Gillette
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 11:32 am
Whatever were they thinking?
The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
Yes I have. It matters little if you or I have a problem with it.etherman wrote:I actually don't see a problem with the ad. Have you watched it?
neither do I, whingers gonna whinge tbfNolanator wrote:What's the issue with the ad? Some people moaning that it panders to SJWs, virtue signalling etc?
I've seen it mentioned that Gilette don't have a particularly good track record with human rights abuses in it's manufacturing or something, so the whole campaign is a bit hypocritical. I don't know enough to comment either way.
I don't see how the message in the ad is an especially bad thing?
If they had tagged these on to the end of the adTurbogoat wrote:Too edgy?
Cuts a bit too close to the bone?
Got people in a lather?
#AccidentalPartridgeJoe Pags Pagliarulo
Verified account @JoeTalkShow
Hey @Gillette, I have an idea, stay out of politics. Real men already stop other guys from acting badly. A razor company should want me to shave with your product. And, btw, I'm extremely masculine. And there's nothing wrong with that. #TheBestMenCanBe
Er, what?BokJock wrote:I am f**king outraged, this will be the end of MANkind as we know it! PC gone made! Feminazis and SJW's have taken over the world!
A little bullying, misogyny and stiff upper lip is how Brittania ruled the waves. How dare we try put an end these traditions we hold so dear. How will the "different" kid grow stronger if they are not beaten up everyday, how will women know if they have done a good job unless they are touched inappropriately in the work place.
When we can put an end to this assault on our masculinity that we have faced for the last TWO years. Thank god we have male rights activists fighting against the oppression that I face on a daily basis.
Piers Morgan is on my side on this so I can't be wrong.
I thought this was the thread where we manufacture fake outrage about a razor commercial, no?Mick Mannock wrote:Er, what?BokJock wrote:I am f**king outraged, this will be the end of MANkind as we know it! PC gone made! Feminazis and SJW's have taken over the world!
A little bullying, misogyny and stiff upper lip is how Brittania ruled the waves. How dare we try put an end these traditions we hold so dear. How will the "different" kid grow stronger if they are not beaten up everyday, how will women know if they have done a good job unless they are touched inappropriately in the work place.
When we can put an end to this assault on our masculinity that we have faced for the last TWO years. Thank god we have male rights activists fighting against the oppression that I face on a daily basis.
Piers Morgan is on my side on this so I can't be wrong.
You did well thenBokJock wrote:I thought this was the thread where we manufacture fake outrage about a razor commercial, no?Mick Mannock wrote:Er, what?BokJock wrote:I am f**king outraged, this will be the end of MANkind as we know it! PC gone made! Feminazis and SJW's have taken over the world!
A little bullying, misogyny and stiff upper lip is how Brittania ruled the waves. How dare we try put an end these traditions we hold so dear. How will the "different" kid grow stronger if they are not beaten up everyday, how will women know if they have done a good job unless they are touched inappropriately in the work place.
When we can put an end to this assault on our masculinity that we have faced for the last TWO years. Thank god we have male rights activists fighting against the oppression that I face on a daily basis.
Piers Morgan is on my side on this so I can't be wrong.
Mick Mannock wrote:You did well thenBokJock wrote:I thought this was the thread where we manufacture fake outrage about a razor commercial, no?Mick Mannock wrote:Er, what?BokJock wrote:I am f**king outraged, this will be the end of MANkind as we know it! PC gone made! Feminazis and SJW's have taken over the world!
A little bullying, misogyny and stiff upper lip is how Brittania ruled the waves. How dare we try put an end these traditions we hold so dear. How will the "different" kid grow stronger if they are not beaten up everyday, how will women know if they have done a good job unless they are touched inappropriately in the work place.
When we can put an end to this assault on our masculinity that we have faced for the last TWO years. Thank god we have male rights activists fighting against the oppression that I face on a daily basis.
Piers Morgan is on my side on this so I can't be wrong.
And yet there are those who demand 16 yo's should get the voteeldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
So you disagree with the message of the ad?eldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
It works if it increases profit above the cost of the ad.Lorthern Nights wrote:I wasn't even aware of this ad until this thread, so the ad campaign has worked as we wouldn't be talking about it if it was just the usual pish from them.
