Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

All things Rugby
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 65505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by CM11 »

DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm

That is what the article says, angry boy.
No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
DAC_
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DAC_ »

CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm

No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Do you even have an opinion on why important people don't need a vaccine (as shown) but we have too? Any opinion at all? Because, given your posting history on people having the vaccine, you should?
DAC_
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DAC_ »

CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm

No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Any opinion at all? Any?
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 65505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by CM11 »

DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:12 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm

Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Do you even have an opinion on why important people don't need a vaccine (as shown) but we have too? Any opinion at all? Because, given your posting history on people having the vaccine, you should?
As I said, the reasons are given in the article.

I've already said to you that covid restrictions conflict and don't always make logical sense. We're about to open nightclubs but partners can't be there until the final seconds of labour. It's wrong but it is what it is. People are trying to do their best to not kill other people in the midst of a serious crisis. Mistakes will happen. Policy won't always make sense but if you're asking why people, allegedly, important to the future of the world are being treated differently than those they are acting on behalf of it would explain your selfish stance on vaccination.
DAC_
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DAC_ »

CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:36 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:12 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:08 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:05 pm

Not my country so not sure why you're asking me to defend the ruling but the article you linked gives the reasons. Not up to me to agree or disagree with those reasons. What we me never before putting UK policy decisions up as any sort of standard to follow.
As I thought, you don't have an answer. Thanks.
I'm not here to solve every problem in the world. Why do I have to have an answer to everything? Do you?
Do you even have an opinion on why important people don't need a vaccine (as shown) but we have too? Any opinion at all? Because, given your posting history on people having the vaccine, you should?
As I said, the reasons are given in the article.

I've already said to you that covid restrictions conflict and don't always make logical sense. We're about to open nightclubs but partners can't be there until the final seconds of labour. It's wrong but it is what it is. People are trying to do their best to not kill other people in the midst of a serious crisis. Mistakes will happen. Policy won't always make sense but if you're asking why people, allegedly, important to the future of the world are being treated differently than those they are acting on behalf of it would explain your selfish stance on vaccination.
You're of the opinion, given your posting history, young children should have vaccinations, but people attending the conference shouldn't?
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 65505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by CM11 »

Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
DAC_
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DAC_ »

CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 65505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by CM11 »

DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
I think you'll find that's not a link when you look at your post again.
DAC_
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DAC_ »

CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:51 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
I think you'll find that's not a link when you look at your post again.
Pro vaxxers, gonna pro vax (apart from important people attending climate change conferences, of course)
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 65505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by CM11 »

DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:53 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:51 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
I think you'll find that's not a link when you look at your post again.
Pro vaxxers, gonna pro vax (apart from important people attending climate change conferences, of course)
Again, not a link.

Another mistake you're trying to bluster out of.
User avatar
Ted.
Posts: 20163
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Ted. »

Mick Mannock wrote: Wed Oct 13, 2021 9:12 pm
Farva wrote: Wed Oct 13, 2021 9:07 pm
message #2527204 wrote: Wed Oct 13, 2021 9:10 am
Mick Mannock wrote: Wed Oct 13, 2021 9:09 am Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan.
:lol:
Incredibly ignorant comment by mick. Taiwan has very low levels of Covid. They have achieved this by closing their country. However that is not sustainable. To reopen they have a choice. They can not vaccinate and allow Covid in to kill thousands or they can vaccinate.

Mick claims to not be an anti Vaxxer but he parrots their propaganda. He is an anti vaxxer.
I am not an anti-vaxxer. I have accepted every previous vaccine offered. I also administer vaccines.

You are a liar.

Why do you lie?
As an aside, another benefit of getting vaccinated against Covid. Something which, IIRC, was vehemently denied by some people in this very thread. read on, if you dare.

...

And remember, endemic Covid doesn't replace an existing disease. It’s another one to add to the pile.

...

And what if the virus changes?

There is also the concern that the virus mutates again and becomes something worse.

Let’s unpack this for a moment. A lot has been written about what the coronavirus will do next, but the reality is that no-one really knows for sure.

One little talked about benefit of the vaccines, however, is the pressure they put on the virus. They not only stop the virus from finding a host, they stop the virus from replicating wildly when it finds itself in the human body doing its thing.

According to this (pre-print) study from July which looked at 1.8m genomes (or versions) of the virus from around the world, the authors found: “the first known evidence that Covid-19 vaccines are fundamentally restricting the evolutionary and antigenic escape pathways accessible to SARS-CoV-2”.

This sounds complicated. But it’s very simple. Vaccination may muffle the virus’ ability to change.


That said, about half the world has still not been vaccinated – there are billions of vulnerable people, in particular, in poorer countries with no immunity.
User avatar
RuggaBugga
Posts: 13330
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by RuggaBugga »

DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:01 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:57 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:29 pm
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
That is what the article says, angry boy.
No it doesn't. Not even your anti vax crackpot website goes that far.

