Re: Proteas v Baggy Greens - 4 TEST SERIES Thread
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:48 pm
So demanding that Rohit Sharma speak English wasn't in the least bit racist? Okaay...
The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
He wanted to say "You keep talking back at me aggressively in a language I don't understand and I think we should have a discussion about it in a langue that I, and my team mates, can understand" but his lizard brain intervened.SecretAgentMan wrote:So demanding that Rohit Sharma speak English wasn't in the least bit racist? Okaay...
That's how you roll. Niggle is a consistent feature with the Wallabies too. Aussie battleeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrssssssssThomas wrote:#pray4daveysaffer13 wrote:Yes, Warner's the victim here, I forgotThomas wrote:So you're saying Warner should have punched De Sook?saffer13 wrote:That "two to tango" comment is a bit silly at times. You can resist all you want but there comes a time when the bully just needs to be throat punched.
Interesting.
It's going to be a spicy second test match. Yes indeed.
Yeah, nah. It actually isn't. It's something kiwis have told themselves so often that they actually believe it. Kinda like the kiwis who actually think the Aussies sledged several retiring Black Caps players during the Cricket World Cup final.mr bungle wrote: That's how you roll. Niggle is a consistent feature with the Wallabies too. Aussie battleeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrssssssss
But that's Wales.mr bungle wrote:We had an entire 3 match series against the Welsh without one tussle. You guys can't go any match without the same, no matter the opposition. It's you Ocker DNA, and we love you for it.
Nah, he isn't Kohli.odd144 wrote:Fellow Saffas (Chicken runners and Klingon's)...we all know that Warner is going to get a scorching double hundred in Port Elizabeth right
Thomas wrote:Nah, he isn't Kohli.odd144 wrote:Fellow Saffas (Chicken runners and Klingon's)...we all know that Warner is going to get a scorching double hundred in Port Elizabeth right
Clogs wrote:mr bungle wrote:Davey dumb dumb.Clogs wrote:BBB wrote:Just seen some footage on Foxsports.
Warner sledges de Kock on the boundary rope by calling him a “f$&king sook...” as the 2 S.A batsmen are taking off their helmets on the boundary rope after they’ve gone off for the tea break,FFS.
Yep just seen it. Ordinary.
What Davey and the Australians fail to realise is that Sook is actually Quentin's sisters name...
Nah just a double as his self entitlement would have swelled his head by then and he would barely be able to hold his head up...poor victimised soul.Clogs wrote:Thomas wrote:Nah, he isn't Kohli.odd144 wrote:Fellow Saffas (Chicken runners and Klingon's)...we all know that Warner is going to get a scorching double hundred in Port Elizabeth right
True dat.
Put him down for a triple.
Not out...
He should be targetting the 4th test here to get the Zimbabwe test off and clear the decks for filling his boots for the Bangladesh tests at home in Julyovalball wrote:Tribunal have been pretty smart with Warner - find him guilty but put him on 3 points, 1 away from a ban - the points stay with him for 24 months - so he'll have to rein in his behaviour for a long time.
And you can be sure that his opponents will make hay while he's got his hands tied - there'll be plenty of baiting going on, trying to get another little meltdown out of him. No doubt the SA crowds might have a word or two for him as well.
guy smiley wrote:Titus O'Reily...
probably my favourite sport at the moment is the rodeo that is David Warner trying to ride a high horse
Thomas wrote:
A lady?Thomas wrote:Saint Warner of Bogan. He has a point though.odd144 wrote:Poor innocent Davey, shame on you bully boy Sef Africans, FOR SHAME!
Outright disgusting': Warner slams South African for wife sledge
http://www.watoday.com.au/sport/cricket ... 4z3cc.html
“I think you guys are well aware that I cop it left, right and centre, especially off the field from spectators. I am used to that and it doesn’t bother me," Warner said.
"But in the proximity of my personal space and behind me, a comment that was vile and disgusting and about my wife and just in general about a lady, was quite poor I felt. My emotional response, you saw, was just (to) something that I don’t believe should have been said. And as I said, I will always stick up for my family. And in that case, my teammates as well.
