Planet Rugby Forum

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

openclashXX wrote:So, the Labour Party conference then

John McDonnell backing a second referendum... so long as it doesn't have an option to vote Remain on it

He and Corbyn continue to disguise their pro-Brexit stance as badly as ever

No doubt Keir Starmer or Lammy will be on the news in a day or two telling us that the Labour Party does back Remaining, and always has done

What a circus

That made me piss myself

It's a mess, but many of John McDonnell's policies are actually quite good when you separate his politics from them.

You want or sperate the policies from the politics ?

It's not hard. Politics is what you believe in, or even the methods you want to install. Policies are the actions you actually have stated you will enact.

It's entirely possible to have policies that are not in line with your political ideals or outlooks. Political goals or ideals can also be achieved by differing political methods. For example some people could be a communist but accept it is neither workable nor pragmatic to input communist methods. However it is possible to achieve the goals of making a more equal society.

I'm not really left wing, however I'm ceasing your company giving 1% to the workers and keeping the rest, but I'm a centrist you hear ....

NO SH*T!!!

Why would you enact policies that go against your politics ? It makes little or no sense .

bimboman wrote:Why would you enact policies that go against your politics ? It makes little or no sense .

Because there can be more than one way to achieve a particular goal. Or that there isn't likely to be a successful outcome in the current climate.

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:Why would you enact policies that go against your politics ? It makes little or no sense .

Because there can be more than one way to achieve a particular goal. Or that there isn't likely to be a successful outcome in the current climate.

Given that view, maybe you can be more detailed then about what you like about the policy of state grabbing of private assets and how you'd go about that policy differantly.

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:Why would you enact policies that go against your politics ? It makes little or no sense .

Because there can be more than one way to achieve a particular goal. Or that there isn't likely to be a successful outcome in the current climate.

Given that view, maybe you can be more detailed then about what you like about the policy of state grabbing of private assets and how you'd go about that policy differantly.

I wouldn't do that policy. I said I like some policies, not all.

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:Why would you enact policies that go against your politics ? It makes little or no sense .

Because there can be more than one way to achieve a particular goal. Or that there isn't likely to be a successful outcome in the current climate.

Given that view, maybe you can be more detailed then about what you like about the policy of state grabbing of private assets and how you'd go about that policy differantly.

I wouldn't do that policy. I said I like some policies, not all.

Go on, which ones ? Are we back on the 500 billion extra on education again ?

F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Hard to believe you’re unemployable.

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Hard to believe you’re unemployable.

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Hard to believe you’re unemployable.

Amazing insight again Lenny. Is my life another of your expert subjects.

c69 wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Your anger is palpable, have a super evening.
You made the figure up again didn't you?
I wish you well.

I quite clearly exaggerated for affect..... Which was obvious, which is why I called you stupid. Because you were being stupid.

No anger here , you seem to struggle with the concept that you're easy to dislike without anger.

Have a terrible evening.

Such a terrible loss of face again.

iarmhiman wrote:Such a terrible loss of face again.

, winning and face on the internet .....

bimboman wrote:

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Hard to believe you’re unemployable.

Amazing insight again Lenny. Is my life another of your expert subjects.

Merely an observation based upon your people skills. You must be a joy to be around in the real world.

bimboman wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:Such a terrible loss of face again.

, winning and face on the internet .....

You have a good evening Bimbo.

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Hard to believe you’re unemployable.

Amazing insight again Lenny. Is my life another of your expert subjects.

Merely an observation based upon your people skills. You must be a joy to be around in the real world.

You might notice considering you've been so razor sharp on this that I'm not rude to most people, I'm rude where I chose to be, I also rarely initiate any contact with those people.

Anything else you'd like guess about me this evening ?

c69 wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Your anger is palpable, have a super evening.
You made the figure up again didn't you?
I wish you well.

I quite clearly exaggerated for affect..... Which was obvious, which is why I called you stupid. Because you were being stupid.

