Planet Rugby Forum

iarmhiman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:My trolling has gone too far. I will step back and tone it down and let this thread get back to Eddie's unfortunate experience following Scotland's outclassing of England.

English posters. I apologise about the England bashing bit. I was having fun but what I was saying was definitely offensive. Sorry.

You were having fun and trying to troll but was getting hissy with Toga about his IRA claims? I think you are trying to re-write history here.

I don't want to be perceived as a Provisional IRA supporter or contemporary IRA supporter. I could have said nothing and that would have grown a lot of legs.

Let's leave it at that. I'm trying to let the thread get back on topic.

I think you failed with that trying to portray all this as your master plan when you basically moaned for pages and pages FFS!

eldanielfire wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:My trolling has gone too far. I will step back and tone it down and let this thread get back to Eddie's unfortunate experience following Scotland's outclassing of England.

English posters. I apologise about the England bashing bit. I was having fun but what I was saying was definitely offensive. Sorry.

You were having fun and trying to troll but was getting hissy with Toga about his IRA claims? I think you are trying to re-write history here.

I don't want to be perceived as a Provisional IRA supporter or contemporary IRA supporter. I could have said nothing and that would have grown a lot of legs.

Let's leave it at that. I'm trying to let the thread get back on topic.

I think you failed with that trying to portray all this as your master plan when you basically moaned for pages and pages FFS!

Right Eldaniel. I've made my last post on that subject now. Continue if you like.

iarmhiman wrote:Right Eldaniel. I've lost the argument and I'm making myself look a bit dim so will not post again for at least 3 minutes. Continue if you like.

Fixed

Keith wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:Right Eldaniel. I've lost the argument and I'm making myself look a bit dim so will not post again for at least 3 minutes. Continue if you like.

Fixed

I can see you're missing Dai. You're a lot more active this week.

iarmhiman wrote:My trolling has gone too far. I will step back and tone it down and let this thread get back to Eddie's unfortunate experience following Scotland's outclassing of England.

English posters. I apologise about the England bashing bit. I was having fun but what I was saying was definitely offensive. Sorry.

Chips wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:My trolling has gone too far. I will step back and tone it down and let this thread get back to Eddie's unfortunate experience following Scotland's outclassing of England.

English posters. I apologise about the England bashing bit. I was having fun but what I was saying was definitely offensive. Sorry.

Nice edit. You posted that already, deleted it and posted it again. Well done.

iarmhiman wrote:

Chips wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:My trolling has gone too far. I will step back and tone it down and let this thread get back to Eddie's unfortunate experience following Scotland's outclassing of England.

English posters. I apologise about the England bashing bit. I was having fun but what I was saying was definitely offensive. Sorry.

Nice edit. You posted that already, deleted it and posted it again. Well done.

First one didn't load on my device.

And you're not off the hook either.

iarmhiman wrote:

Keith wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:Right Eldaniel. I've lost the argument and I'm making myself look a bit dim so will not post again for at least 3 minutes. Continue if you like.

Fixed

I can see you're missing Dai. You're a lot more active this week.

It's almost like it's snowed like fudge leaving me with no work to do...

Mick Mannock wrote:

Keith wrote:

englishchief wrote:The Irish have made an event that took place in England, between an Australian and some Scots, about them.

It's a skill

It is a skill that makes this place increasingly shit. Most nations have the odd few posters who give their country a bad name. With the Irish, it is the majority on here who are turd.

Must be something in the water they have over there.

englishchief wrote:

Mick Mannock wrote:

Keith wrote:

englishchief wrote:The Irish have made an event that took place in England, between an Australian and some Scots, about them.

It's a skill

It is a skill that makes this place increasingly shit. Most nations have the odd few posters who give their country a bad name. With the Irish, it is the majority on here who are turd.

Must be something in the water they have over there.

To them the bored is a Whattsapp group for 6 pissed mates.

Sandstorm wrote:

englishchief wrote:

Mick Mannock wrote:

Keith wrote:

englishchief wrote:The Irish have made an event that took place in England, between an Australian and some Scots, about them.

