Planet Rugby Forum

ticketlessinseattle wrote:

EverReady wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:It's stories like this that make for chilling reading, and makes one reflect on the lived experience of being a trump supporter in a hostile world. I shudder when I realise this could have been me. If I lived in Florida. And Rinkals was my farmboy:

A Florida construction worker has been arrested on suspicion of killing his childhood friend and boss - a Trump supporter, during an argument which may have erupted over politics, according to Orange County Sheriff's Detective Fabian Ramirez.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/flo ... -affidavit

You and I both know that when it comes to the crunch the guys who will do the killing are liberals. Conservatives at their very core are scared and that is why 83% of medal of honour winners support the Democrats since the 1960's. You can find the evidence for that on Liberal treehouse.com and zerobush

Liberals have so many medals of honour they just throw them away.....as geniusly exposed by swiftboat veterans for Bush ; remember John Kerry had so many medals (7) form Vietnam that he threw some away..... ; now Bush spent the Vietnam war coked off his tits blowing through dads cash (see a pattern here ?) but managed to convince "conservatives" that he was the tough Patriot needed to protect the US against Saddam and another 9/11, his WMD's or whatever the latest version was at the time./

One thing the ruling class knows from antiquity is you don't want the soldiers to get involved in running the show.

Case in point: Gladiator, where Gluteus Maximus was played by a Kiwi. My Googling indicates there were no New Zealanders in Germania. Oops - wrong thread.

Seneca of the Night wrote:EDIT: long and short: to argue Margot Robbie and Russell Crowe shouldn't be playing 'European' roles as they are from the direction of the South Pacific is THE DUMBEST SHIT I HAVE EVER HEARD.

I agree. I was doing my best to get annoyed and failed miserably.

6.Jones wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:EDIT: long and short: to argue Margot Robbie and Russell Crowe shouldn't be playing 'European' roles as they are from the direction of the South Pacific is THE DUMBEST SHIT I HAVE EVER HEARD.

I agree. I was doing my best to get annoyed and failed miserably.

You probably need to take a few pointers from Seneca.

Rinkals wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:EDIT: long and short: to argue Margot Robbie and Russell Crowe shouldn't be playing 'European' roles as they are from the direction of the South Pacific is THE DUMBEST SHIT I HAVE EVER HEARD.

I agree. I was doing my best to get annoyed and failed miserably.

You probably need to take a few pointers from Seneca.

maybe he is colour blind unlike Sneakers

now, now, girls..

president trump is actually on 'trial', and all you can come up with is this shite...?

EverReady wrote:You and I both know that when it comes to the crunch the guys who will do the killing are liberals.

Let's see. I've personally known people at 3 different military bases. Based on experience, this is not true. Not to say there aren't people that are liberals that are veterans, but while they're serving, the majority of them are not. And most minorities are not actually liberals as far as political philosophy, they just vote for the Democrats.

6.Jones wrote:One thing the ruling class knows from antiquity is you don't want the soldiers to get involved in running the show.

George Washington
Andrew Jackson
William Henry Harrison (served a month before dying so can't really judge him)
Zachary Taylor
Ulysses Grant
Dwight Eisenhower

2 out of 5 for good presidents ain't bad. And Jackson had his good points, albeit he didn't give a shit about who he pissed off.

Flyin Ryan wrote:

EverReady wrote:You and I both know that when it comes to the crunch the guys who will do the killing are liberals.

Let's see. I've personally known people at 3 different military bases. Based on experience, this is not true. Not to say there aren't people that are liberals that are veterans, but while they're serving, the majority of them are not. And most minorities are not actually liberals as far as political philosophy, they just vote for the Democrats.

6.Jones wrote:One thing the ruling class knows from antiquity is you don't want the soldiers to get involved in running the show.

George Washington
Andrew Jackson
William Henry Harrison (served a month before dying so can't really judge him)
Zachary Taylor
Ulysses Grant
Dwight Eisenhower

2 out of 5 for good presidents ain't bad. And Jackson had his good points, albeit he didn't give a shit about who he pissed off.

I personally *do* like soldiers as leaders. The reason elites don't like them is they tend to play for the team, not the sponsors.

Flyin Ryan wrote:

EverReady wrote:You and I both know that when it comes to the crunch the guys who will do the killing are liberals.

Let's see. I've personally known people at 3 different military bases. Based on experience, this is not true. Not to say there aren't people that are liberals that are veterans, but while they're serving, the majority of them are not. And most minorities are not actually liberals as far as political philosophy, they just vote for the Democrats.

6.Jones wrote:One thing the ruling class knows from antiquity is you don't want the soldiers to get involved in running the show.

George Washington
Andrew Jackson
William Henry Harrison (served a month before dying so can't really judge him)
Zachary Taylor
Ulysses Grant
Dwight Eisenhower

2 out of 5 for good presidents ain't bad. And Jackson had his good points, albeit he didn't give a shit about who he pissed off.

much like trump. and no doubt part of why there's a picture of jackson in the oval office during this administration.

have to say though, trump does seem to piss off all the right people.

merry! wrote:now, now, girls..

president trump is actually on 'trial', and all you can come up with is this shite...?

A trial where the defendant has declined the use of evidence and witnesses, so not really a trial. And your use of girls as a pejorative is telling

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

BokJock wrote:

piquant wrote:

Wilson's Toffee wrote:If the Dems had their way, they would have bombed the White House on a daily basis umtill The Don quit.

Guess they wish...

I'm going out on a limb to suggest the Dems didn't and don't want to carry out terrorist attacks of any size or frequency against the USA

Not true - I saw a photo of Chuck and Nancy in full on Muslim gear, they were posing in front of the Iranian flag and everything

Well the left (and sorC) and equate the Iranian terrorist to Lady Diana cult status....in fact, the guy saved puppies and kittens from burning building in his spare time.

Interesting, you will of course back up that assertion. Iranian military general. I'm pro-abortion and pro death sentence.

You say Iranium Military General...I say, terrorist. Of course, both would be accurate

piquant wrote:

merry! wrote:now, now, girls..

president trump is actually on 'trial', and all you can come up with is this shite...?

A trial where the defendant has declined the use of evidence and witnesses, so not really a trial. And your use of girls as a pejorative is telling

am i supposed to be worried about that or something?

the squealing and bitchiness here reminds me of teenage girls. if you don't mind coming across as such, that's fine by me.

saffer13 wrote: You say Iranium Military General...I say, terrorist. Of course, both would be accurate

Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

You can mark today down as the day the Biden Presidential bid went tits up.
In a strange quirk of fate, the Whitehouse guest logs show that the official who signed the Ukranians in, was one Eric Ciaramello , what a coincidence !

''
Joe Zollo
@jaazee1
BREAKING
Laura Ingraham investigation: Emails expose what Obama admin knew about Bidens and Burisma!''

https://video.foxnews.com/v/61257368690 ... show-clips

merry! wrote:

piquant wrote:

merry! wrote:now, now, girls..

president trump is actually on 'trial', and all you can come up with is this shite...?

A trial where the defendant has declined the use of evidence and witnesses, so not really a trial. And your use of girls as a pejorative is telling

am i supposed to be worried about that or something?

the squealing and bitchiness here reminds me of teenage girls. if you don't mind coming across as such, that's fine by me.

Merry!, mate - that sounds a wee bit squealy.

6.Jones wrote:

merry! wrote:

piquant wrote:

merry! wrote:now, now, girls..

president trump is actually on 'trial', and all you can come up with is this shite...?

A trial where the defendant has declined the use of evidence and witnesses, so not really a trial. And your use of girls as a pejorative is telling

am i supposed to be worried about that or something?

the squealing and bitchiness here reminds me of teenage girls. if you don't mind coming across as such, that's fine by me.

Merry!, mate - that sounds a wee bit squealy.

6.Jones wrote:

merry! wrote:

piquant wrote:

merry! wrote:now, now, girls..

president trump is actually on 'trial', and all you can come up with is this shite...?

A trial where the defendant has declined the use of evidence and witnesses, so not really a trial. And your use of girls as a pejorative is telling

am i supposed to be worried about that or something?

the squealing and bitchiness here reminds me of teenage girls. if you don't mind coming across as such, that's fine by me.

Merry!, mate - that sounds a wee bit squealy.

I wasn't sure if that was the joke

merry! wrote:

Flyin Ryan wrote:

EverReady wrote:You and I both know that when it comes to the crunch the guys who will do the killing are liberals.

