Page 36 of 96

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:21 pm
by CM11
rfurlong wrote:
CM11 wrote:
rfurlong wrote:I don't think abortion should be dealt with via a constitutional provision ... its utter madness that the 8th amendment is in there at all, and its presence has led to all sorts of fvck ups and a general lack of compassion/common sense when dealing with crisis pregnancies (FFA, rape etc)

However, I think 'elective' abortion, due to the pregnancy simply not suiting the mother, is morally repugnant and should be resisted at all costs. Those women who want to use abortion as a contraceptive, can continue to go to Liverpool for all I care. I refuse to feel guilty about not facilitating their selfishness.

The tragedy here is that the intended legislation, as currently drafted/proposed, alienates people like me that want to see the 8th repealed, but who also want abortion restricted to certain grounds.

People keep telling me that the proposed legislation/citizens assembly stance/dail committee report is the logical outcome of trying to square the circle around the availability of abortion pills, the difficulty in proving rape allegations etc. I just find it hard to believe that our politicians cannot come up with proposed legislation that gets rid of the 8th, but which doesn't usher in unrestricted access up to 12 weeks.

Spain has a rape/abortion protocol - why cant we?
Marijuana, like abortion pills, is easily accessible - does that mean we should immediately legalise it?

The 'correct' (in my view) legislation, which covered rape, incest and FFA, would have seen Repeal win by a landslide. Now we have a situation where its touch and go ........ with the sole reason being the crappy proposed legislation.
So it should be very clear to you that Yes is the only vote you can logically argue for.

If we're not dealing with this via the constitution then it really just comes down to what the government feels is the majority opinion of the nation. Surely?
A yes vote from me ushers in legislation that I fundamentally disagree with

I actually don’t believe that unrestricted abortion up to 12 weeks is “the majority opinion of the nation” ..... that’s the whole point I was making!

If the proposed legislation dealt only with rape, incest and FFA (as was the talk 12 months ago) then the yes campaign would skate home ...... because it would represent the majority opinion.
I don't think abortion should be dealt with via a constitutional provision ... its utter madness that the 8th amendment is in there at all, and its presence has led to all sorts of fvck ups and a general lack of compassion/common sense when dealing with crisis pregnancies (FFA, rape etc)
How can you utter this paragraph and then argue for a No vote?

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:23 pm
by Charger21
Jumper wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:What a load of nonsense Mullet - a foetus is not a baby. You’re getting close to every sperm is sacred territory here
If a foetus counts as a "baby", what about a zygote?
Every Sperm Is Sacred
https://youtu.be/fUspLVStPbk

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:25 pm
by HighKingLeinster
Jumper wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:What a load of nonsense Mullet - a foetus is not a baby. You’re getting close to every sperm is sacred territory here
If a foetus counts as a "baby", what about a zygote?
A smaller baby

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:26 pm
by Mullet 2
10 points for your original post.

And those guys are funny so you're also funny.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:28 pm
by Duff Paddy
Mullet 2 wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:What a load of nonsense Mullet - a foetus is not a baby. You’re getting close to every sperm is sacred territory here
And you're sounding like a raving liberal.

So if you call it a different name you can pretend it's not worthy of living?
It has a different name because it is not the same thing. Your argument about worthiness of living is bizarre, no such judgement is being made by anyone. The woman whose body it is has the right to determine whether she wants to carry the foetus, its not my decision no more than it is yours.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:29 pm
by Duff Paddy
HighKingLeinster wrote:
Jumper wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:What a load of nonsense Mullet - a foetus is not a baby. You’re getting close to every sperm is sacred territory here
If a foetus counts as a "baby", what about a zygote?
A smaller baby
Careful now they’ll be calling sperm a half a baby next

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:29 pm
by JoeyFantastic
Conservative Eddie wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Jumper wrote:I hope that any No voters will also be seeking to repeal the 13th ammendment which allows women to travel for abortion. If you believe that abortion is murder (its not) and you idly stand by and watch women travelling to England to get one, you are essentially complicit in what you believe to be the murder of ~4000 Irish "babies" each year.
Care to tell me when you think life begins?

