Planet Rugby Forum

Wilson's Toffee wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

Marlboro wrote:
Do you really think he just loses it and starts tweeting whatever comes into his head at any given moment?

Sad!

Sometimes.

I think Trvmp's twitter feed falls into three categories and comprises approximately:

75% - a reasonable means of communicating his message directly with his base
20% - messages deliberately calculated to provoke a reaction
5% - impulsive stuff where someone's got under his skin and he just can't help himself

He is sidestepping MSM (and entrenched power) in a great way, reducing their influence on voters, demonstrating a new way of communication without opinion forming journos.

Splendid.

penguin wrote:

Wilson's Toffee wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

Marlboro wrote:
Do you really think he just loses it and starts tweeting whatever comes into his head at any given moment?

Sad!

Sometimes.

I think Trvmp's twitter feed falls into three categories and comprises approximately:

75% - a reasonable means of communicating his message directly with his base
20% - messages deliberately calculated to provoke a reaction
5% - impulsive stuff where someone's got under his skin and he just can't help himself

He is sidestepping MSM (and entrenched power) in a great way, reducing their influence on voters, demonstrating a new way of communication without opinion forming journos.

Splendid.

The problem with this rejection of expertise, science, experience and mainstream information sources is that the alternative is not the 'truth the powers that be don't want you to know', it is Alex Jones, FOX news and wingnuts on youtube. When bubblefart sidesteps/ignores data/evidence/reality he is not telling it like he is, he is misinforming millions, and giving power to conspiracy theorists. He is regurgitating crap from fools and telling you it is gold plated truth. It's propaganda without wit or effort.

zt1903 wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

Floppykid wrote:While I think Kid Rock's potential run is ridiculous, that article reads like it was written by Lena Dunham.

Agree with the second half of the sentence.

Spoiler: show

FWIW it's from Buzzfeed and was written by this lady.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/janecoaston/it ... .aleMPM8ro

As for Kid Rock's senate run, why is it ridiculous? Surely the substance of his campaign (if he actually runs) and subsequent tenure (if he wins) is what decides whether it is ridiculous or not. It's surely not ridiculous just because he's a musician?

Well, you're right when you say it's not ridiculous just because he's a "musician". (Note to T-Rump - that's how you add extra quotation marks).

So why is it ridiculous then? Genuinely interested.

The Turn to “Effective, but we don’t like it.”
Posted July 30th, 2017 @ 10:39am in #POTUS #generalkelly #healthcare #Trump

Prior to President Trump’s inauguration, I predicted a coming story arc in three acts. Act one involved mass protests in the streets because Hillary Clinton’s campaign had successfully branded Trump as the next Hitler. Sure enough, we saw mass protests by anti-Trumpers who legitimately and honestly believed the country had just elected the next Hitler. I predicted that the Hitler phase would evaporate by summer for lack of supporting evidence. That happened.

I also predicted the anti-Trumpers would modify their attack from “Hitler” to “incompetent,” and that phase would last the summer. That happened too. The president’s critics called him incompetent and said the White House was in “chaos.” There were plenty of leaks, fake news, and even true stories to support that narrative, as I expected. Every anti-Trump news outlet, and even some that supported him started using “chaos” to describe the situation.

Now comes the fun part.

I predicted that the end of this three-part story would involve President Trump’s critics complaining that indeed he was “effective, but we don’t like it.” Or words to that effect. I based that prediction on the assumption he would get some big wins by the end of the year and it would no longer make sense to question his effectiveness, only his policy choices.

How does the anti-Trump media gracefully pivot from “chaos and incompetence” to a story of “effective, but we don’t like it”? They need an external event to justify the turn. They need a visible sign of the White House moving from rookie status to professional status.

They need General John Kelly to replace Reince Priebus as Chief of Staff.

Done.

Watch in awe as the anti-Trump coverage grudgingly admits things are starting to look more professional and “disciplined” at the White House. And as the president’s accomplishments start to mount up, you will see his critics’ grudging acceptance of his effectiveness, but not his policy choices. We’re entering that phase now with the help of a new Chief of Staff that even the mainstream media can’t hate. Generals command respect from both sides of the government because they have fought for both sides. No one forgets that.

Expect to see lots of stories about General Kelly bringing efficiency and effectiveness to the White House. Reporters and pundits don’t want to criticize a four-star general who fought for them. At best, expect the anti-Trumpers to say the Chief of Staff is calling the shots, not the President. That’s the predictable fake news attack. But I don’t think it will stick through the end of the year.

