Chat Forum
It is currently Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:11 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87878 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1785, 1786, 1787, 1788, 1789, 1790, 1791 ... 2197  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 24371
Location: Middle East
Bowens wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Can one of the financial genuises on here explain why the Steel tariffs just announced are going to be a god thing for the US? I know some local steel producers will benefit fairly quickly, but what about the rest of the country? Steel consumers are going to be working hard with this brilliant infrastructure-rebuild plan, and possibly any other major construction projects that may be built on the Mexican border, are they going to lose out on cheap steel from overseas?


Big hit with Ohio Democrats Sherrod Brown and Tim Ryan. With Paul Ryan, not so much. I sometimes forget you're a conservative.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1GE2U1


Given how many posts have been laughing at Trump, that's an easy point to forget.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12520
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
BokJock wrote:
Random swipe at a celebrity #45759839

Quote:

Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) · Twitter

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump


Alec Baldwin, whose dying mediocre career was saved by his terrible impersonation of me on SNL, now says playing me was agony. Alec, it was agony for those who were forced to watch. Bring back Darrell Hammond, funnier and a far greater talent!


4 hours ago · Twitter


Billy Baldwin jumped in the fray with this
Quote:
Billy Baldwin

@BillyBaldwin
Hope lies & flies
Steel tariffs send market tumbling
Jared's 1/2 billion pay 4 play
Kelly: working for you is God's punishment
Mueller movin' on you like a bitch

Yet he tweets about
Alex Baldwin's dieing career

P.S. He won an Emmy playing you… you never won an Emmy playing you

11:28 AM - Mar 2, 2018
13.8K
4,019 people are talking

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 34158
Turbogoat wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Can one of the financial genuises on here explain why the Steel tariffs just announced are going to be a god thing for the US? I know some local steel producers will benefit fairly quickly, but what about the rest of the country? Steel consumers are going to be working hard with this brilliant infrastructure-rebuild plan, and possibly any other major construction projects that may be built on the Mexican border, are they going to lose out on cheap steel from overseas?


OK, if that answer is too tough, which countries are the most affected by the Steel Tariffs?

Of the 35M Tons imported by the States, it comes from:

1. Canada 16.7 percent

2. Brazil 13.2 percent

3. South Korea 9.7 percent

4. Mexico 9.4 percent

5. Russia 8.1 percent

6. Turkey 5.6 percent

7. Japan 4.9 percent

8. Germany 3.7 percent

9. Taiwan 3.2 percent

10. China 2.9 percent

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1GE10I

Is it reasonable to think that just because Canada, Brazil and South Korea are the main suppliers, they'll also the worst affected by the Tariff or is that too straightforward?


Do you drink?


If you don't know, just say so.

How about the likely result of the Tariffs being a Trade war? The talking heads on TV are all giving their worst case scenarios, which seem to be tariffs - trade war - inevitable depression.
Is that the most likely option, or do our resident financial geniuses thing it may play out in another direction?

If you don't know the answer, don't feel you have to post random abuse instead, but we won't think any less of you if you do.


Who is 'we'?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 34158
Deadtigers wrote:
BokJock wrote:
Random swipe at a celebrity #45759839

Quote:

Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) · Twitter

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump


Alec Baldwin, whose dying mediocre career was saved by his terrible impersonation of me on SNL, now says playing me was agony. Alec, it was agony for those who were forced to watch. Bring back Darrell Hammond, funnier and a far greater talent!


4 hours ago · Twitter


Billy Baldwin jumped in the fray with this
Quote:
Billy Baldwin

@BillyBaldwin
Hope lies & flies
Steel tariffs send market tumbling
Jared's 1/2 billion pay 4 play
Kelly: working for you is God's punishment
Mueller movin' on you like a bitch

Yet he tweets about
Alex Baldwin's dieing career

P.S. He won an Emmy playing you… you never won an Emmy playing you

11:28 AM - Mar 2, 2018
13.8K
4,019 people are talking

Image


Trump should start droning some of these fckerrs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20219
Deadtigers wrote:
BokJock wrote:
Random swipe at a celebrity #45759839

Quote:

Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) · Twitter

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump


Alec Baldwin, whose dying mediocre career was saved by his terrible impersonation of me on SNL, now says playing me was agony. Alec, it was agony for those who were forced to watch. Bring back Darrell Hammond, funnier and a far greater talent!


