Chat Forum
It is currently Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:29 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1752, 1753, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758 ... 2004  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 13142
Location: The centre of The Horrendous Space Kablooie!
The loon appears to want to defund the International Space Station and no doubt get the private sector running it.

It's almost as if his backers want to NASA et al to stop studying the Earth from space for some unknown reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 30746
Location: Chickenrunning...
Ted. wrote:
But but!

Quote:
US intelligence agencies expect Russia to target November's midterm elections

The Trump administration predicts Russia will meddle in US elections this year as it pursues bolder cyber operations and false information campaigns against America and its allies, US intelligence agencies said on Tuesday...


Link.

Trump getting ready to blame bad results on everyone else.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 32452
You guys . . . :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12506
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
Turbogoat wrote:
The Man Without Fear wrote:
I see Trump's infrastructure plan is a perfect cover for throwing more environmental protection on the bonfire.


Shame really. The Infrastructure election promise was a genuinely good one. Rebuild the roads, bridges, airports etc... and make it the envy of the world, all while providing jobs and improving the efficiency of the country as a whole. I'd have voted for that in a heartbeat.

The shitty way it's going to be funded is going to doom it though. Instead of federal funding being 80% of it, with individual States taking up the slack, they're going to reverse it, and have the Feds provide 20%, hoping the States can afford the extra 80%. Instead of 1 Trillion over ten years, it's really only 200 Billion. As so much of the infrastructure is interstate, there's going to be a lot of it just never going to be fully funded by States.

It looks good on paper at a cursory glance, until you realize it's based on "someone will be an investor" type optimism.


Obama had one on the table but the GOP... well you the know the rest.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 2e5fa73ef7
Quote:
The Senate shot down another piece of President Obama’s $447 billion jobs bill Thursday, as a stalemated Congress goes through the motions of attempting legislation to spur economic growth largely as a mechanism to allow each party to blame the other for the failure to act.

The chamber failed to advance a measure to spend $50 billion on highway, rail, transit and airport improvements and another $10 billion as seed money for an infrastructure bank designed to spark private investment in construction. The vote was 51 to 49 in favor, but the measure needed 60 votes to proceed to a full debate.

The failure came in advance of a jobs report due out Friday morning that will show the trajectory of the job market in the final quarter of the year. So far, there are signs that employers are shrugging off the ill effects of Europe’s troubles and volatile financial markets and are continuing to hire at a gradual pace. The September unemployment report relieved concerns about massive waves of layoffs, and last week the Commerce Department said the economy grew at a 2.5 percent annual rate in the summer months, its fastest clip in a year.


The Labor Department also reported Thursday that the number of people filing new claims for unemployment insurance benefits fell last week to 397,000, from a revised 406,000 the previous week. That was the lowest level in five weeks. Also Thursday, a survey from the Institute for Supply Management on activity at the nation’s service businesses was little changed, at 52.9 in October compared with 53 in September. Numbers above 50 indicate expansion.

Meanwhile on Capitol Hill, all 47 Senate Republicans joined Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) and Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) in opposing the Obama infrastructure measure, which would have been funded with a 0.7 percent surtax on those making more than a million dollars a year.

“It makes no sense when you consider that this bill was made up of the same kinds of common-sense proposals that many of these Senators have fought for in the past. It was fully paid for,” Obama said in a statement issued by the White House.

Democrats have been trying to move Obama’s American Jobs Act forward plank by plank, without much success, since the Senate blocked the package in its entirety last month.


The Senate had already blocked another element of the plan that would have provided $35 billion in aid to states to hire teachers and first responders. Democrats have indicated they will ask the Senate to vote on other pieces of the plan, including extending a payroll tax holiday for workers and benefits for the unemployed, and offering new tax incentives to businesses to hire veterans and the long-term unemployed.

Also Thursday, Democrats joined to block a separate Republican proposal to extend the government’s highway spending authority for the next two years and roll back some environmental regulations. A procedural motion to advance the measure was rejected 53 to 47. The current highway spending authority will lapse in February.

Parties trade barbs
The two sides traded accusations that each was holding votes merely to paint the other as obstructionists.