It's a skill

It is a skill that makes this place increasingly shit. Most nations have the odd few posters who give their country a bad name. With the Irish, it is the majority on here who are turd.

Must be something in the water they have over there.

To them the bored is a Whattsapp group for 6 pissed mates.

You mean it isn't?

ovalball wrote:Certainly unacceptable in any form

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-un ... s-12105355

Doesn't say that they were Scottish supporters but infers it as he is partly blaming Gavin Hastings for inciting such hatred

In light of eddies bants ...



And thus

Mick Mannock wrote:

Keith wrote:

englishchief wrote:The Irish have made an event that took place in England, between an Australian and some Scots, about them.

It's a skill

It is a skill that makes this place increasingly shit. Most nations have the odd few posters who give their country a bad name. With the Irish, it is the majority on here who are turd.

A, c'mon, we're not turd, we're first!

Championees!

4 people have been summonsed to appear in court

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-43794700

Four men have been summonsed to appear in court after England rugby union coach Eddie Jones was verbally abused at a railway station in Manchester.

Jones, 58, received foul-mouthed taunts at Manchester Oxford Road station on 25 February, the day after Scotland beat England 25-13 in the Six Nations.

Four men will appear at Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Court on 16 May.

Three of the men, aged 22, 23 and 25, are from Edinburgh, the other is a 25-year-old from South Queensferry.

The four were reported for an alleged public order offence, British Transport Police said.

Australian Jones had been asked to pose for photographs before the atmosphere turned sour, footage obtained by the BBC and released online showed.

Balls Out! wrote:4 people have been summonsed to appear in court

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-43794700

Four men have been summonsed to appear in court after England rugby union coach Eddie Jones was verbally abused at a railway station in Manchester.

Jones, 58, received foul-mouthed taunts at Manchester Oxford Road station on 25 February, the day after Scotland beat England 25-13 in the Six Nations.

Four men will appear at Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Court on 16 May.

Three of the men, aged 22, 23 and 25, are from Edinburgh, the other is a 25-year-old from South Queensferry.

The four were reported for an alleged public order offence, British Transport Police said.

Australian Jones had been asked to pose for photographs before the atmosphere turned sour, footage obtained by the BBC and released online showed.

am glad they got nicked, hopefully a nice fine & some community service round some ENGLISH schools teaching rugby will do them good, even if Jones actually is a Baldy wee cnut

What sort of charge can you get for shouting abuse?

Will there be any builders left if they haul in the ones who shout abuse at birds passing by?

Nieghorn wrote:What sort of charge can you get for shouting abuse?

Will there be any builders left if they haul in the ones who shout abuse at birds passing by?

that hasn't happened for decades tbf, every building site has some kind of hippy crap 'we are considerate workforce' type placard by it.

There are some on here who should be up in front of the beak.

globus wrote:There are some on here who should be up in front of the beak.

Really? Who and what for?

backrow wrote:

Nieghorn wrote:What sort of charge can you get for shouting abuse?

Will there be any builders left if they haul in the ones who shout abuse at birds passing by?

that hasn't happened for decades tbf, every building site has some kind of hippy crap 'we are considerate workforce' type placard by it.

But the builders mostly smoke tons of weed around work so they can't be arsed to wolf whistle. Or their polish. I also notice for big firms a lot of private school types go into building these days. Tons of guys at my rugby club went into construction after A-Levels, ended up on a middle eastern project for a few years and then returned with a nice inflated bank account.

Nieghorn wrote:What sort of charge can you get for shouting abuse?

Will there be any builders left if they haul in the ones who shout abuse at birds passing by?

They'll be charged with Offences under the Public Order Act

using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour intending to and causing harassment, alarm or distress - section 4A of the Act;
using threatening, abusive words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress - section 5 of the Act;
drunk and disorderly behaviour (section 91 Criminal Justice Act 1967);

ovalball wrote:

Nieghorn wrote:What sort of charge can you get for shouting abuse?