I am crushingly disappointed by the debate around this. We should have widespread, safe and free access to contraception and sex ed. We should as a society be focused on preventing unwanted pregnancies first and foremost.
When do you think life begins?

Even with good access to contraception and sex ed we're still going to have thousands of abortions every year. Women will opt for abortions and these women will often be well educated and well informed - use contraception etc. It's a bit of a myth that it's just ill-educated and disadvantaged women getting abortions. Married middle-class women get them too with the support of their husbands for perfectly sane and rational reasons, which ought to be no one else's business but theirs.
Honestly I'm not sure.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:30 pm
by Uncle Fester
Bleh. Conversation moved on a bit.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:31 pm
by Mullet 2
Duff Paddy wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:What a load of nonsense Mullet - a foetus is not a baby. You’re getting close to every sperm is sacred territory here
And you're sounding like a raving liberal.

So if you call it a different name you can pretend it's not worthy of living?
It has a different name because it is not the same thing. Your argument about worthiness of living is bizarre, no such judgement is being made by anyone. The woman whose body it is has the right to determine whether she wants to carry the foetus, its not my decision no more than it is yours.

Except it is and we're having a referendum on it.

Go shout my body my choice with some blue haired birds who care.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:32 pm
by CM11
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Jumper wrote:I hope that any No voters will also be seeking to repeal the 13th ammendment which allows women to travel for abortion. If you believe that abortion is murder (its not) and you idly stand by and watch women travelling to England to get one, you are essentially complicit in what you believe to be the murder of ~4000 Irish "babies" each year.
Care to tell me when you think life begins?

I am crushingly disappointed by the debate around this. We should have widespread, safe and free access to contraception and sex ed. We should as a society be focused on preventing unwanted pregnancies first and foremost.
I completely agree with you on the sex ed etc thing. That doesn't mean it has to be one or the other. The debate (and I'm not sure why it should even be a debate) you talk about should be happening separate to the referendum debate, not as part of it.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:33 pm
by Duff Paddy
Mullet 2 wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:What a load of nonsense Mullet - a foetus is not a baby. You’re getting close to every sperm is sacred territory here
And you're sounding like a raving liberal.

So if you call it a different name you can pretend it's not worthy of living?
It has a different name because it is not the same thing. Your argument about worthiness of living is bizarre, no such judgement is being made by anyone. The woman whose body it is has the right to determine whether she wants to carry the foetus, its not my decision no more than it is yours.

Except it is and we're having a referendum on it.

Go shout my body my choice with some blue haired birds who care.
Not really though because they’ll have the abortion either way

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:33 pm
by JoeyFantastic
CM11 wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Jumper wrote:I hope that any No voters will also be seeking to repeal the 13th ammendment which allows women to travel for abortion. If you believe that abortion is murder (its not) and you idly stand by and watch women travelling to England to get one, you are essentially complicit in what you believe to be the murder of ~4000 Irish "babies" each year.
Care to tell me when you think life begins?

I am crushingly disappointed by the debate around this. We should have widespread, safe and free access to contraception and sex ed. We should as a society be focused on preventing unwanted pregnancies first and foremost.
I completely agree with you on the sex ed etc thing. That doesn't mean it has to be one or the other. The debate (and I'm not sure why it should even be a debate) you talk about should be happening separate to the referendum debate, not as part of it.
In your opinion, for me they are linked.

Care to say when life begins?

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:33 pm
by HighKingLeinster
Duff Paddy wrote:
HighKingLeinster wrote:
Jumper wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:What a load of nonsense Mullet - a foetus is not a baby. You’re getting close to every sperm is sacred territory here
If a foetus counts as a "baby", what about a zygote?
A smaller baby
Careful now they’ll be calling sperm a half a baby next
Nah everybody knows they are knuckle children

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:35 pm
by Duff Paddy
JoeyFantastic wrote:
CM11 wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Jumper wrote:I hope that any No voters will also be seeking to repeal the 13th ammendment which allows women to travel for abortion. If you believe that abortion is murder (its not) and you idly stand by and watch women travelling to England to get one, you are essentially complicit in what you believe to be the murder of ~4000 Irish "babies" each year.
Care to tell me when you think life begins?

