Planet Rugby Forum

Have the U.K.ers got themselves into a position similar to the abortion that happened in the USA, where they are going to have to vote between a fooking imbecilic cockwomble and a deranged tart?

slick wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Pinochet and collusion with Loyalist gangs in the murder of civilians, that work a bit better for you?

Whataboutery of the highest order because you're a supporter of black September terrorists well done you.

Btw, about loyalist gangs n all that; we had the GFA and accepted peace, the forgiving of terrorists was part of that agreement. It wasn't one sided.

Of course neither has anything to do with Boris and his comments on the burka which is a disgusting comparison.

Are you 12?

Facile views about laying wreaths commemorating terrorists like black September isn't a laughing matter, it's disgraceful, the comparison to our current parliament is disgraceful.

Cheer em on.

Always instructive when people fall back on phony equivalence.

Logically, if you really thought it was a fair comparison, you would to be violently opposed to Corbyn. But you're not.

So either (i) it's contrived bullshit, or (ii) you never really gave much of a shit about Pinochet etc.

sewa wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Pinochet and collusion with Loyalist gangs in the murder of civilians, that work a bit better for you?

Whataboutery of the highest order because you're a supporter of black September terrorists well done you.

Btw, about loyalist gangs n all that; we had the GFA and accepted peace, the forgiving of terrorists was part of that agreement. It wasn't one sided.

Of course neither has anything to do with Boris and his comments on the burka which is a disgusting comparison.

You keep using this word ''disgusting'' Bimbobot, I am not convinced you understand it

Gut wrenching , vile views. The dead , the dying, the castrated man bleeding to death, all a misunderstanding from the Heros ....f uck you

bimboman wrote:

Plato'sCave wrote:not cheering on anyone, I can’t stand him, but your wilful naivety about the Tory loved DUP is disgusting.

Good Friday Agreement means nothing to you either I take it ?

Let's cheer on the terrorists.

Oh for Christ’s sake, I can’t stand any terrorist or sympathiser, it seems you don’t go as far as I do with your special exemptions for British nationalist terrrorists. Yay, you go cheer them on

zzzz wrote:Always instructive when people fall back on phony equivalence.

Logically, if you really thought it was a fair comparison, you would to be violently opposed to Corbyn. But you're not.

So either (i) it's contrived bullshit, or (ii) you never really gave much of a shit about Pinochet etc.

They're reaching back nearly 40 years to find some mud for the water.... It is perfect for their politics of hate.

bimboman wrote:

sewa wrote:
You keep using this word ''disgusting'' Bimbobot, I am not convinced you understand it

Gut wrenching , vile views. The dead , the dying, the castrated man bleeding to death, all a misunderstanding from the Heros ....f uck you

Careful, you are getting all emotional again. Don't let it ruin your holidays

Plato'sCave wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Plato'sCave wrote:not cheering on anyone, I can’t stand him, but your wilful naivety about the Tory loved DUP is disgusting.

Good Friday Agreement means nothing to you either I take it ?

Let's cheer on the terrorists.

Oh for Christ’s sake, I can’t stand any terrorist or sympathiser, it seems you don’t go as far as I do with your special exemptions for British nationalist terrrorists. Yay, you go cheer them on

Plato, are you in a particularly troublesome mood today? The word 'disgusting' is being used in response to your posts

Plato'sCave wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Plato'sCave wrote:not cheering on anyone, I can’t stand him, but your wilful naivety about the Tory loved DUP is disgusting.

Good Friday Agreement means nothing to you either I take it ?

Let's cheer on the terrorists.

Oh for Christ’s sake, I can’t stand any terrorist or sympathiser, it seems you don’t go as far as I do with your special exemptions for British nationalist terrrorists. Yay, you go cheer them on

No not for "Christ sake" , you're making facile comparison to muddy water regarding something that happened in 2014 with Corbyn.

I have no exceptions regarding "British terrorists " , there was the GFA and from that peace and renewal , when there's peace and renewal in Isreal you might just stretch to the comparison.

The DUP is democratically elected as party in the UK parliament.