Lying piece of shit.
Can you answer why the Climate People don't need to be vaxxed? But it's important that the working class, are?
Nope. I have no idea what you're on about but given your posting history I'd lay dollars to doughnuts that you've read something and added 1 + 1 to equal 7

I think it's important that everyone is vaxxed.
Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

Slim 293 wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:20 am
Mick Mannock wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:10 am
Slim 293 wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:30 am
DOB wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:29 am Joe Rogan has tested positive, and is taking Ivermectin.

https://www.npr.org/2021/09/01/10334851 ... Z0ODhrQTsU

He's going to enjoy shitting out his intestinal lining... :thumbup:
Is that what is happening to people on clinical trials?

Or are you just being a bit of a twat?

It's currently what's happening to your ilk taking horse medicine against the advice of every health authority...
:lol:
Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

feckwanker wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 11:07 am The funny think is that if the CDC, NHS and other health agencies came out and said to take Ivermectin to combat Covid, Mick would be on here saying how everyone was so stupid for taking a treatment for roundworm in equine species and that there eas no long term steady data about its use to treat Covid.

He's an attention seeking contrarion and a liar and that's about it really.
:lol:
Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

Ted. wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:45 pm
DOB wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:22 am
sorCrer wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:32 am
DOB wrote: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:29 am Joe Rogan has tested positive, and is taking Ivermectin.

https://www.npr.org/2021/09/01/10334851 ... Z0ODhrQTsU
Joe Rogan is a dumb twat.
I just said that.
:lol:
:lol:
Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

Enzedder wrote: Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:42 pm Good old Ivermectin eh?

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... xIdeH52GHc

CDC should just shut up and let this play out. Never had a better chance to improve the gene pool.
:lol:
Dozy
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
There a a fair few sources in east Asia saying it actually. AZ seems to be a disaster of a jab
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 17883
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by message #2527204 »

Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:26 am
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
There a a fair few sources in east Asia saying it actually. AZ seems to be a disaster of a jab
Billions have been administered.

Your beloved big pharma are the masters at manipulating markets for the billions they stand to make.
User avatar
terryfinch
Posts: 5978
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by terryfinch »

Just been on a cycle tour with about 20 folk. Everyone was double jabbed except one woman. She spurted out all the anti-vaccine bollocks from Facebook and acted all superior. Guess what, she got Covid, had to abandon the tour, and is now very ill. The rest of us are all fine and tested negative.

You can’t reason with some people.
Dozy
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

terryfinch wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:36 am Just been on a cycle tour with about 20 folk. Everyone was double jabbed except one woman. She spurted out all the anti-vaccine bollocks from Facebook and acted all superior. Guess what, she got Covid, had to abandon the tour, and is now very ill. The rest of us are all fine and tested negative.

You can’t reason with some people.
Keep us posted.

Very ill, only one...worth following
C69
Posts: 43047
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:44 pm
Location: For Wales the Welsh and aproppriate pronouns

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by C69 »

Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:26 am
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
There a a fair few sources in east Asia saying it actually. AZ seems to be a disaster of a jab
Feel free to post the info...
bimboman
Posts: 76658
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by bimboman »

Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:26 am
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
There a a fair few sources in east Asia saying it actually. AZ seems to be a disaster of a jab

Maybe it’s a racist jab, seems to have worked brilliantly (even better than Pfizer possibly) in the U.K.
bimboman
Posts: 76658
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by bimboman »

But masks and vaccine passports really work super duper,


https://twitter.com/ems_richard/status/ ... 8724604928
Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

terryfinch wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:36 am Just been on a cycle tour with about 20 folk. Everyone was double jabbed except one woman. She spurted out all the anti-vaccine bollocks from Facebook and acted all superior. Guess what, she got Covid, had to abandon the tour, and is now very ill. The rest of us are all fine and tested negative.

You can’t reason with some people.
Is this a permitted anecdote?
Dozy
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

bimboman wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:29 am
Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:26 am
RuggaBugga wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:09 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:06 pm Unacceptable anecdote.
"Vaccine deaths exceed covid deaths in Taiwan"

Lying piece of shit.
There a a fair few sources in east Asia saying it actually. AZ seems to be a disaster of a jab

Maybe it’s a racist jab, seems to have worked brilliantly (even better than Pfizer possibly) in the U.K.
Its just the numbers. 2/3 of the deaths are AZ and most of the others Moderna

I am sure the republic of China are delighted with the gift from Japan that Japan wouldn't use themselves
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 15417
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Coalfalls

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by MungoMan »

Mick Mannock wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 8:32 am
Enzedder wrote: Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:42 pm Good old Ivermectin eh?

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... xIdeH52GHc

CDC should just shut up and let this play out. Never had a better chance to improve the gene pool.
:lol:
Lotta smilies, Mick. A whole lotta smilies.

Meltdown on the menu, is it?
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 15417
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Coalfalls

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by MungoMan »

DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:53 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:51 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
I think you'll find that's not a link when you look at your post again.
Pro vaxxers, gonna pro vax (apart from important people attending climate change conferences, of course)
What with yelling, windmilling your arms and side-stepping, you must get a whole-body working while posting. Very efficient, that.
bimboman
Posts: 76658
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by bimboman »

MungoMan wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 12:22 pm
Mick Mannock wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 8:32 am
Enzedder wrote: Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:42 pm Good old Ivermectin eh?

