Chat Forum
It is currently Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:21 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 34  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 33868
Location: Hut 8
Willie Falloon wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
The only independent witness has said she doesn't believe she was witnessing a rape and two said that the moaning they heard was not that of a woman being raped.

It's over IMHO

Yep, pretty much.

Playing devil's advocate here; if you were the witness, a lot of pressure not to say otherwise. "You believed you were witnessing a rape and did nothing?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:13 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21883
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Miguel Indurain wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


The three most empty vessels too, pontificating day and night on every thread topic. Remarkable.


You spent several years of your life devoted to crying about Ireland on the NAMA thread.

You scurried off when Ireland bounced back and rarely show your face.

You’re a miserable prick and the only joy you’ve ever given this place is with your ridiculous style of posting and threatening to fight people, yes fight. A misery guts who takes things far too seriously.

I wonder if he would give up his seat on a bus


Still here Mick.

I see you still remember that time that you tried to be all morally superior to others on fat shaming when it was shown that you engaged in the same quite regularly on here. I still remember as it was absolutely hilarious calling you out, but it must have left a mark on you.

Much like the rest of the “Irish” that has you regularly on Irish threads looking for offense. Another humorousless and miserable person.

You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:29 pm
Posts: 6849
Out of curiosity how much would both sides' solicitors be earning for this one?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am
Posts: 9118
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver



I have given my opinion on the evidence heard and not on any legal matter. The same as when I sat on a jury.

Perhaps you do it differently in the Cavan District Court.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 23764
Jim Lahey wrote:
Out of curiosity how much would both sides' solicitors be earning for this one?


Sure the barristers aren't free either. 5 weeks in court? A shit load.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 16000
Location: #68
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


When did I do that?

In case you missed it (I’m guessing reading comprehension isn’t your strong point), the piece of idle speculation I did post was very negative on Jackson.

The last bit is utter twaddle. For you to give out about people posting opinions and for you to come out with that utter drivel is telling.

I don’t believe we’re getting the full story from either side. I simply do not think her story is credible and it sinks beyond reasonable doubt. If you want to debate the points then do so, posting every page like you’re above it all and then that utter crap at the end of your post does nothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am
Posts: 9118
Torquemada 1420 wrote:
Willie Falloon wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
The only independent witness has said she doesn't believe she was witnessing a rape and two said that the moaning they heard was not that of a woman being raped.

It's over IMHO

Yep, pretty much.

Playing devil's advocate here; if you were the witness, a lot of pressure not to say otherwise. "You believed you were witnessing a rape and did nothing?"



That's playing stupid advocate


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 33868
Location: Hut 8
Mullet 2 wrote:
Torquemada 1420 wrote:
Willie Falloon wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
The only independent witness has said she doesn't believe she was witnessing a rape and two said that the moaning they heard was not that of a woman being raped.

It's over IMHO

Yep, pretty much.

Playing devil's advocate here; if you were the witness, a lot of pressure not to say otherwise. "You believed you were witnessing a rape and did nothing?"



That's playing stupid advocate

Why? Something in human nature you are party to that the rest of the world is unaware of?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am
Posts: 9118
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.



Fairly deeply unpleasant thing to say.

Have a good solid look at yourself in the mirror and make a renewed effort not to be a wanker for the rest of the day.

There's a good lad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 16000
Location: #68
Mick Mannock wrote:
You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Oh deadly, the “I know you are but what an I” comeback. Brilliant stuff there Mick.

Why are you here again? Looking for more material against the “Irish” I bet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15521
Location: A Glass Cage Of Emotion
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.

FFS. :uhoh:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:20 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21883
Torquemada 1420 wrote:
Willie Falloon wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
The only independent witness has said she doesn't believe she was witnessing a rape and two said that the moaning they heard was not that of a woman being raped.

It's over IMHO

Yep, pretty much.

Playing devil's advocate here; if you were the witness, a lot of pressure not to say otherwise. "You believed you were witnessing a rape and did nothing?"

Good point


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 16000
Location: #68
Sure you’re more of a fan of standing trains aren’t you Von Duggan?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 23764
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


Giving out about armchair legal experts but engaging in a spot of armchair psychology yourself then :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2258
Mullet 2 wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver



I have given my opinion on the evidence heard and not on any legal matter. The same as when I sat on a jury.

Perhaps you do it differently in the Cavan District Court.

Nonsense you have been incredibly shrill on this I would expect better from you, Earl and Bullett no but you yes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 29158
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


Hatred of women? That’s a bit of a leap.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2258
danthefan wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


Giving out about armchair legal experts but engaging in a spot of armchair psychology yourself then :?

Just my opinion like :P


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 48428
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


I think you're displaying your own bias on various levels there. Not sure what opinions have been presented as facts. Care to elaborate?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am
Posts: 9118
Witchfinder General wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver



I have given my opinion on the evidence heard and not on any legal matter. The same as when I sat on a jury.

