Page 1 of 22

Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:34 am
by Kid A
Yellow:

Image


Penalty:

Image

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:38 am
by Andalu
Is it the illuminati, lizard people or banking families behind it?

Or did a young British referee not ref a perfect game?

Tune in next week for more of Kid A's persecution complex.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:39 am
by JB1981
Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:40 am
by Thai guy
Kid A is good at making gifs but that's about it. Zero knowledge on rugby.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:50 am
by Clive Simms
Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:51 am
by Kid A
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Because they are cowards.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 11:54 am
by Clive Simms
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
That gif was from before the directive in 2016 pleb

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:02 pm
by Theflier
How do you explain the two completely wrong decisions during the lions tours at the deaths of the loss and draw which took away the series from them?

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:06 pm
by Clive Simms
Theflier wrote:How do you explain the two completely wrong decisions during the lions tours at the deaths of the loss and draw which took away the series from them?
Corruption mate. Poite making that decision led to a scrum which increased the work props have to do at the end of the game which could've led to a spinal injury which could've led to them going to the world leading Poisson Rouge spinal rehabilitation centre in Lyon which Poite has a 10% share in. Corruption

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:08 pm
by The Native
All Blacks are reffed harsher than others. Last year they conceded less total penalties then their opposition but were shown more cards.

Hideous inconsistency but they just get on with playing Rugby. That's probably one of the reasons they're the best team in the world. No excuses despite the lopsided officiating.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:10 pm
by JB1981
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:10 pm
by Fat Old Git
Kid A wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Because they are cowards.
Most kiwis thought the yellow call was harsh and that the ref made a mistake not goimg up stairs for a second look well before the second incident occurred. And most thought the second could easily have been given a card and was a worse tackle then the first.

But that's rugby. Refs make mistakes. Sometimes they favor your team. Sometimes they don't. It usually balances out in the long run.

People who can't admit that and insist on watching games with one eye shut, believing there is some kind of conspiracy, and picking only examples of errors that support that conspiracy, now they are the true cowards.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:12 pm
by The Native
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:15 pm
by JB1981
Clive Simms wrote:
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
That gif was from before the directive in 2016 pleb
:lol: so no cards for high tackles before then? Do you think the directive brought those in? The gif is an example that calls don't always go the way you want or think they should - or indeed in the AB's favour. There's no need for the precious response.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:17 pm
by Kid A
The Native wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
Nah. Referees who think they might have made a mistake go to the TMO to check. Pearce had no intention of doing that in either incident. Because New Zealand.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:19 pm
by Keith
First gif: penalty only for the seatbelt tackle

Second gif: stonewall red card

'Nuff said

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:20 pm
by JB1981
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Theflier wrote:How do you explain the two completely wrong decisions during the lions tours at the deaths of the loss and draw which took away the series from them?
Amazing how little whinging there was about that in the end. The whole of NZ just shrugged.
When you appreciate the game you realise these things happen. After so much unparalleled success we are fairly mellow and just move on. It's understandable why others struggle to do that.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:21 pm
by Kid A
Keith wrote:First gif: penalty only for the seatbelt tackle

Second gif: stonewall red card

'Nuff said
:thumbup:

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:21 pm
by Mr Mike
The Native wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
A tad harsh, he did asked Ayoub to look at the second so TBF he is young and relatively inexperienced and will come to learn in time that you never ask Ayoub for help.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:22 pm
by Sonny Blount
Kid A wrote:
Keith wrote:First gif: penalty only for the seatbelt tackle

Second gif: stonewall red card

'Nuff said
:thumbup:

Agree.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:22 pm
by Thai guy
The Native wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
Yep. This is Wayne Barnes every time he laces his boots.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:22 pm
by Clive Simms
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
That gif was from before the directive in 2016 pleb
:lol: so no cards for high tackles before then? Do you think the directive brought those in? The gif is an example that calls don't always go the way you want or think they should - or indeed in the AB's favour. There's no need for the precious response.
The directive was a game changer for how high tackles were policed. Pointless comparing before and after

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:23 pm
by Biffer29
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
Richie had left his cloak on so the ref didn’t see it.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:23 pm
by Andalu
Fat Old Git wrote: But that's rugby. Refs make mistakes. Sometimes they favor your team. Sometimes they don't. It usually balances out in the long run.

People who can't admit that and insist on watching games with one eye shut, believing there is some kind of conspiracy, and picking only examples of errors that support that conspiracy, now they are the true cowards.
/thread

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:24 pm
by booze
Clive Simms wrote:
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
That gif was from before the directive in 2016 pleb
Oh that’s ok then. Didn’t realise a swinging arm to the head was Textbook tackle back then

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:27 pm
by booze
Kid A wrote:
The Native wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
Nah. Referees who think they might have made a mistake go to the TMO to check. Pearce had no intention of doing that in either incident. Because New Zealand.
And yet, posters were saying how great as he didn’t bow down to NZ’s aura.

Why do t you show the gif from the other angle which clearly shows an accidental head clash.

