OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

All things Rugby
shereblue
Posts: 5430
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by shereblue »

Following the Truss Oz surrender and the get it done TECA, Bumblecunt now hilariously claiming he doesn't want to rush a US trade deal because he wants to get it right.

Good to see him belatedly acknowledge that it was not Project Fear but that the part Kenyan was right in saying the UK would be at the back of the queue.
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

shereblue wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:51 pm Following the Truss Oz surrender and the get it done TECA, Bumblecunt now hilariously claiming he doesn't want to rush a US trade deal because he wants to get it right.

Good to see him belatedly acknowledge that it was not Project Fear but that the part Kenyan was right in saying the UK would be at the back of the queue.

You do love your own made up narratives.

The Aussie trade deal has now paid for itself many times over right? :lol:

The EU / US deal is feeling even further away now ambassadors are being withdrawn. :lol:
piquant
Posts: 10176
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:01 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by piquant »

Have they actually released the Australia trade deal yet? a deal so good we need to keep it a secret how good we are at negotiating.
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

piquant wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:59 pm Have they actually released the Australia trade deal yet? a deal so good we need to keep it a secret how good we are at negotiating.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliam ... P-9204.pdf
La soule
Posts: 10550
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by La soule »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:01 pm
piquant wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:59 pm Have they actually released the Australia trade deal yet? a deal so good we need to keep it a secret how good we are at negotiating.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliam ... P-9204.pdf
Hats off to Boris and Co. Job well done :thumbup:
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has expressed concerns about the impact
of the agreement with Australia on UK farmers. It fears that a large increase
in imports from Australia, which can be produced on a much larger scale and
using products banned in the UK, could undercut UK farmers.
The RSPCA were also critical of the AIP, saying that it risked “imports
produced to lower animal welfare standards than those permitted here”. It
warned that the agreement “could set a damaging precedent for agreements
with other countries and threatens a race to the bottom.”
The Government is now facing the first significant test of its
manifesto promise, in the form of the recently concluded trade deal
with Australia. Australian farmers – although heavily regulated – are
permitted to use practices that most reasonable observers would not
deem to be in line with UK standards. For example, battery cages for
laying hens are still legal in Australia, and cattle are held in greater
densities than in the UK.
Perhaps most distressingly, the practise of “mulesing” is
commonplace in Australia. This is when the skin is cut off a lamb’s
rump, in
British Chambers of Commerce said that businesses would welcome the AIP
but noted that while it would bring benefits these would not offset the impact
of Brexit on trade with the EU.
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

:roll:
eldanielfire wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:31 pm
Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 12:45 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:53 am Don't let them drag you down rocketz :thumbup:
I let the facts speak for themselves

It seem there are people whose feelings get hurt about the facts and they dont want me to post it. I am like whatever... block me if reality is to hard for you to take.
Except when you post racist memes of course.....
:roll:
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:08 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:01 pm
piquant wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:59 pm Have they actually released the Australia trade deal yet? a deal so good we need to keep it a secret how good we are at negotiating.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliam ... P-9204.pdf
Hats off to Boris and Co. Job well done :thumbup:
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has expressed concerns about the impact
of the agreement with Australia on UK farmers. It fears that a large increase
in imports from Australia, which can be produced on a much larger scale and
using products banned in the UK, could undercut UK farmers.
The RSPCA were also critical of the AIP, saying that it risked “imports
produced to lower animal welfare standards than those permitted here”. It
warned that the agreement “could set a damaging precedent for agreements
with other countries and threatens a race to the bottom.”
The Government is now facing the first significant test of its
manifesto promise, in the form of the recently concluded trade deal
with Australia. Australian farmers – although heavily regulated – are
permitted to use practices that most reasonable observers would not
deem to be in line with UK standards. For example, battery cages for
laying hens are still legal in Australia, and cattle are held in greater
densities than in the UK.
Perhaps most distressingly, the practise of “mulesing” is
commonplace in Australia. This is when the skin is cut off a lamb’s
rump, in
British Chambers of Commerce said that businesses would welcome the AIP
but noted that while it would bring benefits these would not offset the impact
of Brexit on trade with the EU.