4 hours ago · Twitter


Billy Baldwin jumped in the fray with this
Quote:
Billy Baldwin

@BillyBaldwin
Hope lies & flies
Steel tariffs send market tumbling
Jared's 1/2 billion pay 4 play
Kelly: working for you is God's punishment
Mueller movin' on you like a bitch

Yet he tweets about
Alex Baldwin's dieing career

P.S. He won an Emmy playing you… you never won an Emmy playing you

11:28 AM - Mar 2, 2018
13.8K
4,019 people are talking

Image


Ouch. That must have hurt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 24371
Location: Middle East
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Can one of the financial genuises on here explain why the Steel tariffs just announced are going to be a god thing for the US? I know some local steel producers will benefit fairly quickly, but what about the rest of the country? Steel consumers are going to be working hard with this brilliant infrastructure-rebuild plan, and possibly any other major construction projects that may be built on the Mexican border, are they going to lose out on cheap steel from overseas?


OK, if that answer is too tough, which countries are the most affected by the Steel Tariffs?

Of the 35M Tons imported by the States, it comes from:

1. Canada 16.7 percent

2. Brazil 13.2 percent

3. South Korea 9.7 percent

4. Mexico 9.4 percent

5. Russia 8.1 percent

6. Turkey 5.6 percent

7. Japan 4.9 percent

8. Germany 3.7 percent

9. Taiwan 3.2 percent

10. China 2.9 percent

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1GE10I

Is it reasonable to think that just because Canada, Brazil and South Korea are the main suppliers, they'll also the worst affected by the Tariff or is that too straightforward?


Do you drink?


If you don't know, just say so.

How about the likely result of the Tariffs being a Trade war? The talking heads on TV are all giving their worst case scenarios, which seem to be tariffs - trade war - inevitable depression.
Is that the most likely option, or do our resident financial geniuses thing it may play out in another direction?

If you don't know the answer, don't feel you have to post random abuse instead, but we won't think any less of you if you do.


Who is 'we'?


You can just leave it for actual financial geniuses on here to answer. I'm not asking you specifically, you don't actually need to dodge the question.
(It was the Royal 'we' btw, anyone else here is of course free to think even less of you here)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 5:46 am
Posts: 13085
Turbogoat wrote:
Bowens wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Can one of the financial genuises on here explain why the Steel tariffs just announced are going to be a god thing for the US? I know some local steel producers will benefit fairly quickly, but what about the rest of the country? Steel consumers are going to be working hard with this brilliant infrastructure-rebuild plan, and possibly any other major construction projects that may be built on the Mexican border, are they going to lose out on cheap steel from overseas?


Big hit with Ohio Democrats Sherrod Brown and Tim Ryan. With Paul Ryan, not so much. I sometimes forget you're a conservative.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1GE2U1


Given how many posts have been laughing at Trump, that's an easy point to forget.


Well, I think you're basically a John McCain acolyte? Dying breed, no pun intended. But this will win Trump points with labor in the Rust Belt. Sensible move.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7274
Turbogoat wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Can one of the financial genuises on here explain why the Steel tariffs just announced are going to be a god thing for the US? I know some local steel producers will benefit fairly quickly, but what about the rest of the country? Steel consumers are going to be working hard with this brilliant infrastructure-rebuild plan, and possibly any other major construction projects that may be built on the Mexican border, are they going to lose out on cheap steel from overseas?


OK, if that answer is too tough, which countries are the most affected by the Steel Tariffs?

Of the 35M Tons imported by the States, it comes from:

1. Canada 16.7 percent

2. Brazil 13.2 percent

3. South Korea 9.7 percent

4. Mexico 9.4 percent

5. Russia 8.1 percent

6. Turkey 5.6 percent

7. Japan 4.9 percent

8. Germany 3.7 percent

9. Taiwan 3.2 percent

10. China 2.9 percent

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1GE10I

Is it reasonable to think that just because Canada, Brazil and South Korea are the main suppliers, they'll also the worst affected by the Tariff or is that too straightforward?


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-aluminium/trumps-aluminum-imports-tax-will-bite-domestic-industry-idUSKCN1GE2LL
Key point in this article, the USA can't expand it's industry production so it's a straight tax on imports.
What's not in the article beyond stating imports are up 18% is that the US aluminium industry is doing well +5% production from same time last year. We're not talking about a depressed industry but one that's already doing its best to meet rising demand...