Frodder wrote:

Plato'sCave wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Plato'sCave wrote:not cheering on anyone, I can’t stand him, but your wilful naivety about the Tory loved DUP is disgusting.

Good Friday Agreement means nothing to you either I take it ?

Let's cheer on the terrorists.

Oh for Christ’s sake, I can’t stand any terrorist or sympathiser, it seems you don’t go as far as I do with your special exemptions for British nationalist terrrorists. Yay, you go cheer them on

Plato, are you in a particularly troublesome mood today? The word 'disgusting' is being used in response to your posts

To be fair, it's only bimbo saying that. Calling something disgusting is his favoured way of saying Yeah nah I disagree.

bimboman wrote:

No not for "Christ sake" , you're making facile comparison to muddy water regarding something that happened in 2014 with Corbyn.

I have no exceptions regarding "British terrorists " , there was the GFA and from that peace and renewal , when there's peace and renewal in Isreal you might just stretch to the comparison.

The DUP is democratically elected as party in the UK parliament.

So you are open to the Tories potentially doing a deal with Sinn Fein provided they end up in power?

sewa wrote:

bimboman wrote:

sewa wrote:
You keep using this word ''disgusting'' Bimbobot, I am not convinced you understand it

Gut wrenching , vile views. The dead , the dying, the castrated man bleeding to death, all a misunderstanding from the Heros ....f uck you

Careful, you are getting all emotional again. Don't let it ruin your holidays

It won't, I'm an adult and capable of posting views without crying. You want any more pointers on what the dead being honoured by Corbyn actually did ?

bimboman wrote:

sewa wrote:

bimboman wrote:

sewa wrote:
You keep using this word ''disgusting'' Bimbobot, I am not convinced you understand it

Gut wrenching , vile views. The dead , the dying, the castrated man bleeding to death, all a misunderstanding from the Heros ....f uck you

Careful, you are getting all emotional again. Don't let it ruin your holidays

It won't, I'm an adult and capable of posting views without crying. You want any more pointers on what the dead being honoured by Corbyn actually did ?

I don't need any pointers. I said he should be sacked over it two pages back. I don't feel the need to get all hysterical though

Anybody who voted for the fella must be evaluating that decision now

Imagine being on holidays, kicking back and then logging in to PR to really showcase your hysterical Corbyn Derangement Syndrome.

Bullettyme wrote:Imagine being on holidays, kicking back and then logging in to PR to really showcase your hysterical Corbyn Derangement Syndrome.

Plus you have to keep your Brexit opinions fresh and on Page 1.

bimboman wrote:

slick wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Pinochet and collusion with Loyalist gangs in the murder of civilians, that work a bit better for you?

Whataboutery of the highest order because you're a supporter of black September terrorists well done you.

Btw, about loyalist gangs n all that; we had the GFA and accepted peace, the forgiving of terrorists was part of that agreement. It wasn't one sided.

Of course neither has anything to do with Boris and his comments on the burka which is a disgusting comparison.

Are you 12?

Facile views about laying wreaths commemorating terrorists like black September isn't a laughing matter, it's disgraceful, the comparison to our current parliament is disgraceful.

Cheer em on.

FFS, Bimbo, that is imbecilic.

I'm sure that you think you are demonstrating debating skills of the highest order, but you are just coming across as a knob.

Nobody has suggested that they support Black September terrorists and pointing out that the Tories welcomed Pinnochet isn't "whataboutery", it's merely drawing attention to hypocrisy when you accuse others of cosying up to terrorists but can't see that honouring a mass murderer like Pinnochet when he visits is equally reprehensible.

Rinkals wrote:

bimboman wrote:

slick wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Pinochet and collusion with Loyalist gangs in the murder of civilians, that work a bit better for you?

Whataboutery of the highest order because you're a supporter of black September terrorists well done you.

Btw, about loyalist gangs n all that; we had the GFA and accepted peace, the forgiving of terrorists was part of that agreement. It wasn't one sided.

Of course neither has anything to do with Boris and his comments on the burka which is a disgusting comparison.