By year-end, expect “Effective, but we don’t like it.”

Now for some related fun. I have often said Trump supporters and anti-Trumpers are in the same movie theater but watching different movies on the same screen. You’ve seen lots of evidence of that, but I’m going to give you an experiment you can try at home. It might blow your mind.

1. Identify your most lefty, Trump-hating friend or family member.

2. Share this Link of President Trump’s accomplishments while you are in the same room so you can watch them read it.

3. Watch as your lefty friend turns “cognitively blind” to the list of accomplishments as if it is not really there. Your subject will KNOW President has accomplished nothing, and all of his or her friends know it, and the television channels they watch know it. So how-the-hell could there be in existence an extensive list of legitimate accomplishments that make perfect sense and can easily be verified?

The only way that list of accomplishments can exist in your anti-Trumper’s world is if the anti-Trumper has been in a hallucination for months, duped by the media and everyone they love. The existence of the list of accomplishments will form a crack in their reality. It simply can’t exist. That’s the trigger for cognitive blindness. The list will simply be “invisible,” but not in the literal sense, only the mental sense. If you check back in two days, your anti-Trumper will claim once again no such list exists. Watch their eyes when they say it. It will be freaky.

Some anti-Trumpers will pick any one or two items from the list, argue that they are not good for the country, and use it as an excuse to see the rest of the list as nonsense. Some will simply tell you Trump has shepherded no “major legislation” through Congress, which is true. It is also true that he intentionally waited for Congress (and Obamacare) to fail hard before he got serious. The harder they fail, and the more dire the situation, the more power the president will have to push creative solutions on a weakened Congress. Keep in mind that President Trump is a predator when it comes to deal-making. He would have been an idiot to enter the fight hard and early when Congress was at full credibility and strength. That gets you nothing but a committee-made crap-law that may or may not have your name on it. By waiting, he accumulates leverage and widens his options. That’s how I would have played it. I would wait for the lobbyists, Congress, and my critics to punch themselves out before I involved the public and put together a plan to shove down Congress’ useless throats with the help of social media.

I think the President would have been modestly happy with some kind of “skinny” win on healthcare. It would have been good for momentum. But he’ll be much happier with a real health care solution that takes advantage of innovation. (Our constipated Congress ignored innovative solutions, as far as I can tell.)

Frankly, I don’t know how much the world really needs tax reform or infrastructure spending. The stock market doesn’t seem to move on the news of either thing becoming more or less likely as we go. My prediction is that President Trump’s reelection chances (should he run again) will depend mostly on what happens with health care. If President Trump gets that right, on top of the things already going well, Mt. Rushmore could get crowded.

zt1903 wrote:

penguin wrote:

Wilson's Toffee wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

Marlboro wrote:
Do you really think he just loses it and starts tweeting whatever comes into his head at any given moment?

Sad!

Sometimes.

I think Trvmp's twitter feed falls into three categories and comprises approximately:

75% - a reasonable means of communicating his message directly with his base
20% - messages deliberately calculated to provoke a reaction
5% - impulsive stuff where someone's got under his skin and he just can't help himself

He is sidestepping MSM (and entrenched power) in a great way, reducing their influence on voters, demonstrating a new way of communication without opinion forming journos.

Splendid.

The problem with this rejection of expertise, science, experience and mainstream information sources is that the alternative is not the 'truth the powers that be don't want you to know', it is Alex Jones, FOX news and wingnuts on youtube. When bubblefart sidesteps/ignores data/evidence/reality he is not telling it like he is, he is misinforming millions, and giving power to conspiracy theorists. He is regurgitating crap from fools and telling you it is gold plated truth. It's propaganda without wit or effort.

Trvmp's job is to get his message out as he sees fit, as has every President before him. He chooses Twitter as one of his key media and there's nothing inherently wrong with that. Others before him have chosen slick and professional spin and sophistry.

The media's job is to hold him, or any other holder of the Office, to account. They're not currently doing a very good job of it.

Turbogoat wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

Floppykid wrote:While I think Kid Rock's potential run is ridiculous, that article reads like it was written by Lena Dunham.

Agree with the second half of the sentence.

Spoiler: show

FWIW it's from Buzzfeed and was written by this lady.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/janecoaston/it ... .aleMPM8ro

As for Kid Rock's senate run, why is it ridiculous? Surely the substance of his campaign (if he actually runs) and subsequent tenure (if he wins) is what decides whether it is ridiculous or not. It's surely not ridiculous just because he's a musician?

Well, you're right when you say it's not ridiculous just because he's a "musician". (Note to T-Rump - that's how you add extra quotation marks).

So why is it ridiculous then? Genuinely interested.

Shall we start with being arrested for starting a fight in a Waffle House?

Starting fights at the VMAs?

Marrying Pamela Anderson?

Accusing her of faking her miscarriage?

Pick one.

zt1903 wrote:I've talked about Scott Adam's blog in the past, mainly because he has an interesting and different take on things that seems to have been a reasonable predictor in relation to Trvmp. I saw this one this morning.

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/1636008841 ... nt-like-it

The Turn to “Effective, but we don’t like it.”
Posted July 30th, 2017 @ 10:39am in #POTUS #generalkelly #healthcare #bubblefart

Prior to President bubblefart’s inauguration, I predicted a coming story arc in three acts. Act one involved mass protests in the streets because Hillary Clinton’s campaign had successfully branded bubblefart as the next Hitler. Sure enough, we saw mass protests by anti-Trumpers who legitimately and honestly believed the country had just elected the next Hitler. I predicted that the Hitler phase would evaporate by summer for lack of supporting evidence. That happened.

I also predicted the anti-Trumpers would modify their attack from “Hitler” to “incompetent,” and that phase would last the summer. That happened too. The president’s critics called him incompetent and said the White House was in “chaos.” There were plenty of leaks, fake news, and even true stories to support that narrative, as I expected. Every anti-Trump news outlet, and even some that supported him started using “chaos” to describe the situation.

Now comes the fun part.

I predicted that the end of this three-part story would involve President bubblefart’s critics complaining that indeed he was “effective, but we don’t like it.” Or words to that effect. I based that prediction on the assumption he would get some big wins by the end of the year and it would no longer make sense to question his effectiveness, only his policy choices.

How does the anti-Trump media gracefully pivot from “chaos and incompetence” to a story of “effective, but we don’t like it”? They need an external event to justify the turn. They need a visible sign of the White House moving from rookie status to professional status.

They need General John Kelly to replace Reince Priebus as Chief of Staff.

Done.

Watch in awe as the anti-Trump coverage grudgingly admits things are starting to look more professional and “disciplined” at the White House. And as the president’s accomplishments start to mount up, you will see his critics’ grudging acceptance of his effectiveness, but not his policy choices. We’re entering that phase now with the help of a new Chief of Staff that even the mainstream media can’t hate. Generals command respect from both sides of the government because they have fought for both sides. No one forgets that.

Expect to see lots of stories about General Kelly bringing efficiency and effectiveness to the White House. Reporters and pundits don’t want to criticize a four-star general who fought for them. At best, expect the anti-Trumpers to say the Chief of Staff is calling the shots, not the President. That’s the predictable fake news attack. But I don’t think it will stick through the end of the year.

By year-end, expect “Effective, but we don’t like it.”

Now for some related fun. I have often said bubblefart supporters and anti-Trumpers are in the same movie theater but watching different movies on the same screen. You’ve seen lots of evidence of that, but I’m going to give you an experiment you can try at home. It might blow your mind.

1. Identify your most lefty, Trump-hating friend or family member.

2. Share this Link of President bubblefart’s accomplishments while you are in the same room so you can watch them read it.

3. Watch as your lefty friend turns “cognitively blind” to the list of accomplishments as if it is not really there. Your subject will KNOW President has accomplished nothing, and all of his or her friends know it, and the television channels they watch know it. So how-the-hell could there be in existence an extensive list of legitimate accomplishments that make perfect sense and can easily be verified?

The only way that list of accomplishments can exist in your anti-Trumper’s world is if the anti-Trumper has been in a hallucination for months, duped by the media and everyone they love. The existence of the list of accomplishments will form a crack in their reality. It simply can’t exist. That’s the trigger for cognitive blindness. The list will simply be “invisible,” but not in the literal sense, only the mental sense. If you check back in two days, your anti-Trumper will claim once again no such list exists. Watch their eyes when they say it. It will be freaky.