90 billion.
La soule
Posts: 10550
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by La soule »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:17 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:08 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:01 pm
piquant wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:59 pm Have they actually released the Australia trade deal yet? a deal so good we need to keep it a secret how good we are at negotiating.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliam ... P-9204.pdf
Hats off to Boris and Co. Job well done :thumbup:
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has expressed concerns about the impact
of the agreement with Australia on UK farmers. It fears that a large increase
in imports from Australia, which can be produced on a much larger scale and
using products banned in the UK, could undercut UK farmers.
The RSPCA were also critical of the AIP, saying that it risked “imports
produced to lower animal welfare standards than those permitted here”. It
warned that the agreement “could set a damaging precedent for agreements
with other countries and threatens a race to the bottom.”
The Government is now facing the first significant test of its
manifesto promise, in the form of the recently concluded trade deal
with Australia. Australian farmers – although heavily regulated – are
permitted to use practices that most reasonable observers would not
deem to be in line with UK standards. For example, battery cages for
laying hens are still legal in Australia, and cattle are held in greater
densities than in the UK.
Perhaps most distressingly, the practise of “mulesing” is
commonplace in Australia. This is when the skin is cut off a lamb’s
rump, in
British Chambers of Commerce said that businesses would welcome the AIP
but noted that while it would bring benefits these would not offset the impact
of Brexit on trade with the EU.

90 billion.
Well done Joe. Let's see how much he will allow you to have :thumbup:
shereblue
Posts: 5430
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by shereblue »

Quasi Quotation, the embattled Brexit believer, has thankfully re-assured us that:

"There's absolutely no question of the lights going out or people being unable to heat their homes"

Yet another win :thumbup:
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:22 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:17 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:08 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:01 pm
piquant wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:59 pm Have they actually released the Australia trade deal yet? a deal so good we need to keep it a secret how good we are at negotiating.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliam ... P-9204.pdf
Hats off to Boris and Co. Job well done :thumbup:
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has expressed concerns about the impact
of the agreement with Australia on UK farmers. It fears that a large increase
in imports from Australia, which can be produced on a much larger scale and
using products banned in the UK, could undercut UK farmers.
The RSPCA were also critical of the AIP, saying that it risked “imports
produced to lower animal welfare standards than those permitted here”. It
warned that the agreement “could set a damaging precedent for agreements
with other countries and threatens a race to the bottom.”
The Government is now facing the first significant test of its
manifesto promise, in the form of the recently concluded trade deal
with Australia. Australian farmers – although heavily regulated – are
permitted to use practices that most reasonable observers would not
deem to be in line with UK standards. For example, battery cages for
laying hens are still legal in Australia, and cattle are held in greater
densities than in the UK.
Perhaps most distressingly, the practise of “mulesing” is
commonplace in Australia. This is when the skin is cut off a lamb’s
rump, in
British Chambers of Commerce said that businesses would welcome the AIP
but noted that while it would bring benefits these would not offset the impact
of Brexit on trade with the EU.

90 billion.
Well done Joe. Let's see how much he will allow you to have :thumbup:

90 billion lost.
La soule
Posts: 10550
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by La soule »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:30 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:22 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:17 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:08 pm
Hats off to Boris and Co. Job well done :thumbup:
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) has expressed concerns about the impact
of the agreement with Australia on UK farmers. It fears that a large increase
in imports from Australia, which can be produced on a much larger scale and
using products banned in the UK, could undercut UK farmers.
The RSPCA were also critical of the AIP, saying that it risked “imports
produced to lower animal welfare standards than those permitted here”. It
warned that the agreement “could set a damaging precedent for agreements
with other countries and threatens a race to the bottom.”
The Government is now facing the first significant test of its
manifesto promise, in the form of the recently concluded trade deal
with Australia. Australian farmers – although heavily regulated – are
permitted to use practices that most reasonable observers would not
deem to be in line with UK standards. For example, battery cages for
laying hens are still legal in Australia, and cattle are held in greater
densities than in the UK.
Perhaps most distressingly, the practise of “mulesing” is
commonplace in Australia. This is when the skin is cut off a lamb’s
rump, in
British Chambers of Commerce said that businesses would welcome the AIP
but noted that while it would bring benefits these would not offset the impact
of Brexit on trade with the EU.

90 billion.
Well done Joe. Let's see how much he will allow you to have :thumbup:

90 billion lost.
You can' even get the basic facts right. Why am I not surprised?
Sawtooth the Beaver
Posts: 1462
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Sawtooth the Beaver »

shereblue wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:27 pm Quasi Quotation, the embattled Brexit believer, has thankfully re-assured us that:

"There's absolutely no question of the lights going out or people being unable to heat their homes"

Yet another win :thumbup:
Those whose fixed price deals run out and can't afford the projected price hikes may not be so unquestioning.
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:31 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:30 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:22 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:17 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:08 pm

Hats off to Boris and Co. Job well done :thumbup:








90 billion.
Well done Joe. Let's see how much he will allow you to have :thumbup:

90 billion lost.
You can' even get the basic facts right. Why am I not surprised?