Are you 12?

Facile views about laying wreaths commemorating terrorists like black September isn't a laughing matter, it's disgraceful, the comparison to our current parliament is disgraceful.

Cheer em on.

FFS, Bimbo, that is imbecilic.

I'm sure that you think you are demonstrating debating skills of the highest order, but you are just coming across as a knob.

Nobody has suggested that they support Black September terrorists and pointing out that the Tories welcomed Pinnochet isn't "whataboutery", it's merely drawing attention to hypocrisy when you accuse others of cosying up to terrorists but can't see that honouring a mass murderer like Pinnochet when he visits is equally reprehensible.

See notes on phony equivalence.

Bullettyme wrote:Imagine being on holidays, kicking back and then logging in to PR to really showcase your hysterical Corbyn Derangement Syndrome.

Imagine knowing where someone anonymous is through the Internet !



It appears my views on Cobryns support for terrorists that people have page after page described as derangement has far more accuracy than even known at the time.

Why are you an apologist for the old communist?

Rinkals wrote:

bimboman wrote:

slick wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Pinochet and collusion with Loyalist gangs in the murder of civilians, that work a bit better for you?

Whataboutery of the highest order because you're a supporter of black September terrorists well done you.

Btw, about loyalist gangs n all that; we had the GFA and accepted peace, the forgiving of terrorists was part of that agreement. It wasn't one sided.

Of course neither has anything to do with Boris and his comments on the burka which is a disgusting comparison.

Are you 12?

Facile views about laying wreaths commemorating terrorists like black September isn't a laughing matter, it's disgraceful, the comparison to our current parliament is disgraceful.

Cheer em on.

FFS, Bimbo, that is imbecilic.

I'm sure that you think you are demonstrating debating skills of the highest order, but you are just coming across as a knob.

Nobody has suggested that they support Black September terrorists and pointing out that the Tories welcomed Pinnochet isn't "whataboutery", it's merely drawing attention to hypocrisy when you accuse others of cosying up to terrorists but can't see that honouring a mass murderer like Pinnochet when he visits is equally reprehensible.

Pinnichet was news forty years ago received by a long dead politician. Corbyn who wishes to be our prime minister honoured Black September in 2014.

You're making a stupid equivalence. What I can't get to unless it's for support of Corbyn on why anyone would make such a reach.

bimboman wrote:

Bullettyme wrote:Imagine being on holidays, kicking back and then logging in to PR to really showcase your hysterical Corbyn Derangement Syndrome.

Imagine knowing where someone anonymous is through the Internet !



It appears my views on Cobryns support for terrorists that people have page after page described as derangement has far more accuracy than even known at the time.

Why are you an apologist for the old communist?

Have you tried the Pastel de Nata yet? I found it a bit too sweet for my liking but worth trying. You might like it. You could even find a coffee shop with free wifi

Bimbo has completely gone off the deep end. He can't bare to rationalise anything. There is only his side righty on everything and anything that does not fall into that description is some babyish "disgusting" lumping everyone who wants hospitals and schools to be funded properly to fascist dictators as left and therefore wrong. And that is literally all he reasoning he can muster. He does frequently embarrassing himself by bringing in random examples of various failures whose case literally has nothing to do with the debate being had.

Pinnichet was news forty years ago received by a long dead politician. Corbyn who wishes to be our prime minister honoured Black September in 2014.

You're making a stupid equivalence. What I can't get to unless it's for support of Corbyn on why anyone would make such a reach.

How long does a mass murderer have to be dead before they stop being relevant?

Both major UK parties are riven with awfulness but are able to stagger on by continually pointing to the other lot. Whataboutery is good for nothing but protecting partisan interests

Chuckles1188 wrote:Both major UK parties are riven with awfulness but are able to stagger on by continually pointing to the other lot. Whataboutery is good for nothing but protecting partisan interests

I mostly agree. Though I do see whataboutery being used to avoid or try to rubbish legitimate points about hypocrisy and double standards.