“What we’re saying is that people who make all this money, more than a million dollars a year, should contribute to this restructuring of our economy,” Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said of Democrats’ proposal for higher taxes on the wealthy to cover government spending in areas such as infrastructure.

Reid’s GOP counterpart, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), said Democrats were disingenuous about trying to pass the bill, because they included tax increases they knew Republicans would oppose. “The Democrats have deliberately designed this bill to fail,” McConnell said. “So the truth is, Democrats are more interested in building a campaign message than in rebuilding roads and bridges.”

In the GOP-held House, Republicans do not plan to vote on Obama’s bill. Instead, they have passed a series of measures to repeal regulations and spur small-business growth. They charge Senate Democrats with failing to move their ideas ahead.

“Many of these bills have broad bipartisan support, and there’s no reason for the Senate not to take them up,” said House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio). “Unfortunately, they’re just allowing these bills to gather dust, and I don’t think that’s acceptable.”

Boehner told reporters Thursday that Republicans support infrastructure spending and would move a bill before the end of the year to pay for road construction with new revenue from expanded domestic energy production, including drilling.

Despite polls that show job creation is the top priority for most Americans and that their confidence in Congress’s ability to address the nation’s economic challenges is at an all-time low, the debate has moved little in recent weeks.

Although the parties joined to approve free-trade agreements with Panama, Colombia and South Korea that both sides agreed would spur job growth, the stalemate has largely reflected a fundamental disagreement over what government can do to create growth.

Ideological divide
Democrats are eager to invest taxpayer dollars in programs that could result in hiring and have proposed paying for it with higher taxes on the wealthy. Republicans argue that government spending stifles growth and that repealing regulations and cutting taxes would free the private sector to expand.

With ordinary legislating stuck, the debate on jobs bills has largely faded into a rhetorical exercise as lawmakers await the outcome of negotiations of a special bipartisan deficit-reduction panel tasked with cutting at least $1.2 trillion from the nation’s debt over the next decade.

The panel has been offered extraordinary powers; the strategy it recommends will receive a straight up-or-down vote in both the House and Senate, with no amendments or filibusters allowed. Democrats remain hopeful that the “supercommittee” might package some elements of the president’s jobs plan with its recommendations. But the committee remains at an impasse, with a Nov. 23 deadline looming.

As the Senate voted Thursday, about 30 protesters affiliated with the group OurDC, which received seed money from the Service Employees International Union, occupied a waiting area of McConnell’s third-floor office in the Russell Senate Office Building, demanding to meet with the minority leader. His office said they departed without incident when the office closed.

“The senator needs to see their pain, hear their stories, and really needs to look them in the eye,” said James Adams, one of the group’s organizers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21818
Seneca of the Night wrote:
You guys . . . :roll:


No you don't! :x


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20992
Semper Fi, 100mile-guy

:thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20992
Anyhoo, as they say in the movies, ‘Revenge is a dish best eaten cold..’

Quote:
Anthony Scaramucci

@Scaramucci
Based on FBI testimony, WH Chief of Staff John Kelly almost certainly knew about credible allegations of domestic abuse against Rob Porter at least 6 months ago - then recently forced others to lie about that timeline. Inexcusable. Kelly must resign.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21818
Santa wrote:


Short and sweet.

You'll be waiting awhile for "truth and repair".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38099
Location: in transit
shanky wrote:
Anyhoo, as they say in the movies, ‘Revenge is a dish best eaten cold..’

Quote:
Anthony Scaramucci

@Scaramucci
Based on FBI testimony, WH Chief of Staff John Kelly almost certainly knew about credible allegations of domestic abuse against Rob Porter at least 6 months ago - then recently forced others to lie about that timeline. Inexcusable. Kelly must resign.


When you fire people from a reality tv show they're gone. No right of reply.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20992
Yup.

It seems like only yesterday Sarah Sanders was telling us no one should question the retired marine hero-general

The winds change quickly round there

This thing is less ‘House of Cards’ and more ‘Carry on up the Borgias’.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12506
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
shanky wrote:
Yup.