Some anti-Trumpers will pick any one or two items from the list, argue that they are not good for the country, and use it as an excuse to see the rest of the list as nonsense. Some will simply tell you bubblefart has shepherded no “major legislation” through Congress, which is true. It is also true that he intentionally waited for Congress (and Obamacare) to fail hard before he got serious. The harder they fail, and the more dire the situation, the more power the president will have to push creative solutions on a weakened Congress. Keep in mind that President bubblefart is a predator when it comes to deal-making. He would have been an idiot to enter the fight hard and early when Congress was at full credibility and strength. That gets you nothing but a committee-made crap-law that may or may not have your name on it. By waiting, he accumulates leverage and widens his options. That’s how I would have played it. I would wait for the lobbyists, Congress, and my critics to punch themselves out before I involved the public and put together a plan to shove down Congress’ useless throats with the help of social media.

I think the President would have been modestly happy with some kind of “skinny” win on healthcare. It would have been good for momentum. But he’ll be much happier with a real health care solution that takes advantage of innovation. (Our constipated Congress ignored innovative solutions, as far as I can tell.)

Frankly, I don’t know how much the world really needs tax reform or infrastructure spending. The stock market doesn’t seem to move on the news of either thing becoming more or less likely as we go. My prediction is that President bubblefart’s reelection chances (should he run again) will depend mostly on what happens with health care. If President bubblefart gets that right, on top of the things already going well, Mt. Rushmore could get crowded.

Turbogoat wrote:OK, so we know he's an asshole.

But you want to judge him on his campaign, which he doesn't have yet.

We have no idea what his policies are, and it's likely he doesn't either.

Yup, that's how T-rump was elected, playing up his celebrity, providing no coherent detailed policy in his campaign, just selling himself as as an outsider with no experience. Kid Rock is just the next step in this political devolution.

But yeah, just because we know he's a asshole with zero policies or ability is no reason to think his Senate run would in any way be ridiculous.

More celeb politicians, that's what this World is crying out for. The backlash from T-rump may well make it a lot harder for clowns of this calibre to insult their way into power.

Lenny wrote: Just out of curiosity, what exactly are these accomplishments that us lefties are blind to?

Turbogoat wrote:

I'm convinced. Give Kid Rock a chance! His policies might be genius!

I admire your optimism.

Turbogoat wrote:

I'm convinced. Give Kid Rock a chance! His policies might be genius!

I admire your optimism.

zt1903 wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

I'm convinced. Give Kid Rock a chance! His policies might be genius!

I admire your optimism.

I'm not saying his policies might be genius at all, that's a classic strawman. I'm neither optimistic nor pessimistic, I'm reserving judgement.

If you wish to carry on sneering that's your prerogative.

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

I'm convinced. Give Kid Rock a chance! His policies might be genius!

I admire your optimism.

Have you seen this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSQJ2ULuhb8

Turbogoat wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

I'm convinced. Give Kid Rock a chance! His policies might be genius!

I admire your optimism.

I'm not saying his policies might be genius at all, that's a classic strawman. I'm neither optimistic nor pessimistic, I'm reserving judgement.

If you wish to carry on sneering that's your prerogative.

I'm not sneering, I'm just judging poor Kid Rock on the only thing we have to go by, his entire life to this date.

Choosing to ignore his entire life to this date isn't reserving judgement, it's willfully ignoring anything and everything that would make him unfit for office.

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

I'm convinced. Give Kid Rock a chance! His policies might be genius!

I admire your optimism.

Have you seen this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSQJ2ULuhb8

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

4071 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

It's not easy to read because of the compiler's style, and he doesn't help by overloading it with non-deliveries.

It would be nice to get an edited version that is actually a list of genuine achievements, uncrowded by the stuff that shouldn't be there. If you hide a handful of diamonds in a handful of cut glass and claim that they are all diamonds then you lose credibility.

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

It's a reddit list, don't think I'll invest the time. It's pretty obvious that there's a mix of genuine stuff and things that are a stretch. Further, it's not my list and it wasn't important to any point I was making.

Some of the reactions thus far kind of prove Adams' point though.

penguin wrote:

4071 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

It's not easy to read because of the compiler's style, and he doesn't help by overloading it with non-deliveries.

It would be nice to get an edited version that is actually a list of genuine achievements, uncrowded by the stuff that shouldn't be there. If you hide a handful of diamonds in a handful of cut glass and claim that they are all diamonds then you lose credibility.

Yes. There are 'things he had done'...but a lot of that list is trying to shine some turds.

Look at his 4 major campaign 'promises' - build the wall and make mexico pay, lock her up, muslim ban, jobs.