Frodder wrote:

Pinnichet was news forty years ago received by a long dead politician. Corbyn who wishes to be our prime minister honoured Black September in 2014.

You're making a stupid equivalence. What I can't get to unless it's for support of Corbyn on why anyone would make such a reach.

How long does a mass murderer have to be dead before they stop being relevant?

I dunno ask Corbyn he's the wreath layer.

Is this really going to matter? The Guardian ran this story back in 2017 and it appears few care.

This though

Brazil wrote:Mind you, "present but not involved" is as good an analogy for his leadership methods as I've seen.

Very good.

eldanielfire wrote:Bimbo has completely gone off the deep end. He can't bare to rationalise anything. There is only his side righty on everything and anything that does not fall into that description is some babyish "disgusting" lumping everyone who wants hospitals and schools to be funded properly to fascist dictators as left and therefore wrong. And that is literally all he reasoning he can muster. He does frequently embarrassing himself by bringing in random examples of various failures whose case literally has nothing to do with the debate being had.

I've quite rightly described Corbyn as a terrorist supporter, that is all.


You're butt hurt over the ludicrous posts you made about education funding paying for itself though seems to be an issue with you.

I totally rationalised everything I posted with examples, you posted absolutly no examples.

I think the veneration of the black September terrorists disgusting, some people don't it appears. That's frightning considering we have elections coming in the UK.

bimboman wrote: Why are you an apologist for the old communist?

This is an example of why everyone calls you deranged, and I'll throw in shrill too.

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:Bimbo has completely gone off the deep end. He can't bare to rationalise anything. There is only his side righty on everything and anything that does not fall into that description is some babyish "disgusting" lumping everyone who wants hospitals and schools to be funded properly to fascist dictators as left and therefore wrong. And that is literally all he reasoning he can muster. He does frequently embarrassing himself by bringing in random examples of various failures whose case literally has nothing to do with the debate being had.

I've quite rightly described Corbyn as a terrorist supporter, that is all.


You're butt hurt over the ludicrous posts you made about education funding paying for itself though seems to be an issue with you.

I totally rationalised everything I posted with examples, you posted absolutly no examples.

I think the veneration of the black September terrorists disgusting, some people don't it appears. That's frightning considering we have elections coming in the UK.

Its disgusting and frightening, at least you aren't prone to hyperbole

bimboman wrote:

Rinkals wrote:

bimboman wrote:

slick wrote:

bimboman wrote: Whataboutery of the highest order because you're a supporter of black September terrorists well done you.

Btw, about loyalist gangs n all that; we had the GFA and accepted peace, the forgiving of terrorists was part of that agreement. It wasn't one sided.

Of course neither has anything to do with Boris and his comments on the burka which is a disgusting comparison.

Are you 12?

Facile views about laying wreaths commemorating terrorists like black September isn't a laughing matter, it's disgraceful, the comparison to our current parliament is disgraceful.

Cheer em on.

FFS, Bimbo, that is imbecilic.

I'm sure that you think you are demonstrating debating skills of the highest order, but you are just coming across as a knob.

Nobody has suggested that they support Black September terrorists and pointing out that the Tories welcomed Pinnochet isn't "whataboutery", it's merely drawing attention to hypocrisy when you accuse others of cosying up to terrorists but can't see that honouring a mass murderer like Pinnochet when he visits is equally reprehensible.

Pinnichet was news forty years ago received by a long dead politician. Corbyn who wishes to be our prime minister honoured Black September in 2014.

You're making a stupid equivalence. What I can't get to unless it's for support of Corbyn on why anyone would make such a reach.

So what?

If that's what your point is, then say so.

Calling it whataboutery shows that you either don't understand the point being made or are deliberately misunderstanding to score cheep points against someone on the internet.

In either case you look like a knob.

sewa wrote:

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:Bimbo has completely gone off the deep end. He can't bare to rationalise anything. There is only his side righty on everything and anything that does not fall into that description is some babyish "disgusting" lumping everyone who wants hospitals and schools to be funded properly to fascist dictators as left and therefore wrong. And that is literally all he reasoning he can muster. He does frequently embarrassing himself by bringing in random examples of various failures whose case literally has nothing to do with the debate being had.