Will there be any builders left if they haul in the ones who shout abuse at birds passing by?

They'll be charged with Offences under the Public Order Act

using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour intending to and causing harassment, alarm or distress - section 4A of the Act;
using threatening, abusive words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress - section 5 of the Act;
drunk and disorderly behaviour (section 91 Criminal Justice Act 1967);

Should be just a slap on the wrist at most for shouting an obscenity at a bigot

iarmhiman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

iarmhiman wrote:My trolling has gone too far. I will step back and tone it down and let this thread get back to Eddie's unfortunate experience following Scotland's outclassing of England.

English posters. I apologise about the England bashing bit. I was having fun but what I was saying was definitely offensive. Sorry.

You were having fun and trying to troll but was getting hissy with Toga about his IRA claims? I think you are trying to re-write history here.

I don't want to be perceived as a Provisional IRA supporter or contemporary IRA supporter. I could have said nothing and that would have grown a lot of legs.

Let's leave it at that. I'm trying to let the thread get back on topic.

I think you failed with that trying to portray all this as your master plan when you basically moaned for pages and pages FFS!

Right Eldaniel. I've made my last post on that subject now. Continue if you like.

SaintK wrote:

globus wrote:There are some on here who should be up in front of the beak.

Really? Who and what for?

Malicious communications Act 1988

Improper use of public electronic communications network

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or

(b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.

(2)A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—

(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,

(b)causes such a message to be sent; or

(c)persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.

(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.

(4)Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to anything done in the course of providing a programme service (within the meaning of the Broadcasting Act 1990 (c. 42)).

backrow wrote:

Balls Out! wrote:4 people have been summonsed to appear in court

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-43794700

Four men have been summonsed to appear in court after England rugby union coach Eddie Jones was verbally abused at a railway station in Manchester.

Jones, 58, received foul-mouthed taunts at Manchester Oxford Road station on 25 February, the day after Scotland beat England 25-13 in the Six Nations.

Four men will appear at Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Court on 16 May.

Three of the men, aged 22, 23 and 25, are from Edinburgh, the other is a 25-year-old from South Queensferry.

The four were reported for an alleged public order offence, British Transport Police said.

Australian Jones had been asked to pose for photographs before the atmosphere turned sour, footage obtained by the BBC and released online showed.

am glad they got nicked, hopefully a nice fine & some community service round some ENGLISH schools teaching rugby will do them good, even if Jones actually is a Baldy wee cnut

Would need to know something about rugby to teach it, which is unconfirmed afaik, beyond Scotland won and who the England coach is.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-m ... r-44143114

All three receive undisclosed fines.

the briefest searches on them suggest no real rugby affiliation at all, the early train to Manchester backs this up.

frillage wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-m ... r-44143114

All three receive undisclosed fines.

the briefest searches on them suggest no real rugby affiliation at all, the early train to Manchester backs this up.

What do you mean 'undisclosed'?

Cleeton, of Carrick Knowe Avenue, was fined £120, Inglis, of Cornhill Terrace, received a fine of £105 and Grant, of Drum Crescent, was fined £140.

Lobby wrote:

frillage wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-m ... r-44143114

All three receive undisclosed fines.

the briefest searches on them suggest no real rugby affiliation at all, the early train to Manchester backs this up.

What do you mean 'undisclosed'?

Cleeton, of Carrick Knowe Avenue, was fined £120, Inglis, of Cornhill Terrace, received a fine of £105 and Grant, of Drum Crescent, was fined £140.

copied from elsewhere where said fines not mentioned and didnt read full article!

Lobby wrote:

frillage wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-m ... r-44143114

All three receive undisclosed fines.

the briefest searches on them suggest no real rugby affiliation at all, the early train to Manchester backs this up.

What do you mean 'undisclosed'?

Cleeton, of Carrick Knowe Avenue, was fined £120, Inglis, of Cornhill Terrace, received a fine of £105 and Grant, of Drum Crescent, was fined £140.

Money well spent.