. It just shows the value of doing the basics right before trying to be too adventurous.

The semi-final will against England (likely) or New Zealand. Both undefeated, both scoring heavily throughout.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 4:35 pm
by Sards
Slider wrote:
Sards wrote:
sunnybanana wrote:Good performance :thumbup:

Great to see them finally using their backs more.
Depends on how the ARGIES have been against other sides...I must be honest I havent watched them before
They have been good, very good indeed. Lost by a point to France who scored after the hooter, and 37-26 winners over Georgia in the opening round with the home crowd really pushing their team.

Junior Boks were unrecognisable from the game against France, which they really should have lost. It just shows the value of doing the basics right before trying to be too adventurous.

The semi-final will against England (likely) or New Zealand. Both undefeated, both scoring heavily throughout.
Have to agree. They seem to be clicking. Lots of praise for Curwin.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2017 6:42 pm
by OupaStruisbaai
handyman wrote:
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods
Damian Willemse
He is trolling OomPB.
He can trol all he wants Damian is one of the most gifted players I have seen. His type is rare in SA.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 6:33 am
by Sards
OomPB wrote:
handyman wrote:
Jensrsa wrote:
Sards wrote:Who the fecxk is this number 12....he looks the goods
Damian Willemse
He is trolling OomPB.
He can trol all he wants Damian is one of the most gifted players I have seen. His type is rare in SA.
;)

I will admit when wrong......

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 7:17 am
by sunnybanana
I've never seen a baby Bok side play that type of rugby before. A talented backline, full of ball players, given license to express themselves and playing with confidence. They usually play an overly structured, dour game which underutilises their skills and relies on them simply being more physical and better organised than their opposition (which is how they played against France).

I don't think they'll win the comp but it's a refreshing change. We need to develop players who can think for themselves and back their abilities. The talent is clearly there.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 8:54 am
by OupaStruisbaai
sunnybanana wrote:I've never seen a baby Bok side play that type of rugby before. A talented backline, full of ball players, given license to express themselves and playing with confidence. They usually play an overly structured, dour game which underutilises their skills and relies on them simply being more physical and better organised than their opposition (which is how they played against France).

I don't think they'll win the comp but it's a refreshing change. We need to develop players who can think for themselves and back their abilities. The talent is clearly there.
Well Sunny, I wacthed these kids on schoolboy level and know they will bring change to our rugby. Sardyn jump up and down about Bosch because he play for the Sharks.

Vok I have seen him destroy Paul Roos on Markotter on his own playing for Grey High. Lambaard and a whole bunch of Boishaaiers (most are at the Lions) coming through the ranks. Willemse & Vermeulen from Paul Roos is just phenomenal talents.

Papier is a Malmesbury kid, poached by the Bulls since his schooldays.

They are all players of colour and need to get through our systems. Once they at senior level you'll see a much brigher future for our rugby.

Johan Grobbelaar (nr 2) played goalie with my sons hockey team at Prymary school.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 8:56 am
by OupaStruisbaai
If our forwards give them possession, they'll beat any team.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:12 am
by Beaver_Shark
Our No 8. Juarno Augustus is an absolute machine.

Re: Baby Boks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:29 am
by Sards
Definitely hope going forward.
Lets see what they bring against England in the Semis.....I hope its more of the same.

:thumbup: