Chat Forum
It is currently Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:10 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103441 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 2427, 2428, 2429, 2430, 2431, 2432, 2433 ... 2587  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19306
Location: A vacant lot next to a pile of rubble
And you think others are being played. :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
merry! wrote:
Image

:)

fat chance.


Relying on the smokey-tinted lens of a Sarah Sanders statement to offer up a version of events more palatable to you isn't as convincing as you seem to think. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
MrJonno wrote:
To paraphrase

"if trump was guilty we couldn't say so and would have to make the statement we are making right now but if he was not guilty we would make a different statement"


If Mueller did Twitter.


tbh, that kind of succinct summary might be the only way to get through to many of his supporters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:51 pm
Posts: 16391
merry! wrote:
Mueller wrote:
We conducted an independent criminal investigation and reported the results to the attorney general, as required by department regulations. The attorney general then concluded that it was appropriate to provide our report to Congress and to the American people. At one point in time, I requested that certain portions of the report be released and the attorney general preferred to make — preferred to make the entire report public all at once and we appreciate that the attorney general made the report largely public. And I certainly do not question the attorney general's good faith in that decision.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/29/robert-mueller-statement-russia-investigation-text-transcript-1346453

:?

hmmm....the weirdos assured us barr was up to no good.

maybe they were just dreaming again.

Notice he said the Russian interference was real, nothing about the co duct of the people investigating it either. At some point you’ll have to decide whether he’s deep state or not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5485
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Merry manages to find a less reliable source than judicialwoke.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6393
Location: emmerdale
:lol:

too dumb to know when you're getting the piss taken out of you..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19306
Location: A vacant lot next to a pile of rubble
merry! wrote:
:lol:

too dumb to know when you're getting the piss taken out of you..


You have more self awareness than I had given you credit for! :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 13893
Location: South Oxfordshire
In the meantime, the Department of Energy has been hard at work with the marketing people. Henceforth, Liquidfied Natural Gas destined for export will be inow as "Molecules of Freedom"


For the avoidance of doubt, I am not kidding - this was how they were described in the press release at https://www.energy.gov/articles/departm ... eeport-lng


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 11:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38976
Saint wrote:
In the meantime, the Department of Energy has been hard at work with the marketing people. Henceforth, Liquidfied Natural Gas destined for export will be inow as "Molecules of Freedom"


For the avoidance of doubt, I am not kidding - this was how they were described in the press release at https://www.energy.gov/articles/departm ... eeport-lng


I guess a genuine patriot would use only Freedom Gas when cooking his Freedom Fries.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 11:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11141
Location: Coalfalls
Kiwias wrote:
Saint wrote:
In the meantime, the Department of Energy has been hard at work with the marketing people. Henceforth, Liquidfied Natural Gas destined for export will be inow as "Molecules of Freedom"


For the avoidance of doubt, I am not kidding - this was how they were described in the press release at https://www.energy.gov/articles/departm ... eeport-lng


I guess a genuine patriot would use only Freedom Gas when cooking his Freedom Fries.

Gaze upon the face of Freedom!

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 12:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
So... paying a bit closer attention to what Mueller just stated now.
He made it very, very clear that it was because of DoJ guidelines that he didn't bring charges against the POTUS and spoke about exactly this with AG Barr, directly contradicting what Barr then said when he brought forth his version of events.

So Barr has clearly lied.
Explicitly.
About some really quite important factors.
For political partisanship that the Attorney General is supposed to be far above.
There have been quite a few calls for Barr to be impeached already. Hearing it from the horses mouth now... that may be the tipping point.
The House may choose to subpoena Mueller to get his version on their official record (Mueller may have said he doesn't need to go before them, but that may not be his choice if they go down this route)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 13893
Location: South Oxfordshire
Turbogoat wrote:
So... paying a bit closer attention to what Mueller just stated now.
He made it very, very clear that it was because of DoJ guidelines that he didn't bring charges against the POTUS and spoke about exactly this with AG Barr, directly contradicting what Barr then said when he brought forth his version of events.

So Barr has clearly lied.
Explicitly.
About some really quite important factors.
For political partisanship that the Attorney General is supposed to be far above.
There have been quite a few calls for Barr to be impeached already. Hearing it from the horses mouth now... that may be the tipping point.
The House may choose to subpoena Mueller to get his version on their official record (Mueller may have said he doesn't need to go before them, but that may not be his choice if they go down this route)



Plenty of commentary already though that Myellef spoke and America heard two different things. Mueller is acting within the framework of the law, DoJ policy, and his understanding. That only works if both sides agree that thses things actually exist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 16590
Location: Adelaide via Sydney and Patea
Turbogoat wrote:
So... paying a bit closer attention to what Mueller just stated now.
He made it very, very clear that it was because of DoJ guidelines that he didn't bring charges against the POTUS and spoke about exactly this with AG Barr, directly contradicting what Barr then said when he brought forth his version of events.

So Barr has clearly lied.
Explicitly.
About some really quite important factors.
For political partisanship that the Attorney General is supposed to be far above.
There have been quite a few calls for Barr to be impeached already. Hearing it from the horses mouth now... that may be the tipping point.
The House may choose to subpoena Mueller to get his version on their official record (Mueller may have said he doesn't need to go before them, but that may not be his choice if they go down this route)


It appears that the swamp is bottomless...

Quote:
Day 819: Attorney General William Barr repeatedly insisted that Robert Mueller "found no evidence" that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that Russian efforts to interfere "did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign." Barr also claimed Mueller's report did not find "collusion" between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. Further, Barr said that even if the Trump campaign had colluded with WikiLeaks, that was not a crime. Mueller identified "numerous" Trump campaign-Russia contacts, but the report says there was "insufficient evidence" to establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump or his campaign aides and their contacts with Russians. The report outlines how Trump was elected with Russia's help and when a federal inquiry was started to investigate the effort, Trump took multiple steps to stop or undermine it. Barr said Mueller examined 10 "episodes" where Trump may have obstructed justice, but that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein "disagreed with some of the special counsel's legal theories and felt that some of the episodes did not amount to obstruction." According to Barr, Trump acted out of "noncorrupt motives" because he was frustrated by Mueller's investigation, as well as media coverage that he felt was hurting his administration. (Washington Post / New York Times / Politico / NBC News / CNN / The Guardian / Bloomberg)

https://whatthefuckjusthappenedtoday.com/

Quote:
War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 2:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38976
The White House asked the U.S. Navy to make sure a warship named for late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) would be "out of sight" ahead of President Trump's visit to Japan over the weekend, according to an email obtained by The Wall Street Journal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-hous ... 0?mod=e2tw


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 2:47 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4097
It is in the Deep State's interest to carry on with whatever side issues to distract the American public's gaze from what is really going on. Trump, no-Trump, it does not fukken matter one jot. America continues to bully countries, businesses, private individuals... whoever in the name of "national security".
The military junta in the Pentagon are closer and closer to complete control.
I hope Assange gets his day in court and his council explains to the American people how your government tramples on your constitution.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 2:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15652
Fat Old Git wrote:
merry! wrote:
:lol:

too dumb to know when you're getting the piss taken out of you..


You have more self awareness than I had given you credit for! :shock:


Shot! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 3:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15652
Turbogoat wrote:
MrJonno wrote:
To paraphrase

"if trump was guilty we couldn't say so and would have to make the statement we are making right now but if he was not guilty we would make a different statement"


If Mueller did Twitter.


tbh, that kind of succinct summary might be the only way to get through to many of his supporters.


It should be even more unequivocal.

Quote:
“If we were confident that the president did not commit a crime we would have said so”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 3:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 33122
Location: Planet Rock
Turbogoat wrote:
merry! wrote:
Image

:)

fat chance.


Relying on the smokey-tinted lens of a Sarah Sanders statement to offer up a version of events more palatable to you isn't as convincing as you seem to think. :D

Is that the woman who admitted she lies to make Trump look better?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 3:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2016 5:04 am
Posts: 8663
Quote:
Robert Mueller literally says Russian intelligence hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails to influence our election and when he tried to investigate this serious attack on the United States Trump obstructed him. He can’t indict a sitting president and is begging Congress to impeach him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 4:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Anonymous. wrote:

Is that the woman who admitted she lies to make Trump look better?


Yes/ No/ Not sure/ Maybe. She used to lie her ass off for him on a daily basis, but doesn't anymore - not because she stopped lying, but because she stopped holding Press briefings, which is kinda the core role of the Press Secretary. She's on record as saying she wants to be remembered as "transparent and honest" which is just... delusional. Kinda sad really.

There's also Hope Hicks, who was just called in to testify in front of various Committees, and just flat out refused to answer when asked if she'd lied or been directed to lie for Trump, despite being very cooperative on all other fronts.

Or there's Kellyanne Conway, who apparently doesn't lie, she just uses 'alternative facts' - a semantic ploy so desperate even poor Merry wouldn't fall for that one.

Or there's Omarosa Manigault Newman - arch evil reality TV star turned Presidential advisor who either lied while in the administration or lied after getting chucked out... your call about when she was being more truthful.

Or there's Ivanka Trump, handbag designer turned Presidential Advisor who apparently has no idea where all the Inauguration committee money went.

Or there's Melania Trump who has to pretend to be the loving wife of Trump and aint nobody falling for that one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 4:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 9322
Location: Texas
Kiwias wrote:
The White House asked the U.S. Navy to make sure a warship named for late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) would be "out of sight" ahead of President Trump's visit to Japan over the weekend, according to an email obtained by The Wall Street Journal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-hous ... 0?mod=e2tw

Pedant point, named for McCain Sr and McCain Jr, McCain III was added as a namesake later.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 4:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Bokkom wrote:
It is in the Deep State's interest to carry on with whatever side issues to distract the American public's gaze from what is really going on. Trump, no-Trump, it does not fukken matter one jot. America continues to bully countries, businesses, private individuals... whoever in the name of "national security".
The military junta in the Pentagon are closer and closer to complete control.
I hope Assange gets his day in court and his council explains to the American people how your government tramples on your constitution.


It's a bold strategy to start a post by referring to the Deep State, but your larger point - that actual important matters on the World stage should really be the priority is about right.
Unfortunately, the Administration and the policy of being dicks to other countries/ businesses/ individuals are inextricably linked. Just ask the countries: Venezuela, Yemen, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba. Canada, Germany, Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico, China, Montenegro etc...
Just ask the businesses: Amazon, the NYT, Ford, Harley Davidson etc...
Just ask the private individuals: James Comey, Jeff Bezos, Soy Farmers, every woman ever etc...

Taking issue with Trump isn't merely because he is wearing a tan suit or is a secret muslim, there are very real world ramifications of his venal, corrupt, self-serving words and actions that should never be quietly accepted, even when there are a thousand other things that he does that also require the same attention.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 6:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6061
comets wrote:
Quote:
Robert Mueller literally says Russian intelligence hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails to influence our election and when he tried to investigate this serious attack on the United States Trump obstructed him. He can’t indict a sitting president and is begging Congress to impeach him.


The DNC emails are the one allegedly hacked NOT Hillary's private server (BTW which apparently was treated like a glory hole in a biker bar by around a dozen foreign entities.).

Mueller's role is to gather evidence and present that to the DoJ for a decision whether to proceed. He cant make the decision to indict or not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 6:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15781
Turbogoat wrote:
merry! wrote:
Image

:)

fat chance.


Relying on the smokey-tinted lens of a Sarah Sanders statement to offer up a version of events more palatable to you isn't as convincing as you seem to think. :D

Because Merry considers her truthful and reliable.

I don't think the rest of us are quite so gullible (with the exception of a certain immigrant school teacher, naturally).

To be honest, I think Trump is perfectly entitled to view Mueller's actions as an exoneration. His declaration that the report speaks for him and he has nothing to add hands Barr the mechanism for censoring the parts which may be damaging to Trump and gives him a free pass.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 7:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15781
Turbogoat wrote:
Anonymous. wrote:

Is that the woman who admitted she lies to make Trump look better?


Yes/ No/ Not sure/ Maybe. She used to lie her ass off for him on a daily basis, but doesn't anymore - not because she stopped lying, but because she stopped holding Press briefings, which is kinda the core role of the Press Secretary. She's on record as saying she wants to be remembered as "transparent and honest" which is just... delusional. Kinda sad really.

