Chat Forum
It is currently Mon Jun 25, 2018 6:32 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77071 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 1927  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 7:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6754
Jesus freak and former Pennsylvania Senator and grandson of a coal miner, Rick Santorum, in his 2014 book "Blue Collar Conservatives", questionably asserted that Romney would have won the White House had so many conservative blue-collar workers not stayed at home.

Well, Trump read Santorum’s book and then met up with Santorum in New York, a meeting which Santorum subsequently described to Fred Barnes at The Weekly Standard.

“Trump,” Santorum said, “liked the idea of being concerned about working men and women who have lost the opportunity to have the good-paying jobs they used to have.”

Yes, Trump “liked the IDEA of being concerned” and then he just had to sell it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 7:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6754
This election campaign will be the most fascinating of my lifetime.

Trump will say whatever he wants; he is as unburdened by any sense of shame as he is by ideology. He knows social media will amplify his words and the press will clamour to hear him, not question him ("I know words, I have the best words"). Moreover, he has every dog-whistle in his pocket and and he is ready to blow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 8:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11828
Location: Indiana
Brian9848 wrote:
This election campaign will be the most fascinating of my lifetime.

Trump will say whatever he wants; he is as unburdened by any sense of shame as he is by ideology. He knows social media will amplify his words and the press will clamour to hear him, not question him ("I know words, I have the best words"). Moreover, he has every dog-whistle in his pocket and and he is ready to blow.


Don't like the man, don't want him to be president, and I think he'll lose anyway, but I agree. He is the perfect candidate for the modern-day internet-driven and mass media-driven news culture.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6754
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15226
Location: South Oxfordshire
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


And those were the nice things they said about Donald


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 9271
Saint wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


And those were the nice things they said about Donald



http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1438986153 ... ampaign-ad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 8:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10714
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532



:lol:

Don's the man

edit at least he hasn't reacted like an excited school girl / boy when someone's been killed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15226
Location: South Oxfordshire
zt1903 wrote:
Saint wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


And those were the nice things they said about Donald



http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1438986153 ... ampaign-ad


It's a viewpoint. Personally I think the ad is at least mildly amusing, and does what it was intended to do - remind the anti Trump brigade exactly why they were anti Trump.

At the end of the day, nothing really starts till after the conventions


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10714
zt1903 wrote:
Saint wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


And those were the nice things they said about Donald



http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1438986153 ... ampaign-ad



Agree with this. This slavos will help Trump. Trump is anti the establishment who have sold American's out. Clinton and these sore losers are all a part of the same bought group


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 9271
Saint wrote:
zt1903 wrote:
Saint wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


And those were the nice things they said about Donald



http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1438986153 ... ampaign-ad


It's a viewpoint. Personally I think the ad is at least mildly amusing, and does what it was intended to do - remind the anti Trump brigade exactly why they were anti Trump.

At the end of the day, nothing really starts till after the conventions


Indeed. It is an amusing ad, but Adams point about its impact makes sense.

Scott Adams has been one of the most accurate people in explaining/getting Trump. He predicted him winning back in August. His blogs on the subject are worth a read and are genuinely more insightful than the regular diet of tripe we're getting c&p'd by political hacks from the mainstream media and Salon, the Atlantic, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15226
Location: South Oxfordshire
zt1903 wrote:
Saint wrote:
zt1903 wrote:
Saint wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


And those were the nice things they said about Donald



http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1438986153 ... ampaign-ad


It's a viewpoint. Personally I think the ad is at least mildly amusing, and does what it was intended to do - remind the anti Trump brigade exactly why they were anti Trump.

At the end of the day, nothing really starts till after the conventions


Indeed. It is an amusing ad, but Adams point about its impact makes sense.

Scott Adams has been one of the most accurate people in explaining/getting Trump. He predicted him winning back in August. His blogs on the subject are worth a read and are genuinely more insightful than the regular diet of tripe we're getting c&p'd by political hacks from the mainstream media and Salon, the Atlantic, etc.


or Silver for that matter.

I get why Trump won the GOP primaries. I don't like it, I'm very disturbed by the implications, but I get it. I don't get how that translates into winning the main competition, even against Clinton, without the rest of the USA undergoing a bout of mass amnesia.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10714
Saint wrote:

or Silver for that matter.

