Andy Burnham

All things Rugby

What's the Manchester mayor up to?

Failed politician trying to resurrect his career on the backs of future covid victims
18
58%
Staunch defender of the north against cruel Westminster diktat
13
42%
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
Dobbin
Posts: 3160
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Andy Burnham

Post by Dobbin »

Well..?
User avatar
Dobbin
Posts: 3160
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Dobbin »

Pretty conclusive so far from a massive representative sample.
Rugby2023
Posts: 12106
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:05 pm

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Rugby2023 »

Am I right in saying he doesn't oppose lockdown per se, but rather is trying to extract compensation from the Govt in exchange for his blessing?
User avatar
MrDominator
Posts: 4042
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:14 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by MrDominator »

Burnham has always been a monumental charlatan.
User avatar
Azlan Roar
Posts: 3099
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Adopted Lion - Jon Davies

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Azlan Roar »

Rugby2023 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:15 am Am I right in saying he doesn't oppose lockdown per se, but rather is trying to extract compensation from the Govt in exchange for his blessing?
This, but there is a massive subplot with Burnham, fueled by his dislike of the "Westminster Bubble" and desire to see more power devolved to cities and local authorities, especially ones that are north of Watford.
ovalball
Posts: 11403
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by ovalball »

Local Tory MPs appear to agree with him !!
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

Knob.

He says there's no need for tier 3, but he's willing to lockdown for cash.

Political posturing with people's lives at stake.
Varsity Way
Posts: 1213
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 3:50 pm

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Varsity Way »

He could do with wearing a shirt and tie rather than looking like a guy in a pub. Looks like a pikey with no respect for his office.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

A workers'mayor on a workers' wage?
For Militant read Momentum, for Hatton read Burnham.
C69
Posts: 39421
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:44 pm
Location: For Wales the Welsh and aproppriate pronouns

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by C69 »

message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:00 pm A workers'mayor on a workers' wage?
For Militant read Momentum, for Hatton read Burnham.
Lol, Hatton was never a mayor or even the leader of Labour in Liverpool.
And to suggest Burnham is a Momentum supporter shows exactly how much you know about politics.
Burnham even has the support of large swathes of the Tory MPs in the region.
However carry on, its cute.
User avatar
Anonymous 1
Posts: 38526
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Location: Planet Rock

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Anonymous 1 »

message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
It's so funny you should say that. When I posted that sage were recommending a national lockdown to save lives and the NHS but the government were refusing (doing an Andy Brunham) you had a different tune
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:03 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:45 am Sage recommending lockdown. Government delaying so eventually we have a longer lockdown. When it happens they will no doubt say they were guided by the science again.
There's no right or wrong way, but the government are the ones balancing risk using all available input, and they are the ones who will be judged on decisions made, not individual scientists or failed politicians.
User avatar
Frodder
Posts: 10336
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:25 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Frodder »

C69 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:52 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:00 pm A workers'mayor on a workers' wage?
For Militant read Momentum, for Hatton read Burnham.
Lol, Hatton was never a mayor or even the leader of Labour in Liverpool.
And to suggest Burnham is a Momentum supporter shows exactly how much you know about politics.
Burnham even has the support of large swathes of the Tory MPs in the region.
However carry on, its cute.
Hatton was an unhinged lunatic who was happy to put 1000's of people out of work for his "beliefs". I think he re-joined the Labour for about 10mins after his Twitter past was unearthed. I met him once and he's short which may expain a few things
bimboman
Posts: 66063
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by bimboman »

Frodder wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:50 am
C69 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:52 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:00 pm A workers'mayor on a workers' wage?
For Militant read Momentum, for Hatton read Burnham.
Lol, Hatton was never a mayor or even the leader of Labour in Liverpool.
And to suggest Burnham is a Momentum supporter shows exactly how much you know about politics.
Burnham even has the support of large swathes of the Tory MPs in the region.
However carry on, its cute.
Hatton was an unhinged lunatic who was happy to put 1000's of people out of work for his "beliefs". I think he re-joined the Labour for about 10mins after his Twitter past was unearthed. I met him once and he's short which may expain a few things


He's like a large part of the British left ....
C69
Posts: 39421
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:44 pm
Location: For Wales the Welsh and aproppriate pronouns

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by C69 »