It seems like only yesterday Sarah Sanders was telling us no one should question the retired marine hero-general

The winds change quickly round there

This thing is less ‘House of Cards’ and more ‘Carry on up the Borgias’.


Trump has destroyed almost every political thriller about the presidency. All the intrigue you see on these shows you know doesn't exist in this WH.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12506
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
Quote:
Mark Herring

@MarkHerringVA
*BREAKING* A federal judge has blocked President @realDonaldTrump's unlawful order ending the #DACA program and granted our request for a nationwide injunction.

3:49 PM - Feb 13, 2018
2,671
1,486 people are talking about this


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10163
Location: Texas
What does that decision add to the earlier one?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 6505
Mr Mike wrote:
What does that decision add to the earlier one?



Quote:
Garaufis did not dispute that the Trump administration has the authority to end DACA. Instead, his decision holds that the administration likely violated a federal statute known as the Administrative Procedure Act by winding down DACA in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner. He concluded that a temporary injunction is necessary because ending DACA would likely cause “irreparable harm” to DACA recipients:

If the decision is allowed to go into effect prior to a full adjudication on the merits, there is no way the court can “unscramble the egg” and undo the damage caused by what, on the record before it, appears to have been a patently arbitrary and capricious decision.


https://www.motherjones.com/politics/20 ... ding-daca/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1282
Location: Saint Paul
shanky wrote:
Semper Fi, 100mile-guy

:thumbup:


I thought this cünt was a spud peeler?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6915
Deadtigers wrote:
Quote:
Mark Herring

@MarkHerringVA
*BREAKING* A federal judge has blocked President @realDonaldTrump's unlawful order ending the #DACA program and granted our request for a nationwide injunction.

3:49 PM - Feb 13, 2018
2,671
1,486 people are talking about this



Democrats should just accept the deal for 1.8mil, it isn't unreasonable

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/trump-d ... ntary.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 18912
Location: Adelaide via Sydney and Patea
Deadtigers wrote:
shanky wrote:
Yup.

It seems like only yesterday Sarah Sanders was telling us no one should question the retired marine hero-general

The winds change quickly round there

This thing is less ‘House of Cards’ and more ‘Carry on up the Borgias’.


Trump has destroyed almost every political thriller about the presidency. All the intrigue you see on these shows you know doesn't exist in this WH.


Aaron Sorkin's new pitch: "every scene is an old man in bed Tweeting about Fox & Friends"...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6915
Taranaki Snapper wrote:
Deadtigers wrote:
shanky wrote:
Yup.

It seems like only yesterday Sarah Sanders was telling us no one should question the retired marine hero-general

The winds change quickly round there

This thing is less ‘House of Cards’ and more ‘Carry on up the Borgias’.


Trump has destroyed almost every political thriller about the presidency. All the intrigue you see on these shows you know doesn't exist in this WH.


Aaron Sorkin's new pitch: "every scene is an old man in bed Tweeting about Fox & Friends"...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCebOfRrnvI&t=449s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12506
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
_fatprop wrote:
Deadtigers wrote:
Quote:
Mark Herring

@MarkHerringVA
*BREAKING* A federal judge has blocked President @realDonaldTrump's unlawful order ending the #DACA program and granted our request for a nationwide injunction.

3:49 PM - Feb 13, 2018
2,671
1,486 people are talking about this



Democrats should just accept the deal for 1.8mil, it isn't unreasonable

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/trump-d ... ntary.html


That is a f**king white supremist ransom note. I would do a Dreamers for the funding for the wall but not touching Family migration or the Visa lottery.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 43757
Deadtigers wrote:
_fatprop wrote:
Deadtigers wrote:
Quote:
Mark Herring

@MarkHerringVA
*BREAKING* A federal judge has blocked President @realDonaldTrump's unlawful order ending the #DACA program and granted our request for a nationwide injunction.

3:49 PM - Feb 13, 2018
2,671
1,486 people are talking about this



Democrats should just accept the deal for 1.8mil, it isn't unreasonable

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/trump-d ... ntary.html


That is a f**king white supremist ransom note. I would do a Dreamers for the funding for the wall but not touching Family migration or the Visa lottery.