I get why Trump won the GOP primaries. I don't like it, I'm very disturbed by the implications, but I get it. I don't get how that translates into winning the main competition, even against Clinton, without the rest of the USA undergoing a bout of mass amnesia.


But surely you can see why Hillary is scarier? So Trump might (he might not) stand up for the 99%. He will be watched closely which is no bad thing and will have nothing to hide behind (he's white and male). Hillary will only represent the 1%. And she seems to love killing and war. She is controlled and dangerous. Obama was controlled and a fake but wasn't too mad / bad. Hillary is mad.


Last edited by Silver on Thu May 05, 2016 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15226
Location: South Oxfordshire
Silver wrote:
Saint wrote:

or Silver for that matter.

I get why Trump won the GOP primaries. I don't like it, I'm very disturbed by the implications, but I get it. I don't get how that translates into winning the main competition, even against Clinton, without the rest of the USA undergoing a bout of mass amnesia.


But surely you can see why Hillary is scarier? So Trump might (he might not) stand up for the 99%. He will be watched closely which is no bad thing and will have nothing to hide behind (he's white and male). Hillary will only represent the 1%. And she seems to love killing and war. She is controlled and dangerous. Obama was controlled and a fake but wasn't too mad. Hillary is mad.


I forgot I hadn't put you on ignore yet


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7516
Location: NZ, but England fan.
Brian9848 wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Welcome back Brian.


Kudos.. you reactionary, pompous, gin swilling fart. You called his GOP nomination way back when nobody else did. Nobody.

Uhum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 9:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 3046
Location: This vale of tears.
Saint wrote:

I get why Trump won the GOP primaries. I don't like it, I'm very disturbed by the implications, but I get it. I don't get how that translates into winning the main competition, even against Clinton, without the rest of the USA undergoing a bout of mass amnesia.


Trump's candidacy says a great about the mess the Republican party has got itself into since the rise of the 'tea party' faction.

Don's gonna show that you can either:

1. Be extreme enough to win the GOP nomination

or

2. Be moderate enough to appeal to enough of the mass electorate to win the Presidency.

But you can't be both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:07 pm
Posts: 2609
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


:lol: That clip of Jeb saying he needs therapy at the end made me really laugh out loud. It's so funny, it's just like a tv show.

Can you imagine this guy could end up representing America

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 10:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 10:49 am
Posts: 1352
Location: Sunny Plymouth
For those of you who think Trump is unpopular and the Corporate Shrill will walk into the Whitehouse.

Here is what Obama's former campaign manager thinks of that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHLp-P5cayw

As for the bitchqueen. well....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypl1MYuKDY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 10:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 5:46 am
Posts: 12162
TokenSarriesFan wrote:
Here is what Obama's former campaign manager thinks of that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHLp-P5cayw


Van is a regular CNN panelist - very insightful guy (in a way that most of their aloof beltway insider voices are not - eg Peter Beinart) but often gets too emotional. His analysis here is good, especially re: the Rust Belt. Sanders did well in this region of the country with a similar trade message to Trump's and NAFTA and the Clintons are widely disliked. Dennis Kucinich enjoyed wide popularity in Ohio throughout the Clinton years with a similar anti-NAFTA message.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2016 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 9973
Seems to me too many pundits are assuming that Clinton will walk this easily. Gut feeling says it will be very close. Even a Trump win could happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7020
flaggETERNAL wrote:
Seems to me too many pundits are assuming that Clinton will walk this easily. Gut feeling says it will be very close. Even a Trump win could happen.

The point with Trump is that he was/is the only candidate that is left field enough that he can over come this current divide in the republican party:
Quote:
Don's gonna show that you can either:

1. Be extreme enough to win the GOP nomination
or
2. Be moderate enough to appeal to enough of the mass electorate to win the Presidency.

But you can't be both.

which essentially destroyed Romney's chances, and be different enough to break some existing voting patterns.

Cruz was never going to win a general election, a person who would unit left and center against him. Neither was Jeb, that family name vs Clinton's = not a snowball's chance in hell.

