Chat Forum
It is currently Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:19 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86167 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1789, 1790, 1791, 1792, 1793, 1794, 1795 ... 2155  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 24583
Location: Middle East
Rinkals wrote:
Smutley wrote:
BokJock wrote:
So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

    Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitter
    Had his communications director resign
    Found out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearance
    been sued by a porn star
    had his chief economic adviser resign
    had a twitter spat with 'Alex' Bladwin
    Held a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRA
    Had a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.

Don't forget his chum who dumped his steel stocks right before the tariff announcement, and Jared's Qatari loans malarkey.

He also got North and South Korea confused.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/03/trump-confuses-north-and-south-korea.html

Easy mistake to make, I guess.

Quote:
The claim that Trump had spoken with North Korea confounded foreign policy observers. “It was not clear whether Trump was describing a direct conversation or messages sent through diplomatic channels,” reported the Washington Post.

The answer turns out to be: neither. Trump was describing a conversation with South Korea. An official from the National Security Council tells Yonhap News Agency, a South Korean publication, that Trump “was referring to his March 1 phone call with South Korean President Moon Jae-in.” So Trump was close, geographically, but instead of describing a breakthrough exchange with the totalitarian enemy that is developing nukes and threatening to kill us, he was describing the democratic ally that has no nukes and is trying not to be killed.

Trump was right that it was a Korea, but he had the wrong one. There are so many Koreas these days, it is hard to keep track.


Can't wait to see the attempts to explain this away as some deliberate master-trolling episode.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:19 pm
Posts: 1506
Location: Capital of Mercia
BokJock wrote:
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Goes to show how low the Clintons and Obama, even Romney, figures on the USA public's scale of opinion of basic decency. Establishment politicians... together with the Bushes, Cruz, McCain, Pelosi and other lowlife.

Compared to them The Don is a veritable saint ... pornstars and all.


Moron or Troll?

Trollron


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 13334
Location: The centre of The Horrendous Space Kablooie!
White hunter, black heart latest.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-trophy-hunting-import-ban-tusks-obama-son-elephants-big-game-a8243361.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8026
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
500 000 elephants left.
Being killed at a rate of 100 a day.

He’s a f**king piece of shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21646
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7109
BokJock wrote:
So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

    Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitter
    Had his communications director resign
    Found out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearance
    been sued by a porn star
    had his chief economic adviser resign
    had a twitter spat with 'Alex' Bladwin
    Held a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRA
    Had a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.


A couple of those points are straight out of the Bernie Sanders play book, no love for those?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 7002
BokJock wrote:
So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

    Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitter
    Had his communications director resign
    Found out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearance
    been sued by a porn star
    had his chief economic adviser resign
    had a twitter spat with 'Alex' Bladwin
    Held a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRA
    Had a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.


Who cares bro.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 16789
shanky wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


Yeah, any analysis I've read suggests the 'he didn't sign' argument is a loser. It's almost certainly designed to try and get some detail out in public through the court case which would then be outside of the NDA. And to give her more publcity so that she could just try and ignore the NDA and make more money than she'd pay for breaching it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7109
shanky wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


An agreement was made, consideration provided and actions by the parties have followed demonstrating the agreement was in place


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2959
Jay Cee Gee wrote:
shanky wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


Yeah, any analysis I've read suggests the 'he didn't sign' argument is a loser. It's almost certainly designed to try and get some detail out in public through the court case which would then be outside of the NDA. And to give her more publcity so that she could just try and ignore the NDA and make more money than she'd pay for breaching it.


Not a Lawyer, but didn't Trumps lawyer say that he paid the money, & it was nothing to do with Trump.

So how does the fact that the contract was cast as being between, Trump & Pornstar, when the Lawyer has now gone on the record, as casting the contract as between Lawyer & Pornstar, effect the validity of the contract ?

It's all immaterial really; as Trump has always used lawsuits as a way of stifling comment; & used his deeper pockets to try & scare away challengers. When he & his lawyers actually faced competent appellants, they pissed their pants, & settled rather than face the prospect of sitting in court & having Donald have to Testify (See Trump University).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 44885
Rinkals wrote:
All good fun.

As long as he knows where to aim his nukes...


Iraq, Syria, whatever.

Check at 1'30"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZJx5lncaCg


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:51 pm
Posts: 13527
shanky wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


Good thread on it here

https://twitter.com/TheViewFromLL2/status/971484958089936896
But who did she have the contract with? Trump signed nothing, so it's deniable enough for him. Seeing tweets that this is always how it was done in Hollywood. Wouldn't surprise me for him to deny it and hint that "maybe Cohen had done some bad stuff and was being blackmailed, I hear it happens". She can claim she never intended to sign a binding contract with Michael Cohen only Trump could prove that wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:51 pm
Posts: 13527
Seb Gorkha

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2959
paddyor wrote:
Seb Gorkha

Image


I wonder is Gorkha, like Bannon; as the Mooch informed us, can suck his own dick ?