I am crushingly disappointed by the debate around this. We should have widespread, safe and free access to contraception and sex ed. We should as a society be focused on preventing unwanted pregnancies first and foremost.
I completely agree with you on the sex ed etc thing. That doesn't mean it has to be one or the other. The debate (and I'm not sure why it should even be a debate) you talk about should be happening separate to the referendum debate, not as part of it.
In your opinion, for me they are linked.

Care to say when life begins?
Save the philosophy debates for the arts block, unanswerable questions like that don’t contribute to moving this forward

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:39 pm
by Mullet 2
So what?

Know any laws that aren't broken? :lol:

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:42 pm
by CM11
If Mullet is arguing from a position of personal opinion, and it's his to have, then he's entitled to his position. I'm just never sure if he just takes a stance for the sake of it and then essentially plays devil's advocate.

Personally, I have a position on when a foetus is definitely a foetus and a position on bringing unwanted children into a world already overpopulated with the quality of life of those children uncertain. The second part there is where I come from when the first part no longer applies and I've said before that IMO it's unusual to see abortion as contraception past the stage where I could argue a foetus has become a baby.

I certainly have qualms about late stage abortions when we're talking purely elective abortion but again, I don't see many women taking that option lightly and there would usually be some other relevant circumstances.

To those who have different views and just see it as murder. Fair enough. I don't.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:44 pm
by CM11
JoeyFantastic wrote:
CM11 wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Jumper wrote:I hope that any No voters will also be seeking to repeal the 13th ammendment which allows women to travel for abortion. If you believe that abortion is murder (its not) and you idly stand by and watch women travelling to England to get one, you are essentially complicit in what you believe to be the murder of ~4000 Irish "babies" each year.
Care to tell me when you think life begins?

I am crushingly disappointed by the debate around this. We should have widespread, safe and free access to contraception and sex ed. We should as a society be focused on preventing unwanted pregnancies first and foremost.
I completely agree with you on the sex ed etc thing. That doesn't mean it has to be one or the other. The debate (and I'm not sure why it should even be a debate) you talk about should be happening separate to the referendum debate, not as part of it.
In your opinion, for me they are linked.

Care to say when life begins?
They are linked to the extent that if the education isn't good enough then you get a higher proportion of people using abortion as contraception but they're not linked from the perspective of deciding whether abortion is acceptable or not. Which is essentially what the referendum debate is about, even though that's not exactly what it's about either.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:46 pm
by Mullet 2
Over populated world?

How many kids have you?

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:47 pm
by etherman
I once asked a retired gyenacologist when he thought life began. "Not til one has been accepted to a decent school."

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:48 pm
by JoeyFantastic
Duff Paddy wrote: Save the philosophy debates for the arts block, unanswerable questions like that don’t contribute to moving this forward
For yourself maybe, for me it's the fundamental question.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:49 pm
by CM11
Mullet 2 wrote:Over populated world?

How many kids have you?
One of life's many contradictions.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:52 pm
by Adetroy
Duff Paddy wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
CM11 wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Jumper wrote:I hope that any No voters will also be seeking to repeal the 13th ammendment which allows women to travel for abortion. If you believe that abortion is murder (its not) and you idly stand by and watch women travelling to England to get one, you are essentially complicit in what you believe to be the murder of ~4000 Irish "babies" each year.
Care to tell me when you think life begins?

I am crushingly disappointed by the debate around this. We should have widespread, safe and free access to contraception and sex ed. We should as a society be focused on preventing unwanted pregnancies first and foremost.
I completely agree with you on the sex ed etc thing. That doesn't mean it has to be one or the other. The debate (and I'm not sure why it should even be a debate) you talk about should be happening separate to the referendum debate, not as part of it.
In your opinion, for me they are linked.