If Trump can do enough between now and November to get the party officially endorsing him, and I think he's smart enough to cut it, and then find something to sweeten the pot for the mass electorate, he'll be a force.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4982
Kiwias wrote:
Just imagine if Bernie chose Elizabeth Warren as his VP and announced it now


Nah. Warren should have come out and endorsed The Bern long ago but chose to keep her arse on the fence.
Tulsi Gabbard on the other hand left her job as vice chair at the DNC so she could endorse him.
Young (35), female, military background, bit of colour in her cheeks and fit. That's the dream ticket right there.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 1:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11164
Anyone have a link or can give a quick low-down on the policy differences between Trump and establishment Republicans? I can only think of Trump's opposition to free trade agreements like NAFTA and the TPPA. It seems like Paul Ryan represents a body of opinion within the GOP that think Trump is a Bernie democrat in disguise. :o


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 42835
Flyin Ryan wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
This election campaign will be the most fascinating of my lifetime.

Trump will say whatever he wants; he is as unburdened by any sense of shame as he is by ideology. He knows social media will amplify his words and the press will clamour to hear him, not question him ("I know words, I have the best words"). Moreover, he has every dog-whistle in his pocket and and he is ready to blow.


Don't like the man, don't want him to be president, and I think he'll lose anyway, but I agree. He is the perfect candidate for the modern-day internet-driven and mass media-driven news culture.


This explains it quite well
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 1:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 18637
Location: Adelaide via Sydney and Patea
The attack ads have started...

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 1:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:53 pm
Posts: 31935
Location: Perth
It's a little bit sad watching Silver keep throwing out his usual pitiful offerings. No one responds. No one bites. He was once an interesting troll who was one of the best in sidetracking a thread. But now...

It's time has perhaps come and gone. Adam Sandler, Mr Bean, Rita the Eat Eater.... Silver.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 1:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:43 am
Posts: 3638
MorseCode wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


:lol: That clip of Jeb saying he needs therapy at the end made me really laugh out loud. It's so funny, it's just like a tv show.

Can you imagine this guy could end up representing America

Image


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 2:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11828
Location: Indiana
Kiwias wrote:
Flyin Ryan wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
This election campaign will be the most fascinating of my lifetime.

Trump will say whatever he wants; he is as unburdened by any sense of shame as he is by ideology. He knows social media will amplify his words and the press will clamour to hear him, not question him ("I know words, I have the best words"). Moreover, he has every dog-whistle in his pocket and and he is ready to blow.


Don't like the man, don't want him to be president, and I think he'll lose anyway, but I agree. He is the perfect candidate for the modern-day internet-driven and mass media-driven news culture.


This explains it quite well
Image


Look at this message board. Stupidity's a virtue amongst people that are keyboard warriors that hide behind anonymity and refuse to acknowledge alternate points of view when challenged on their beliefs. You display stubbornness and stupidity for instance when it comes to Japanese Rugby.

The nicheification of modern society has been incredibly negative for politics of all areas and stripes. That's how the world works now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 2:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 42835
Flyin Ryan wrote:
Kiwias wrote:
Flyin Ryan wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
This election campaign will be the most fascinating of my lifetime.

Trump will say whatever he wants; he is as unburdened by any sense of shame as he is by ideology. He knows social media will amplify his words and the press will clamour to hear him, not question him ("I know words, I have the best words"). Moreover, he has every dog-whistle in his pocket and and he is ready to blow.


Don't like the man, don't want him to be president, and I think he'll lose anyway, but I agree. He is the perfect candidate for the modern-day internet-driven and mass media-driven news culture.


This explains it quite well
Image


Look at this message board. Stupidity's a virtue amongst people that are keyboard warriors that hide behind anonymity and refuse to acknowledge alternate points of view when challenged on their beliefs. You display stubbornness and stupidity for instance when it comes to Japanese Rugby.

The nicheification of modern society has been incredibly negative for politics of all areas and stripes. That's how the world works now.


