Chat Forum
It is currently Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:30 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1017 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15106
Location: By the mighty beard of Adam Jones
Rowdy wrote:
What does "lean out" mean in that article? I'm having trouble keeping up with all these neologisms.


The opposite of 'lean in?'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 2302
Womack wrote:
Rowdy wrote:
What does "lean out" mean in that article? I'm having trouble keeping up with all these neologisms.


The opposite of 'lean in?'

Thanks :thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:55 am
Posts: 4088
Location: Newport, Gwent
Rowdy wrote:
Womack wrote:
Rowdy wrote:
What does "lean out" mean in that article? I'm having trouble keeping up with all these neologisms.


The opposite of 'lean in?'

Thanks :thumbup:

Yes with 'lean in' meaning being more assertive 'lean out' means to get out of the way.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21832
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ling-roads

The byline:

"Roads designed by men are killing women – and stop millions from cycling"

Genuinely WTF? Those roads kill all genders without discrimination, how did that become a gender issue? I agree segreated cycle lanes would be a huge solution to the danger sof cycling but WTF is that to do with gender?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:10 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10746
Location: Mostly London........Mostly
eldanielfire wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/13/safety-women-cycling-roads

The byline:

"Roads designed by men are killing women – and stop millions from cycling"

Genuinely WTF? Those roads kill all genders without discrimination, how did that become a gender issue? I agree segreated cycle lanes would be a huge solution to the danger sof cycling but WTF is that to do with gender?


I thought a big issue was that women generally speaking are more risk adverse and don't like 'owning the lane' when cycling around town and instead stick to the kerb as much as possible, which unfortunately leads to them being disproportionately represented in the stats for injuries involving turning lorries.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15106
Location: By the mighty beard of Adam Jones
Basically the article is advocating for properly segregated cycle lanes (and more broadly I guess for more related infrastructure, eg secure bike parking and in her case, nicer showers and somewhere for her to plug a hairdryer at work). As the Netherlands proves, if you do create segregated cycle infrastructure and basically gear your transport system around encouraging cycling, more people male and female will cycle.

The gender issue is not very well expressed there and the by-line draws a bit of a long bow based on the paragraph about the Manchester council leader and his previous opposition to segregated cycle lanes. But there is a gender issue in this in that the current situation is that those who choose to cycle to get about largely do so in the knowledge that they will frequently have to dice with traffic & be assertive. In many situations, the quicker you can go, the safer you will feel (and in fact, the safer you will be). That situation discourages female cyclists more than male ones.

It's worth noting that segregated bike lanes do not meet with universal support amongst cycling advocates. There is actually a school of traditionalist opposition to segregated infrastructure, because it is seen as an erosion of cyclists' right to the road & an acknowledgement of the supremacy of motorised traffic. This view goes hand in hand with the idea that as long as you are assertive and properly skilled, and capable of riding at 20mph in bursts to negotiate pinch points etc safely, you can ride on the roads with motorised traffic perfectly safely. Leaving gender out of it, my view is this is an elitist viewpoint that will not encourage mass takeup of cycling as transport.

As to whether any of this really matters, I'm a bit more equanimous these days. I don't expect the UK to ever adopt a Netherlands-style approach to cycling infrastructure. We don't spend enough on our transport infrastructure anyway, let alone setting aside the kind of budget really needed to go all in on cycling. There'll be the usual fudges and isolated efforts, some good some bad. I'd like it to be different but there we go.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21832
danny_fitz wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/13/safety-women-cycling-roads

The byline:

"Roads designed by men are killing women – and stop millions from cycling"

Genuinely WTF? Those roads kill all genders without discrimination, how did that become a gender issue? I agree segreated cycle lanes would be a huge solution to the danger sof cycling but WTF is that to do with gender?


I thought a big issue was that women generally speaking are more risk adverse and don't like 'owning the lane' when cycling around town and instead stick to the kerb as much as possible, which unfortunately leads to them being disproportionately represented in the stats for injuries involving turning lorries.