Let's see. I've personally known people at 3 different military bases. Based on experience, this is not true. Not to say there aren't people that are liberals that are veterans, but while they're serving, the majority of them are not. And most minorities are not actually liberals as far as political philosophy, they just vote for the Democrats.

6.Jones wrote:One thing the ruling class knows from antiquity is you don't want the soldiers to get involved in running the show.

George Washington
Andrew Jackson
William Henry Harrison (served a month before dying so can't really judge him)
Zachary Taylor
Ulysses Grant
Dwight Eisenhower

2 out of 5 for good presidents ain't bad. And Jackson had his good points, albeit he didn't give a shit about who he pissed off.

much like trump. and no doubt part of why there's a picture of jackson in the oval office during this administration.

have to say though, trump does seem to piss off all the right people.

I would have thought the comparison to how Jackson treated native americans would be more of the symbolism he was going for

Saint wrote:

merry! wrote:

Flyin Ryan wrote:

EverReady wrote:You and I both know that when it comes to the crunch the guys who will do the killing are liberals.

Let's see. I've personally known people at 3 different military bases. Based on experience, this is not true. Not to say there aren't people that are liberals that are veterans, but while they're serving, the majority of them are not. And most minorities are not actually liberals as far as political philosophy, they just vote for the Democrats.

6.Jones wrote:One thing the ruling class knows from antiquity is you don't want the soldiers to get involved in running the show.

George Washington
Andrew Jackson
William Henry Harrison (served a month before dying so can't really judge him)
Zachary Taylor
Ulysses Grant
Dwight Eisenhower

2 out of 5 for good presidents ain't bad. And Jackson had his good points, albeit he didn't give a shit about who he pissed off.

much like trump. and no doubt part of why there's a picture of jackson in the oval office during this administration.

have to say though, trump does seem to piss off all the right people.

I would have thought the comparison to how Jackson treated native americans would be more of the symbolism he was going for

Jackson's war with the central bankers is the most likely reason, though i'm sure trump also admires his general style.

penguin wrote:

saffer13 wrote: You say Iranium Military General...I say, terrorist. Of course, both would be accurate

Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

Iranium is to Iran as Plutonium is to Pluto.

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Saint wrote:
I would have thought the comparison to how Jackson treated native americans would be more of the symbolism he was going for

Why? Trump likes the Indians. Real ones at least.

Narendra Modi?

6.Jones wrote:

penguin wrote:

saffer13 wrote: You say Iranium Military General...I say, terrorist. Of course, both would be accurate

Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

Iranium is to Iran as Plutonium is to Pluto.

dicks.

But yes, the murderous prick very well could be classified as a WMD.

Saint wrote:

merry! wrote:

Flyin Ryan wrote:

EverReady wrote:You and I both know that when it comes to the crunch the guys who will do the killing are liberals.

Let's see. I've personally known people at 3 different military bases. Based on experience, this is not true. Not to say there aren't people that are liberals that are veterans, but while they're serving, the majority of them are not. And most minorities are not actually liberals as far as political philosophy, they just vote for the Democrats.

6.Jones wrote:One thing the ruling class knows from antiquity is you don't want the soldiers to get involved in running the show.

George Washington
Andrew Jackson
William Henry Harrison (served a month before dying so can't really judge him)
Zachary Taylor
Ulysses Grant
Dwight Eisenhower

2 out of 5 for good presidents ain't bad. And Jackson had his good points, albeit he didn't give a shit about who he pissed off.

much like trump. and no doubt part of why there's a picture of jackson in the oval office during this administration.

have to say though, trump does seem to piss off all the right people.

I would have thought the comparison to how Jackson treated native americans would be more of the symbolism he was going for

Jackson was in his and his supporters' opinions robbed of the election in 1824. The era of U.S. politics preceding 1824 was called "The Era of Good Feelings", or there was only one political party. The Federalists which had formed around circa 1800 had effectively died as they had no presence in the southern or western frontier which is where all the population growth was occurring. James Monroe was president at this time and the person nominated for president was considered by a party elite caucus. The caucus nominated William Crawford in 1824. Also running was John Quincy Adams (son of the 2nd president John Adams, from the northeast), Henry Clay (Speaker of the House, power player in Congress), and Andrew Jackson. Jackson was a war hero from the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812. The fact this was a 4-way completed destroyed the party caucus method of selecting a president.