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... xIdeH52GHc

CDC should just shut up and let this play out. Never had a better chance to improve the gene pool.
:lol:
Lotta smilies, Mick. A whole lotta smilies.

Meltdown on the menu, is it?

It’s been quite disciplined and aimed at a particular issue.
Dozy
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

How about a mandatory negative AIDS test before entering a brothel or some meat market nightclub?

How about having to prove that your aggression levels are low before entering any public place?

How about having to show your criminal record and being checked for traits of extremist ideology before going to any public event?

How about having the state check whether you are prone to alcoholism, violence, drug abuse, extremism, religious fanaticism or suicide before having children?

How about doing an IQ test before having children?

All for the greater good, so that you do not endanger others.
Dozy
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

Image
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 65505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by CM11 »

Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:31 pm How about a mandatory negative AIDS test before entering a brothel or some meat market nightclub?

How about having to prove that your aggression levels are low before entering any public place?

How about having to show your criminal record and being checked for traits of extremist ideology before going to any public event?

How about having the state check whether you are prone to alcoholism, violence, drug abuse, extremism, religious fanaticism or suicide before having children?

How about doing an IQ test before having children?

All for the greater good, so that you do not endanger others.
Sounds good.
User avatar
DragsterDriver
Posts: 27839
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Big Willi Style

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by DragsterDriver »

MungoMan wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 12:24 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:53 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:51 pm
DAC_ wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:48 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Oct 15, 2021 11:46 pm Can you post a link where I gave an opinion on young children getting vaccinated?

Or indeed where I gave an opinion that any adult shouldn't?
You're one of the most pro Vaxxers on PR (not for important people, obviously, given your last post)
I think you'll find that's not a link when you look at your post again.
Pro vaxxers, gonna pro vax (apart from important people attending climate change conferences, of course)
What with yelling, windmilling your arms and side-stepping, you must get a whole-body working while posting. Very efficient, that.
https://www.tiktok.com/@isa_minelife/vi ... enger&_r=1

Like your video :thumbup:
User avatar
sorCrer
Posts: 13662
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by sorCrer »

Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:31 pm
How about doing an IQ test before having children?
:thumbup:

Would have saved us from your inane dribbling.
User avatar
RuggaBugga
Posts: 13330
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by RuggaBugga »

Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:31 pm How about a mandatory negative AIDS test before entering a brothel or some meat market nightclub?

How about having to prove that your aggression levels are low before entering any public place?

How about having to show your criminal record and being checked for traits of extremist ideology before going to any public event?

How about having the state check whether you are prone to alcoholism, violence, drug abuse, extremism, religious fanaticism or suicide before having children?

How about doing an IQ test before having children?

All for the greater good, so that you do not endanger others.
How bout you stfu you loony plum.
User avatar
Frodder
Posts: 13101
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:25 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Frodder »

Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:55 pm Image
Insert Beaver gag
Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

:lol:
Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

Mick Mannock
Posts: 28463
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Mick Mannock »

BREAKING: During an interview with Stew Peters, Dr Jane Ruby provided Breaking information, corroborated by multiple sources, that a Vaxxed Delta Airlines pilot died in flight within the last two weeks, an emergency landing was forced, and the company is covering it up!

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/10/s ... -required/

It was a disastrous weekend for Southwest Airlines. Across Saturday and Sunday, they canceled more than 2,100 flights, about a quarter of their total. Now here’s where it gets interesting: It’s extremely obvious someone is lying about why. In a statement, Southwest blamed bad weather and air traffic control problems. But the Federal Aviation Administration says, no, there haven’t been any air traffic control issues since last Friday. And if “Bad weather” was forcing cancellations, it was a peculiar kind of weather that only affected Southwest and its airplanes. Other airlines didn’t have mass cancellations. There was some rain and thunderstorms in Florida, but no hurricanes. Nothing that required a mass shutdown.

No, somebody is lying here. And it could be from both Southwest and the FAA. There are reports that in Jacksonville, Florida, air traffic controllers walked off the job to protest against vaccine mandates. But that might not be all. Southwest announced a vaccine mandate for all personnel last week, and there are reports that pilots are joining the resistance as well. But Southwest’s pilot’s union claims there is no such protest action underway; they say that “poor planning” by Southwest management caused the cancellations. So maybe the union is lying or clueless as well.
To unravel all of this, Dr. Jane Ruby joined the show to discuss.
Dozy
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Coronavirus Thread. Virus v humans

Post by Dozy »

CM11 wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 6:05 pm
Dozy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:31 pm How about a mandatory negative AIDS test before entering a brothel or some meat market nightclub?

How about having to prove that your aggression levels are low before entering any public place?

How about having to show your criminal record and being checked for traits of extremist ideology before going to any public event?

How about having the state check whether you are prone to alcoholism, violence, drug abuse, extremism, religious fanaticism or suicide before having children?

How about doing an IQ test before having children?

All for the greater good, so that you do not endanger others.
Sounds good.
Says plenty about you..I am sure I could find plenty of tests you would fail and therefore ensure you are f**ked
Post Reply