90 billion dollars lost.
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:42 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:31 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:30 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:22 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:17 pm


90 billion.
Well done Joe. Let's see how much he will allow you to have :thumbup:

90 billion lost.
You can' even get the basic facts right. Why am I not surprised?

90 billion dollars lost.
To the USA. Why are you gloating?

Besides the UK is losing 800 million pounds a week due to brexit https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 43018.html
Last edited by Rocketz on Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

Germany warns of lost U.S. trust as France wins EU support

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/fr ... 021-09-21/

Brexit is going to hurt
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:43 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:42 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:31 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:30 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:22 pm

Well done Joe. Let's see how much he will allow you to have :thumbup:

90 billion lost.
You can' even get the basic facts right. Why am I not surprised?

90 billion dollars lost.
To the USA. Why are you gloating?

:lol: ....

Even our few billions in crumbs are superb.
La soule
Posts: 10550
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by La soule »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:42 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:31 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:30 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:22 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:17 pm


90 billion.
Well done Joe. Let's see how much he will allow you to have :thumbup:

90 billion lost.
You can' even get the basic facts right. Why am I not surprised?

90 billion dollars lost.
That's still wrong.

This is too complicated for you. Let it go.
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:45 pm
Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:43 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:42 pm
La soule wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:31 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:30 pm


90 billion lost.
You can' even get the basic facts right. Why am I not surprised?

90 billion dollars lost.
To the USA. Why are you gloating?

:lol: ....

Even our few billions in crumbs are superb.
You are losing 800 million pounds a week at the moment https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 43018.html

And you havent even implemented Brexit yet

Now the EU is taking France's side and quite a few countries will veto and services agreements...

Welcome to the painhouse
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Rockets in nit understanding GDP vs deal profits shocker. :lol:
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Now the EU is taking France's side and quite a few countries will veto and services agreements...

They’ll do what ?

“Service agreements “ eh?
DAC_
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by DAC_ »

"Painhouse"

:lol:
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:50 pm Rockets in nit understanding GDP vs deal profits shocker. :lol:
Are you back to take another beating after you ran away last week?
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:51 pm
Now the EU is taking France's side and quite a few countries will veto and services agreements...

They’ll do what ?

“Service agreements “ eh?
I think that you can kiss goodbye. They will just force you to implement the deal you signed
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:55 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:50 pm Rockets in nit understanding GDP vs deal profits shocker. :lol:
Are you back to take another beating after you ran away last week?

I’ll not bother again, you don’t grasp anything that you post. I now know why as well. Most of its a bit of a mystery for you.
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:00 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:51 pm
Now the EU is taking France's side and quite a few countries will veto and services agreements...

They’ll do what ?

“Service agreements “ eh?
I think that you can kiss goodbye. They will just force you to implement the deal you signed


They’ll force nothing. There’s no services agreement anyway you fool. You’re so wonderfully stupid,
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:01 pm
Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:00 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:51 pm
Now the EU is taking France's side and quite a few countries will veto and services agreements...

They’ll do what ?

“Service agreements “ eh?
I think that you can kiss goodbye. They will just force you to implement the deal you signed


They’ll force nothing. There’s no services agreement anyway you fool. You’re so wonderfully stupid,
I was wondering why you posted that. You are obviously faking that you know something about "finances"

But now that I have your attention can you answer this
Hey where did you vanish to after refusing to answer questions as to why the growth in jobs and trades in Amsterdam isnt to their benefit?
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Conflating the trades with “jobs” is silly, they’re separate issues completely. You’d know that if you understood the basics about the trades.


You don’t because you’re quite a simple bigoted chap.
piquant
Posts: 10176
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:01 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by piquant »

it's actually rather worrying there's no service agreement. and they were told a long time if there's one thing left over at the end without other dependencies for the love of god don't let it be services, make sure you get that wrapped up alongside other items.

they were told, and incredibly stupidly they've left it and set the EU up to take business off us.

I'm not going to say there was no need to be in this position because we could have got a bad result out of negotiations and ended up with a bad trade deal on services with the EU to go along with the rest of the bad deals they're doing, it wasn't going to be possible to get a good deal as such, but drunk monkeys would have put us in a better position had they been running the executive
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:15 pm Conflating the trades with “jobs” is silly, they’re separate issues completely. You’d know that if you understood the basics about the trades.


You don’t because you’re quite a simple bigoted chap.