Election gets held, and all 4 candidates win states to where no one won a majority in the Electoral College. This meant, for the only time in the nation's history so far, the House of Representatives would meet and select the president from the top 3 electoral vote getters. Jackson received the plurality, followed by Adams and Crawford. Clay finished 4th and was not available for selection from a body where he had a ton of influence. Crawford suffered medical problems which put him out of serious selection. So it was between Adams and Jackson. Clay absolutely hated Jackson, leading to one of his 2 most famous political statements, "I don't see how killing 2000 Englishmen in New Orleans qualifies a man for the presidency". He threw his support behind Adams, who was elected by the House, and Clay became Secretary of State. Jackson and his supporters were furious, calling it "The Corrupt Bargain". This led to the creation of the next two-party system in the country's history, and Jackson and his supporters 4 years later ran against Adams and won. The political elites in Washington were nonplussed about it all, saying the country had been taken over by the dogs.

There's the bit about the Native Americans. Supreme Court made a ruling against Jackson, which led to Jackson saying "[Supreme Court Justice] John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it." Jackson was on the side of the Union in the then-growing chasm developing between the North and South and was furious when his one-time vice president James Calhoun - a supporter of Southern interests - backstabbed him on administration issues. Jackson hated the Bank of the United States that Clay and his supporters (now calling themselves Whigs after the Whig Party in Britain that was the archnemesis of the Tories during the American Revolution) strongly believed in as part of their "American System", and led to a banking crisis in the country as Jackson refused funds to the BUS leading the head of the BUS Nicholas Biddle to go out and collect all the loans he loaned to banks around the country, which they couldn't pay back. Clay ran against Jackson in 1832 using some of Jackson's decisions against him, but Clay misread the population at-large because the population largely agreed with what Jackson was doing, which led to Clay's most famous political statement: "I'd rather be right than be president."

You can see the parallels in Jackson and Trump, it's just Jackson operated in a time of less rules, a less interconnected world, and the President of the United States was not one of the most powerful people in the world then.

Seneca of the Night wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Saint wrote:
I would have thought the comparison to how Jackson treated native americans would be more of the symbolism he was going for

Why? Trump likes the Indians. Real ones at least.

Narendra Modi?

Navajo Modi they call him.

incidentally, have you noticed how the narrative/mob is pivoting from the 'trump is a stain on our democracy' position to one where they're now saying the whole system/everyone is corrupt?

the medicine is clearly working..

Backwoodsman1 wrote:You can mark today down as the day the Biden Presidential bid went tits up.
In a strange quirk of fate, the Whitehouse guest logs show that the official who signed the Ukranians in, was one Eric Ciaramello , what a coincidence !

''
Joe Zollo
@jaazee1
BREAKING
Laura Ingraham investigation: Emails expose what Obama admin knew about Bidens and Burisma!''

https://video.foxnews.com/v/61257368690 ... show-clips

saffer13 wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

penguin wrote:

saffer13 wrote: You say Iranium Military General...I say, terrorist. Of course, both would be accurate

Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

Iranium is to Iran as Plutonium is to Pluto.

dicks.

But yes, the murderous prick very well could be classified as a WMD.

Yeah. Murderous pricks are a dime a dozen. Well if they from the East. Murderous pricks from the West are normally serial killers or school shooters.

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

penguin wrote:

saffer13 wrote: You say Iranium Military General...I say, terrorist. Of course, both would be accurate

Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

Iranium is to Iran as Plutonium is to Pluto.

dicks.

But yes, the murderous prick very well could be classified as a WMD.

Yeah. Murderous pricks are a dime a dozen. Well if they from the East. Murderous pricks from the West are normally serial killers or school shooters.

Agreed but neither of those are supported and encouraged by their government to keep murdering.

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

penguin wrote:
Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

Iranium is to Iran as Plutonium is to Pluto.

dicks.

But yes, the murderous prick very well could be classified as a WMD.

Yeah. Murderous pricks are a dime a dozen. Well if they from the East. Murderous pricks from the West are normally serial killers or school shooters.

Agreed but neither of those are supported and encouraged by their government to keep murdering.

ahem
Edward Gallagher says hello...