"I’ve always felt that when it comes to family or racism comments or anything like that, that’s just a no-go zone. I’ve been called everything under the sun out the field and that, quite frankly, doesn’t bother me"
I have a point to make - so I make it.Bindi wrote:fudge me you go on.Enzedder wrote:Perhaps Warner's Captain needs some attention from the ICC officials about his lack of action - shall we say condoning - of it.
handyman wrote:A lady?Thomas wrote:Saint Warner of Bogan. He has a point though.odd144 wrote:Poor innocent Davey, shame on you bully boy Sef Africans, FOR SHAME!
Outright disgusting': Warner slams South African for wife sledge
http://www.watoday.com.au/sport/cricket ... 4z3cc.html
“I think you guys are well aware that I cop it left, right and centre, especially off the field from spectators. I am used to that and it doesn’t bother me," Warner said.
"But in the proximity of my personal space and behind me, a comment that was vile and disgusting and about my wife and just in general about a lady, was quite poor I felt. My emotional response, you saw, was just (to) something that I don’t believe should have been said. And as I said, I will always stick up for my family. And in that case, my teammates as well.
"I’ve always felt that when it comes to family or racism comments or anything like that, that’s just a no-go zone. I’ve been called everything under the sun out the field and that, quite frankly, doesn’t bother me"
Careful Ovals - you'll get Bindi attacking you too.ovalball wrote:Puts the lie to Smith's utterings on the subject - he needs to get control of his players.saffer13 wrote:So much for "leaving it out on the field" What a plum
Whoa there Tiger. It was SBW who had a go at Warner's wife. QDK only reminded him of it.argus wrote:Still over reaction by QDKsaffer13 wrote:Yes, Warner's the victim here, I forgotThomas wrote:So you're saying Warner should have punched De Sook?saffer13 wrote:That "two to tango" comment is a bit silly at times. You can resist all you want but there comes a time when the bully just needs to be throat punched.
Interesting.
got called a "sook" (wtf is a sook?) and he had a go at the guys wife
...with camerasRinkals wrote:Good point.Thomas wrote:What crowds?Rinkals wrote:I don't think South African crowds are quite as aggressive as Australian crowds are.ovalball wrote:Tribunal have been pretty smart with Warner - find him guilty but put him on 3 points, 1 away from a ban - the points stay with him for 24 months - so he'll have to rein in his behaviour for a long time.
And you can be sure that his opponents will make hay while he's got his hands tied - there'll be plenty of baiting going on, trying to get another little meltdown out of him. No doubt the SA crowds might have a word or two for him as well.
De Kock has gone down the Not Guilty route - expect plenty of Aussie outrage if he's successful.
And I don't think the Saffer players are quite as effective verbally, either, so I suspect the ICC action does little more than let Warner off the hook. All he needs to do is make sure that any verbals are out of range of the stump mikes for a year or two and he'll be all right. I doubt either of these umpires will take any action that might result in a ban for him.
However, Newlands, Wanderers and St Georges will be far better supported.
No but we dont think he's blameless nor the Saffa set up. Only the Kiwis are setting exemplarary levels in sportsmanship and grace no other team can even begin to match.handyman wrote:Even ex-players from Aus are blaming Smith, Warner and LehmanRinkals wrote:I see South Africa have three players facing bans: Rabada, du Plessis and de Kock, while Australia only have Warner, so your suggestion that the ICC have allowed open season on Warner doesn't really scan.ovalball wrote:Very hard to sledge the batsman out of range of the stump mikes.Rinkals wrote:I don't think South African crowds are quite as aggressive as Australian crowds are.ovalball wrote:Tribunal have been pretty smart with Warner - find him guilty but put him on 3 points, 1 away from a ban - the points stay with him for 24 months - so he'll have to rein in his behaviour for a long time.
And you can be sure that his opponents will make hay while he's got his hands tied - there'll be plenty of baiting going on, trying to get another little meltdown out of him. No doubt the SA crowds might have a word or two for him as well.
De Kock has gone down the Not Guilty route - expect plenty of Aussie outrage if he's successful.
And I don't think the Saffer players are quite as effective verbally, either, so I suspect the ICC action does little more than let Warner off the hook. All he needs to do is make sure that any verbals are out of range of the stump mikes for a year or two and he'll be all right. I doubt either of these umpires will take any action that might result in a ban for him.
And, it doesn't seem to require much to wind him up.
I'm a little surprised that Ian Chappel has waded in as he hasn't shown any inclination to be over fond of South Africans in the past.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22674045/smith-lehmann-culpable-warner-episode-chappell
But no, some posters still think De Kock's to blame.