Because he surely must be able to, give that remarkable act of intellectual flexibility ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8026
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
She doesn’t have to do anything now, she’s basically confirmed it by engaging in this lawsuit. That’s all she needed to do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10860
And now he’s flipped on the steel import tax...

Nobody leads like him. Nobody makes a decision like him - nobody


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 44885
Hong Kong wrote:
And now he’s flipped on the steel import tax...

Nobody leads like him. Nobody makes a decision like him - nobody


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWee9vtUoGY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 18488
“everybody wants to work in the White House, They all want a piece of that Oval Office; they want a piece of the West Wing So many people want to come in"

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10860
Kiwias wrote:
Hong Kong wrote:
And now he’s flipped on the steel import tax...

Nobody leads like him. Nobody makes a decision like him - nobody


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWee9vtUoGY

Good heavens! He makes the Orange shitgibbon look positively coherent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19310
Location: Adelaide via Sydney and Patea
fishfoodie wrote:
paddyor wrote:
Seb Gorkha

Image


I wonder is Gorkha, like Bannon; as the Mooch informed us, can suck his own dick ?

Because he surely must be able to, give that remarkable act of intellectual flexibility ?


He has a Ph.D, don'cha know? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 3:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 24583
Location: Middle East
shanky wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


Don't think the success of the action is as important as the publicity about it, or that certain activities may be confirmed, in a fairly legal setting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 3:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 35157
Location: Planet Rock
_fatprop wrote:
shanky wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


An agreement was made, consideration provided and actions by the parties have followed demonstrating the agreement was in place

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 35157
Location: Planet Rock
Kiwias wrote:
The Man Without Fear wrote:
Make America Filthy Again!

And what's worse is that is it far, far easier to destroy regulations than it is to reinstate them given the depth of the pockets of those who are affected in the two scenarios.

Pure scum. History will judge them in the harshest fashion.


Add to this the damage he is inflicting on the 4th estate, the judiciary, and America's standing in the world and the picture is grim indeed.


To be fair it's the American people who damaged their standing in the world when they elected Trump. He is just being Trump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 44885
Anonymous. wrote:
Kiwias wrote:
The Man Without Fear wrote:
Make America Filthy Again!

And what's worse is that is it far, far easier to destroy regulations than it is to reinstate them given the depth of the pockets of those who are affected in the two scenarios.

Pure scum. History will judge them in the harshest fashion.


Add to this the damage he is inflicting on the 4th estate, the judiciary, and America's standing in the world and the picture is grim indeed.


To be fair it's the American people who damaged their standing in the world when they elected Trump. He is just being Trump.


He promised them he would be the most presidential president ever :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 5:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 7:02 am
Posts: 2990
The greatest President since George Washingmachine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 6:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 468
The Man Without Fear wrote:


Relax, this only applies no Nambia


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15751
Location: South Oxfordshire
Anonymous. wrote:
_fatprop wrote:
shanky wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
PORNSTAR SUES PRESIDENT

Extra, extra, read all about it,

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/06/poli ... index.html


It's bizarre that this kind of headline is barely a ripple these days :lol:



Seems an unlikely basis for successful action since she accepted the money and acted (initially) as if the contract was in force

I wonder if this is more likely an opportunity to remove her obligation to hand over the pics/dress so she can then publsih them and maximise the $ value of her moment in the sun.


An agreement was made, consideration provided and actions by the parties have followed demonstrating the agreement was in place

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Seeing how the White House position is that Donald is neither aware of the payment or the agreement, his actions with regards to the NDA would appear to be null and void. For his actions to be taken as abiding by the NDA, he needs to admit he was aware of the NDA


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10860
Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 31917
Hong Kong wrote:
Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning


So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ?
No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am
Posts: 965
Santa wrote:
BokJock wrote:
So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

    Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitter
    Had his communications director resign
    Found out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearance
    been sued by a porn star
    had his chief economic adviser resign
    had a twitter spat with 'Alex' Bladwin
    Held a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRA
    Had a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.


Who cares bro.


The majority of people that have bothered to comment on this thread I would imagine


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am
Posts: 965
_fatprop wrote:
BokJock wrote:
So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

    Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitter
    Had his communications director resign
    Found out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearance
    been sued by a porn star
    had his chief economic adviser resign
    had a twitter spat with 'Alex' Bladwin
    Held a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRA
    Had a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.