My understanding is that only parents, spouses, siblings and children of a green card holder can immigrate under the family migration system. If so, what is the major problem with this?

Similarly, people applying through the visa lottery have to go through reasonably rigorous vetting at present. Clearly any system can be improved but are there any fundamental flaws with teh current system?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 12:47 pm
Posts: 3514
Location: Chukity - puck!!!
100MileDad wrote:

He wouldn't be my first choice as president, that's for sure, but I just can't understand the hysterical froth you boys have worked yourselves up into about it.

To be fair, I haven't countered in the fact that you're mostly middle class lefties who got most of their left leanings from University and not from real life.


How is that degree in banjo working out for you?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12506
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
Kiwias wrote:

My understanding is that only parents, spouses, siblings and children of a green card holder can immigrate under the family migration system. If so, what is the major problem with this?

Similarly, people applying through the visa lottery have to go through reasonably rigorous vetting at present. Clearly any system can be improved but are there any fundamental flaws with teh current system?


Yes, family migration is a hallmark of US immigration. It was all good and a great story when it was whites from Ireland, Italy, Poland and Lithuania. Now that it is more browns and blacks that will vote for the left and some how are taking jobs away from Americans.

My Brother and my other Brother's brother in law won the lottery at different times and they were both well vetted, extremely educated professionals. My bro was a healthcare professional while the BiL was an electic and environmental engineer. These people help enrich the country.


Last edited by Deadtigers on Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 43757
Deadtigers wrote:
Kiwias wrote:

My understanding is that only parents, spouses, siblings and children of a green card holder can immigrate under the family migration system. If so, what is the major problem with this?

Similarly, people applying through the visa lottery have to go through reasonably rigorous vetting at present. Clearly any system can be improved but are there any fundamental flaws with teh current system?


Yes, family migration is a hallmark of US immigration. It was all good and a great story when it was whites from Ireland, Italy, Poland and Lithuania. Now that it is more browns and blacks that will vote for the left anne some how are taking jobs away from Americans.

My Brother and my other Brother's brother in law won the lottery at different times and they were both well vetted, extremely educated professionals. My bro was a healthcare professional while the BiL was an electic and environmental engineer. These people help enrich the country.


Out of interest, how long did the vetting process take for your brother and your brother's brother in law?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6915
Deadtigers wrote:
_fatprop wrote:
Deadtigers wrote:
Quote:
Mark Herring

@MarkHerringVA
*BREAKING* A federal judge has blocked President @realDonaldTrump's unlawful order ending the #DACA program and granted our request for a nationwide injunction.

3:49 PM - Feb 13, 2018
2,671
1,486 people are talking about this



Democrats should just accept the deal for 1.8mil, it isn't unreasonable

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/trump-d ... ntary.html


That is a f**king white supremist ransom note. I would do a Dreamers for the funding for the wall but not touching Family migration or the Visa lottery.


What an absolute load of bullocks, family migration will take years to clear, it would be phased out, probably at least two terms democrat presidents, so plenty of chance for amendment and the Visa lottery is just silly. Create a nice merit based system like adult countries.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12506
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
Kiwias wrote:
Deadtigers wrote:
Kiwias wrote:

My understanding is that only parents, spouses, siblings and children of a green card holder can immigrate under the family migration system. If so, what is the major problem with this?

Similarly, people applying through the visa lottery have to go through reasonably rigorous vetting at present. Clearly any system can be improved but are there any fundamental flaws with teh current system?


Yes, family migration is a hallmark of US immigration. It was all good and a great story when it was whites from Ireland, Italy, Poland and Lithuania. Now that it is more browns and blacks that will vote for the left anne some how are taking jobs away from Americans.

My Brother and my other Brother's brother in law won the lottery at different times and they were both well vetted, extremely educated professionals. My bro was a healthcare professional while the BiL was an electic and environmental engineer. These people help enrich the country.


Out of interest, how long did the vetting process take for your brother and your brother's brother in law?