Bloody good sledge, I must admit ...1.
a person lacking spirit or self-confidence.
2.
a hand-reared calf.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22684273/curious-case-australian-line-controlThroughout its colourful and rich history, Australian cricket has offered us some of the game's most magnificent qualities: competitiveness, daring, energy, positivity. For the better part of the last two decades, they were the gold standard for the game. Yet, slowly, during the same period, so many major series featuring the Aussies has begun to produce an overheated, eventually absurd subplot. In which they usually claim to be the victims, while often being deliberate, and even skillful agent provocateurs.
Are they now the spiritual guardians of cricket ?o but we dont think he's blameless nor the Saffa set up. Only the Kiwis are setting exemplarary levels in sportsmanship and grace no other team can even begin to match.
Chilli wrote:NAre they now the spiritual guardians of cricket ?o but we dont think he's blameless nor the Saffa set up. Only the Kiwis are setting exemplarary levels in sportsmanship and grace no other team can even begin to match.
Or they just think he's low on confidence following his run of low scores vs India.Rinkals wrote:Interesting that South Africa have three players on a suspension and David Warner is the only Aussie.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22684273/curious-case-australian-line-controlThroughout its colourful and rich history, Australian cricket has offered us some of the game's most magnificent qualities: competitiveness, daring, energy, positivity. For the better part of the last two decades, they were the gold standard for the game. Yet, slowly, during the same period, so many major series featuring the Aussies has begun to produce an overheated, eventually absurd subplot. In which they usually claim to be the victims, while often being deliberate, and even skillful agent provocateurs.
The fact that Warner accuses de Kock of being a "fucking sook" indicates that de Kock had tried to get the umpires to moderate the Aussie sledging, which they had declined to do. If the ICC are serious about stamping out this kind of incident, they have to be a lot less tolerant of Aussie transgressions on this sort of thing and apply the same standards as are applied to other teams that aren't tier one.
No, they are just cvnts.Wilson's Toffee wrote:Chilli wrote:NAre they now the spiritual guardians of cricket ?o but we dont think he's blameless nor the Saffa set up. Only the Kiwis are setting exemplarary levels in sportsmanship and grace no other team can even begin to match.
I think that should be India ..
Errm possibly not.Rinkals wrote:Interesting that South Africa have three players on a suspension and David Warner is the only Aussie.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22684273/curious-case-australian-line-controlThroughout its colourful and rich history, Australian cricket has offered us some of the game's most magnificent qualities: competitiveness, daring, energy, positivity. For the better part of the last two decades, they were the gold standard for the game. Yet, slowly, during the same period, so many major series featuring the Aussies has begun to produce an overheated, eventually absurd subplot. In which they usually claim to be the victims, while often being deliberate, and even skillful agent provocateurs.
The fact that Warner accuses de Kock of being a "fucking sook" indicates that de Kock had tried to get the umpires to moderate the Aussie sledging, which they had declined to do. If the ICC are serious about stamping out this kind of incident, they have to be a lot less tolerant of Aussie transgressions on this sort of thing and apply the same standards as are applied to other teams that aren't tier one.
Clogs wrote:Errm possibly not.Rinkals wrote:Interesting that South Africa have three players on a suspension and David Warner is the only Aussie.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22684273/curious-case-australian-line-controlThroughout its colourful and rich history, Australian cricket has offered us some of the game's most magnificent qualities: competitiveness, daring, energy, positivity. For the better part of the last two decades, they were the gold standard for the game. Yet, slowly, during the same period, so many major series featuring the Aussies has begun to produce an overheated, eventually absurd subplot. In which they usually claim to be the victims, while often being deliberate, and even skillful agent provocateurs.
The fact that Warner accuses de Kock of being a "fucking sook" indicates that de Kock had tried to get the umpires to moderate the Aussie sledging, which they had declined to do. If the ICC are serious about stamping out this kind of incident, they have to be a lot less tolerant of Aussie transgressions on this sort of thing and apply the same standards as are applied to other teams that aren't tier one.
Allow me to elaborate:
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"I may have also fvcked your dog/sister/mother you fvcking spastic you have no right being in this side you fvcking spastic"*
About 2 hours later of constant sniggering, the player fires back: "Could SBW borrow your box again?"