I've quite rightly described Corbyn as a terrorist supporter, that is all.


You're butt hurt over the ludicrous posts you made about education funding paying for itself though seems to be an issue with you.

I totally rationalised everything I posted with examples, you posted absolutly no examples.

I think the veneration of the black September terrorists disgusting, some people don't it appears. That's frightning considering we have elections coming in the UK.

Its disgusting and frightening, at least you aren't prone to hyperbole

I genuinly think that someone with Cobyns world view an absolute danger to the UK if he became PM. I believe that his views regarding Britain and its place. His view of people and busines in the uk as dangerous.

His views in general are disgusting, an example of which is a man laying a wreath at the graves of the Black September members.

There's a long long list of these types on incidence , every time Jezza is standing on the wrong side.

Dangerous and disgusting underplays it in reality.

Calling it whataboutery shows that you either don't understand the point being made or are deliberately misunderstanding to score cheep

No calling it whataboutery shows I disagree with the facile comparisons being made and question the reasons for the ludicrous comparisons.

c69 wrote:I guess those who think that Corbyn is a terrorist supporter would not vote for him irrespective of any other reason.
Tbh I can't disagree with that if people feel so strongly about leaders that get close to murderous bastards.

Unless they wanted to f uck up the Labour Party .

c69 wrote:So I suppose those who rightly find terrorist suppost "disgusting" would never actually vote for people that supported Pinochet or the Khymer Rouge and Pol Pot. It would be somewhat hypocritical if they voted for someone that funded actually funded real terrorists and perpetrators of genocide.

Whataboutery ! Well done.

Geopolitics through a child's eye.

c69 wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:So I suppose those who rightly find terrorist suppost "disgusting" would never actually vote for people that supported Pinochet or the Khymer Rouge and Pol Pot. It would be somewhat hypocritical if they voted for someone that funded actually funded real terrorists and perpetrators of genocide.

Whataboutery ! Well done.

Geopolitics through a child's eye.

Oh as long as it's the right sort of terrorist or mass murderer than it's OK.
I remember a quote from Thatcher about Suharto the former Indonesian leader that killed a million of his people according to Amnesty International.

“One of our very best and most valuable friends,”

"It's Thatchers fault"

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:Bimbo has completely gone off the deep end. He can't bare to rationalise anything. There is only his side righty on everything and anything that does not fall into that description is some babyish "disgusting" lumping everyone who wants hospitals and schools to be funded properly to fascist dictators as left and therefore wrong. And that is literally all he reasoning he can muster. He does frequently embarrassing himself by bringing in random examples of various failures whose case literally has nothing to do with the debate being had.

I've quite rightly described Corbyn as a terrorist supporter, that is all.


You're butt hurt over the ludicrous posts you made about education funding paying for itself though seems to be an issue with you.

I totally rationalised everything I posted with examples, you posted absolutly no examples.

I think the veneration of the black September terrorists disgusting, some people don't it appears. That's frightning considering we have elections coming in the UK.

Rationalised is using non-connected examples? Venesuela went broke because it invested in education did it? F#cking hell

c69 wrote:Bimbo you were taking the high ground that people should not vote for Cornyn because of his support for terrorists.
It's a reasonable position tbh. There is a logical progression that you would treat each politician the same if they supported mass murderers or terrorists.

There is no argument that Thatcher did exactly that.
Did you use the same moral compass for her that you use for Corbyn?


I'm too bored to continue...

Bye

Only a child would make that equivalence. It's idiotic.

c69 wrote:Bimbo you were taking the high ground that people should not vote for Cornyn because of his support for terrorists.
It's a reasonable position tbh. There is a logical progression that you would treat each politician the same if they supported mass murderers or terrorists.

There is no argument that Thatcher did exactly that.
Did you use the same moral compass for her that you use for Corbyn?


I'm too bored to continue...

Bye

We both know he won't. He has no moral compass. He's just a shrill for right wing political positions.