No anger here , you seem to struggle with the concept that you're easy to dislike without anger.

Have a terrible evening.

So you lied again.
Adios matey. Chill the fudge out.
Stop being so abusive.

No I clearly used exaggeration, that you think it might be factual is either autism or dishonesty on your behalf.

You're a horrible individual , rudeness clearly doesn't impact you (I'd imagine a life time of dealing with it) so stop whining. You could chose to just f uck off.

How can you expect anyone to take you seriously when you have hissy fits like this? Chill the fudge down.

What just happened when I went away?

iarmhiman wrote:How can you expect anyone to take you seriously when you have hissy fits like this? Chill the fudge down.

Face, winning and being taken seriously on the Internet .

eldanielfire wrote:What just happened when I went away?

Another, yes another Bimbo meltdown. Poor C69 was just engaging in honest debate and got a viscous assault from an increasingly unhinged Bimboman.

bimboman wrote:

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Hard to believe you’re unemployable.

Amazing insight again Lenny. Is my life another of your expert subjects.

Merely an observation based upon your people skills. You must be a joy to be around in the real world.

You might notice considering you've been so razor sharp on this that I'm not rude to most people, I'm rude where I chose to be, I also rarely initiate any contact with those people.

Anything else you'd like guess about me this evening ?

If anything else strikes me I’ll come back to you.

boo hoo goo, thanks to quite a lot of your posts C69 mental health is fair game, don't go winging about that now. Silly hypocrite.

iarmhiman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:What just happened when I went away?

Another, yes another Bimbo meltdown. Poor C69 was just engaging in honest debate and got a viscous assault from an increasingly unhinged Bimboman.

, dishonest as ever.

The smileys are out. Never a good sign.

iarmhiman wrote:The smileys are out. Never a good sign.

Winning, face, being taken seriously and smileys on the Internet.

c69 wrote:

bimboman wrote: boo hoo goo, thanks to quite a lot of your posts C69 mental health is fair game, don't go winging about that now. Silly hypocrite.

What do you mean?
Are you classing autism as a mental health issue?

What should I classify it as ? Like its relevant to the point I made.

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Lenny wrote:

bimboman wrote:F uck off you stupid fat c unt.

Hard to believe you’re unemployable.

Amazing insight again Lenny. Is my life another of your expert subjects.

Merely an observation based upon your people skills. You must be a joy to be around in the real world.

People skills! On here? I would welcome your list of posters/personas who fulfil that criteria.

I see this thread is going well as ever......

Frodder wrote:I see this thread is going well as ever......

I do wonder what mental barrier Bimboman has to any nuance. He must be the only person outside of Corbynista's in the entire UK who believe one political side is 100% entirely right and everything is perfect there and anything else is 100% entirely wrong and evil and that there can be no in-between what-so-ever.

Frodder wrote:I see this thread is going well as ever......

Yes. Folk are taking a wee break from traducing Comrade Corbyn in favour of traducing each other.

MungoMan wrote:

Frodder wrote:I see this thread is going well as ever......

Yes. Folk are taking a wee break from traducing Comrade Corbyn in favour of traducing each other.

Correct, it's like witnessing a car crash with the way 1 particular poster is having a virtual meltdown

openclashXX wrote:So, the Labour Party conference then

John McDonnell backing a second referendum... so long as it doesn't have an option to vote Remain on it

He and Corbyn continue to disguise their pro-Brexit stance as badly as ever

No doubt Keir Starmer or Lammy will be on the news in a day or two telling us that the Labour Party does back Remaining, and always has done

What a circus

And right on cue

Labour is embroiled in a row over the party’s approach to a Final Say Brexit referendum, following a split between two of the shadow cabinet’s most senior figures.

Sir Keir Starmer, the party’s Brexit spokesman, was forced to confirm that remaining in the EU will be a potential option in a future referendum backed by Labour after John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor, ruled the idea out.