Aussie cricketer:"I will fvcking cut you if you mention my family you fvcking cvnt"
Aussie cricketer:"Hold me back I am a fvcking tiger and will smash this cvnt"
Aussie cricketer:'There is a line, we decide where it starts and ends, so don't you fvcking dare cross it"
For the non Australian's on here do you think that about covers it?
*Possibly never said, but in fairness it can't be ruled out.
Clogs wrote:Errm possibly not.Rinkals wrote:Interesting that South Africa have three players on a suspension and David Warner is the only Aussie.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22684273/curious-case-australian-line-controlThroughout its colourful and rich history, Australian cricket has offered us some of the game's most magnificent qualities: competitiveness, daring, energy, positivity. For the better part of the last two decades, they were the gold standard for the game. Yet, slowly, during the same period, so many major series featuring the Aussies has begun to produce an overheated, eventually absurd subplot. In which they usually claim to be the victims, while often being deliberate, and even skillful agent provocateurs.
The fact that Warner accuses de Kock of being a "fucking sook" indicates that de Kock had tried to get the umpires to moderate the Aussie sledging, which they had declined to do. If the ICC are serious about stamping out this kind of incident, they have to be a lot less tolerant of Aussie transgressions on this sort of thing and apply the same standards as are applied to other teams that aren't tier one.
Allow me to elaborate:
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer: "Why are you such a sook De Kock"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"Oi. De Kock, why are you such a sook De Kock?"
Aussie cricketers:"snigger"
Aussie cricketer:"I may have also fvcked your dog/sister/mother you fvcking spastic you have no right being in this side you fvcking spastic"*
About 2 hours later of constant sniggering, the player fires back: "Could SBW borrow your box again?"
Aussie cricketer:"I will fvcking cut you if you mention my family you fvcking cvnt"
Aussie cricketer:"Hold me back I am a fvcking tiger and will smash this cvnt"
Aussie cricketer:'There is a line, we decide where it starts and ends, so don't you fvcking dare cross it"
For the non Australian's on here do you think that about covers it?
*Possibly never said, but in fairness it can't be ruled out.
They got beaten last year in a three test series.blackblackblack wrote:The thing thatgets me is that The Aussie team is comprised of some of the most outrageously talented players, they are streets ahead of most teams they play. So much so that I don't think they even need to indulge in the mindgames. The hypocrisy of spouting on about the spirit of cricket then behaving as they do is so unabashed in it's hypocrisy the only analogy I could imagine would be the co presenter of the best actress award at the oscars standing behind the actress presenting the award speaking about metoo and times up, while he stands close behind nodding sagely, all the while rubbing himself up against her arse. They don't need to do it but dive in anyway, which indicates some sort of perverse pleasure at the offensive nature of their behaviour. Asking for the stump mike (a channel Naan innovation BTW) to be turned down then acting like spoiled children when it wasn't until it eventually was so they could go on their merry way. Symptomatic of their nation at large. Needlessly, but self indulgently twattish.
Crybaby.Wilson's Toffee wrote:Sook.
Bloody good sledge, I must admit ...1.
a person lacking spirit or self-confidence.
2.
a hand-reared calf.
SecretAgentMan wrote:Crybaby.Wilson's Toffee wrote:Sook.
Bloody good sledge, I must admit ...1.
a person lacking spirit or self-confidence.
2.
a hand-reared calf.
Indeed.Chilli wrote:I trust that the Protea's will get their retaliation in first at the start of the next test.
McMillan, who was involved in several “verbals” with the Australians during his playing days, believes Warner was looking for trouble.
“It’s an old trick of his - to say sniping and personal things - but when it comes back his way he loses his temper,” McMillan told Netwerk24.
“It just shows that he can’t take what he dishes out. Typical short man syndrome. He needs to grow up,” McMillan continued, referring to the fact that Warner is just 1.7m tall.
The Australian camp denied that Warner had said anything personal towards De Kock, but McMillan implied that they were lying.
“Anyone who believes he (Warner) and the Aussies did not say anything of a personal nature must be very naive...”
McMillan also spoke to Sport24 earlier this week when he urged the Proteas to rather focus on their cricket ahead of Friday’s second Test in Port Elizabeth.
“Sometimes it is best to ignore certain players on the field. There will be some sledging again in Port Elizabeth (the second Test, from Friday) but we must try to let our performance there shut their mouths. Beating them usually works, but if it goes the other way again ... well, they’re all over you," McMillan said.