That has nothing to do with the design of roads, unless you want to tell me how these roads would been designed differently by females. Last I head Amsterdam and Copenhagen's safer for cyclists roads were all mostly male designed as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15106
Location: By the mighty beard of Adam Jones
eldanielfire wrote:
danny_fitz wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/13/safety-women-cycling-roads

The byline:

"Roads designed by men are killing women – and stop millions from cycling"

Genuinely WTF? Those roads kill all genders without discrimination, how did that become a gender issue? I agree segreated cycle lanes would be a huge solution to the danger sof cycling but WTF is that to do with gender?


I thought a big issue was that women generally speaking are more risk adverse and don't like 'owning the lane' when cycling around town and instead stick to the kerb as much as possible, which unfortunately leads to them being disproportionately represented in the stats for injuries involving turning lorries.


That has nothing to do with the design of roads, unless you want to tell me how these roads would been designed differently by females. Last I head Amsterdam and Copenhagen's safer for cyclists roads were all mostly male designed as well.


It's a silly click-baity by-line based on a slightly silly couple of paragraphs about how the leader of Manchester City Council Richard Leese - a man - has until recently opposed segregated infrastructure (which would encourage more women - and men, and BMEs, and LGBT, and children - to cycle). Move beyond that silliness and there is still a gender issue here although as per my post above. Although as I say, it's one element of the wider elitism that still surrounds cycling, which is in itself one factor amongst several that prevents cycling as transport being taken up in the UK to the extent it has been in the Netherlands. NB, this also applies to the article about BMEs and cycling that was posted here a week or so ago - the same elitism & the same poor infrastructure with the same result, that cycling to get about remains a minority pursuit. Again, whether this really matters is something upon which opinions differ. At some point there will need to be some reordering of our transport infrastructure to keep pace with technological advancements - ie driverless cars. Whether cycling will still be a useful alternative remains to be seen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21832
Womack wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
danny_fitz wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/13/safety-women-cycling-roads

The byline:

"Roads designed by men are killing women – and stop millions from cycling"

Genuinely WTF? Those roads kill all genders without discrimination, how did that become a gender issue? I agree segreated cycle lanes would be a huge solution to the danger sof cycling but WTF is that to do with gender?


I thought a big issue was that women generally speaking are more risk adverse and don't like 'owning the lane' when cycling around town and instead stick to the kerb as much as possible, which unfortunately leads to them being disproportionately represented in the stats for injuries involving turning lorries.


That has nothing to do with the design of roads, unless you want to tell me how these roads would been designed differently by females. Last I head Amsterdam and Copenhagen's safer for cyclists roads were all mostly male designed as well.


It's a silly click-baity by-line based on a slightly silly couple of paragraphs about how the leader of Manchester City Council Richard Leese - a man - has until recently opposed segregated infrastructure (which would encourage more women - and men, and BMEs, and LGBT, and children - to cycle). Move beyond that silliness and there is still a gender issue here although as per my post above.


The article doesn't and that is what we are discussing.

Quote:
Although as I say, it's one element of the wider elitism that still surrounds cycling, which is in itself one factor amongst several that prevents cycling as transport being taken up in the UK to the extent it has been in the Netherlands. NB, this also applies to the article about BMEs and cycling that was posted here a week or so ago - the same elitism & the same poor infrastructure with the same result, that cycling to get about remains a minority pursuit. Again, whether this really matters is something upon which opinions differ. At some point there will need to be some reordering of our transport infrastructure to keep pace with technological advancements - ie driverless cars. Whether cycling will still be a useful alternative remains to be seen.


Regardless of technological advancement cycling will of course be an alternative, due to the joy, fitness element and even the nimble shortcuts that can be taken. The care didn't make cycling obsolete and driverless cars won't. I believe more should be done to separate cycle paths through cities but it is a safety issue not a gender one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15106
Location: By the mighty beard of Adam Jones
It's not a very good article, agreed. I'm just giving some perspective on the issues the writer is referring (poorly) to.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21832
Womack wrote:
It's not a very good article, agreed. I'm just giving some perspective on the issues the writer is referring (poorly) to.


