Planet Rugby Forum

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

We all have a responsibility to save the planet/three private jet flights in a week just fudge off

Duff Paddy wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

We all have a responsibility to save the planet/three private jet flights in a week just fudge off

Super yacht Burns 200 gallons of fuel an hour (0.9t) and produces 3.3t of CO2..... Where do they get these muppets???

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

Why's that down to hsi wife? He had a mom famous for promoting good causes and a father famous for being big on Climate Change. I don't think Harry needs his wife to make big shows of hypocrisy like most climate change celebrities do.

eldanielfire wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

Why's that down to hsi wife? He had a mom famous for promoting good causes and a father famous for being big on Climate Change. I don't think Harry needs his wife to make big shows of hypocrisy like most climate change celebrities do.

Harry is white so it’s the black woman’s fault (am I doing this right)

Made I larf

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/11 ... 6853562368

Now that it's been conclusively proven beyond a doubt that Jeffrey Epstein totally and truly committed suicide, I would like to say:

- Hillary Clinton is the most amazing woman in the world, and her husband Bill Clinton is an American icon and role model.

The photos of Andrew waving off a couple of young girls from the door of Epsteins house in The Times this morning don't look great. This is 2 years after his mates conviction.

We all know that that iconic Clinton painting will be worth millions in the next future

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

Ibiza is in France now? Daily Mail geography.....

_fatprop wrote:Made I larf

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/11 ... 6853562368

Now that it's been conclusively proven beyond a doubt that Jeffrey Epstein totally and truly committed suicide, I would like to say:

- Hillary Clinton is the most amazing woman in the world, and her husband Bill Clinton is an American icon and role model.

Are you familiar with humor?

paddyor wrote:https://amp.tmz.com/2019/08/16/jeffrey- ... y-hanging/

So the coroner says suicide......chose your fighter
1)Coroners a mossad agent or adjacent

2)He was hung by someone else who made it look that way

3)He was compelled to commit suicide

4)He realized the game was up and committed suicide of his own volition.

Number and reason.

The case for 3 intensifies!

https://nypost.com/2019/08/19/jeffrey-e ... e-suicide/

Fair play to the daily mail they are not letting up on this story. They must know a shit load about Price Andrew that they can’t publish. Safe to say he won’t be visiting the USA any time soon.

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

slick wrote:The photos of Andrew waving off a couple of young girls from the door of Epsteins house in The Times this morning don't look great. This is 2 years after his mates conviction.

Andrew is probably a complete sleaze but he obviously wasn't "waving off" THE young girl. He did wave goodbye to a woman though.

Duff Paddy wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

Why's that down to hsi wife? He had a mom famous for promoting good causes and a father famous for being big on Climate Change. I don't think Harry needs his wife to make big shows of hypocrisy like most climate change celebrities do.

Harry is white so it’s the black woman’s fault (am I doing this right)

Possibly. Or maybe it's more that until he married her he was the darling of the British public, now with every utterance or faux pas he's becoming more and more unpopular.

Good to see Wills taking the opportunity to rub it in after he said more than 2 kids was bad for the environment though...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9776363/w ... ivate-jet/

So close...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9788487/a ... ills-kate/

Anonymous. wrote:

slick wrote:The photos of Andrew waving off a couple of young girls from the door of Epsteins house in The Times this morning don't look great. This is 2 years after his mates conviction.

Andrew is probably a complete sleaze but he obviously wasn't "waving off" THE young girl. He did wave goodbye to a woman though.

Tell it to the FBI. This is getting interesting.

Duff Paddy wrote:

Anonymous. wrote:

slick wrote:The photos of Andrew waving off a couple of young girls from the door of Epsteins house in The Times this morning don't look great. This is 2 years after his mates conviction.

Andrew is probably a complete sleaze but he obviously wasn't "waving off" THE young girl. He did wave goodbye to a woman though.

Tell it to the FBI. This is getting interesting.

?

Australian media are speculating that the lady who Prince Andrew is waving off is former-PM Paul Keating's (adult) daughter, Katherine Keating.

RodneyRegis wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:
Harry is white so it’s the black woman’s fault (am I doing this right)

Possibly. Or maybe it's more that until he married her he was the darling of the British public, now with every utterance or faux pas he's becoming more and more unpopular.

More and more unpopular with who...m?

whom.

Anonymous. wrote:

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Duff Paddy wrote:They royals had become bizarrely popular in the past years, this is just a timely reminder of what they’re really like

It's open season on Harry atm: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... break.html

He's made a calamitous choice of wife it seems.

not even attempting to hide his racism anymore

Undoubtedly there are some real victims but many of those targeted by Epstein wanted to be part of the party lifestyle and got used. These are not victims, they just got a bad deal.

Who are the unfortunates who just wanted to be in the party scene? Andrew, Clinton et al, or the 12-year-old girls?

The FBI is studying two broken cameras outside Epstein's cell? Wait, what? The FBI is capable of analysing electronics? I thought this stuff was outsourced to CrowdStrike, or possibly the Awan brothers.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-peop ... SKCN1VI2LC

Masterji wrote:Undoubtedly there are some real victims but many of those targeted by Epstein wanted to be part of the party lifestyle and got used. These are not victims, they just got a bad deal.