Doesn't even necessarily need to be that for the big brands, it's about keeping them in people's conscious.Mick Mannock wrote:It works if it increases profit above the cost of the ad.Lorthern Nights wrote:I wasn't even aware of this ad until this thread, so the ad campaign has worked as we wouldn't be talking about it if it was just the usual pish from them.
Because there are no ads targeted at the gullibility of 35 -70 year olds?!?Mick Mannock wrote:And yet there are those who demand 16 yo's should get the voteeldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
They cannot do that indefinitelyLorthern Nights wrote:Doesn't even necessarily need to be that for the big brands, it's about keeping them in people's conscious.Mick Mannock wrote:It works if it increases profit above the cost of the ad.Lorthern Nights wrote:I wasn't even aware of this ad until this thread, so the ad campaign has worked as we wouldn't be talking about it if it was just the usual pish from them.
Which ones do you have in mind?BokJock wrote:Because there are no ads targeted at the gullibility of 35 -70 year olds?!?Mick Mannock wrote:And yet there are those who demand 16 yo's should get the voteeldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
Well they don't necessarily need to increase profits, maintain or even manage profit erosion can be equally valid for ad campaigns. Sure they can't continue running the business down indefinitely but there is a lot more to it than just ad campaigns and the return or otherwise they give.Mick Mannock wrote:They cannot do that indefinitelyLorthern Nights wrote:Doesn't even necessarily need to be that for the big brands, it's about keeping them in people's conscious.Mick Mannock wrote:It works if it increases profit above the cost of the ad.Lorthern Nights wrote:I wasn't even aware of this ad until this thread, so the ad campaign has worked as we wouldn't be talking about it if it was just the usual pish from them.
There was no comment there on the message of the ad, just what motivated Proctor and Gamble's marketing department. Probably saw the massive free publicity Nike got from their recent campaign.etherman wrote:So you disagree with the message of the ad?eldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
Woah dude that’s so not cool. Toxic masculinity. What if young boys were reading his bad example.Mick Mannock wrote:Yes I have. It matters little if you or I have a problem with it.etherman wrote:I actually don't see a problem with the ad. Have you watched it?
Are you dimMick Mannock wrote:I am not convinced that Gillette intended to have such an overwhelming negative response to an ad for shaving products.
Payday lenders to gambling sites to new fad workout equipment to miracle cleaning products - take your pick.Mick Mannock wrote:Which ones do you have in mind?BokJock wrote:Because there are no ads targeted at the gullibility of 35 -70 year olds?!?Mick Mannock wrote:And yet there are those who demand 16 yo's should get the voteeldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
Those 16 year olds are no different to other 16 year olds in full time employment or education.BokJock wrote:Payday lenders to gambling sites to new fad workout equipment to miracle cleaning products - take your pick.Mick Mannock wrote:Which ones do you have in mind?BokJock wrote:Because there are no ads targeted at the gullibility of 35 -70 year olds?!?Mick Mannock wrote:And yet there are those who demand 16 yo's should get the voteeldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
the point being, there are huge swathes of really dumb older people that get to vote too - in Britain at least, you can serve in the forces at 16 so you should get the vote at 16.
Man In Black wrote:You all know there is a nuanced take that is possible in this, right?
The Guardian writer Ally Fogg lays it out quite well on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/allyfogg/status/108 ... 57952?s=21
Talk about missing the pointPutting aside the message of the ad, the clarity of message of the collective online reaction is palpable - it screams "do not dare to criticise our behaviour or challenge us to change" & that reaction can go swivel. >
I've not seen it. Afterall it isn't even aimed at being shown in the UK.etherman wrote:So you disagree with the message of the ad?eldanielfire wrote:Tim Pool had a good term for the current trend in advertising it's called "feel bad liberalism" because there's so much SJW bollocks going around companies are simply cynically taking advantage of middle class millennials who have been drilled into their head about white privilege and other distorted bollocks. It's a way to make them part their money by feeling they are doing something good or just guilting it away.
Basically cynical greedy company works cynically to exploit the young and stupid shocker. It's as it's always been.
Piers Morgan was frothing this morning, Gillette have won me over for that alone.Plastic Sarrie wrote:It seems to be annoying the sort of people who are very quick to accuse others of being "snowflakes"
For that reason, it must be brilliant