Amid a backlash Mr McDonnell rowed back on his comments, and later conceded at a meeting at the party’s conference in Liverpool that Labour could still back a new vote that would see the party stay in the EU.

If ever there was a 24 hours that summed up Labour and Brexit...

c69 wrote:

MungoMan wrote:

Frodder wrote:I see this thread is going well as ever......

Yes. Folk are taking a wee break from traducing Comrade Corbyn in favour of traducing each other.

When you say folk, I suspect you mean on the whole that is, just one seemingly abusive individual.
The way I see it personal abuse is pretty much expected on here. It does however come to a point when an individual just abuses everyone all the time. A bit like when refry got canned. If a poster gets to that point then they need to be relieved of their ability to post for their own good.
I have reported this post for the mods to think it over.

Shirley you mean 'that post': 'this post' would be the post to which I am responding.

Apologies of course if you are in fact reporting yourself. A man's got to have a hobby...

eldanielfire wrote:

Frodder wrote:I see this thread is going well as ever......

I do wonder what mental barrier Bimboman has to any nuance. He must be the only person outside of Corbynista's in the entire UK who believe one political side is 100% entirely right and everything is perfect there and anything else is 100% entirely wrong and evil and that there can be no in-between what-so-ever.

Oh do f uck off, you want to claim that policies are seprate from political beliefs that's mint nuance that's plain stupid.

No one here even gets my political views correct they lazy pigeon hole all,the time. For example i'm not "right wing" , but lazy tropes by challenged lefties continue.

My view of socialism and further left as being wrong is my view, I don't say oh I don't like socialism but I like a little bit of it.

Frodder wrote:

MungoMan wrote:

Frodder wrote:I see this thread is going well as ever......

Yes. Folk are taking a wee break from traducing Comrade Corbyn in favour of traducing each other.

Correct, it's like witnessing a car crash with the way 1 particular poster is having a virtual meltdown

Haha, melt down equals bothering to answer the trolls. Wonderful.

bimboman wrote:

Oh do f uck off, you want to claim that policies are seprate from political beliefs that's mint nuance that's plain stupid.

No one here even gets my political views correct they lazy pigeon hole all,the time. For example i'm not "right wing" , but lazy tropes by challenged lefties continue.

My view of socialism and further left as being wrong is my view, I don't say oh I don't like socialism but I like a little bit of it.

So angry he can barely type, watch the stress levels mate

c69 wrote:

MungoMan wrote:

Frodder wrote:I see this thread is going well as ever......

Yes. Folk are taking a wee break from traducing Comrade Corbyn in favour of traducing each other.

When you say folk, I suspect you mean on the whole that is, just one seemingly abusive individual.
The way I see it personal abuse is pretty much expected on here. It does however come to a point when an individual just abuses everyone all the time. A bit like when refry got canned. If a poster gets to that point then they need to be relieved of their ability to post for their own good.
I have reported this post for the mods to think it over.

I don't abuse everyone that's a a lie , from you a troll who even with polite requests not too carried on interacting and trolling , I've not posted abuse as much as asked you to leave my posting alone, same as the two Irish posters who spend all day at work posting how I'm unemployed etc.

As for own good, you've had a campaign for me to be banned for a long time which is rather odd considering how much "attention" you seem to want from me all the time.

You're a f ucking horrible individual, nasty, and hypocritical. Horrid.

"Far right" being the most constant and horrible lie you bandy about, is something that you deserve every bit of any "abuse" you receive.

Haha, melt down equals bothering to answer the trolls. Wonderful.

You're a f ucking horrible individual, nasty, and hypocritical. Horrid.

Well, that's an answer I suppose

Frodder wrote:

Haha, melt down equals bothering to answer the trolls. Wonderful.

You're a f ucking horrible individual, nasty, and hypocritical. Horrid.

Well, that's an answer I suppose

Yep.