Had a little dig around the aluminium industry. Well as much of a dig as I felt like lying in bed on a Sunday morning. It's complicated. China is the world's largest manufacturer by an order of magnitude, simply immense, 31 million tonnes (of the world's 57 million tonnes) while Russia at the next highest is only 3,000 million tonnes and the rest of the world makes up in slices. Yet when it comes to value of exports, Russia leads the way by a long way. So I'm guessing we're talking say aircraft grade stuff rather than beer cans. And for the USA imports, who is going to be impacted the most per the article and from what I can see it's Canada again. And Canada is accepted as being integral to the USA's strategic defence. The countries with the biggest trade deficits to the USA don't register.

It's screwed up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19003
Location: Adelaide via Sydney and Patea
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12520
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
Flockwitt wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Can one of the financial genuises on here explain why the Steel tariffs just announced are going to be a god thing for the US? I know some local steel producers will benefit fairly quickly, but what about the rest of the country? Steel consumers are going to be working hard with this brilliant infrastructure-rebuild plan, and possibly any other major construction projects that may be built on the Mexican border, are they going to lose out on cheap steel from overseas?


OK, if that answer is too tough, which countries are the most affected by the Steel Tariffs?

Of the 35M Tons imported by the States, it comes from:

1. Canada 16.7 percent

2. Brazil 13.2 percent

3. South Korea 9.7 percent

4. Mexico 9.4 percent

5. Russia 8.1 percent

6. Turkey 5.6 percent

7. Japan 4.9 percent

8. Germany 3.7 percent

9. Taiwan 3.2 percent

10. China 2.9 percent

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1GE10I

Is it reasonable to think that just because Canada, Brazil and South Korea are the main suppliers, they'll also the worst affected by the Tariff or is that too straightforward?


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-aluminium/trumps-aluminum-imports-tax-will-bite-domestic-industry-idUSKCN1GE2LL
Key point in this article, the USA can't expand it's industry production so it's a straight tax on imports.
What's not in the article beyond stating imports are up 18% is that the US aluminium industry is doing well +5% production from same time last year. We're not talking about a depressed industry but one that's already doing its best to meet rising demand...

Had a little dig around the aluminium industry. Well as much of a dig as I felt like lying in bed on a Sunday morning. It's complicated. China is the world's largest manufacturer by an order of magnitude, simply immense, 31 million tonnes (of the world's 57 million tonnes) while Russia at the next highest is only 3,000 million tonnes and the rest of the world makes up in slices. Yet when it comes to value of exports, Russia leads the way by a long way. So I'm guessing we're talking say aircraft grade stuff rather than beer cans. And for the USA imports, who is going to be impacted the most per the article and from what I can see it's Canada again. And Canada is accepted as being integral to the USA's strategic defence. The countries with the biggest trade deficits to the USA don't register.

It's screwed up.


it will hurt business that use steel as part of their product because prices will go up regardless of if they use domestic or foreign.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15654
Location: South Oxfordshire
Deadtigers wrote:
Flockwitt wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Can one of the financial genuises on here explain why the Steel tariffs just announced are going to be a god thing for the US? I know some local steel producers will benefit fairly quickly, but what about the rest of the country? Steel consumers are going to be working hard with this brilliant infrastructure-rebuild plan, and possibly any other major construction projects that may be built on the Mexican border, are they going to lose out on cheap steel from overseas?


OK, if that answer is too tough, which countries are the most affected by the Steel Tariffs?

Of the 35M Tons imported by the States, it comes from:

1. Canada 16.7 percent

2. Brazil 13.2 percent

3. South Korea 9.7 percent

4. Mexico 9.4 percent

5. Russia 8.1 percent

6. Turkey 5.6 percent

7. Japan 4.9 percent

8. Germany 3.7 percent

9. Taiwan 3.2 percent

10. China 2.9 percent

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1GE10I

Is it reasonable to think that just because Canada, Brazil and South Korea are the main suppliers, they'll also the worst affected by the Tariff or is that too straightforward?


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-aluminium/trumps-aluminum-imports-tax-will-bite-domestic-industry-idUSKCN1GE2LL
Key point in this article, the USA can't expand it's industry production so it's a straight tax on imports.
What's not in the article beyond stating imports are up 18% is that the US aluminium industry is doing well +5% production from same time last year. We're not talking about a depressed industry but one that's already doing its best to meet rising demand...