Frodder wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:50 am
C69 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:52 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:00 pm A workers'mayor on a workers' wage?
For Militant read Momentum, for Hatton read Burnham.
Lol, Hatton was never a mayor or even the leader of Labour in Liverpool.
And to suggest Burnham is a Momentum supporter shows exactly how much you know about politics.
Burnham even has the support of large swathes of the Tory MPs in the region.
However carry on, its cute.
Hatton was an unhinged lunatic who was happy to put 1000's of people out of work for his "beliefs". I think he re-joined the Labour for about 10mins after his Twitter past was unearthed. I met him once and he's short which may expain a few things
Hatton was a complete twat, didn't realise he was short lol.
The most vile and very short politician I have ever had the misfortunate to meet was Neil Kinnock.
A nasty amoral careerist who would sell his soul if he or his nepotic vile family could make a buck.
bimboman
Posts: 66063
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by bimboman »

C69 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:48 am
Frodder wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:50 am
C69 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:52 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:00 pm A workers'mayor on a workers' wage?
For Militant read Momentum, for Hatton read Burnham.
Lol, Hatton was never a mayor or even the leader of Labour in Liverpool.
And to suggest Burnham is a Momentum supporter shows exactly how much you know about politics.
Burnham even has the support of large swathes of the Tory MPs in the region.
However carry on, its cute.
Hatton was an unhinged lunatic who was happy to put 1000's of people out of work for his "beliefs". I think he re-joined the Labour for about 10mins after his Twitter past was unearthed. I met him once and he's short which may expain a few things
Hatton was a complete twat, didn't realise he was short lol.
The most vile and very short politician I have ever had the misfortunate to meet was Neil Kinnock.
A nasty amoral careerist who would sell his soul if he or his nepotic vile family could make a buck.

Just like much of the British left.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:32 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
It's so funny you should say that. When I posted that sage were recommending a national lockdown to save lives and the NHS but the government were refusing (doing an Andy Brunham) you had a different tune
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:03 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:45 am Sage recommending lockdown. Government delaying so eventually we have a longer lockdown. When it happens they will no doubt say they were guided by the science again.
There's no right or wrong way, but the government are the ones balancing risk using all available input, and they are the ones who will be judged on decisions made, not individual scientists or failed politicians.
He isn't in Government. He doesn't know all the facts and he isn't responsible for the economy. The only people he has a mandate from are those in Manchester he's killing.
C69
Posts: 39421
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:44 pm
Location: For Wales the Welsh and aproppriate pronouns

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by C69 »

message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:55 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:32 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
It's so funny you should say that. When I posted that sage were recommending a national lockdown to save lives and the NHS but the government were refusing (doing an Andy Brunham) you had a different tune
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:03 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:45 am Sage recommending lockdown. Government delaying so eventually we have a longer lockdown. When it happens they will no doubt say they were guided by the science again.
There's no right or wrong way, but the government are the ones balancing risk using all available input, and they are the ones who will be judged on decisions made, not individual scientists or failed politicians.
He isn't in Government. He doesn't know all the facts and he isn't responsible for the economy. The only people he has a mandate from are those in Manchester he's killing.
He is killing people?
https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OGC.7cbf ... IdxuOvY%3d
User avatar
Anonymous 1
Posts: 38526
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Location: Planet Rock

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Anonymous 1 »

message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:55 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:32 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
It's so funny you should say that. When I posted that sage were recommending a national lockdown to save lives and the NHS but the government were refusing (doing an Andy Brunham) you had a different tune
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:03 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:45 am Sage recommending lockdown. Government delaying so eventually we have a longer lockdown. When it happens they will no doubt say they were guided by the science again.
There's no right or wrong way, but the government are the ones balancing risk using all available input, and they are the ones who will be judged on decisions made, not individual scientists or failed politicians.
He isn't in Government. He doesn't know all the facts and he isn't responsible for the economy. The only people he has a mandate from are those in Manchester he's killing.
So you are now in favour of a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS :thumbup:
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:16 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:55 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:32 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
It's so funny you should say that. When I posted that sage were recommending a national lockdown to save lives and the NHS but the government were refusing (doing an Andy Brunham) you had a different tune
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:03 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:45 am Sage recommending lockdown. Government delaying so eventually we have a longer lockdown. When it happens they will no doubt say they were guided by the science again.
There's no right or wrong way, but the government are the ones balancing risk using all available input, and they are the ones who will be judged on decisions made, not individual scientists or failed politicians.
He isn't in Government. He doesn't know all the facts and he isn't responsible for the economy. The only people he has a mandate from are those in Manchester he's killing.
So you are now in favour of a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS :thumbup:
What? It is Manchester, not national. I'm in favour of a lockdown where it's deemed necessary to have a lockdown.
User avatar
Anonymous 1
Posts: 38526
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Location: Planet Rock