Perhaps you do it differently in the Cavan District Court.

Nonsense you have been incredibly shrill on this I would expect better from you, Earl and Bullett no but you yes.



You're the one calling anybody who believes in reasonable doubt to be woman haters but we're shrill? Step away from the lefty keyboard for a few hours.

I love women, me Ma is one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:24 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21883
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Oh deadly, the “I know you are but what an I” comeback. Brilliant stuff there Mick.

Why are you here again? Looking for more material against the “Irish” I bet.


Not all. You are appearing a bit paranoid.

This is not YOUR thread. You do not own it. I hope the correct verdict is reached whatever it might be. If you searched all my posts on this thread you might already know that. But you cannot be bothered because you have a weird agenda that I have an agenda.

And in case you failed to notice, the alledged victim is the same nationality as the alledged perps, so how you manage to spin this as me looking for some anti-Irish stuff, is beyond me.


Last edited by Mick Mannock on Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am
Posts: 9118
Mick Mannock wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Oh deadly, the “I know you are but what an I” comeback. Brilliant stuff there Mick.

Why are you here again? Looking for more material against the “Irish” I bet.


Not all. You are appearing a bit paranoid.

This is not YOUR thread. You do not own it. I hope the correct verdict is reached whatever it might be. If you searched all my posts on this thread you might already know that. But you cannot be bothered because you have a weird agenda that I have an agenda.



Mick's just here to protect the integrity of the legal process lads. So back off.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2258
CM11 wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


I think you're displaying your own bias on various levels there. Not sure what opinions have been presented as facts. Care to elaborate?

Of course I am, this is PR everyones biased oh here its the sort of case closed pronouncements based on snippets of evidence that I am more referring to, its a court case its adversarial in nature and theres a long way to go in terms of more forensic evidence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:51 pm
Posts: 10839
Mick Mannock wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Oh deadly, the “I know you are but what an I” comeback. Brilliant stuff there Mick.

Why are you here again? Looking for more material against the “Irish” I bet.


Not all. You are appearing a bit paranoid.

This is not YOUR thread. You do not own it. I hope the correct verdict is reached whatever it might be. If you searched all my posts on this thread you might already know that. But you cannot be bothered because you have a weird agenda that I have an agenda.

In fairness you do tend to stalk Irish interest threads looking for offense. Bit like Henry looking for other nations fans being "arrogant". To go full witchfinder, you appear to be scared in some way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 18229
Witchfinder General wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver



I have given my opinion on the evidence heard and not on any legal matter. The same as when I sat on a jury.

Perhaps you do it differently in the Cavan District Court.

Nonsense you have been incredibly shrill on this I would expect better from you, Earl and Bullett no but you yes.


Please always add the Blackrock part.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 16000
Location: #68
Witchfinder General wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver



I have given my opinion on the evidence heard and not on any legal matter. The same as when I sat on a jury.

Perhaps you do it differently in the Cavan District Court.

Nonsense you have been incredibly shrill on this I would expect better from you, Earl and Bullett no but you yes.


Actually read this thread.

I played the ball and not the man on here until you and others decided to do otherwise.

My first post here was saying to someone who thought the defense did a poor job in their I Irish questions that I did not think so, with reasons.

Of course I questioned her story. I also questioned Paddy Jackson’s line about not having vaginal sec and posted quite negatively on him as to why he would do so. I do not find her story credible, however and stand over that. That doesn’t make someone a woman hater.

You are revealing either your own bias about me, or your simple poor reading comprehension skills. Keep posting away there though as if you’re above it al.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:29 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21883
Mullet 2 wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Oh deadly, the “I know you are but what an I” comeback. Brilliant stuff there Mick.

Why are you here again? Looking for more material against the “Irish” I bet.


Not all. You are appearing a bit paranoid.

This is not YOUR thread. You do not own it. I hope the correct verdict is reached whatever it might be. If you searched all my posts on this thread you might already know that. But you cannot be bothered because you have a weird agenda that I have an agenda.



Mick's just here to protect the integrity of the legal process lads. So back off.

:thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 48428
Witchfinder General wrote:
CM11 wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


I think you're displaying your own bias on various levels there. Not sure what opinions have been presented as facts. Care to elaborate?

Of course I am, this is PR everyones biased oh here its the sort of case closed pronouncements based on snippets of evidence that I am more referring to, its a court case its adversarial in nature and theres a long way to go in terms of more forensic evidence.


You are of course correct that there is plenty more to hear but people are just giving their opinion on the evidence to date. Maybe it's crass, or worse, to be discussing it at all but it is just opinion being spouted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 33868
Location: Hut 8
Mick Mannock wrote:
Not all. You are appearing a bit paranoid.

This is not YOUR thread. You do not own it. I hope the correct verdict is reached whatever it might be.