Had a little dig around the aluminium industry. Well as much of a dig as I felt like lying in bed on a Sunday morning. It's complicated. China is the world's largest manufacturer by an order of magnitude, simply immense, 31 million tonnes (of the world's 57 million tonnes) while Russia at the next highest is only 3,000 million tonnes and the rest of the world makes up in slices. Yet when it comes to value of exports, Russia leads the way by a long way. So I'm guessing we're talking say aircraft grade stuff rather than beer cans. And for the USA imports, who is going to be impacted the most per the article and from what I can see it's Canada again. And Canada is accepted as being integral to the USA's strategic defence. The countries with the biggest trade deficits to the USA don't register.

It's screwed up.


it will hurt business that use steel as part of their product because prices will go up regardless of if they use domestic or foreign.


No it won't - it's a trade war, and those are easy to win [/Trump]

Anything else is fake news


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 5:46 am
Posts: 13085
Schumer is for the tariff too. One of the best things Trump has proposed (not done yet). I'm speaking as someone who has lots of blue collar family in Ohio - they like it. :thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 18576
Bowens wrote:
Schumer is for the tariff too. One of the best things Trump has proposed (not done yet). I'm speaking as someone who has lots of blue collar family in Ohio - they like it. :thumbup:

You've always come across as a low-browed moron tbf. Nice to have it confirmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 5:46 am
Posts: 13085
:D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21852
Various economists are saying the tariff will have miniscule effect on the economy at large (<<<1% on inflation or growth).

The main impact is political. As in, will play well in the rust belt but will play badly in places like Beijing.

I’d expect some retaliation.



PS: What’s the betting that Don thought he was actually penalising foreign Steele with this measure?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 12520
Location: I. S. Of The Bronx
Bowens wrote:
Schumer is for the tariff too. One of the best things Trump has proposed (not done yet). I'm speaking as someone who has lots of blue collar family in Ohio - they like it. :thumbup:


I know you are but this idea is flawed. Schumer loves it because it plays well with the white blue collar guys the Dems lost the past few years. personally just as they think little of my struggles, I think very little of theirs. This gives Schumer a chance to look good because it makes the Dems look like they are for US workers, especially as most GOP are against it and Trump like clockwork will not follow through.

The flaw in the idea is that it will raise prices for products and as we as a nation have stagnant wage increase this will be a problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38556
Location: in transit
shanky wrote:
Various economists are saying the tariff will have miniscule effect on the economy at large (<<<1% on inflation or growth).

The main impact is political. As in, will play well in the rust belt but will play badly in places like Beijing.

I’d expect some retaliation.



PS: What’s the betting that Don thought he was actually penalising foreign Steele with this measure?



It is an interesting time to decide to start any sort of trade war with China specifically beginning to flex some real muscle... and dragging most of Asia and the Pacific along with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38556
Location: in transit
Just ripples on a pond...

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/03/trump-t ... ts-up.html
Quote:
President Donald Trump threatened to hit car exports from the European Union with a retaliatory tax, escalating a brewing global fight with U.S. trading partners triggered by newly announced 25 percent U.S. tariffs on imported steel and aluminum.

In a post on Twitter, Trump cited a "big imbalance" between the two countries, said if the 28-nation bloc insisted on imposing punitive taxes on U.S. goods, America would strike back on European car exports. It was an apparent response to European officials threatening policy changes of their own in the wake of Trump's sudden pronouncement on metal imports.

"If the E.U. wants to further increase their already massive tariffs and barriers on U.S. companies doing business there, we will simply apply a tax on their cars which freely pour into the U.S.," the president said on Twitter.

That could spell trouble for car manufacturers like Volkswagen and BMW, two of the most popular European brands sold in the U.S. The German luxury car maker also manufactures many of its cars in America, shipping billions of dollars worth abroad.

In 2016, the EU shipped more than 6 million cars abroad, and the U.S. — its largest market by far — absorbed more than 1 million of those, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers Association.

Each year, the U.S. imports more from Europe than the continent absorbs in American goods, to the tune of a trade deficit worth more than $11 billion in 2017, according to U.S. Census data.

Trump's hasty decision to impose tariffs on steel imports has stoked talk of a brewing trade war, roiling both the political establishment and the global economic order. The move also prompted E.U. trade chiefs to weigh hitting a broad array of U.S. imports with a 25 percent tax, Reuters reported this week.



https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/03/kudlow- ... hikes.html


Quote:
One of the ironies of trade protectionism is that tariffs and import quotas are what we do to ourselves in times of peace what foreign nations do to u‎s with blockades to keep imports from entering our country in times of war.