He did get some funding for the wall, but from his own side not mexico, and it was mainly for repairs not new wall and certainly nothing like the wall he talked about.

Lock her up - no. (however was never really going to do it so no surprise there).

Muslim ban - would have got more through earlier if he had just stopped calling it a muslim ban. Managed to trip himself up several times, and then still failed to block the main terrorist states anyway

Jobs - unemployment was trending down when he came in, so most of the good here cannot be chalked up to him, and even then last month saw a downturn, so not exactly a stellar return 6 months in. Things like the carrier deal were very poor when you actually look at the detail and the coal mining stuff is just ignorant of the actual job industry in the US but to be fair the real result of this will take a lot longer to work out.

EDIT - 5. Healthcare. Nope. Nothing.

Marlboro wrote:
I'll give you a hand.

Build a wall - in progress.
Jobs - tick.
Travel ban - tick.
Healthcare - fail so far
Lock her up - watch this space.


Not bad for 6 months work.

Thats not including Drain The Swamp which will be ongoing but a success so far, nor the repeal 2 laws for every new one which is a big tick.

Same with illegal immigration.

houtkabouter wrote:How many jobs has he created Marlboro?

houtkabouter wrote:How many jobs has he created Marlboro?

Sandstorm wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:How many jobs has he created Marlboro?

All those guys hired to investigate his dodgy Russian connections?

Marlboro wrote:

penguin wrote:

4071 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:
I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

It's not easy to read because of the compiler's style, and he doesn't help by overloading it with non-deliveries.

It would be nice to get an edited version that is actually a list of genuine achievements, uncrowded by the stuff that shouldn't be there. If you hide a handful of diamonds in a handful of cut glass and claim that they are all diamonds then you lose credibility.

Yes. There are 'things he had done'...but a lot of that list is trying to shine some turds.

Look at his 4 major campaign 'promises' - build the wall and make mexico pay, lock her up, muslim ban, jobs.

He did get some funding for the wall, but from his own side not mexico, and it was mainly for repairs not new wall and certainly nothing like the wall he talked about.

Lock her up - no. (however was never really going to do it so no surprise there).

Muslim ban - would have got more through earlier if he had just stopped calling it a muslim ban. Managed to trip himself up several times, and then still failed to block the main terrorist states anyway

Jobs - unemployment was trending down when he came in, so most of the good here cannot be chalked up to him, and even then last month saw a downturn, so not exactly a stellar return 6 months in. Things like the carrier deal were very poor when you actually look at the detail and the coal mining stuff is just ignorant of the actual job industry in the US but to be fair the real result of this will take a lot longer to work out.

EDIT - 5. Healthcare. Nope. Nothing.

I'll give you a hand.

Build a wall - Fail.
Jobs - tick.
Travel ban - Partial tick.
Healthcare - Fail
Lock her up - Fail.


Pretty hopeless for 6 months work - especially considering the promises he made.

Thats not including Drain The Swamp which will be ongoing but a success so far - His machine to "Drain the Swamp" has the lever on 'Blow', not 'Suck'!!

houtkabouter wrote:

zt1903 wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Have you read that list of bubbles accomplishment ZT?

I've skimmed it. Why?

I think the point of it is - as per the Scott Adams article I was quoting - for many people Trvmp has "achieved nothing" yet for others there's a long list. It's his long running analogy about people in the same movie theatre watching different movies.
Truth is somewhere in between.

You should probably read it.

Saturnine wrote:

Build a wall - Fail.
Jobs - tick.
Travel ban - Partial tick.
Healthcare - Fail
Lock her up - Fail.


Pretty hopeless for 6 months work - especially considering the promises he made.

Thats not including Drain The Swamp which will be ongoing but a success so far - His machine to "Drain the Swamp" has the lever on 'Blow', not 'Suck'!!

As a centrist - and therefore unbiased - I've fixed the above for you.

You're welcome.

Marlboro wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:How many jobs has he created Marlboro?

About 400 or so in the coal industry, wasn't it? Unless you count the 800 jobs he saved at Carrier. (Soon to be 200 apparently - 600 people will be getting fired for Christmas I heard).

Marlboro wrote:
I'll give you a hand.

Build a wall - in progress.
Jobs - tick.
Travel ban - tick.
Healthcare - fail so far
Lock her up - watch this space.


Not bad for 6 months work.

Thats not including Drain The Swamp which will be ongoing but a success so far, nor the repeal 2 laws for every new one which is a big tick.

Same with illegal immigration.