The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
Poor innocent lamb100MileDad wrote:The French have committed genocides all over the world, their hypocrisy is astounding.
No.DragsterDriver wrote:Isn’t it a bit chippy to still be going on about a potato famine?
well to be fair to DAC he probably wishes his ancestors could have been more thorough to save him peeling spuds in northern IrelandDragsterDriver wrote:Isn’t it a bit chippy to still be going on about a potato famine?
Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
Oh, very good.DragsterDriver wrote:Isn’t it a bit chippy to still be going on about a potato famine?
DragsterDriver wrote:Isn’t it a bit chippy to still be going on about a potato famine?
Stoke will end up voting for another party they despise such as the Torys due to no other choice. The Torys in response will pump more money into London.100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
Stoke, alongside Essex, epitomises everything that is wrong with this country100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
Particularly Essex. That place is full of horrible ignorant chavs.shereblue wrote:Stoke, alongside Essex, epitomises everything that is wrong with this country100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
Comes back to the assumption that a lot of brexit voters know the difference between hard and soft brexit. The Brexiteers voters I know wouldn't. Labour are still brexitting.100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
shereblue wrote:Stoke, alongside Essex, epitomises everything that is wrong with this country100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
Not a fan of oatcakes and pottery then?shereblue wrote:Stoke epitomises everything that is wrong with this country
Corbyn still wants to cut immigration so that local workers jobs are not being undercut.Petej wrote:Comes back to the assumption that a lot of brexit voters know the difference between hard and soft brexit. The Brexiteers voters I know wouldn't. Labour are still brexitting.100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
What has Stoke done?shereblue wrote:Stoke, alongside Essex, epitomises everything that is wrong with this country100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
iarmhiman wrote:Corbyn still wants to cut immigration so that local workers jobs are not being undercut.Petej wrote:Comes back to the assumption that a lot of brexit voters know the difference between hard and soft brexit. The Brexiteers voters I know wouldn't. Labour are still brexitting.100MileDad wrote:Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....TranceNRG wrote:Can they though? They still got a considerable share of the vote outside London (I blieve it went up in the last election) and a significant number of leavers still supporting them in the last election despite the decieving tactics.100MileDad wrote:If Labour carry on like this I can seem them being a "London only" party.
Most everyone outside of the capital can see them for what they really are.
That demographic he's targeting voted precisely for that reason. They want to control immigration.
Hard to know which is better. Both full of the most horrible people one would not want to meet.100MileDad wrote:Newport is the equivalent of Essex?
ha ha ha ha.
Not based on his speech yesterdayiarmhiman wrote:Corbyn still wants to cut immigration so that local workers jobs are not being undercut.
You obviously have no idea about either, I would suggest most of your knowledge about the UK comes from watching Dave TV re-runs..iarmhiman wrote:Hard to know which is better. Both full of the most horrible people one would not want to meet.100MileDad wrote:Newport is the equivalent of Essex?
ha ha ha ha.
That was the reason. The tabloid reading average White van driving Englisher wouldn't know anything about politics. What they do know is that they don't like Jonny Foreigner taking their jobs. That's why they voted out.100MileDad wrote:iarmhiman wrote:Corbyn still wants to cut immigration so that local workers jobs are not being undercut.Petej wrote:Comes back to the assumption that a lot of brexit voters know the difference between hard and soft brexit. The Brexiteers voters I know wouldn't. Labour are still brexitting.100MileDad wrote:
Stoke for example vote Brexit. Stoke are Red, if Labour affect Brexit, Stoke won't be red.....
That demographic he's targeting voted precisely for that reason. They want to control immigration.
You irish are right on comedic form today!
No matter how many times you repeat this, it isn't true. I know this is what your media tells you but your media is full of shite most of the time.The tabloid reading average White van driving Englisher wouldn't know anything about politics. What they do know is that they don't like Jonny Foreigner taking their jobs. That's why they voted out
The Cons are doing quite well getting the Corbyn has betrayed Brexit message out, Farage too.Petej wrote:Comes back to the assumption that a lot of brexit voters know the difference between hard and soft brexit. The Brexiteers voters I know wouldn't. Labour are still brexitting.
He said it in his speech yesterday. Yes he wants to remain in the customs union but not single market and he wants to still control immigration and have a say in free trade deals. He is more deluded that the tossers in the Tory party.Keith wrote:Not based on his speech yesterdayiarmhiman wrote:Corbyn still wants to cut immigration so that local workers jobs are not being undercut.