Or consider that we impose sanctions on U.S. enemies such as North Korea, Russia and Iran because we want them to feel the economic pain of being deprived of imports. But now we are imposing sanctions on our own country by punishing with tariffs in order to make Americans more prosperous. If ever there were a crisis of logic, this is it.

President Trump genuinely believes that his steel and aluminum tariffs will save thousands of blue collar jobs. And we know from our interactions with him that he truly cares about these workers in Pennsylvania, Ohio and other rust belt states.

The American people do as well, and we don't want factories to shut down. But even if tariffs save every one of the 140,000 or so steel jobs in America, it puts at risk 5 million manufacturing and related jobs in industries that use steel. These producers now have to compete in hyper-competitive international markets using steel that is 20 percent above the world price and aluminum that is 7 to 10 percent above the price paid by our foreign rivals.

In other words, steel and aluminum may win in the short term, but steel and aluminum users and consumers will lose. In fact, tariff hikes are really tax hikes.

‎ Some of those 5 million jobs will be put in harm's way. And if they sell less to foreigners, the trade deficit goes up, not down.

Since so many of the things Americans consumers buy today are made of steel or aluminum, a 25 percent tariff will likely get passed on to consumers at the cash register. This is a regressive tax on low-income families.
Trump should also examine the historical record on tariffs, because they have almost never worked as intended and almost always deliver an unhappy ending.

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 signed into law by Republican President Herbert Hoover gave us, and worsened, the Great Depression.

Richard Nixon's 10 percent import surcharge contributed to the stagflation of the 1970s.

George W. Bush tried to save the steel industry by imposing tariffs on steel and If those tariffs worked, we wouldn't be having this discussion today. ‎We tried to save the color TV industry with protectionist measures and instead they wiped out the domestic production.

We aren't persuaded by the Trump administration claim that we need to impose these tariffs for national security reasons. Despite stiff competition from imports, many specialty steel producers are doing just fine and actually exporting steel to Mexico and Canada.

Meanwhile, Canada is the number one exporter of steel to the United States. Does anyone really believe Canada is a national security threat to the U.S.?

What does worry us that Canada and Mexico are now both threatening retaliatory tariffs against America. This tit-for-tat trade breakdown could put NAFTA in serious jeopardy. That could inflict severe economic damage to all three nations, and a stock market meltdown.

Trump should continue to make American producers more competitive in global markets through tax, regulatory, energy, and other pro-America policy changes that bring jobs and capital back to the United States. That is happening at a furious pace right now as Trump has made America almost overnight the best and most reliable place in the world to invest. Steel and aluminum import tariffs work decisively against this goal.

Ronald Reagan in the 1980s invoked anti-dumping provisions against Japanese steel. It was one of his few decisions he later confessed he wishes he hadn't made. ‎Trump will come to learn the same thing, and we hope it is sooner, not later.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 5:46 am
Posts: 13085
Larry Kudlow. I don't think so pal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38556
Location: in transit
It's too easy to shoot the messenger without discussing the message.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 5:46 am
Posts: 13085
8200 good paying jobs have been reassured in a vulnerable region.

Quote:
If we fail to stand up for steel jobs today, China will come after other jobs up and down the supply chain tomorrow.


https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/p ... el-imports


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 3:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21852
No Bruce Springsteen gigs needed in Cleveland from now on.

Rust belt’s back, baby!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 4:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21852
guy smiley wrote:
shanky wrote:
Various economists are saying the tariff will have miniscule effect on the economy at large (<<<1% on inflation or growth).

The main impact is political. As in, will play well in the rust belt but will play badly in places like Beijing.

I’d expect some retaliation.



PS: What’s the betting that Don thought he was actually penalising foreign Steele with this measure?



It is an interesting time to decide to start any sort of trade war with China specifically beginning to flex some real muscle... and dragging most of Asia and the Pacific along with it.



They only have to cash in some of their US$3 trillion in bonds to get Don’s attention real fast.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 4:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38556
Location: in transit
shanky wrote:


They only have to cash in some of their US$3 trillion in bonds to get Don’s attention real fast.



That would really liven things up. For all of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5481
Donald Trump joking about Kim Jong-un:

Quote:
"As far as the risk of dealing with a madman is concerned, that's his problem, not mine."


To be fair, that's a funny line.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 10:49 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 44954
4071 wrote:
Donald Trump joking about Kim Jong-un:

Quote:
"As far as the risk of dealing with a madman is concerned, that's his problem, not mine."


To be fair, that's a funny line.