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Anonymous 1 »

message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:30 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:16 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:55 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:32 am
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
It's so funny you should say that. When I posted that sage were recommending a national lockdown to save lives and the NHS but the government were refusing (doing an Andy Brunham) you had a different tune
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:03 am
There's no right or wrong way, but the government are the ones balancing risk using all available input, and they are the ones who will be judged on decisions made, not individual scientists or failed politicians.
He isn't in Government. He doesn't know all the facts and he isn't responsible for the economy. The only people he has a mandate from are those in Manchester he's killing.
So you are now in favour of a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS :thumbup:
What? It is Manchester, not national. I'm in favour of a lockdown where it's deemed necessary to have a lockdown.
Sage say it's necessary to have a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
bimboman
Posts: 66063
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by bimboman »

And sage have been brilliant so far.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:38 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:30 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:16 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:55 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:32 am
It's so funny you should say that. When I posted that sage were recommending a national lockdown to save lives and the NHS but the government were refusing (doing an Andy Brunham) you had a different tune

He isn't in Government. He doesn't know all the facts and he isn't responsible for the economy. The only people he has a mandate from are those in Manchester he's killing.
So you are now in favour of a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS :thumbup:
What? It is Manchester, not national. I'm in favour of a lockdown where it's deemed necessary to have a lockdown.
Sage say it's necessary to have a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS
message #2527204 wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:39 pm Burnham's the one refusing to implement the lockdown and potentially putting lives and the NHS at risk. For cash.
Sage put the idea of a circuit breaker as one of a number of options on a list. At no point did they say " it's necessary to have a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS"
User avatar
Anonymous 1
Posts: 38526
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Location: Planet Rock

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Anonymous 1 »

message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:51 am Sage put the idea of a circuit breaker as one of a number of options on a list. At no point did they say " it's necessary to have a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS"
A circuit breaker is a lockdown. It's just supposed to be a short one. If it's not to save lives and protect the NHS what the fuck is it for ?

What is a 'circuit breaker' lockdown, and how could it help curb rising Covid-19 cases?

Pressure is growing on the Government to impose a short-term circuit-breaker lockdown in England in a bid to get rising coronavirus infections under control.

Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer has called on the Government to impose a two- to three-week circuit breaker to prevent a "sleepwalk into a long and bleak winter". He is backed by Government scientific advisers, the NHS and the National Education Union, Britain's biggest teaching union.

Some scientists have warned the newly announced three-tier local-alert system does not go far enough, and only universal measures have any chance of curbing the second wave of the virus.

Wales will impose a two-week “fire break” lockdown from 6pm on Friday October 23

What will this mean for our daily lives, how long could a circuit-breaker lockdown last, and where is the proof it will work?

What is a circuit breaker?
An actual circuit-breaker is an automatic switch installed in an electrical circuit that flips and breaks the flow of electricity when there is a power surge or a short-circuit, preventing fire and other damage.

A circuit-breaker lockdown would therefore see Britons sever almost all contact with people outside their own household by shutting non-essential businesses and stopping social interactions.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:05 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:51 am Sage put the idea of a circuit breaker as one of a number of options on a list. At no point did they say " it's necessary to have a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS"
A circuit breaker is a lockdown. It's just supposed to be a short one. If it's not to save lives and protect the NHS what the fuck is it for ?

What is a 'circuit breaker' lockdown, and how could it help curb rising Covid-19 cases?

Pressure is growing on the Government to impose a short-term circuit-breaker lockdown in England in a bid to get rising coronavirus infections under control.

Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer has called on the Government to impose a two- to three-week circuit breaker to prevent a "sleepwalk into a long and bleak winter". He is backed by Government scientific advisers, the NHS and the National Education Union, Britain's biggest teaching union.

Some scientists have warned the newly announced three-tier local-alert system does not go far enough, and only universal measures have any chance of curbing the second wave of the virus.

Wales will impose a two-week “fire break” lockdown from 6pm on Friday October 23

What will this mean for our daily lives, how long could a circuit-breaker lockdown last, and where is the proof it will work?

What is a circuit breaker?
An actual circuit-breaker is an automatic switch installed in an electrical circuit that flips and breaks the flow of electricity when there is a power surge or a short-circuit, preventing fire and other damage.