There's also Hope Hicks, who was just called in to testify in front of various Committees, and just flat out refused to answer when asked if she'd lied or been directed to lie for Trump, despite being very cooperative on all other fronts.

Or there's Kellyanne Conway, who apparently doesn't lie, she just uses 'alternative facts' - a semantic ploy so desperate even poor Merry wouldn't fall for that one.

Or there's Omarosa Manigault Newman - arch evil reality TV star turned Presidential advisor who either lied while in the administration or lied after getting chucked out... your call about when she was being more truthful.

Or there's Ivanka Trump, handbag designer turned Presidential Advisor who apparently has no idea where all the Inauguration committee money went.

Or there's Melania Trump who has to pretend to be the loving wife of Trump and aint nobody falling for that one.

I think you badly underestimate him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15781
Turbogoat wrote:
Bokkom wrote:
It is in the Deep State's interest to carry on with whatever side issues to distract the American public's gaze from what is really going on. Trump, no-Trump, it does not fukken matter one jot. America continues to bully countries, businesses, private individuals... whoever in the name of "national security".
The military junta in the Pentagon are closer and closer to complete control.
I hope Assange gets his day in court and his council explains to the American people how your government tramples on your constitution.


It's a bold strategy to start a post by referring to the Deep State, but your larger point - that actual important matters on the World stage should really be the priority is about right.
Unfortunately, the Administration and the policy of being dicks to other countries/ businesses/ individuals are inextricably linked. Just ask the countries: Venezuela, Yemen, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba. Canada, Germany, Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico, China, Montenegro etc...
Just ask the businesses: Amazon, the NYT, Ford, Harley Davidson etc...
Just ask the private individuals: James Comey, Jeff Bezos, Soy Farmers, every woman ever etc...

Taking issue with Trump isn't merely because he is wearing a tan suit or is a secret muslim, there are very real world ramifications of his venal, corrupt, self-serving words and actions that should never be quietly accepted, even when there are a thousand other things that he does that also require the same attention.


Are you sure that's what he's saying?

I was under the impression he was laying it all at the door of the Illuminati.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Rinkals wrote:
To be honest, I think Trump is perfectly entitled to view Mueller's actions as an exoneration.


Maybe, but that's because Trump has a very fanciful definition of 'exoneration'.

Really, if he was exonerated by the report, he was exonerated the second they convened the Special Investigation, as they were never going to be able to indict a sitting President according to the rules they adhered to. As Mueller said, if there is going to be some form of indictment, it was never going to come from the criminal justice system. Congress, it's your time to shine.

Actual exoneration though, is a different kettle of fish. Mueller spelled out: IF there had been evidence to show that Trump had not committed a crime, they would have said so. They clearly, carefully and deliberately did NOT say so.

As much as it would have been a glorious denouement to see Mueller slap down charges of Presidenting-Under-the-Influence, that wasn't an option. What's happening now is that pressure is building, the truth of the report is becoming more and more difficult to ignore, it isn't going away, and action against first of all Barr is going to become a lot more likely.

It sucks that politics, rather than justice may well be the deciding factor in impeachment of course.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Rinkals wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Bokkom wrote:
It is in the Deep State's interest to carry on with whatever side issues to distract the American public's gaze from what is really going on. Trump, no-Trump, it does not fukken matter one jot. America continues to bully countries, businesses, private individuals... whoever in the name of "national security".
The military junta in the Pentagon are closer and closer to complete control.
I hope Assange gets his day in court and his council explains to the American people how your government tramples on your constitution.


It's a bold strategy to start a post by referring to the Deep State, but your larger point - that actual important matters on the World stage should really be the priority is about right.
Unfortunately, the Administration and the policy of being dicks to other countries/ businesses/ individuals are inextricably linked. Just ask the countries: Venezuela, Yemen, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba. Canada, Germany, Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico, China, Montenegro etc...
Just ask the businesses: Amazon, the NYT, Ford, Harley Davidson etc...
Just ask the private individuals: James Comey, Jeff Bezos, Soy Farmers, every woman ever etc...

