Planet Rugby Forum

1. Ireland - 9 points
2. Wales - 9 points
3. England - 6 points

4. Meh
5. Who cares
6. Rubbish

I believe Wales B would have won had the try been given. The apology from World Rugby doesn't change the result officially but unofficially I believe it does.

Do you need a hug?

Fück off Dai

Wales were second best for the vast majority of the game - get over it ffs

1. Ireland - 9 points
2. Wales - 9 points
3. England - 6 points

4. Meh
5. Who cares
6. Rubbish

Seems fair enough - have you got a link to where this was published?

I'll keep updating the table as the tournament goes along.

Dai is making the England victory all the sweeter.

Apologies to all the normal Welsh chaps, you have been very gracious as always but this fecker is a tool of the greatest magnitude

Dai another day wrote:1. Ireland - 9 points
2. Wales - 9 points
3. England - 6 points

4. Meh
5. Who cares
6. Rubbish

I believe Wales B would have won had the try been given. The apology from World Rugby doesn't change the result officially but unofficially I believe it does.

Well that's that then. Dai says so, so it must be true. Grand slam to follow, as surely nobody could beat Wales without cheating.

I'm imagining Dai at his PC, in the midst of a proper bout of ugly-crying

Bless his little cotton socks

croyals wrote:

That’s clearly chuckles to the right of Cartman - fail

Is Dai the worst loser in the history of sport.

ovalball wrote:Is Dai the worst loser in the history of sport.

Yes

Dai another day wrote:1. Ireland - 9 points
2. Wales - 9 points
3. England - 6 points

4. Meh
5. Who cares
6. Rubbish

I believe Wales B would have won had the try been given. The apology from World Rugby doesn't change the result officially but unofficially I believe it does.

Im not sure it’s that simple. I believe the World rugby admission actually officially unofficially changes the result...

Dai another day wrote:1. Ireland - 9 points
2. Wales - 9 points
3. England - 6 points

4. Meh
5. Who cares
6. Rubbish

I believe Wales B would have won had the try been given. The apology from World Rugby doesn't change the result officially but unofficially I believe it does.

He`s an embarrassment to the rest of us. All the moaning in the world isn`t going to change the result. Get over it and move on.

Alternative 6N table:

1. England
2. Ireland
3. France
4. Scotland
5. Wales
6. Italy


Oh wait, that was last year's actual table.

rfurlong wrote:Wales were second best for the vast majority of the game - get over it ffs

Clearly watching wrong game.

Clive wrote:

rfurlong wrote:Wales were second best for the vast majority of the game - get over it ffs

Clearly watching wrong game.

Sir Ian McGeechan said the same thing. It is what it is.

Points per ratio of population.

1. Wales 108
2. Ireland 103.4
3. Scotland 41.5
4. England 9
5. France 1.4
6. Italy 0

Rugby2023 wrote:

Clive wrote:

rfurlong wrote:Wales were second best for the vast majority of the game - get over it ffs

Clearly watching wrong game.

Sir Ian McGeechan said the same thing. It is what it is.

Ye a matter of opinion

Rugby2023 wrote:

Clive wrote:

rfurlong wrote:Wales were second best for the vast majority of the game - get over it ffs

Clearly watching wrong game.

Sir Ian McGeechan said the same thing. It is what it is.

Check the stats. The score is a misnomer which has be officially discarded by world rugby.

Clive Simms wrote:Points per ratio of population.

1. Wales 108
2. Ireland 103.4
3. Scotland 41.5
4. England 9
5. France 1.4
6. Italy 0

I wouldn't normally do this but as this is "one of those" threads, "Points per ratio of population" is about as meaningful as the original post. For the avoidance of doubt, that means it has no meaning. It is unintelligible. It is gobbledygook. It is the effluent of the numerically illiterate.

A5D5E5 wrote:

Clive Simms wrote:Points per ratio of population.

1. Wales 108
2. Ireland 103.4
3. Scotland 41.5
4. England 9
5. France 1.4
6. Italy 0

I wouldn't normally do this but as this is "one of those" threads, "Points per ratio of population" is about as meaningful as the original post. For the avoidance of doubt, that means it has no meaning. It is unintelligible. It is gobbledygook. It is the effluent of the numerically illiterate.

Quite. It is unintelligible for the unintelligent.

It's also more whining by a poor loser with a distinct lack of sportsmanship.