Poor kid A. Making silly gifs seem to define your life

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:30 pm
by Mr Mike
Kid A wrote:
The Native wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
Nah. Referees who think they might have made a mistake go to the TMO to check. Pearce had no intention of doing that in either incident. Because New Zealand.
Didn’t he ask George in the second, explaining his reasoning for a penalty and got the Ayoub “agreed”?

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:36 pm
by Clive Simms
booze wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
That gif was from before the directive in 2016 pleb
Oh that’s ok then. Didn’t realise a swinging arm to the head was Textbook tackle back then
Of course it isn't but admit the second gif is a red and we're both in agreement

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:37 pm
by Kid A
Mr Mike wrote:
Kid A wrote:
The Native wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
Nah. Referees who think they might have made a mistake go to the TMO to check. Pearce had no intention of doing that in either incident. Because New Zealand.
Didn’t he ask George in the second, explaining his reasoning for a penalty and got the Ayoub “agreed”?
Either way, 4 officials "missed" it

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:43 pm
by Vahian
Peaches wrote:double red card on the 2nd gif shirley
Wow you can send someone off twice! Wait dose that mean they get to come back on?

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:43 pm
by Mr Mike
Kid A wrote:
Mr Mike wrote:
Kid A wrote:Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
Nah. Referees who think they might have made a mistake go to the TMO to check. Pearce had no intention of doing that in either incident. Because New Zealand.
Didn’t he ask George in the second, explaining his reasoning for a penalty and got the Ayoub “agreed”?
Either way, 4 officials "missed" it[/quote]Well they didn’t miss it, they explained their reasoning for the call. The Citing Commissioner will have an opportunity to revisit it.

But a tad rich whining about things when you get simple facts wrong yourself, even with the benefits of multiple replays and hours of festering.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 12:48 pm
by zt1903
Clive Simms wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
That gif was from before the directive in 2016 pleb
:lol: so no cards for high tackles before then? Do you think the directive brought those in? The gif is an example that calls don't always go the way you want or think they should - or indeed in the AB's favour. There's no need for the precious response.
The directive was a game changer for how high tackles were policed. Pointless comparing before and after
That wasn’t a high tackle, it was a clothesline.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:02 pm
by booze
Clive Simms wrote:
booze wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:
JB1981 wrote:Your title should more accurately be 'An example of a referee making a mistake'. Either that or we need a lot more examples.

Here's one to start. I don't believe this was a card, or perhaps even a penalty.

Image
That gif was from before the directive in 2016 pleb
Oh that’s ok then. Didn’t realise a swinging arm to the head was Textbook tackle back then
Of course it isn't but admit the second gif is a red and we're both in agreement
On another day it might have been but I have also seen the other angle which showed an accidental head clash which isn’t a red card.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:07 pm
by Dark
Last AB try was dodge. Rest of the game was even Stephens calls wise

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:07 pm
by Fat Old Git
Kid A doesn't actually want a debate. He just wants people to validate his tin foil expenditure.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:13 pm
by The Native
Kid A wrote:
The Native wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Clive Simms wrote:Instead of having a go at Kid A why not debate the gifs?

Top one is play on, bottom one is red. Ref should've gone upstairs for both but he still has promise
I reject the premise of the OP that those are examples of NZ being refereed differently. They are examples of errors by the referee and as you say, both should have gone upstairs.
Exactly. The referee was out of his depth and shat the bed.
Nah. Referees who think they might have made a mistake go to the TMO to check. Pearce had no intention of doing that in either incident. Because New Zealand.
So, he shat the bed. Thanks for reiterating my point with different words.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:15 pm
by Santa
Seneca of the Night wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Theflier wrote:How do you explain the two completely wrong decisions during the lions tours at the deaths of the loss and draw which took away the series from them?
Amazing how little whinging there was about that in the end. The whole of NZ just shrugged.
When you appreciate the game you realise these things happen. After so much unparalleled success we are fairly mellow and just move on. It's understandable why others struggle to do that.
Yep. Best thing we can do on this thread is have compassion and empathy for Kid A. It is a dark place, and we can only hope that he gets the appropriate help to move him on in his journey.
Transmission of trauma through epigenetics you reckon? This has been building for more than 100 years Generation upon generation subject to constant defeat and humiliation. It's at times like this that you can appreciate how measured the Jews have been about the holocaust.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:16 pm
by Kid A
Godwin's law on page 1.

Impressive

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:16 pm
by englishchief
Welsh referee Luke Pearce had a bit of a shocker. Taken too many lessons off Nige probably.

Re: Comparing how New Zealand are refereed to others

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2018 1:20 pm
by Mr Mike
englishchief wrote:Welsh referee Luke Pearce had a bit of a shocker. Taken too many lessons off Nige probably.
I see his wiki page is already updated.
In the 2018 mid-year rugby union internationals, he will referee his first tier 1 vs tier 1 game (New Zealand vs France). [8] His poor performance in this game was heavily criticised by English supporters.[9]