Care to say when life begins?
Save the philosophy debates for the arts block, unanswerable questions like that don’t contribute to moving this forward
The arrogance of that statement defies belief.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:53 pm
by Duff Paddy
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote: Save the philosophy debates for the arts block, unanswerable questions like that don’t contribute to moving this forward
For yourself maybe, for me it's the fundamental question.
Only if you’re willing to completely discount the autonomy of the pregnant woman, which I’m guessing you are.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:53 pm
by Conservative Eddie
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Conservative Eddie wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Jumper wrote:I hope that any No voters will also be seeking to repeal the 13th ammendment which allows women to travel for abortion. If you believe that abortion is murder (its not) and you idly stand by and watch women travelling to England to get one, you are essentially complicit in what you believe to be the murder of ~4000 Irish "babies" each year.
Care to tell me when you think life begins?

I am crushingly disappointed by the debate around this. We should have widespread, safe and free access to contraception and sex ed. We should as a society be focused on preventing unwanted pregnancies first and foremost.
When do you think life begins?

Even with good access to contraception and sex ed we're still going to have thousands of abortions every year. Women will opt for abortions and these women will often be well educated and well informed - use contraception etc. It's a bit of a myth that it's just ill-educated and disadvantaged women getting abortions. Married middle-class women get them too with the support of their husbands for perfectly sane and rational reasons, which ought to be no one else's business but theirs.
Honestly I'm not sure.
Well, many will say that it (human life) begins at fertilization - a zygote. Though I'm always tempted to say "so what?"

It's possible, in the lab, to take a human ovum from a female donor and remove its nucleus. Then to take one of your cells, remove its nucleus and inject it into the evacuated ovum. It's possible if you do this enough times you'll arrive at a viable developing zygote. Not that different from the one that originates and develops the old-fashioned way. These zygotes/embryos could then, in theory, be implanted into a female surrogate. Or used in basic and clinical research, as they have been.

This is presumably all highly objectionable to those who consider it a human life or baby, no different to you or me. Should they be used in research? Should donated embryos?

Again, they're all "human lives". I just don't think it explains very much to simply categorise every "human life" from fertilization to the death of the oldest adult human as if they're the same, or should be treated the same morally and legally. It sort of ignores quite a lot of important details.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:55 pm
by JoeyFantastic
Duff Paddy wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote: Save the philosophy debates for the arts block, unanswerable questions like that don’t contribute to moving this forward
For yourself maybe, for me it's the fundamental question.
Only if you’re willing to completely discount the autonomy of the pregnant woman, which I’m guessing you are.
Not so, it is a question of competing rights.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:56 pm
by Duff Paddy
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote: Save the philosophy debates for the arts block, unanswerable questions like that don’t contribute to moving this forward
For yourself maybe, for me it's the fundamental question.
Only if you’re willing to completely discount the autonomy of the pregnant woman, which I’m guessing you are.
Not so, it is a question of competing rights.
Undoubtedly

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:58 pm
by JoeyFantastic
Duff Paddy wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:
JoeyFantastic wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote: Save the philosophy debates for the arts block, unanswerable questions like that don’t contribute to moving this forward
For yourself maybe, for me it's the fundamental question.
Only if you’re willing to completely discount the autonomy of the pregnant woman, which I’m guessing you are.
Not so, it is a question of competing rights.
Undoubtedly
Which accrue when life begins, so define there for me, sound.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:58 pm
by Duff Paddy
Okay now you’ve gone back to square one again. As I said unanswerable.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:04 pm
by JoeyFantastic
Duff Paddy wrote:Okay now you’ve gone back to square one again. As I said unanswerable.
If you felt it was unanswerable, and you felt life was the highest right a person has, then you could never support the repeal vote as the uncertainty would cause anyone pause. I don't think it's unanswerable though, even if I don't have the answer.