Just answer the question

Here is a clue

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/economie/bedri ... roup-venlo
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

Another Brexit benefit gone? PM accepts deal with UK not priority for US

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/ ... us-291412/
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:26 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:15 pm Conflating the trades with “jobs” is silly, they’re separate issues completely. You’d know that if you understood the basics about the trades.


You don’t because you’re quite a simple bigoted chap.

Just answer the question

Here is a clue

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/economie/bedri ... roup-venlo

The trades being discussed will generate few if any jobs in Amsterdam, the taxes you referred to are paid in the same amount in the same places regardless of where they’re booked. You’re a fool.
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

Briten zahlen viel mehr für Zölle

Das sind umgerechnet 2,6 Milliarden Euro

https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/we ... g-101.html
According to calculations by the accounting firm UHY Hacker Young, a total of 2.2 billion British pounds in customs duties were due from January to July. 2021, a 40% increase from last year
I guess that cancels out the scraps of the Sub Deal
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:57 pm
Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:26 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:15 pm Conflating the trades with “jobs” is silly, they’re separate issues completely. You’d know that if you understood the basics about the trades.


You don’t because you’re quite a simple bigoted chap.

Just answer the question

Here is a clue

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/economie/bedri ... roup-venlo

The trades being discussed will generate few if any jobs in Amsterdam, the taxes you referred to are paid in the same amount in the same places regardless of where they’re booked. You’re a fool.
Defelection come come you faux economist cum logistics expert answer the questions as asked then we can move along to your silly claims
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

it's actually rather worrying there's no service agreement. and they were told a long time if there's one thing left over at the end without other dependencies for the love of god don't let it be services, make sure you get that wrapped up alongside other items
Services have been off the table for 4 years now, why on earth is this suddenly “worrying” now?

The idea that they were ever on offer is also nonsense.
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:02 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:57 pm
Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:26 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:15 pm Conflating the trades with “jobs” is silly, they’re separate issues completely. You’d know that if you understood the basics about the trades.


You don’t because you’re quite a simple bigoted chap.

Just answer the question

Here is a clue

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/economie/bedri ... roup-venlo

The trades being discussed will generate few if any jobs in Amsterdam, the taxes you referred to are paid in the same amount in the same places regardless of where they’re booked. You’re a fool.
Defelection come come you faux economist cum logistics expert answer the questions as asked then we can move along to your silly claims
But I’ve not “deflected” , I’ve told you straight few if any jobs and no extra taxes. .... they’re not claims they’re facts.

I’ve answered your questions. You’re a fool
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:05 pm
Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:02 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:57 pm
Rocketz wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:26 pm
bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:15 pm Conflating the trades with “jobs” is silly, they’re separate issues completely. You’d know that if you understood the basics about the trades.


You don’t because you’re quite a simple bigoted chap.

Just answer the question

Here is a clue

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/economie/bedri ... roup-venlo

The trades being discussed will generate few if any jobs in Amsterdam, the taxes you referred to are paid in the same amount in the same places regardless of where they’re booked. You’re a fool.
Defelection come come you faux economist cum logistics expert answer the questions as asked then we can move along to your silly claims
But I’ve not “deflected” , I’ve told you straight few if any jobs and no extra taxes. .... they’re not claims they’re facts.

I’ve answered your questions. You’re a fool
Here it is again read
Hey where did you vanish to after refusing to answer questions as to why the growth in jobs and trades in Amsterdam isnt to their benefit?
Sawtooth the Beaver
Posts: 1462
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Sawtooth the Beaver »

Image

Express writers suffering from selective amnesia.
User avatar
Rocketz
Posts: 5922
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: United States of Europe

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by Rocketz »

bimboman wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:04 pm
it's actually rather worrying there's no service agreement. and they were told a long time if there's one thing left over at the end without other dependencies for the love of god don't let it be services, make sure you get that wrapped up alongside other items
Services have been off the table for 4 years now, why on earth is this suddenly “worrying” now?

The idea that they were ever on offer is also nonsense.

So this not a problem then

Financial industry urges Brussels to extend access to UK clearing houses
Banks and asset managers warn of ‘major’ market disruption when licence expires next year

https://www.ft.com/content/a9fe5bbe-f17 ... 7197b40df4

Come on you wizz kid I'll wait
bimboman
Posts: 75499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: OFFICIAL Brexit Thread

Post by bimboman »

Hey where did you vanish to after refusing to answer questions as to why the growth in jobs and trades in Amsterdam isnt to their benefit?
The trades generate few if no more jobs in Amsterdam.


So there’s no benefit from what we were discussing.


I keep answering this very clearly ... you seem quite hard of thinking again.
Post Reply