The Cons are doing quite well getting the Corbyn has betrayed Brexit message out, Farage too.
It's most certainly true. It's not a good thing to admit to mind which is why you are not.100MileDad wrote:No matter how many times you repeat this, it isn't true. I know this is what your media tells you but your media is full of shite most of the time.The tabloid reading average White van driving Englisher wouldn't know anything about politics. What they do know is that they don't like Jonny Foreigner taking their jobs. That's why they voted out
iarmhiman wrote:It's most certainly true. It's not a good thing to admit to mind which is why you are not.100MileDad wrote:No matter how many times you repeat this, it isn't true. I know this is what your media tells you but your media is full of shite most of the time.The tabloid reading average White van driving Englisher wouldn't know anything about politics. What they do know is that they don't like Jonny Foreigner taking their jobs. That's why they voted out
Sovereignty
On the day of the referendum Lord Ashcroft's polling team questioned 12,369 people who had completed voting.[6] This poll produced data that showed that 'Nearly half (49%) of leave voters said the biggest single reason for wanting to leave the European Union was “the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK”.
Immigration
Lord Ashcroft's election day poll of 12,369 voters also discovered that 'One third (33%) [of leave voters] said the main reason was that leaving “offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.”'[8]
Presumably Irhasismihan believes white van man belongs to that particular third of leave voters. All very Emily Thornberry.100MileDad wrote:Immigration
Lord Ashcroft's election day poll of 12,369 voters also discovered that 'One third (33%) [of leave voters] said the main reason was that leaving “offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.”'[8]
Spent much time in Essex have you? It is a huge county so I would be interested in knowing the extent of your personal experience. After all, you claim the county is full of horrible people.iarmhiman wrote:Hard to know which is better. Both full of the most horrible people one would not want to meet.100MileDad wrote:Newport is the equivalent of Essex?
ha ha ha ha.
Corbyn still wants to cut immigration so that local workers jobs are not being undercut.
That demographic he's targeting voted precisely for that reason. They want to control immigration.
That has nothing to do with EU. All EU countries have their own immigration rules for non EU citizens. They are only bound to the freedom of movement for EU citizens.100MileDad wrote:It must be said, however, that we may not have had this thread had Merkel not thrown open the doors of Europe to all and sundry....bless her.
He's watched Dave TV though.Mick Mannock wrote:Spent much time in Essex have you? It is a huge county so I would be interested in knowing the extent of your personal experience. After all, you claim the county is full of horrible people.iarmhiman wrote:Hard to know which is better. Both full of the most horrible people one would not want to meet.100MileDad wrote:Newport is the equivalent of Essex?
ha ha ha ha.
Are you from Essex Mick? I'd wager you are.Mick Mannock wrote:Spent much time in Essex have you? It is a huge county so I would be interested in knowing the extent of your personal experience. After all, you claim the county is full of horrible people.iarmhiman wrote:Hard to know which is better. Both full of the most horrible people one would not want to meet.100MileDad wrote:Newport is the equivalent of Essex?
ha ha ha ha.
Mick Mannock wrote:Spent much time in Essex have you? It is a huge county so I would be interested in knowing the extent of your personal experience. After all, you claim the county is full of horrible people.iarmhiman wrote:Hard to know which is better. Both full of the most horrible people one would not want to meet.100MileDad wrote:Newport is the equivalent of Essex?
ha ha ha ha.
100MileDad wrote:He's watched Dave TV though.Mick Mannock wrote:Spent much time in Essex have you? It is a huge county so I would be interested in knowing the extent of your personal experience. After all, you claim the county is full of horrible people.iarmhiman wrote:Hard to know which is better. Both full of the most horrible people one would not want to meet.100MileDad wrote:Newport is the equivalent of Essex?
ha ha ha ha.
Not quite sure how you can compare one of the wealthiest counties in England with a small post industrial town in Wales mind.
It doesn't matter, we know who runs the EU and who is seen as the main figurehead.........iarmhiman wrote:That has nothing to do with EU. All EU countries have their own immigration rules for non EU citizens. They are only bound to the freedom of movement for EU citizens.100MileDad wrote:It must be said, however, that we may not have had this thread had Merkel not thrown open the doors of Europe to all and sundry....bless her.
Merkel letting in so many Syrians was a kind gesture but definitely a wrong one.
Must be careful what I post here.bimboman wrote:Corbyn still wants to cut immigration so that local workers jobs are not being undercut.
That demographic he's targeting voted precisely for that reason. They want to control immigration.
You're so thick.