Obviously, that assumes you believe that life is an actual right, maybe it is, maybe it isn't but it tends to be the fundamental right from which all other rights flow from.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:05 pm
by CM11
I've yet to get a straight answer from those who think abortion when it's rape/incest is ok but otherwise it's killing a baby. I can just about understand people thinking abortion due to FFA is ok but not in any other instances but I presume these people also back voluntary euthanasia.

I get those who just point blank think aborting a fertilised egg is murder and I respect, but disagree, with that stance.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:06 pm
by Mullet 2
CM11 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Over populated world?

How many kids have you?
One of life's many contradictions.

A few abortions help balance it out I suppose :lol:

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:08 pm
by CM11
Mullet 2 wrote:
CM11 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Over populated world?

How many kids have you?
One of life's many contradictions.

A few abortions help balance it out I suppose :lol:
:roll:

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:08 pm
by Mullet 2
Duff doesn't want to tell you when life begins.

Because he frankly doesn't care when that is.

If he gives an opinion on when life begins he limits when it's allowed end. Far better to not ask these questions and avoid grief from the missus.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:09 pm
by Mullet 2
CM11 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
CM11 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Over populated world?

How many kids have you?
One of life's many contradictions.

A few abortions help balance it out I suppose :lol:
:roll:
It's an over populated world.

Abortions are your carbon credits

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:11 pm
by Mullet 2
CM11 wrote:I've yet to get a straight answer from those who think abortion when it's rape/incest is ok but otherwise it's killing a baby. I can just about understand people thinking abortion due to FFA is ok but not in any other instances but I presume these people also back voluntary euthanasia.

I get those who just point blank think aborting a fertilised egg is murder and I respect, but disagree, with that stance.

Euthanasia?

It's like legions of strawmen

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:12 pm
by JoeyFantastic
Mullet 2 wrote:Duff doesn't want to tell you when life begins.

Because he frankly doesn't care when that is.

If he gives an opinion on when life begins he limits when it's allowed end. Far better to not ask these questions and avoid grief from the missus.
It's bizarre that people who are pro-abortion can't give an answer to that question tbf. I've no real skin in the game except that I don't know the answer to that question. Anyone who intends to vote (eitherway) should have an answer to it, imo.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:13 pm
by CM11
Mullet 2 wrote:
CM11 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
CM11 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Over populated world?

How many kids have you?
One of life's many contradictions.

A few abortions help balance it out I suppose :lol:
:roll:
It's an over populated world.

Abortions are your carbon credits
Again :roll:

I wouldn't have set out to have the number of children I have but I did also mention wanted in my post and they all are. I wouldn't deny anyone any number of children but bringing unwanted children into this world with a questionable quality of life just because someone else dictated they had to have the child is where I disagree.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:14 pm
by Conservative Eddie
I get those who just point blank think aborting a fertilised egg is murder and I respect, but disagree, with that stance.
I don't. A significant percentage - it could be half - of all fetilized eggs don't get implanted in the uterus. They get removed during menstruation.

Millions if not billions of "murders" playing out on sanitary pads every day.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:14 pm
by CM11
Mullet 2 wrote:
CM11 wrote:I've yet to get a straight answer from those who think abortion when it's rape/incest is ok but otherwise it's killing a baby. I can just about understand people thinking abortion due to FFA is ok but not in any other instances but I presume these people also back voluntary euthanasia.

I get those who just point blank think aborting a fertilised egg is murder and I respect, but disagree, with that stance.

Euthanasia?

It's like legions of strawmen
Not really putting it forward as a strawman but you'd have realised that if you weren't in full defensive mode.

Re: Repealing the 8th

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:16 pm
by CM11
Conservative Eddie wrote:
I get those who just point blank think aborting a fertilised egg is murder and I respect, but disagree, with that stance.
I don't. A significant percentage - it could be half - of all fetilized eggs don't get implanted in the uterus. They get removed during the menstruation.

Millions if not billions of "murders" playing out on sanitary pads every day.
Ok, poor wording. Implanted eggs then.