I didn't have him down as being so self-aware.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38556
Location: in transit
4071 wrote:
Donald Trump joking about Kim Jong-un:

Quote:
"As far as the risk of dealing with a madman is concerned, that's his problem, not mine."


To be fair, that's a funny line.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20219
Kiwias wrote:
4071 wrote:
Donald Trump joking about Kim Jong-un:

Quote:
"As far as the risk of dealing with a madman is concerned, that's his problem, not mine."


To be fair, that's a funny line.


I didn't have him down as being so self-aware.


To be fair he can be very self depreciating.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 34158
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20219
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Nah, over egging it. He is funny to an extent, but it kind of gets overridden by his insincerity, his lies, his viciousness and his blatant racism cynical demagoguery.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 34158
Bullettyme wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Nah, over egging it. He is funny to an extent, but it kind of gets overridden by his insincerity, his lies, his viciousness and his blatant racism cynical demagoguery.


Sucks to be you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20219
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Bullettyme wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Nah, over egging it. He is funny to an extent, but it kind of gets overridden by his insincerity, his lies, his viciousness and his blatant racism cynical demagoguery.


Sucks to be you.


Nah it's pretty damn good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:14 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 44954
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Do you genuinely believe this shit? Of course we can see how funny he can be and how he is taking the mickey with a lot of his out-there statements.

That does not mean we can not also see the damage he is doing in so many areas, which you seemingly can not accept.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 31528
Location: Chickenrunning...
Kiwias wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Do you genuinely believe this shit? Of course we can see how funny he can be and how he is taking the mickey with a lot of his out-there statements.

That does not mean we can not also see the damage he is doing in so many areas, which you seemingly can not accept.

1 good joke makes all those dead kids ok :thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:23 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 44954
Sandstorm wrote:
Kiwias wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Do you genuinely believe this shit? Of course we can see how funny he can be and how he is taking the mickey with a lot of his out-there statements.

That does not mean we can not also see the damage he is doing in so many areas, which you seemingly can not accept.

1 good joke makes all those dead kids ok :thumbup:


Obviously :thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 31862
"We came, we saw, he died ! Haaa-haaaa-haa-haaaa-haa !"

An American thing, seemingly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4658
Bullettyme wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Nah, over egging it. He is funny to an extent, but it kind of gets overridden by his insincerity, his lies, his viciousness and his blatant racism cynical demagoguery.

I agree with almost all of that...except, is he really a racist?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 34423
Location: Planet Rock
Bokkom wrote:
Bullettyme wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Nah, over egging it. He is funny to an extent, but it kind of gets overridden by his insincerity, his lies, his viciousness and his blatant racism cynical demagoguery.

I agree with almost all of that...except, is he really a racist?

You've never bet anyone less racist than Trump. I tell you


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4658
Anonymous. wrote:
Bokkom wrote:
Bullettyme wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Nah, over egging it. He is funny to an extent, but it kind of gets overridden by his insincerity, his lies, his viciousness and his blatant racism cynical demagoguery.

I agree with almost all of that...except, is he really a racist?

You've never bet anyone less racist than Trump. I tell you

In English?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 20219
Bokkom wrote:
Bullettyme wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
As someone who is broadly supportive of him, I feel a bit a bit sorry for you anti-trumpists, as you can't appreciate just how fcking funny this whole thing is. He's an extremely funny guy.


Nah, over egging it. He is funny to an extent, but it kind of gets overridden by his insincerity, his lies, his viciousness and his blatant racism cynical demagoguery.

I agree with almost all of that...except, is he really a racist?


I'd lean that way based on his treatment of "the mexican" Judge Curiel, his invective towards Mexicans in general, his flirtations with racist extremists and his dogwhistles towards same and his previous history of not renting to black people.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87878 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1785, 1786, 1787, 1788, 1789, 1790, 1791 ... 2197  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: assfly, beafheart, bessantj, bimboman, Bing [Bot], Boxcar Ira, choc, clydecloggie, danny_fitz, dargotronV.1, earl the beaver, easyray, eevyl, feckwanker, Gert, Google [Bot], hermie, Laurent, Lenny, lorcanoworms, Mr Mike, Nieghorn, OomPB, PCPhil, penguin, Rinkals, SamShark, S Club, sewa, sockwithaticket, St_Badger, Steamin Beamin, Stjudes, sturginho, tabascoboy, The Man Without Fear, The Sun God, Toro, Toulon's Not Toulouse, unseenwork and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group