Wow

Please DON’T tell us your thoughts on the Rotherham victims

Masterji wrote:Undoubtedly there are some real victims but many of those targeted by Epstein wanted to be part of the party lifestyle and got used. These are not victims, they just got a bad deal.

Strange comment which misses the fact completely.

Masterji wrote:Undoubtedly there are some real victims but many of those targeted by Epstein wanted to be part of the party lifestyle and got used. These are not victims, they just got a bad deal.

Hm. Would you say the same about the young lasses groomed in e.g. Rotherham?

Given that most of the accused in that ongoing omnicuntitude are your compatriots (I might be waaaay off here, but IIRC you hold a level of Indophobia that I've only ever seen in West Bangladeshis...) your statement is at the very least duuuuudeseriouslee???

Masterji wrote:Undoubtedly there are some real victims but many of those targeted by Epstein wanted to be part of the party lifestyle and got used. These are not victims, they just got a bad deal.

Wow! What a total lack of insight. I guess you are the "her short skirt meant she was asking for it" school of sexual assault.

https://newsthump.com/2015/01/05/duke-o ... ialnetwork
Breaking news

Gwenno wrote:https://newsthump.com/2015/01/05/duke-o ... ialnetwork
Breaking news

This is truely shocking . Brings new meaning to the epithet Duke of Pork.

Anonymous. wrote:

slick wrote:The photos of Andrew waving off a couple of young girls from the door of Epsteins house in The Times this morning don't look great. This is 2 years after his mates conviction.

Andrew is probably a complete sleaze but he obviously wasn't "waving off" THE young girl. He did wave goodbye to a woman though.

so the girls just happened to be in the vicinity ? not following your point

Seneca of the Night wrote:Huge if true:

https://twitter.com/euronews/status/119 ... 35266?s=19

Wrong link sorry:

https://www.businessinsider.com/amy-rob ... ?r=US&IR=T

It was really sad to hear about the reporter's suicide next week Tuesday.

(Credit Jimmy Dore)

*She singled out Clinton and prince Andrew in the clip.


I'm not exactly the biggest Trump fan, but I'm definitely also not a never-Trumper. It is therefore interesting how they try to smear Project Veritas despite actual video evidence of the reporter's words, yet Rachel Madcow and company kept on banging on about Russia-gate despite no evidence whatsoever, even after Trump was cleared.


Anyways, it's despicable. Hope many teenage sex slaves could've maybe been avoided if this was aired 4 years ago.

ticketlessinseattle wrote:

Anonymous. wrote:

slick wrote:The photos of Andrew waving off a couple of young girls from the door of Epsteins house in The Times this morning don't look great. This is 2 years after his mates conviction.

Andrew is probably a complete sleaze but he obviously wasn't "waving off" THE young girl. He did wave goodbye to a woman though.

so the girls just happened to be in the vicinity ? not following your point

There is a video that makes it look like Andrew is waving just after the young girl leaves the property with Epstein. In reality Epstein leaves the property with the young girl and an hour later a clearly older woman leaves and Andrew waves goodbye to her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibDCJ_CQKAY

Never paid much attention to the story, being a pedo is as American as being a cowboy.

Watched the docu-series Jeffrey Epstein:Filthy Rich... extraordinary the level of corruption in America. The contrast between being rich and poor in America and how justice is prosecuted is particularly apt these days.

They should hunt down Ghislaine Maxwell, Alex Acosta and Alan Dershowitz and put them to the guillotine.

The Optimist wrote:being a pedo is as American as being a cowboy.

Does that mean it is rare?

Trending on twitter today. Anonymous claims to have released stuff that Trump and Clinton was trafficking, Trump illed Epstein, Naomi Campbell was involved int he Epstein saga and it's connected to the president of Brazil.

Starting to get into fantasy conspiracy theory here, but we know he was ridiculously connected and the MSM is utterly ignoring it again.

Anyone watched the Epstein docu-series on Netflix? Any good?

Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Anyone watched the Epstein docu-series on Netflix? Any good?

I haven't actually. I don't know.

LandOTurk wrote:

Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Anyone watched the Epstein docu-series on Netflix? Any good?

I haven't actually. I don't know.

Yes, it's good and thoroughly disturbing.

The enormous privilege that enormous wealth brings is scary. The guy should have been in jail 20 years before he was locked up, and the really dodgy deal Acosta did to get him off in 2007 was huge.

A big moment was Virginia Roberts mentioning that she was abused by Alan Dershowitz.
Cut to Dershowitz daring her to accuse him directly on the documentary.
Cut back to Roberts explicitly accusing Alan Dershowitz of abusing her at least six times while she was underage.

Be interesting to see how that pans out.

LandOTurk wrote:

Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Anyone watched the Epstein docu-series on Netflix? Any good?

I haven't actually. I don't know.

Average at best.

Like most Netflix series too long and drags on.
No significant new info
Avoids much of his associations which could have been a very interesting angle
Personaly think his crimes are bad enough, found the constant need to insert photos of victims when they looked/were younger than when Epstein had involvementnwith them unnecessary.