They just changed the process but once
You apply and to qualify to be selected takes 3-6 months then once selected you just have to survive your interview.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20992
puku wrote:
shanky wrote:
Semper Fi, 100mile-guy

:thumbup:


I thought this cünt was a spud peeler?



You were wrong then

This here is..Spec Ops, 1st Marine Battalion, Walmington-on-Sea


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12506
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
_fatprop wrote:
Deadtigers wrote:
_fatprop wrote:
Deadtigers wrote:
Quote:
Mark Herring

@MarkHerringVA
*BREAKING* A federal judge has blocked President @realDonaldTrump's unlawful order ending the #DACA program and granted our request for a nationwide injunction.

3:49 PM - Feb 13, 2018
2,671
1,486 people are talking about this



Democrats should just accept the deal for 1.8mil, it isn't unreasonable

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/trump-d ... ntary.html


That is a f**king white supremist ransom note. I would do a Dreamers for the funding for the wall but not touching Family migration or the Visa lottery.


What an absolute load of bullocks, family migration will take years to clear, it would be phased out, probably at least two terms democrat presidents, so plenty of chance for amendment and the Visa lottery is just silly. Create a nice merit based system like adult countries.


The Visa system is pretty merit based as it is. unless you don't think a guy with a bachelors in Electrical engineering and a masters in environmentally progressive engineering is not merit. But as usual you just go off a tabloid rag and don't know the caliber of Visa winners.

As for family migration why should it end? it is the bedrock of this country and it has had continued positive effect in this country. Why do you think Miller alter reports or won't release them?

There is no statistical reason for this outside of xenophobia. Business people disagree with the changes as well as academics.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 6:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6915
Deadtigers wrote:


The Visa system is pretty merit based as it is. unless you don't think a guy with a bachelors in Electrical engineering and a masters in environmentally progressive engineering is not merit. But as usual you just go off a tabloid rag and don't know the caliber of Visa winners.

As for family migration why should it end? it is the bedrock of this country and it has had continued positive effect in this country. Why do you think Miller alter reports or won't release them?

There is no statistical reason for this outside of xenophobia. Business people disagree with the changes as well as academics.


Diversity Visa applicants only need a High School Education to go into the lottery, you highlight my point someone with a "bachelors in Electrical engineering and a masters in environmentally progressive engineering" should not need to go into a random lottery, merit based system is simply fairer.

Family migration? It would be politically prudent to get DACA through and fix Family Migration under the next Dem president. And that would be before the current applicants have even been processed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 6505
I can't work out which is worse: the white supremacist plot to control US immigration or the sino supremacist plot to control Chinese borders or the hispanic supremacist plot to control Mexican borders or the white supremacist plot to control New Zealand's borders or the Aboriginal supremacist plot to control Australian borders.

Almost certainly the white ones.

The various bantu supremacist plots to control various African borders are morally good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20992
Santa wrote:
I can't work out which is worse: the white supremacist plot to control US immigration or the sino supremacist plot to control Chinese borders or the hispanic supremacist plot to control Mexican borders or the white supremacist plot to control New Zealand's borders or the Aboriginal supremacist plot to control Australian borders.

Almost certainly the white ones.

The various bantu supremacist plots to control various African borders are morally good.


Holy shit. :lol:

What is this?

“Go on, punch me in the stomach. Rock hard abs. Go on.”


PUNCH ME IN THE STOMACH!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 30026
shanky wrote:
Santa wrote:
I can't work out which is worse: the white supremacist plot to control US immigration or the sino supremacist plot to control Chinese borders or the hispanic supremacist plot to control Mexican borders or the white supremacist plot to control New Zealand's borders or the Aboriginal supremacist plot to control Australian borders.

Almost certainly the white ones.

The various bantu supremacist plots to control various African borders are morally good.


Holy shit. :lol:

What is this?

“Go on, punch me in the stomach. Rock hard abs. Go on.”



PUNCH ME IN THE STOMACH!



Santa is right.

Why should outsiders decide who can or cannot be allowed inside your house ? If the country decided that it is a republic, let the republican government deal with it, according to the rules decided on by government. . If a democracy, ditto. Monarchy, the same. If they are white or black or blue or socialist supremacists, and won the elections, so be it ... Shit happens.