Agreed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6988
This is pretty fantastic

http://poll2018.trust.org/

Apparently the US is 10th most dangerous place for women and the third on sexual violence

Quote:
Top 10
01 India
02 Democratic Republic of the Congo
03 USA
03 Syria
05 Congo
06 South Africa
07 Pakistan
07 Afghanistan
09 Mexico
10 Somalia
10 Egypt
10 Nigeria


And 6th for non sexual violence
Quote:
Top 10
01 Afghanistan
02 Syria
03 India
04 Yemen
05 Pakistan
06 USA
07 Saudi Arabia
08 Democratic Republic of the Congo
09 Somalia
09 Mexico


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:00 pm
Posts: 1002
_fatprop wrote:
This is pretty fantastic

http://poll2018.trust.org/

Apparently the US is 10th most dangerous place for women and the third on sexual violence

Quote:
Top 10
01 India
02 Democratic Republic of the Congo
03 USA
03 Syria
05 Congo
06 South Africa
07 Pakistan
07 Afghanistan
09 Mexico
10 Somalia
10 Egypt
10 Nigeria


And 6th for non sexual violence
Quote:
Top 10
01 Afghanistan
02 Syria
03 India
04 Yemen
05 Pakistan
06 USA
07 Saudi Arabia
08 Democratic Republic of the Congo
09 Somalia
09 Mexico


Literally unbelievable. The murder rate of women by their partners is 20 times higher in Russia than the US (18.3 per 100,000 vs 0.6)

https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-03-10/least-12000-people-killed-domestic-violence-every-year-russias-not-even-sure


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 7102
Ramming Speed wrote:
_fatprop wrote:
This is pretty fantastic

http://poll2018.trust.org/

Apparently the US is 10th most dangerous place for women and the third on sexual violence

Quote:
Top 10
01 India
02 Democratic Republic of the Congo
03 USA
03 Syria
05 Congo
06 South Africa
07 Pakistan
07 Afghanistan
09 Mexico
10 Somalia
10 Egypt
10 Nigeria


And 6th for non sexual violence
Quote:
Top 10
01 Afghanistan
02 Syria
03 India
04 Yemen
05 Pakistan
06 USA
07 Saudi Arabia
08 Democratic Republic of the Congo
09 Somalia
09 Mexico


Literally unbelievable. The murder rate of women by their partners is 20 times higher in Russia than the US (18.3 per 100,000 vs 0.6)

https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-03-10/least-12000-people-killed-domestic-violence-every-year-russias-not-even-sure


Trump tweets are apparently very dangerous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 4:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:00 pm
Posts: 1002
Another gem. Decolonising Indie Music (so you don’t have to).

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/jun/28/its-about-time-the-black-and-asian-bands-decolonising-british-indie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 7102
Ramming Speed wrote:


I read that. Decolonise has now become a word without meaning.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 34171
Santa wrote:
Ramming Speed wrote:


I read that. Decolonise has now become a word without meaning.



Doesn't it mean cultural appropriation here?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2018 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10535
I got a goodie

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... eportation
Quote:
The Tories have made a mess of immigration. Only Labour can fix it by Diane Abbott


It's like Jeremy Hunt saying Labour have made a mess of the welfare state only Tories can fix it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2018 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1269
Boobs not Moobs wrote:
I got a goodie

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... eportation
Quote:
The Tories have made a mess of immigration. Only Labour can fix it by Diane Abbott


It's like Jeremy Hunt saying Labour have made a mess of the welfare state only Tories can fix it.


Presumably when Diane is in charge, we'll have an achievable immigration target of twelvety-ten hundreds and thousands a week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 9:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:00 pm
Posts: 1002
End of thread.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jun/30/women-fest-first-man-free-festival-sisterhood-song


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 9:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1806
Quote:
All women are welcome at the festival, says Jacout, including transgender women and pre-operative individuals. “We’re also happy to have non-binary people provided they have a vagina; but not non-binary people with a penis because we have to draw the line somewhere.”


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Surely thats a wind up?