A circuit-breaker lockdown would therefore see Britons sever almost all contact with people outside their own household by shutting non-essential businesses and stopping social interactions.
It was on a list of available options.....obviously at the more extreme end
User avatar
Anonymous 1
Posts: 38526
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:15 pm
Location: Planet Rock

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Anonymous 1 »

message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:08 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:05 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:51 am Sage put the idea of a circuit breaker as one of a number of options on a list. At no point did they say " it's necessary to have a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS"
A circuit breaker is a lockdown. It's just supposed to be a short one. If it's not to save lives and protect the NHS what the fuck is it for ?

What is a 'circuit breaker' lockdown, and how could it help curb rising Covid-19 cases?

Pressure is growing on the Government to impose a short-term circuit-breaker lockdown in England in a bid to get rising coronavirus infections under control.

Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer has called on the Government to impose a two- to three-week circuit breaker to prevent a "sleepwalk into a long and bleak winter". He is backed by Government scientific advisers, the NHS and the National Education Union, Britain's biggest teaching union.

Some scientists have warned the newly announced three-tier local-alert system does not go far enough, and only universal measures have any chance of curbing the second wave of the virus.

Wales will impose a two-week “fire break” lockdown from 6pm on Friday October 23

What will this mean for our daily lives, how long could a circuit-breaker lockdown last, and where is the proof it will work?

What is a circuit breaker?
An actual circuit-breaker is an automatic switch installed in an electrical circuit that flips and breaks the flow of electricity when there is a power surge or a short-circuit, preventing fire and other damage.

A circuit-breaker lockdown would therefore see Britons sever almost all contact with people outside their own household by shutting non-essential businesses and stopping social interactions.
It was on a list of available options.....obviously at the more extreme end
List of available options :lol: :lol:
Coronavirus: Sage asked for swathe of urgent lockdown measures three weeks ago, new documents show

The government’s scientific advisers recommended a two-week ‘circuit break’ lockdown three weeks ago in a bid to curtail the spread of Covid -19, official documents show.

Sage told ministers a swathe of interventions would be required to reverse the exponential rise in cases.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:17 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:08 am
Anonymous 1 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:05 am
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:51 am Sage put the idea of a circuit breaker as one of a number of options on a list. At no point did they say " it's necessary to have a national lockdown to save lives and protect the NHS"
A circuit breaker is a lockdown. It's just supposed to be a short one. If it's not to save lives and protect the NHS what the fuck is it for ?

What is a 'circuit breaker' lockdown, and how could it help curb rising Covid-19 cases?

Pressure is growing on the Government to impose a short-term circuit-breaker lockdown in England in a bid to get rising coronavirus infections under control.

Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer has called on the Government to impose a two- to three-week circuit breaker to prevent a "sleepwalk into a long and bleak winter". He is backed by Government scientific advisers, the NHS and the National Education Union, Britain's biggest teaching union.

Some scientists have warned the newly announced three-tier local-alert system does not go far enough, and only universal measures have any chance of curbing the second wave of the virus.

Wales will impose a two-week “fire break” lockdown from 6pm on Friday October 23

What will this mean for our daily lives, how long could a circuit-breaker lockdown last, and where is the proof it will work?

What is a circuit breaker?
An actual circuit-breaker is an automatic switch installed in an electrical circuit that flips and breaks the flow of electricity when there is a power surge or a short-circuit, preventing fire and other damage.

A circuit-breaker lockdown would therefore see Britons sever almost all contact with people outside their own household by shutting non-essential businesses and stopping social interactions.
It was on a list of available options.....obviously at the more extreme end
List of available options :lol: :lol:
Coronavirus: Sage asked for swathe of urgent lockdown measures three weeks ago, new documents show

The government’s scientific advisers recommended a two-week ‘circuit break’ lockdown three weeks ago in a bid to curtail the spread of Covid -19, official documents show.

Sage told ministers a swathe of interventions would be required to reverse the exponential rise in cases.
The short-list of non-pharmaceutical interventions that should be considered for immediate introduction include:

o A circuit-breaker (short period of lockdown) to return incidence to low levels.
o Advice to work from home for all those that can. oBanning all contact within the home with members of other households (except members of a support bubble)
o Closure of all bars, restaurants, cafes, indoor gyms, and personal services (e.g. hairdressers)
o All university and college teaching to be online unless absolutely essential.
Give up, dude. A circuit breaker would also involve the country taking notice and there's very little evidence that would be the case. Also they recommend tht if there is one, it should coincide with the school holidays ... ie next week.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 5991
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: 'ertfordshire

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by SaintK »

