The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
slick wrote:Eddie is a genius to be fair. Turned around a shite team, then made them shite again so he could turn them around again.Chuckles1188 wrote:Can't go with quick turnaround merchants indefinitely, but as long as it sustains through to the World Cup I don't care all that much
Trotsky. Not the first name I'd expect on the RFU teamsheetChuckles1188 wrote:slick wrote:Eddie is a genius to be fair. Turned around a shite team, then made them shite again so he could turn them around again.Chuckles1188 wrote:Can't go with quick turnaround merchants indefinitely, but as long as it sustains through to the World Cup I don't care all that much
Are we sure he's half Japanese? Permanent revolution..
Chuckles1188 wrote:Can't go with quick turnaround merchants indefinitely, but as long as it sustains through to the World Cup I don't care all that much
Not according to that Deviationist Running Dog of Capitalism wikipediaChuckles1188 wrote:Thought "permanent revolution" was Mao?
Fair enough, guess Mao just covered it and took it to another level in his classic album The Little Red Book. Bit like All Along The Watchtower with HendrixManInTheBar wrote:Not according to that Deviationist Running Dog of Capitalism wikipediaChuckles1188 wrote:Thought "permanent revolution" was Mao?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_revolution
L.D.Bronstein commonly known as Trotsky published a work called Permanent Revolution in 1929 apparently
Don't worry clash there is still time for your hoped for outcome.Anonymous. wrote:Obviously most Englishmen will not be hoping for the same outcome as youopenclashXX wrote:Eddie Jones + John Mitchell = disaster in making
When has that ever mattered. Remember the certainty PR posters had about Andy Farrell selecting the England team.JM2K6 wrote:Because not a single person on here has a clue what's going on. None of us are in the England management teambooji boy wrote:A lot of ifs, buts and maybes in that analysis.james garner wrote:We know Eddie has a short shelf life, comes in motivates the players, gets results then starts to piss everyone off. Maybe Eddie knows this and his response is to bring in a new character in a similar vein who can be a new focus point to start the process again, or so that the players start to think that Eddie isn't too bad and start responding to him
Either that or the RFU still don't have a clue.. I
But you know Barnes knows fuck all about rugby, don't you?eldanielfire wrote:I pretty much agree with everything Barnes says there. It's a bonkers appointment on paper.
He knows a little bit, but he's obsessed with dumping on England.Enzedder wrote:But you know Barnes knows fuck all about rugby, don't you?eldanielfire wrote:I pretty much agree with everything Barnes says there. It's a bonkers appointment on paper.
Barnes does talk a lot of shite but he did voice some legitimate concerns. Although I'm not sure why people think this job with internal players is beyond him.Enzedder wrote:But you know Barnes knows fuck all about rugby, don't you?eldanielfire wrote:I pretty much agree with everything Barnes says there. It's a bonkers appointment on paper.
Barnes talks a lot of shite. I suspect Barnes has a ghostwriter who perhaps doesn't always write a lot of shite.Anonymous. wrote:Barnes does talk a lot of shite but he did voice some legitimate concerns. Although I'm not sure why people think this job with internal players is beyond him.Enzedder wrote:But you know Barnes knows fuck all about rugby, don't you?eldanielfire wrote:I pretty much agree with everything Barnes says there. It's a bonkers appointment on paper.
The seeming desire of some England "supporters" for Jones to fail is a bit sad
That's why I said on paper. I don't know much about Mitchell and the Barnes article and reaction here was about all I was informed about.Enzedder wrote:But you know Barnes knows fuck all about rugby, don't you?eldanielfire wrote:I pretty much agree with everything Barnes says there. It's a bonkers appointment on paper.
Never gets old.usermame wrote:This is the obligatory Barnes credibility vid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XRGJpMJDUk
Raggs wrote:Barnes talks a lot of shite. I suspect Barnes has a ghostwriter who perhaps doesn't always write a lot of shite.Anonymous. wrote:Barnes does talk a lot of shite but he did voice some legitimate concerns. Although I'm not sure why people think this job with internal players is beyond him.Enzedder wrote:But you know Barnes knows fuck all about rugby, don't you?eldanielfire wrote:I pretty much agree with everything Barnes says there. It's a bonkers appointment on paper.
The seeming desire of some England "supporters" for Jones to fail is a bit sad
eldanielfire wrote:That's why I said on paper. I don't know much about Mitchell and the Barnes article and reaction here was about all I was informed about.Enzedder wrote:But you know Barnes knows fuck all about rugby, don't you?eldanielfire wrote:I pretty much agree with everything Barnes says there. It's a bonkers appointment on paper.
Glad to see that we called this as an excellent appointment. Also only a maybe, no ifs or butsJM2K6 wrote:Because not a single person on here has a clue what's going on. None of us are in the England management teambooji boy wrote:A lot of ifs, buts and maybes in that analysis.james garner wrote:We know Eddie has a short shelf life, comes in motivates the players, gets results then starts to piss everyone off. Maybe Eddie knows this and his response is to bring in a new character in a similar vein who can be a new focus point to start the process again, or so that the players start to think that Eddie isn't too bad and start responding to him
Either that or the RFU still don't have a clue.. I
