Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

All things Rugby
La soule
Posts: 10226
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by La soule »

DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:58 am
La soule wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:52 am
DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:04 am
La soule wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:56 am
DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:49 am

So surely the daily figures are misleading, at best. Then.
Misleading to you as it does not fit your conspirationist views of life. Then.

They are pretty clear to the rest of us, well most of us.
There is nothing conspirationist?

They say: "100 people died today from Covid the highest rise since March*"

The Truth: a lot of people who died but would have died anyway had a positive test 4 weeks ago and we're using that number because we want to keep the fear level ramped up and keep you compliant. If we don't have that fear you won't get your kids vaxed.
This is how you choose to interpret this as it suits your agenda.

I trust doctors to report the cause of death accurately. They are competent to do so, I am not.
My agenda is I want a clear and simple truth and not given a statement that could be construed a hundred different ways.

Sweden are having about 6 deaths a week at the moment. We're having hundreds - is tha tbecause we're reporting it differently? and if so, why?
There are discrepancies indeed in how countries report those deaths. Belgium for example are extreme in which deaths are included in the COVID figures,basically everyone who got COVID or even said the word basically.

Why? Because we are different countries.

WHO would have you believed (well merely us, the gullible fools, not the master of truth like you of course) that excess deaths worldwide supports the view that COVID related deaths are 2 going to 3 times higher the amount actually reported.
ukjim
Posts: 2343
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by ukjim »

DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:49 am
The amount of shit spread in this thread shows the general ignorance of basic science and medical issues which the general population have.
Then it needs to be explained properly to us thickos then.

"100 people died had positive covid tests within the last 28 days"

Means fudge all to all of us "plebs"
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transpar ... ertificate
DAC_
Posts: 3585
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DAC_ »

not the master of truth like you of course
The master of truth? Grow up son.
La soule
Posts: 10226
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by La soule »

DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:13 pm
not the master of truth like you of course
The master of truth? Grow up son.
Well, you seem to understand things on a different level than stupid plebs like us do.

A real visionary.
User avatar
eldanielfire
Posts: 35365
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by eldanielfire »

Ethical Vegans could be anti-Vaxxers, or anti-Vaxxers are vegans?

https://www.euronews.com/green/2021/08/ ... -workplace

Not that we needed anything new to know both groups are wrong-uns!
DAC_
Posts: 3585
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DAC_ »

ukjim wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:09 pm
DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:49 am
The amount of shit spread in this thread shows the general ignorance of basic science and medical issues which the general population have.
Then it needs to be explained properly to us thickos then.

"100 people died had positive covid tests within the last 28 days"

Means fudge all to all of us "plebs"
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transpar ... ertificate
The ONS give two figures. The Media doesn't.
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Jeff the Bear wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:19 am
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:07 am Moderna, Astrazeneca and Pfizer EU contracts unredacted were leaked last night

not only member states are required to indemnify AstraZeneca, they also must pay for their legal defense when citizens put forward claims against them. If you wonder why the governments try to play down the severity of side effects, here's the real reason.

Each Participating Member State shall indemnify and hold harmless AstraZeneca, its Affiliates, subcontractors, licensors (you know the rest).... The Indemnified Person (AstraZeneca) shall assume and control the defense of any Third Party Claim using legal counsel reasonably chosen by the Indemnified Person....at the indemnified Party (member state) costs and expenses. The Indemnifying Party shall pay the invoices of legal counsel and other expenses of the Indemnified Person arising from defending the Third Party Claim....

"The Commission and each of the Participating Member States each within their respective competencies, on behalf of itself, waive and release any claim against AstraZeneca arising out of or relating to: (a) lack of safety or efficacy of the Vaccine...(b) use or administration of the Vaccine under pandemic conditions issues relating to storage or transport conditions including deep cold chain storage; (d) lack of proper aseptic technique or dosing at the point of administration of the Vaccine; or (e) delays in
delivery of the Vaccine under this Agreement"
Sounds like a smart clause to have. I imagine Sinovac wouldn't need such clauses as any Chinese person who complained would just get sent to a 'reeducation camp' and harvested for organs.
Christ you are thick.
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Quite aggressive censorship of these contracts and even of doctors discussing them.

Very odd.
C69
Posts: 42222
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:44 pm
Location: For Wales the Welsh and aproppriate pronouns

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by C69 »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:36 pm Quite aggressive censorship of these contracts and even of doctors discussing them.

Very odd.
All seems quite standard tbh, not at all aggressive for big Pharma.
Do you live in a parallel Universe. What makes you think this is more agressive than usual?
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

C69 wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:14 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:36 pm Quite aggressive censorship of these contracts and even of doctors discussing them.

Very odd.
All seems quite standard tbh, not at all aggressive for big Pharma.
Do you live in a parallel Universe. What makes you think this is more agressive than usual?
The banning of people on social media for mentioning it....is this normal and acceptable to you??
bimboman
Posts: 74645
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by bimboman »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:31 pm
C69 wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:14 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:36 pm Quite aggressive censorship of these contracts and even of doctors discussing them.

Very odd.
All seems quite standard tbh, not at all aggressive for big Pharma.
Do you live in a parallel Universe. What makes you think this is more agressive than usual?
The banning of people on social media for mentioning it....is this normal and acceptable to you??

Acceptable? It’s positively desirable for the dishonest communist authoritarian wanker,
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

bimboman wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:42 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:31 pm
C69 wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:14 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:36 pm Quite aggressive censorship of these contracts and even of doctors discussing them.

Very odd.
All seems quite standard tbh, not at all aggressive for big Pharma.
Do you live in a parallel Universe. What makes you think this is more agressive than usual?
The banning of people on social media for mentioning it....is this normal and acceptable to you??

Acceptable? It’s positively desirable for the dishonest communist authoritarian wanker,
The speed of these reforms and control. My misses said it reminds her of 1960s cultural Revolution.....that isn't a complement at all either. It's really frightening to live in a society wondering what more radical bat shit crazy stuff will they start doing next. What is also crazy is just of f**king blind the people around us are to what is going on too. They've swollowed all the bullshit hook line and sinker.
Varsity Way
Posts: 1449
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 3:50 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Varsity Way »

The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
Flyin Ryan
Posts: 11269
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Flyin Ryan »

La soule wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:07 pm
DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:58 am
La soule wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:52 am
DAC_ wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:04 am
La soule wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:56 am

Misleading to you as it does not fit your conspirationist views of life. Then.

They are pretty clear to the rest of us, well most of us.
There is nothing conspirationist?

They say: "100 people died today from Covid the highest rise since March*"

The Truth: a lot of people who died but would have died anyway had a positive test 4 weeks ago and we're using that number because we want to keep the fear level ramped up and keep you compliant. If we don't have that fear you won't get your kids vaxed.
This is how you choose to interpret this as it suits your agenda.

I trust doctors to report the cause of death accurately. They are competent to do so, I am not.
My agenda is I want a clear and simple truth and not given a statement that could be construed a hundred different ways.

Sweden are having about 6 deaths a week at the moment. We're having hundreds - is tha tbecause we're reporting it differently? and if so, why?
There are discrepancies indeed in how countries report those deaths. Belgium for example are extreme in which deaths are included in the COVID figures,basically everyone who got COVID or even said the word basically.

Why? Because we are different countries.

WHO would have you believed (well merely us, the gullible fools, not the master of truth like you of course) that excess deaths worldwide supports the view that COVID related deaths are 2 going to 3 times higher the amount actually reported.
Twice wouldn't surprise me at all counting people that never got tested but died and also governments wanting to reduce their numbers.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 29194
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Chickenrunning...

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sandstorm »

Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
Can we see the test results for the 21/22 flu vaccine please?
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
mRNA no doubt
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Cultural revolution :lol: :lol:
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm Cultural revolution :lol: :lol:
Very much so....one very much tweeked to deal with the information and connected age. The same goal to have a fast paradigm shift with untold upheaval to our lives .all built on the most questionable of ideas
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
mRNA no doubt
It would unethical to offer the least efficacious vaccines.
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:29 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm Cultural revolution :lol: :lol:
Very much so....one very much tweeked to deal with the information and connected age. The same goal to have a fast paradigm shift with untold upheaval to our lives .all built on the most questionable of ideas
:lol: :lol:
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:29 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
mRNA no doubt
It would unethical to offer the least efficacious vaccines.
It's unethical to deny ones that some of the people want and will not take the alternative experimental types. That's unethical. It's unethical to use experimental mRNA on kids, that's unethical.
It's unethical that we have teachers who are looking for experimental mRNA jabs in the kids they are meant to look after. It's unethical that we don't have them coming out in large numbers to stop this ....that's unethical.
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:37 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:29 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
mRNA no doubt
It would unethical to offer the least efficacious vaccines.
It's unethical to deny ones that some of the people want and will not take the alternative experimental types. That's unethical. It's unethical to use experimental mRNA on kids, that's unethical.
It's unethical that we have teachers who are looking for experimental mRNA jabs in the kids they are meant to look after. It's unethical that we don't have them coming out in large numbers to stop this ....that's unethical.
Nah, giving cheap Chinese knock offs is unethical.
User avatar
Glaston
Posts: 3280
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Glaston »

Sandstorm wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:19 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
Can we see the test results for the 21/22 flu vaccine please?
and the safety testing of a combined jab :P
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:41 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:37 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:29 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
mRNA no doubt
It would unethical to offer the least efficacious vaccines.
It's unethical to deny ones that some of the people want and will not take the alternative experimental types. That's unethical. It's unethical to use experimental mRNA on kids, that's unethical.
It's unethical that we have teachers who are looking for experimental mRNA jabs in the kids they are meant to look after. It's unethical that we don't have them coming out in large numbers to stop this ....that's unethical.
Nah, giving cheap Chinese knock offs is unethical.
You are a shit teacher. You don't deserve any pay rises for years.
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Glaston wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:41 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:19 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
Can we see the test results for the 21/22 flu vaccine please?
and the safety testing of a combined jab :P
mRNA is the problem
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:42 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:41 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:37 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:29 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm

mRNA no doubt
It would unethical to offer the least efficacious vaccines.
It's unethical to deny ones that some of the people want and will not take the alternative experimental types. That's unethical. It's unethical to use experimental mRNA on kids, that's unethical.
It's unethical that we have teachers who are looking for experimental mRNA jabs in the kids they are meant to look after. It's unethical that we don't have them coming out in large numbers to stop this ....that's unethical.
Nah, giving cheap Chinese knock offs is unethical.
You are a shit teacher. You don't deserve any pay rises for years.
Well I have and I didn’t have to buy my missus from back pages of a Chinese catalogue either.
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:41 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:37 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:29 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:23 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
mRNA no doubt
It would unethical to offer the least efficacious vaccines.
It's unethical to deny ones that some of the people want and will not take the alternative experimental types. That's unethical. It's unethical to use experimental mRNA on kids, that's unethical.
It's unethical that we have teachers who are looking for experimental mRNA jabs in the kids they are meant to look after. It's unethical that we don't have them coming out in large numbers to stop this ....that's unethical.
Nah, giving cheap Chinese knock offs is unethical.
WHO approved , multiple reports and data saying safe and effective.

Not leaving a trail of death in their wake.

Still, your racism means you just attack them based on them being from the race of a quarter of the planet you hate.

You have zero interest in people and only have interest in your racism and gammon vaccine nationalism. You are a scumbag and totally unemployable.

🤣 Don't you have any crayon lessons to prepare for next month.
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:44 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:42 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:41 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:37 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:29 pm
It would unethical to offer the least efficacious vaccines.
It's unethical to deny ones that some of the people want and will not take the alternative experimental types. That's unethical. It's unethical to use experimental mRNA on kids, that's unethical.
It's unethical that we have teachers who are looking for experimental mRNA jabs in the kids they are meant to look after. It's unethical that we don't have them coming out in large numbers to stop this ....that's unethical.
Nah, giving cheap Chinese knock offs is unethical.
You are a shit teacher. You don't deserve any pay rises for years.
Well I have and I didn’t have to buy my missus from back pages of a Chinese catalogue either.
A teacher....ignorant, foolish and racist.

You deserve you shit life. You are the making of it 😂


Parents know the inaction of you and your mates is why the kids have to be treated with a medical experimental mRNA jab.

You are below low.
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Cheap Chinese knock offs, a system built around stealing intellectual property is only ever going to produce the least efficacious vaccine.
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:49 pm Cheap Chinese knock offs, a system built around stealing intellectual property is only ever going to produce the least efficacious vaccine.
You should be ashamed of yourself. Look in the mirror, feel that shame.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 15761
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by message #2527204 »

Dozy wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:18 pm
message #2527204 wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:07 pm
Dozy wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:58 pm
TheFrog wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:18 pm
Dozy wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 8:29 am

Good to hear.. where does this put the liability.

Have you seen the contracts?

The Albanian, Brazilian, EU and now Dominican Republic ones have been leaked. I'm sure you've took the time to look at them.
Is your concern the health and safety of people or just getting financial compensations?
H&S first and responsibilities.

H&S isnt a concern for government who block other jabs and treatments that might see more come on board just to push mRNA
They don't need to block anything. Just rely on idiot antivaxxers and a few choice scare stories.
Tell that to the people all around the world who are healthy and still blocked from travel due to wrong vaccine
Like me, you mean? :? :) :((
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:52 pm
Sefton wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:49 pm Cheap Chinese knock offs, a system built around stealing intellectual property is only ever going to produce the least efficacious vaccine.
You should be ashamed of yourself. Look in the mirror, feel that shame.
If I was paid for peddling Chinese propaganda because I was a plumber who couldn’t even get a job fixing a tap then I’d feel some shame.
bimboman
Posts: 74645
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by bimboman »

Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.

What was wrong with their first jabs ?
Dozy
Posts: 2301
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

message #2527204 wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:52 pm
Dozy wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:18 pm
message #2527204 wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:07 pm
Dozy wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:58 pm
TheFrog wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:18 pm

Is your concern the health and safety of people or just getting financial compensations?
H&S first and responsibilities.

H&S isnt a concern for government who block other jabs and treatments that might see more come on board just to push mRNA
They don't need to block anything. Just rely on idiot antivaxxers and a few choice scare stories.
Tell that to the people all around the world who are healthy and still blocked from travel due to wrong vaccine
Like me, you mean? :? :) :((
You are fair safer in our society then the likes of morally bankrupt Sefton
bimboman
Posts: 74645
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by bimboman »

Sandstorm wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:19 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.
Can we see the test results for the 21/22 flu vaccine please?

https://flucamp.com/history-flu-vaccine-1940-2030/
User avatar
Sefton
Posts: 16984
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Sefton »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:57 pm
message #2527204 wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:52 pm
Dozy wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:18 pm
message #2527204 wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 7:07 pm
Dozy wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:58 pm

H&S first and responsibilities.

H&S isnt a concern for government who block other jabs and treatments that might see more come on board just to push mRNA
They don't need to block anything. Just rely on idiot antivaxxers and a few choice scare stories.
Tell that to the people all around the world who are healthy and still blocked from travel due to wrong vaccine
Like me, you mean? :? :) :((
You are fair safer in our society then the likes of morally bankrupt Sefton
I think the translation software is buggy.
User avatar
TheFrog
Posts: 14630
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by TheFrog »

Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:00 pm
bimboman wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:42 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:31 pm
C69 wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:14 pm
Dozy wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:36 pm Quite aggressive censorship of these contracts and even of doctors discussing them.

Very odd.
All seems quite standard tbh, not at all aggressive for big Pharma.
Do you live in a parallel Universe. What makes you think this is more agressive than usual?
The banning of people on social media for mentioning it....is this normal and acceptable to you??

Acceptable? It’s positively desirable for the dishonest communist authoritarian wanker,
The speed of these reforms and control. My misses said it reminds her of 1960s cultural Revolution.....that isn't a complement at all either. It's really frightening to live in a society wondering what more radical bat shit crazy stuff will they start doing next. What is also crazy is just of f**king blind the people around us are to what is going on too. They've swollowed all the bullshit hook line and sinker.
Why don't you move to PR China and enjoy life in a truly democratic country?
User avatar
TheFrog
Posts: 14630
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by TheFrog »

bimboman wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:56 pm
Varsity Way wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:12 pm The NHS in Cornwall are offering their work force the booster vaccination and flu jab in one sitting in September.

What was wrong with their first jabs ?
I guess same as for the flu. You need to constantly update to adapt to mutations and dominating strains.
User avatar
RodneyRegis
Posts: 16520
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by RodneyRegis »

Uberlol

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
These data clearly show that addition of chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV if the drug is added immediately following virus adsorption.
User avatar
earl the beaver
Posts: 53435
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by earl the beaver »

Rodney, I imagine Puku might chirp up who is far more knowledgeable about this than me but that article is 16 years old and is about SARS spreading in cells under controlled conditions, not about the spread of SARS in humans. Its not about Covid 19 at all.
Post Reply