Stubbornness, yes, but not stupidity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 2:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11828
Location: Indiana
And then you have the complete depowerment of the media who have fallen so far. To go outside the election for the moment, the BBC - supposedly one of the gold standards when it comes to independent search for truth journalism - made complete fools of themselves this week taking hook, line, and sinker the words of Craig Wright that he was Bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto from a misleading proof...and two days later he withdrew from public life because he couldn't deal with people's criticism of him or that his "proofs" weren't really proofs. :roll:

When you have a weak media, they can't hold people to account. Nicheification has ruined them financially. So either they go out of business or they chase ratings. Trump drove ratings and web clicks. And the outlets that have propped up and created these separate niches are too small and divided for most people to listen to them, as well as lacking the credentials that everyone respects what they say is true automatically.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 3:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 42835
Flyin Ryan wrote:
And then you have the complete depowerment of the media who have fallen so far. To go outside the election for the moment, the BBC - supposedly one of the gold standards when it comes to independent search for truth journalism - made complete fools of themselves this week taking hook, line, and sinker the words of Craig Wright that he was Bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto from a misleading proof...and two days later he withdrew from public life because he couldn't deal with people's criticism of him or that his "proofs" weren't really proofs. :roll:

When you have a weak media, they can't hold people to account. Nicheification has ruined them financially. So either they go out of business or they chase ratings. Trump drove ratings and web clicks. And the outlets that have propped up and created these separate niches are too small and divided for most people to listen to them, as well as lacking the credentials that everyone respects what they say is true automatically.


The same is happening here in Japan, with the media controlled by the government and authorities to a disturbing degree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 3:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:05 pm
Posts: 9532
flaggETERNAL wrote:
Seems to me too many pundits are assuming that Clinton will walk this easily. Gut feeling says it will be very close. Even a Trump win could happen.

I liken it to an unheralded boxer (Trump) who has beaten a lot of solid and underrated opposition (GOP candidates) on his way up to a title shot but doesn't get any credit for beating them because they weren't big names. Supporters of the champion (Clinton) think it will be an easy win because they don't rate Trump's prior opposition and blindly believe their guy (or gal) is so superior in every way that she cannot possibly lose.

As someone who has supported almost every one of the other GOP candidates against Trump, I think the Clinton supporters are going to be in for a shock as to just how tough this fight is going to be. When you look where Trump has come from (he was viewed as a joke candidacy) to where he is today in the race....this is not a individual that is to be underestimated.

The Dem CNN analyst Van Jones, who has watched every one of Trump's previous fights closely, gets it. It's like he said in the video "haw haw, the Trump train is not going to get any bigger, it's not going to hit us.......splat". That's the danger.


Last edited by Rugby2023 on Fri May 06, 2016 3:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 3:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4808
:thumbup:

Im nailing my colours to the mast: I reckon he'll destroy her. He's such a different opponent to anything she normally has to fight that she'll make mistakes and play into his hands.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 4:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:53 pm
Posts: 31935
Location: Perth
I just don't understand how Clinton is regarded as a 'heavyweight'. Who has she beaten? Ever? With all of the political machinations and support behind her, she is struggling to overcome an old bloke who calls himself a socialist who never acomplished much in the game. Bernie Sanders shouldn't have gone close to a serious contender. He wouldn't have gotten a single delegate against the likes of Obama or Bill Clinton. Hillary made him look like a big deal though...

When it all boils down to it, Hillary Clinton's only great asset is being Bill Clinton's wife. All of her power comes from that. She got to where she is by calling in favours. That's really all she has. The ultimate political insider trading off her accomplished husband's name and powerbase. And favours don't mean much anymore. Fortunately for her, the GOP's division and the rise of the crazies means that actual political operators are sidelined. Hillary won't have to contend with a Romney, McCain or Ryan. She is going to up against a reality tv star who got the nomination by whipping some Tea Party loons.

This is truly a cripple fight.

I find it laughable that people regard either of them with much respect.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 4:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 42835
towny wrote:
I just don't understand how Clinton is regarded as a 'heavyweight'. Who has she beaten? Ever? With all of the political machinations and support behind her, she is struggling to overcome an old bloke who calls himself a socialist who never acomplished much in the game. Bernie Sanders shouldn't have gone close to a serious contender. He wouldn't have gotten a single delegate against the likes of Obama or Bill Clinton. Hillary made him look like a big deal though...