Clive Simms wrote:

A5D5E5 wrote:

Clive Simms wrote:Points per ratio of population.

1. Wales 108
2. Ireland 103.4
3. Scotland 41.5
4. England 9
5. France 1.4
6. Italy 0

I wouldn't normally do this but as this is "one of those" threads, "Points per ratio of population" is about as meaningful as the original post. For the avoidance of doubt, that means it has no meaning. It is unintelligible. It is gobbledygook. It is the effluent of the numerically illiterate.

Quite. It is unintelligible for the unintelligent.

Going for the Emperor's New Table angle eh? That is bound to go well for you.

A5D5E5 wrote:

Clive Simms wrote:

A5D5E5 wrote:

Clive Simms wrote:Points per ratio of population.

1. Wales 108
2. Ireland 103.4
3. Scotland 41.5
4. England 9
5. France 1.4
6. Italy 0

I wouldn't normally do this but as this is "one of those" threads, "Points per ratio of population" is about as meaningful as the original post. For the avoidance of doubt, that means it has no meaning. It is unintelligible. It is gobbledygook. It is the effluent of the numerically illiterate.

Quite. It is unintelligible for the unintelligent.

Going for the Emperor's New Table angle eh? That is bound to go well for you.

Indeed

cubby boi wrote:

Rugby2023 wrote:

Clive wrote:

rfurlong wrote:Wales were second best for the vast majority of the game - get over it ffs

Clearly watching wrong game.

Sir Ian McGeechan said the same thing. It is what it is.

Check the stats. The score is a misnomer which has be officially discarded by world rugby.

Dai another day wrote:1. Ireland - 9 points
2. Wales - 9 points
3. England - 6 points

4. Meh
5. Who cares
6. Rubbish

I believe Wales B would have won had the try been given. The apology from World Rugby doesn't change the result officially but unofficially I believe it does.

Oh good - so Scotland unofficially beat Australia and made the unofficial RWC semi-finals then. I'm quite excited - I think we had a real chance of unofficially beating Argentina and making our first unofficial final.

Plato'sCave wrote:Fück off Dai

So much this!
Inveterate troll who just can't help himself. But we've come to expect it from him.

The first poster I have blocked in years

Since when was a try 7 points ?
I did not see a successful conversion, so the official table is still correct.

Leinster in London wrote:Since when was a try 7 points ?
I did not see a successful conversion, so the official table is still correct.

Also, the disallowing of the try led to Wales going back to take a penalty which they converted, so at most a 4 point gain. It was 12-0 at the time, so the most likely score at half time had the try been given would be 12-5 (assuming no conversion). Even if they then scored the penalty they got in the second half, it would still only be 12-8.

Very Alternative Six Nations table

1. A cadre of Trans men and women with jars of piss instead of boots - 8
2. Alcoholic bees angry at a world that never accepted them - 6
3. 27 large Labradors disguised as small Labradors - 5
4. A selection of people named Steve with the word 'homo' instead of a mouth - 3
5. That bit between the end of the Houses of the Holy and the start of Trampled Under Foot on the Led Zeppelin Album Physical Graffiti - 1
6. The ghosts of those that died at Andrew Lloyd Webber musicals - 0

Wait, wasn't this in the 23rd minute???

Clive Simms wrote:Points per ratio of population.

1. Wales 108
2. Ireland 103.4
3. Scotland 41.5
4. England 9
5. France 1.4
6. Italy 0

What you need is points per money invested. I can’t be arsed though. With the abortion of a kicking game employed on Saturday I’m fùcking delighted with third.

Clive Simms wrote:

Rugby2023 wrote:

Clive wrote:

rfurlong wrote:Wales were second best for the vast majority of the game - get over it ffs

Clearly watching wrong game.

Sir Ian McGeechan said the same thing. It is what it is.

Ye a matter of opinion

I'm pretty sure I heard that Steve Borthwick had World Rugby on the phone...

I'm worried. I appear to have just swung in from a parallel universe where Dai was explaining how he'd taken in on the chin and moved on

http://forum.planetrugby.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=83939

The only thing Dai is taking on the chin is his own sperm from his anger wanks.

WR's apology to Wales fans today is justification for Dai's persistence in pointing out the incompetence of the officiating.

Most of Dai's efforts however resulted in locked threads and threats of a ban. The officiating here reflects the officiating of that try. #Verybad.