I'd be surprised if anyone here wanted otherwise, regardless of leaning.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am
Posts: 9118
Witchfinder General wrote:
CM11 wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Witchfinder General wrote:
I never realised how many senior counsels post on here who without being in court can tell how a jury are reacting to the evidence, step forward the new legal dream team of the firm of Mullet,Bullet and Beaver


It’s not difficult in life to have an opinion on something.

its presenting your opinions as fact that's the issue here, you want them found not guilty we get that but you, Mullett and Earl with your hysterical pronouncements on every piece of evidence that suits your bias are creating an impression of a deep seated hatred for women.


I think you're displaying your own bias on various levels there. Not sure what opinions have been presented as facts. Care to elaborate?

Of course I am, this is PR everyones biased oh here its the sort of case closed pronouncements based on snippets of evidence that I am more referring to, its a court case its adversarial in nature and theres a long way to go in terms of more forensic evidence.


Now who is setting up a legal firm :lol:

Stay down champ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:31 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21883
paddyor wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Oh deadly, the “I know you are but what an I” comeback. Brilliant stuff there Mick.

Why are you here again? Looking for more material against the “Irish” I bet.


Not all. You are appearing a bit paranoid.

This is not YOUR thread. You do not own it. I hope the correct verdict is reached whatever it might be. If you searched all my posts on this thread you might already know that. But you cannot be bothered because you have a weird agenda that I have an agenda.

In fairness you do tend to stalk Irish interest threads looking for offense. Bit like Henry looking for other nations fans being "arrogant". To go full witchfinder, you appear to be scared in some way.


I do not as it happens. You imagine stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 16000
Location: #68
Mick Mannock wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
You are a consistently self-important drip. Also more than a little humourless yourself.


Oh deadly, the “I know you are but what an I” comeback. Brilliant stuff there Mick.

Why are you here again? Looking for more material against the “Irish” I bet.


Not all. You are appearing a bit paranoid.

This is not YOUR thread. You do not own it. I hope the correct verdict is reached whatever it might be. If you searched all my posts on this thread you might already know that. But you cannot be bothered because you have a weird agenda that I have an agenda.

And in case you failed to notice, the alledged victim is the same nationality as the alledged perps, so how you manage to spin this as me looking for some anti-Irish stuff, is beyond me.


I haven’t seen you post much worthwhile.

Your first post here was taking offense to an old POC gag he tells at speaking events.

You are here, there and everywhere, looking to moan about the “Irish”.

Standard issue for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am
Posts: 9118
Witchfinder has been quick to believe the worst about Jackson and Olding without hearing all the evidence. It seems clear to me that he has some deep issues around the trusting of men. A self-hating man, it's sad to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:34 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21883
One post. You are a soppy drip. And a fantacist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 48428
Ah, Mick must know exactly what he's doing, it's gone on far too long for him not to have come to a realisation, if it was accidental initially. No one can lack that much self awareness, can they?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4923
Location: Terenure, Dublin 6, Ireland
Witchfinder General wrote:
CM11 wrote:
I think you're displaying your own bias on various levels there. Not sure what opinions have been presented as facts. Care to elaborate?

Of course I am, this is PR everyones biased oh here its the sort of case closed pronouncements based on snippets of evidence that I am more referring to, its a court case its adversarial in nature and theres a long way to go in terms of more forensic evidence.


This is fair comment, WG in my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:18 am
Posts: 2791
How many weeks are left to go, 2 or 3?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2258
Mullet 2 wrote:
Witchfinder has been quick to believe the worst about Jackson and Olding without hearing all the evidence. It seems clear to me that he has some deep issues around the trusting of men. A self-hating man, it's sad to see.

That's just your opinion 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5542
Location: the Confederacy of Dunces
on an abortion of a thread keep up the good work Witchfinder.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 48428
JoeMangled wrote:
How many weeks are left to go, 2 or 3?


Meant to be 5 weeks. We're only in week 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 13518
Location: Best country in the world.
Bullettyme wrote:
The Sun God wrote:
Bullettyme wrote:
Paddy should really put his Instagram on private or else turn off comments on it. :uhoh:


No, it could be useful in the event of an appeal.......court of public opinion etc...


Really? Just had a look at it, jesus you'd think he was guilty already.


Exactly.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 4071, assfly, backrow, bessantj, BetterByBoat, Bing [Bot], BokJock, booze, camroc1, Captain Average, DragsterDriver, Edinburgh01, feckwanker, Gospel, guy smiley, Gwenno, irishrugbyua, Jeff the Bear, jolindien, Kiwias, koroke hangareka, ManInTheBar, Mick Mannock, mikerob, Mog The Almighty, Plato'sCave, rabble, Raggs, Rugby2023, RuggaBugga, Santa, Smutley, tabascoboy, Toulon's Not Toulouse, TranceNRG, troglodiet, Wilson's Toffee, Yer Man, youngsidd and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group