When it all boils down to it, Hillary Clinton's only great asset is being Bill Clinton's wife. All of her power comes from that. She got to where she is by calling in favours. That's really all she has. The ultimate political insider trading off her accomplished husband's name and powerbase. And favours don't mean much anymore. Fortunately for her, the GOP's division and the rise of the crazies means that actual political operators are sidelined. Hillary won't have to contend with a Romney, McCain or Ryan. She is going to up against a reality tv star who got the nomination by whipping some Tea Party loons.

This is truly a cripple fight.

I find it laughable that people regard either of them with much respect.


I watched the clip of her, when asked about the likelihood of strong attacks from Trump, basically saying "Bring it on. I've been the target of attacks for 25 years now"

The problem is that Trump does not operate the same way as all the politicians to have attacked her over that time. She has never had to deal with anything like him.

It will be very nasty and incredibly entertaining


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 4:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 18637
Location: Adelaide via Sydney and Patea
Lacrobat wrote:
MorseCode wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


:lol: That clip of Jeb saying he needs therapy at the end made me really laugh out loud. It's so funny, it's just like a tv show.

Can you imagine this guy could end up representing America

Image


Image


Drumpf still crushing on Marla...
http://www.avclub.com/article/sharp-eye ... top-236337


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 4:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 14483
Location: Melbourne
zt1903 wrote:
Saint wrote:
zt1903 wrote:
Saint wrote:
Brian9848 wrote:
First salvos being fired by Clinton...

https://amp.twimg.com/v/85d61190-d754-4 ... b58ec11532


And those were the nice things they said about Donald



http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1438986153 ... ampaign-ad


It's a viewpoint. Personally I think the ad is at least mildly amusing, and does what it was intended to do - remind the anti Trump brigade exactly why they were anti Trump.

At the end of the day, nothing really starts till after the conventions


Indeed. It is an amusing ad, but Adams point about its impact makes sense.

Scott Adams has been one of the most accurate people in explaining/getting Trump. He predicted him winning back in August. His blogs on the subject are worth a read and are genuinely more insightful than the regular diet of tripe we're getting c&p'd by political hacks from the mainstream media and Salon, the Atlantic, etc.


Though he makes some very valid points, Adams is being disingenuous when he claims to have no skin in the game. The man is a red-blooded Republican and, at the very least, is sporting an impressive semi-erection for the Don.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 6:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4982
towny wrote:
I just don't understand how Clinton is regarded as a 'heavyweight'. Who has she beaten? Ever? With all of the political machinations and support behind her, she is struggling to overcome an old bloke who calls himself a socialist who never acomplished much in the game. Bernie Sanders shouldn't have gone close to a serious contender. He wouldn't have gotten a single delegate against the likes of Obama or Bill Clinton. Hillary made him look like a big deal though...

When it all boils down to it, Hillary Clinton's only great asset is being Bill Clinton's wife. All of her power comes from that. She got to where she is by calling in favours. That's really all she has. The ultimate political insider trading off her accomplished husband's name and powerbase. And favours don't mean much anymore. Fortunately for her, the GOP's division and the rise of the crazies means that actual political operators are sidelined. Hillary won't have to contend with a Romney, McCain or Ryan. She is going to up against a reality tv star who got the nomination by whipping some Tea Party loons.

This is truly a cripple fight.

I find it laughable that people regard either of them with much respect.


I think it's presumptive to assume she will be the nominee.

Her aides are currently giving evidence to the FBI over the email thing.
Another investigation into possible corruption while she was Secretary of State is ongoing.
That hacker fella claims he was all over her server.

The republicans want her to win the nomination because there is a cornucopia of sleaze to dive into if she does. Trump will beat her and it will be fun.

The Dems deserve all they get for running with the most rancid candidate in the stable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 6:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11164
Ewinkum wrote:
towny wrote:
I just don't understand how Clinton is regarded as a 'heavyweight'. Who has she beaten? Ever? With all of the political machinations and support behind her, she is struggling to overcome an old bloke who calls himself a socialist who never acomplished much in the game. Bernie Sanders shouldn't have gone close to a serious contender. He wouldn't have gotten a single delegate against the likes of Obama or Bill Clinton. Hillary made him look like a big deal though...