It is not as if the million of illegal immigrants in the USA/elsewhere have any rights to be there, to be accepted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20992
Except that’s not what he wrote.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 30026
shanky wrote:
Except that’s not what he wrote.



Calling somebody by some or other vaunted (and unearned) pejorative (white supremacist, by DT, in this case) is absolutely SO PR and divorced from reality.

If white supremacists finally get a real say in the USA government, I do not want to hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 6505
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
shanky wrote:
Except that’s not what he wrote.



Calling somebody by some or other vaunted (and unearned) pejorative (white supremacist, by DT, in this case) is absolutely SO PR and divorced from reality.

If white supremacists finally get a real say in the USA government, I do not want to hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth ...


I've got no idea what Shanky is on about. I accidentally wrote borders when I meant to write immigration. Maybe that's it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 23758
Location: Middle East
Michael Cohen - personal lawyer of Trump - has come forward and claimed that he paid Stormy Daniels - visual performance artist - 130 grand of his own money, and that neither Trump no the Trump campaign repaid him for this.
He said he will "always protect Trump."

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/02/13/poli ... index.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 23758
Location: Middle East
Santa wrote:
I can't work out which is worse: the white supremacist plot to control US immigration or the sino supremacist plot to control Chinese borders or the hispanic supremacist plot to control Mexican borders or the white supremacist plot to control New Zealand's borders or the Aboriginal supremacist plot to control Australian borders.

Almost certainly the white ones.

The various bantu supremacist plots to control various African borders are morally good.


At least the "but Saudi does it!" attempt to justify it has been abandoned.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 30026
Santa wrote:
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
shanky wrote:
Except that’s not what he wrote.



Calling somebody by some or other vaunted (and unearned) pejorative (white supremacist, by DT, in this case) is absolutely SO PR and divorced from reality.

If white supremacists finally get a real say in the USA government, I do not want to hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth ...


I've got no idea what Shanky is on about. I accidentally wrote borders when I meant to write immigration. Maybe that's it.


:thumbup: Thought so.

Shanky is just feeling hyper critical today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 30026
Turbogoat wrote:
Michael Cohen - personal lawyer of Trump - has come forward and claimed that he paid Stormy Daniels - visual performance artist - 130 grand of his own money, and that neither Trump no the Trump campaign repaid him for this.
He said he will "always protect Trump."

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/02/13/poli ... index.html



Ag, he will pad his fees, a bit, and make it back.

Good to see some personal loyalty, in these modern times.

Quote:
"Just because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20992
Santa wrote:
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
shanky wrote:
Except that’s not what he wrote.



Calling somebody by some or other vaunted (and unearned) pejorative (white supremacist, by DT, in this case) is absolutely SO PR and divorced from reality.

If white supremacists finally get a real say in the USA government, I do not want to hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth ...


I've got no idea what Shanky is on about. I accidentally wrote borders when I meant to write immigration. Maybe that's it.



You were explaining that the proposed border policy was, in fact a product of white supremacy but questioning why that was such a big deal because, you know, other theoretical examples may exist elsewhere to the same effect


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7870
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Santa wrote:
I can't work out which is worse: the white supremacist plot to control US immigration or the sino supremacist plot to control Chinese borders or the hispanic supremacist plot to control Mexican borders or the white supremacist plot to control New Zealand's borders or the Aboriginal supremacist plot to control Australian borders.

Almost certainly the white ones.

The various bantu supremacist plots to control various African borders are morally good.

I don’t know why you can’t work it out. You’re an intelligent guy and it’s an easy problem.

Lots of people rape. Doesn’t make it okay, specially when you’re essentially the self professed role model for the world.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1752, 1753, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758 ... 2004  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 749a, assfly, Cullen, Dimebag, DOB, eugenefraxby, Google Adsense [Bot], happyhooker, Hong Kong, Jensrsa, Laurent, Macrosan, Sonny Blount, UncleFB, Wendigo7, WoodlandsRFC, Yourmother and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group