Laurent wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote: Yeah. Murderous pricks are a dime a dozen. Well if they from the East. Murderous pricks from the West are normally serial killers or school shooters.

Agreed but neither of those are supported and encouraged by their government to keep murdering.

ahem
Edward Gallagher says hello...

Yeah, same thing

Laurent wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:
Yeah. Murderous pricks are a dime a dozen. Well if they from the East. Murderous pricks from the West are normally serial killers or school shooters.

Agreed but neither of those are supported and encouraged by their government to keep murdering.

ahem
Edward Gallagher says hello...

ahem
Americas drone pilots say hello

merry! wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Saint wrote:
I would have thought the comparison to how Jackson treated native americans would be more of the symbolism he was going for

Why? Trump likes the Indians. Real ones at least.

Narendra Modi?

Navajo Modi they call him.

incidentally, have you noticed how the narrative/mob is pivoting from the 'trump is a stain on our democracy' position to one where they're now saying the whole system/everyone is corrupt?

the medicine is clearly working..

The Batman of Presidents?

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

penguin wrote:

saffer13 wrote: You say Iranium Military General...I say, terrorist. Of course, both would be accurate

Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

Iranium is to Iran as Plutonium is to Pluto.

dicks.

But yes, the murderous prick very well could be classified as a WMD.

Yeah. Murderous pricks are a dime a dozen. Well if they from the East. Murderous pricks from the West are normally serial killers or school shooters.

Or they carpet bomb Cambodia. Or start the Iraq war to avenge their daddy.

BokJock wrote:


The Batman of Presidents?

Bat-shit-man.

BokJock wrote:

merry! wrote: the medicine is clearly working..

The Batman of Presidents?

kapow!

BokJock wrote:


The Batman of Presidents?

He's got mommy and daddy issues

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

penguin wrote: Iranium being a knock off brand uranium? Now it makes sense why they had to take him out...he was a weapon of mass destruction himself.

Iranium is to Iran as Plutonium is to Pluto.

dicks.

But yes, the murderous prick very well could be classified as a WMD.

Yeah. Murderous pricks are a dime a dozen. Well if they from the East. Murderous pricks from the West are normally serial killers or school shooters.

Agreed but neither of those are supported and encouraged by their government to keep murdering.

Saffer, you're a nice enough bloke but definitely an E class fellow. Pretty good at sports though.

sorCrer wrote:Saffer, you're a nice enough bloke but definitely an E class fellow. Pretty good at sports though.

E class. You'll have to explain that...not familiar with that classism definition.

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:Saffer, you're a nice enough bloke but definitely an E class fellow. Pretty good at sports though.

E class. You'll have to explain that...not familiar with that classism definition.

As in you weren't in the A, B, C or even D class at school or did they just shove you all in one class in Graaff-Reinet?

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:Saffer, you're a nice enough bloke but definitely an E class fellow. Pretty good at sports though.

E class. You'll have to explain that...not familiar with that classism definition.

As in you weren't in the A, B, C or even D class at school or did they just shove you all in one class in Graaff-Reinet?

Got it. Due to my lack of intelligence, being e class and all, thank you for spelling it out for me. Rinki often uses that kind of logic as well calling people stupid. You two seem to be kindred spirits.

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:Saffer, you're a nice enough bloke but definitely an E class fellow. Pretty good at sports though.

E class. You'll have to explain that...not familiar with that classism definition.

As in you weren't in the A, B, C or even D class at school or did they just shove you all in one class in Graaff-Reinet?

Got it. Due to my lack of intelligence, being e class and all, thank you for spelling it out for me. Rinki often uses that kind of logic as well calling people stupid. You two seem to be kindred spirits.

Not sure about Rinkhals but it's your complete lack of awareness that does it for me.

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:

saffer13 wrote:

sorCrer wrote:Saffer, you're a nice enough bloke but definitely an E class fellow. Pretty good at sports though.

E class. You'll have to explain that...not familiar with that classism definition.

As in you weren't in the A, B, C or even D class at school or did they just shove you all in one class in Graaff-Reinet?

Got it. Due to my lack of intelligence, being e class and all, thank you for spelling it out for me. Rinki often uses that kind of logic as well calling people stupid. You two seem to be kindred spirits.

Not sure about Rinkhals but it's your complete lack of awareness that does it for me.