Taking issue with Trump isn't merely because he is wearing a tan suit or is a secret muslim, there are very real world ramifications of his venal, corrupt, self-serving words and actions that should never be quietly accepted, even when there are a thousand other things that he does that also require the same attention.


Are you sure that's what he's saying?

I was under the impression he was laying it all at the door of the Illuminati.


Oh he was blaming the Illuminati for sure. I was just pointing out the La Cosa NosTrump were doing far more nefarious deeds against countries, businesses and individuals than any secret elite cabal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38976
Turbogoat wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
To be honest, I think Trump is perfectly entitled to view Mueller's actions as an exoneration.


Maybe, but that's because Trump has a very fanciful definition of 'exoneration'.

Really, if he was exonerated by the report, he was exonerated the second they convened the Special Investigation, as they were never going to be able to indict a sitting President according to the rules they adhered to. As Mueller said, if there is going to be some form of indictment, it was never going to come from the criminal justice system. Congress, it's your time to shine.

Actual exoneration though, is a different kettle of fish. Mueller spelled out: IF there had been evidence to show that Trump had not committed a crime, they would have said so. They clearly, carefully and deliberately did NOT say so.

As much as it would have been a glorious denouement to see Mueller slap down charges of Presidenting-Under-the-Influence, that wasn't an option. What's happening now is that pressure is building, the truth of the report is becoming more and more difficult to ignore, it isn't going away, and action against first of all Barr is going to become a lot more likely.

It sucks that politics, rather than justice may well be the deciding factor in impeachment of course.


Though ultimately, it will be a desire for justice that convinces the required number of GOP senators to vote for impeachment. Naturally this will require more thought and reflection on their behalf than they have shown thus far and maybe even more convincing evidence, whatever that may turn out to be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15781
Turbogoat wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
To be honest, I think Trump is perfectly entitled to view Mueller's actions as an exoneration.


Maybe, but that's because Trump has a very fanciful definition of 'exoneration'.

Really, if he was exonerated by the report, he was exonerated the second they convened the Special Investigation, as they were never going to be able to indict a sitting President according to the rules they adhered to. As Mueller said, if there is going to be some form of indictment, it was never going to come from the criminal justice system. Congress, it's your time to shine.

Actual exoneration though, is a different kettle of fish. Mueller spelled out: IF there had been evidence to show that Trump had not committed a crime, they would have said so. They clearly, carefully and deliberately did NOT say so.

As much as it would have been a glorious denouement to see Mueller slap down charges of Presidenting-Under-the-Influence, that wasn't an option. What's happening now is that pressure is building, the truth of the report is becoming more and more difficult to ignore, it isn't going away, and action against first of all Barr is going to become a lot more likely.

It sucks that politics, rather than justice may well be the deciding factor in impeachment of course.


No, but Mueller doesn't draw any conclusions. He doesn't say what he found; he just says what he didn't find which is a cop out.

If Mueller isn't unequivocal in his conclusions, then Trump is entitled to regard them as non-committal. Which they are: a nothing burger. He might claim that it's up to Congress to pursue it but Congress is hobbled by it's bipartisan nature and split along party lines.

Which essentially means that he has given Trump a free pass.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 8751
My summary of Meuller's speech:

1. Russian interference was the central investigation. There was some. No collusion though.

2. Barr has played a straight bat with the way he released the report.

3. They thought they couldn't make a charging decision on obstruction so they didn't. We're they right? I don't know. I understand the OLC opinion says you can't indict. Does it say you can't charge? Mueller isn't beyond criticism on this point. He may have f.ucked up.

3. Despite facially adhering to the fairness principle of not formally accusing Trump of obstruction when he had no recourse to a trial to clear himself, they then undermined it by implying that he should have been charged anyway. That's called having it both ways. It's a problem. There's a reasonable case that he's undermining the presumption of innocence in the way he has handled things.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4 ... g-his-role

4 Despite what some morons think there is no contradiction between what Barr said and what Mueller said around the declination. Mueller said would not consider charges. That doesn't mean that they would have charged in the absence of the OLC guidance. Wven if they thoughts was guilty they might have determined that they didn't have a chargeable case. It means they didn't consider whether they had a chargeable case and therefore the OLC guidance didn't affect that decision. The DOJ and SPO have issued a joint statement to that effect.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-sec ... eller-barr

5. Not exonerated is not a legal threshold. It has no place in this kind of report. Prosecutors charge or dont. If they dont charge the presumption of innocence holds. It holds until a person is found guily. Mueller undermines the presumption of innocence.