How could it possibly not be ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 9:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 22857
Ramming Speed wrote:


I actually find this one more disturbing. We live in an age where a man feels guilt over spanking his girlfriend.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl ... eel-guilty


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:44 pm
Posts: 46596
Location: In the Centre/left wing
Ramming Speed wrote:

Fecking sexist bastards


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 9:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 22857
c69 wrote:


Durty hoors


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 6734
Mick Mannock wrote:
c69 wrote:


Durty hoors


Hence the ""yoni steaming"?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 4677
Location: Monmouthshire
kiwinoz wrote:
Mick Mannock wrote:
c69 wrote:


Durty hoors


Hence the ""yoni steaming"?


pissing on hot rocks?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10180
There, will, however, be vaginal steaming, feminist debate, and a chance for contemplation in the sacred womb tent. :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:30 pm
Posts: 14590
Quote:
“Instead of people saying, I paid for a ticket now I’m going to be entertained, we’re asking them to think about what they can contribute: what’s the gift, knowledge, craft or skill they can share - and of course I can buy all the hideous tye dyed juggling trousers I’ll ever need” she told the Observer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 14897
Catman wrote:
Quote:
All women are welcome at the festival, says Jacout, including transgender women and pre-operative individuals. “We’re also happy to have non-binary people provided they have a vagina; but not non-binary people with a penis because we have to draw the line somewhere.”


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Surely thats a wind up?

How could it possibly not be ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Genius stuff :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2018 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5762
Another classic....
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jul/02/from-breast-grabbing-to-hottest-fan-galleries-is-this-world-cup-the-most-sexist?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2018 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 1:55 am
Posts: 4088
Location: Newport, Gwent
terryfinch wrote:

That one seems alright tbh.

I think this one is more of a candidate https://www.theguardian.com/world/short ... to-the-50s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 12:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 15096
Location: Auckland, NZ, Earth
A female festival is not really a problem imo.....but "Sacred Womb Tent" :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 46139
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... nversation


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21832
JM2K6 wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/30/nothing-like-broken-leg-mental-health-conversation


What's wrong with that?

IMO it's a genuine expression of what it can be like to deal with mental health.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:18 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 10746
Location: Mostly London........Mostly
True Blue wrote:
A female festival is not really a problem imo.....but "Sacred Womb Tent" :lol:


Still curious as to what 'vaginal steaming' is though.

Is it like cooking mussels?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 7102
danny_fitz wrote:
True Blue wrote:
A female festival is not really a problem imo.....but "Sacred Womb Tent" :lol:


Still curious as to what 'vaginal steaming' is though.

Is it like cooking mussels?


Zoe explains how vaginal steaming can be used to prevent fascism.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... y-festival


Last edited by Santa on Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 7102
eldanielfire wrote:
JM2K6 wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/30/nothing-like-broken-leg-mental-health-conversation


What's wrong with that?

IMO it's a genuine expression of what it can be like to deal with mental health.


He's trying to enearnest the thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 34171
Santa wrote:
eldanielfire wrote:
JM2K6 wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/30/nothing-like-broken-leg-mental-health-conversation


What's wrong with that?

IMO it's a genuine expression of what it can be like to deal with mental health.


He's trying to enearnest the thread.


The Guardian posts a large number of very stupid articles ripe for ridicule, therefore every article the Guardian publishes is a very stupid article ripe for ridicule . . . or IS IT? AHA!

We may be busted here. Be careful, it is a fiendish trap.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 46139
Or, the Guardian occasionally has a comment is free article that you guys hyperventilate over, and believe represents the majority of their output, hence the thread title.

Weird that we don't have this thread for the mail or the Telegraph or the spectator or the times. Can't quite put my finger on why.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 34171
JM2K6 wrote:
Or, the Guardian occasionally has a comment is free article that you guys hyperventilate over, and believe represents the majority of their output, hence the thread title.

Weird that we don't have this thread for the mail or the Telegraph or the spectator or the times. Can't quite put my finger on why.


I'm not going to argue with that; if that's your view, you are entitled to it. Everyone else can make up their own mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1017 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: A5D5E5, BillW, Captain Average, carlos_c, CarrotGawks, danny_fitz, earl the beaver, easyray, EverReady, feckwanker, FravBront, Jensrsa, Laurent, Margin_Walker, Mog The Almighty, mr bungle, Mr. Very Popular, OomPB, SaintK, sockwithaticket, sonic_attack, The Native, Toro, Witchfinder General, Working Class Rugger and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group