Give up, dude. A circuit breaker would alsoinvolve the country taking notice and there's very little evidence that would be the case[/b]. Also they recommend tht if there is one, it should coincide with the school holidays ... ie next week.[/b]
Apart from the 67% who back a "circuit breaker" lockdown
The poll also revealed that 67% of people would support a short "circuit breaker" lockdown in England
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... 12108347
Bradwall Boy
Posts: 454
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Bradwall Boy »

To be fair, he has got form for presiding over body counts.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

SaintK wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:56 am
Give up, dude. A circuit breaker would alsoinvolve the country taking notice and there's very little evidence that would be the case[/b]. Also they recommend tht if there is one, it should coincide with the school holidays ... ie next week.[/b]
Apart from the 67% who back a "circuit breaker" lockdown
The poll also revealed that 67% of people would support a short "circuit breaker" lockdown in England
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... 12108347
That's 30% who would take no notice. Less than 10% for the first one?
User avatar
Frodder
Posts: 10336
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:25 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Frodder »

message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:47 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:56 am
Give up, dude. A circuit breaker would alsoinvolve the country taking notice and there's very little evidence that would be the case[/b]. Also they recommend tht if there is one, it should coincide with the school holidays ... ie next week.[/b]
Apart from the 67% who back a "circuit breaker" lockdown
The poll also revealed that 67% of people would support a short "circuit breaker" lockdown in England
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... 12108347
That's 30% who would take no notice. Less than 10% for the first one?
and the remaining 3%?
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

Frodder wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:13 pm
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:47 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:56 am
Give up, dude. A circuit breaker would alsoinvolve the country taking notice and there's very little evidence that would be the case[/b]. Also they recommend tht if there is one, it should coincide with the school holidays ... ie next week.[/b]
Apart from the 67% who back a "circuit breaker" lockdown
The poll also revealed that 67% of people would support a short "circuit breaker" lockdown in England
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... 12108347
That's 30% who would take no notice. Less than 10% for the first one?
and the remaining 3%?
:lol: I put 1/3 originally and edited it because of typo. Sorry if it offends.
User avatar
Frodder
Posts: 10336
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:25 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Frodder »

message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:19 pm
Frodder wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:13 pm
message #2527204 wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:47 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:56 am
Give up, dude. A circuit breaker would alsoinvolve the country taking notice and there's very little evidence that would be the case[/b]. Also they recommend tht if there is one, it should coincide with the school holidays ... ie next week.[/b]
Apart from the 67% who back a "circuit breaker" lockdown
The poll also revealed that 67% of people would support a short "circuit breaker" lockdown in England
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus- ... 12108347
That's 30% who would take no notice. Less than 10% for the first one?
and the remaining 3%?
:lol: I put 1/3 originally and edited it because of typo. Sorry if it offends.
I'm hitting the report button right now
User avatar
YOYO
Posts: 16790
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:44 pm

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by YOYO »

So what is the UK government giving Manchester? £20 million for the next 6 months?
bimboman
Posts: 66063
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by bimboman »

YOYO wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:15 pm So what is the UK government giving Manchester? £20 million for the next 6 months?


Nope.
User avatar
YOYO
Posts: 16790
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:44 pm

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by YOYO »

bimboman wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:18 pm
YOYO wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:15 pm So what is the UK government giving Manchester? £20 million for the next 6 months?


Nope.
£65 mill?
User avatar
Zico
Posts: 7510
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by Zico »

How dare a Mancunian give a shit about his own?
User avatar
YOYO
Posts: 16790
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:44 pm

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by YOYO »

What’s the population of Greater Manchester?

4.9 mill people in Ireland (ROI) and our government providing billions of euros to support the country.
User avatar
YOYO
Posts: 16790
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:44 pm

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by YOYO »

How much did your failed test and trace system cost? £12 billion or some insane amount.
ChipSpike
Posts: 1490
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 11:10 am

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by ChipSpike »

YOYO wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:29 pm What’s the population of Greater Manchester?

4.9 mill people in Ireland (ROI) and our government providing billions of euros to support the country.
So what? The UK gov is providing hundreds of billions to support the country.
User avatar
message #2527204
Posts: 11318
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Ultracrepidaria

Re: Andy Burnham

Post by message #2527204 »

YOYO wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 5:29 pm What’s the population of Greater Manchester?

4.9 mill people in Ireland (ROI) and our government providing billions of euros to support the country.
Rishi's only handing out tenners.

Ireland will demand it back from the EU.
Post Reply