When it all boils down to it, Hillary Clinton's only great asset is being Bill Clinton's wife. All of her power comes from that. She got to where she is by calling in favours. That's really all she has. The ultimate political insider trading off her accomplished husband's name and powerbase. And favours don't mean much anymore. Fortunately for her, the GOP's division and the rise of the crazies means that actual political operators are sidelined. Hillary won't have to contend with a Romney, McCain or Ryan. She is going to up against a reality tv star who got the nomination by whipping some Tea Party loons.

This is truly a cripple fight.

I find it laughable that people regard either of them with much respect.


I think it's presumptive to assume she will be the nominee.

Her aides are currently giving evidence to the FBI over the email thing.
Another investigation into possible corruption while she was Secretary of State is ongoing.
That hacker fella claims he was all over her server.

The republicans want her to win the nomination because there is a cornucopia of sleaze to dive into if she does. Trump will beat her and it will be fun.

The Dems deserve all they get for running with the most rancid candidate in the stable.


All well and good but Trump ain't winning squat unless he can win the demographics that matter in presidential elections - Hispanics; Women; and Blacks. In short, the Obama Coalition. The republicans have won the white male vote hands down in the past 2 failed presidential elections.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 14483
Location: Melbourne
Ewinkum wrote:
towny wrote:
I just don't understand how Clinton is regarded as a 'heavyweight'. Who has she beaten? Ever? With all of the political machinations and support behind her, she is struggling to overcome an old bloke who calls himself a socialist who never acomplished much in the game. Bernie Sanders shouldn't have gone close to a serious contender. He wouldn't have gotten a single delegate against the likes of Obama or Bill Clinton. Hillary made him look like a big deal though...

When it all boils down to it, Hillary Clinton's only great asset is being Bill Clinton's wife. All of her power comes from that. She got to where she is by calling in favours. That's really all she has. The ultimate political insider trading off her accomplished husband's name and powerbase. And favours don't mean much anymore. Fortunately for her, the GOP's division and the rise of the crazies means that actual political operators are sidelined. Hillary won't have to contend with a Romney, McCain or Ryan. She is going to up against a reality tv star who got the nomination by whipping some Tea Party loons.

This is truly a cripple fight.

I find it laughable that people regard either of them with much respect.


I think it's presumptive to assume she will be the nominee.

Her aides are currently giving evidence to the FBI over the email thing.
Another investigation into possible corruption while she was Secretary of State is ongoing.
That hacker fella claims he was all over her server.

The republicans want her to win the nomination because there is a cornucopia of sleaze to dive into if she does. Trump will beat her and it will be fun.

The Dems deserve all they get for running with the most rancid candidate in the stable.


Fuck that is rich. Trump is as toxic as it gets.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2016 7:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4808
Kiwias wrote:
towny wrote:
I just don't understand how Clinton is regarded as a 'heavyweight'. Who has she beaten? Ever? With all of the political machinations and support behind her, she is struggling to overcome an old bloke who calls himself a socialist who never acomplished much in the game. Bernie Sanders shouldn't have gone close to a serious contender. He wouldn't have gotten a single delegate against the likes of Obama or Bill Clinton. Hillary made him look like a big deal though...

When it all boils down to it, Hillary Clinton's only great asset is being Bill Clinton's wife. All of her power comes from that. She got to where she is by calling in favours. That's really all she has. The ultimate political insider trading off her accomplished husband's name and powerbase. And favours don't mean much anymore. Fortunately for her, the GOP's division and the rise of the crazies means that actual political operators are sidelined. Hillary won't have to contend with a Romney, McCain or Ryan. She is going to up against a reality tv star who got the nomination by whipping some Tea Party loons.

This is truly a cripple fight.

I find it laughable that people regard either of them with much respect.


I watched the clip of her, when asked about the likelihood of strong attacks from Trump, basically saying "Bring it on. I've been the target of attacks for 25 years now"

The problem is that Trump does not operate the same way as all the politicians to have attacked her over that time. She has never had to deal with anything like him.

It will be very nasty and incredibly entertaining




:nod: :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77071 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 1927  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: anonymous_joe, Balls Out!, Bing [Bot], booji boy, Cartman, ChipSpike, crash 669, danthefan, Google Adsense [Bot], Jeff the Bear, Lorthern Nights, Old Man by the Sea, Plastic Sarrie, Plato'sCave, redhouse, Snooze, Spyglass, Yourmother, ZappaMan and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group