6. The final thing that almost nobody is talking about is the basis for charging the president with obstruction in these circumstances in the first place. Barr made that point that he disagreed as a matter of law that the (or many of the) 10 acts were obstruction.

The has been a very robust discussion on Lawfare about the weakness of Meuller's constitutional analysis as it relates to the application of the obstruction laws to Trump.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/mueller-rep ... is-part-ii

Basically he saying that Mueller misinterpreted the clear statement rule in relation to whether the obstruction statute applies in this case. I reckon he's winning. He should as he's a former head of the OLC and teaches at Harvard.


Last edited by Santa on Thu May 30, 2019 8:36 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8705
Location: The Fountain of Running Rugby
Santa wrote:
My summary of Meuller's speech:

1. 'Collusion' was the central investigation and there wasn't any.

2. Barr has played a straight bat with the way he released the report.

3. They thought they couldn't make a charging decision on obstruction so they didn't. We're they right? I don't know. I understand the OLC opinion says you can't indict. Does it say you can't charge? Mueller isn't beyond criticism on this point. He may have f.ucked up.

3. Despite facially adhering to the fairness principle of not formally accusing Trump of obstruction when he had no recourse to a trial to clear himself, they then undermined it by implying that he should have been charged anyway. That's called having it both ways. It's a problem. There's a reasonable case that he's undermining the presumption of innocence in the way he has handled things.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4 ... g-his-role

4 Despite what some morons think there is no contradiction between what Barr said and what Mueller said around the declination. Mueller said would not consider charges. That doesn't mean that they would have charged in the absence of the OLC guidance. It means they didn't consider it. The DOJ and SPO have issued a joint statement to that effect.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-sec ... eller-barr

5. Not exonerated is not a legal threshold. It has no place in this kind of report. Prosecutors charge or dont. If they dont charge the presumption of innocwof innocence holds. It holda until a person is found guily. Mueller undermines the presumption of innocence.

6. The final thing that almost nobody is talking about is the basis for charging the president with obstruction in these circumstances in the first place. Barr made that point that he disagreed as a matter of law that the (or many of the) 10 acts were obstruction.

The has been a very robust discussion on Lawfare about the weakness of Meuller's constitutional analysis as it relates to the application of the obstruction laws to Trump.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/mueller-rep ... is-part-ii

Basically he saying that Mueller misinterpreted the clear statement rule in relation to whether the obstruction statute applies in this case. I reckon he's winning. He should so he's a former head of the OLC and teaches at Harvard.

Interesting


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Big Nipper wrote:
Santa wrote:
My summary of Meuller's speech:


Interesting


Riveting


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5485
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
My take on this

1. trumpo is a cunt
2. Barr is a lying fucktard
3. mueller is a straight up fellow
4. Hi Santa
5. Merry made a funnynotfunny
6. http://www.Randomlink.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6393
Location: emmerdale
would you like to sniff my grots, hoot?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 38976
Turbogoat wrote:
Big Nipper wrote:
Santa wrote:
My summary of Meuller's speech:


Interesting


Riveting


Fascinating


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5485
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
merry! wrote:
would you like to sniff my grots, hoot?

Is that a gammon thing?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am
Posts: 3839
Fox News legal guy disagrees with Santa and Merry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbswCOpAUa8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
houtkabouter wrote:
merry! wrote:
would you like to sniff my grots, hoot?

Is that a gammon thing?


It's one of his better posts, admittedly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2019 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am
Posts: 3839
I can't understand how much clearer Mueller has to be that Trump obstructed justice and that congress needs to act.

"what you are seeing and hearing is not what is happening"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103441 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 2427, 2428, 2429, 2430, 2431, 2432, 2433 ... 2587  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bokkom, Dark, Ewinkum, farmerdave, flashman, Ghost-Of-Nepia, handyman, I like haggis, Jensrsa, Mullet 2 and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group