A couple of those points are straight out of the Bernie Sanders play book, no love for those?


The tariff thing is a campaign promise - so you can see why HE did it.

If Bernie had flip flopped on gun control and back down to the NRA there definitely would have been backlash from his supporters


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 19310
Location: Adelaide via Sydney and Patea
wamberal99 wrote:
The greatest President since George Washingmachine.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndLfIOwAi58


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8026
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Would they care if he got her pregnant then paid 130k for the coat hanger?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8026
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
Hong Kong wrote:
Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning


So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ?
No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....

She isn’t a prostitute and she clearly isn’t I’ll-spirited about the affair, she’s using the publicity exactly like he has in the past, to gain notoriety and make a buck.

She’s a truthful version of Trump, she doesn’t lie about what she is and doesn’t pretend to be something else.

It’s strange how his behaviour towards women was a big fat lie apparently and yet all these little truths are coming out and painting a matching pattern of behaviour.

Clearly you feel it’s okay for men to treat women that way.

What happens when Stormy releases the pissing video and people discover the orange hue is actually from his golden shower habit?

Suddenly another pattern gets closed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 24583
Location: Middle East
Do Stormy Daniels' lawyers work in the Barely Legal department?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 7:14 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5553
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
Hong Kong wrote:
Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning


So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ?
No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....


No Biblical injunction against adultery?

The extent to which a Christian would overturn the moral code of his holy book, purely to defend a lying egotist is extraordinary.

It even says that you should worship no gods above God, yet your slavish devotion to Trump has surely crossed over to outright worship.

Is Trump the false prophet of Revelations? Have you thrown your lot in with Satan, now?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 35157
Location: Planet Rock
BokJock wrote:
_fatprop wrote:
BokJock wrote:
So over the last seven days or so the 'non chaotic just energetic' POTUS has:

    Announced tariffs which will probably spark a trade war with the EU, China and Canada. and then antogonised those countries/blocs via twitter
    Had his communications director resign
    Found out that his Head of Middle East Peace (and every other portfolio) has been downgraded in his security clearance
    been sued by a porn star
    had his chief economic adviser resign
    had a twitter spat with 'Alex' Bladwin
    Held a very productive meeting with lawamakers on guns, where he said he would take away peoples guns where necessary cause he wasn't afraid of the NRA, and then back tracked after a meeting with the NRA
    Had a former adviser have a nervous breakdown on TV over the Mueller investigation

and that was just in the last week, but there is no chaos in the Whitehouse - just great energy.


A couple of those points are straight out of the Bernie Sanders play book, no love for those?


The tariff thing is a campaign promise - so you can see why HE did it.

If Bernie had flip flopped on gun control and back down to the NRA there definitely would have been backlash from his supporters

He promised to build a wall and get the Mexicans to pay for it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 7:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 8492
Location: Florida
Turbogoat wrote:
Do Stormy Daniels' lawyers work in the Barely Legal department?


You looking to get hired?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21646
According to Stormy, they only did the dirty deed once.

$130k for a single root. Damn.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 31917
4071 wrote:
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
Hong Kong wrote:
Maybe this is 5D chess. Agree to a NDA but don’t sign it yourself and get your personal lawyer to pay a bit of pocket money to the other side, party B, for reasons best known to no one. Then when party B realise you haven’t signed the NDA, thereby releasing party B from any obligation to abide by non-disclosure, you can safely stand back and say nothing to do with me. But then that allows party B to talk about the very thing you didnt want to acknowledge happened in the first place.

So much winning


So who gives a fok ? Any evidence that anybody thought he was a strict Calvinist, before they voted for him ?
No biblical injunction against using prostitutes, btw, so The Don was just a magnanimous consumer.. now targeted by an ill-spirited harpy jealous of his success....


No Biblical injunction against adultery?

The extent to which a Christian would overturn the moral code of his holy book, purely to defend a lying egotist is extraordinary.

It even says that you should worship no gods above God, yet your slavish devotion to Trump has surely crossed over to outright worship.

Is Trump the false prophet of Revelations? Have you thrown your lot in with Satan, now?


Quote where I espoused the christian faith.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86167 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 1789, 1790, 1791, 1792, 1793, 1794, 1795 ... 2155  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 4071, bessantj, Boomslang, CrazyIslander, Flametop, Google [Bot], guy smiley, haunch, Jumper, lorcanoworms, Lorthern Nights, Man In Black, Margin_Walker, MungoMan, Nolanator, Onelostbear, ovalball, redderneck, rett, Rowdy, Scrumhead, Stjudes, Trey, UncleFB, Willie Falloon, Yer Man and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group