Re: My dad played a bit
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2021 8:05 pm
The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
Worse is that I'm older than LiamWinnie wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:19 pmI was trying to work our when Ian Botham played Rugby when I realised it was his grandson
So yep, I'm sitting on that step feeling old with you!
Yes, I believe so. In Wales there are dozen liken this, but the sons rarely make the regional let alone international grade. Top of my head -
Tamati Ellison is the grandson of Vince Bevan and descendent of Thomas Ellison played for the New Zealand Native 1888–89 and led the first NZ team who toured Australia in 1893 (he was also a lawyer and politician).
Yeah, he's a good one to mention. Rhys Ellison the former Otago and Waikato midfielder is another one from that family.Ted. wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:43 amTamati Ellison is the grandson of Vince Bevan and descendent of Thomas Ellison played for the New Zealand Native 1888–89 and led the first NZ team who toured Australia in 1893 (he was also a lawyer and politician).
He is also related to Keith Davis (AB and Maori AB) and Riki Ellison, the first NZer to play NFL. Rhett Ellison, Riki's son, also played NFL.
Mauritz Van Den Berg was a Springbok in the late 1930’s, represented South Africa as a lock, and his son, Derek followed suit in the 1970’s, after playing for Ikeys and Western Province. Grandson Kris played for both Maties and Ikeys.ZuluBoy wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 6:28 pm Carel du Plessis , Willie du Plessis and Michael du Plessis (3 brothers Springboks in the 1986 Springboks best ever backline) and their brother Jaque du Plessis (E.P) dad Willem du Plessis (E.P)
E.P is Eastern Province ( Elephants ) and neighbours of W.P is Western Province (Stormers)
As an aside, the last two are Zimbabwean, I went to school with David, he now owns a Wine distributorship in Harare which was a life saver when the wife and I went to look after my parents a couple of years ago, my mothers Alzheimer's was a tough thing to deal with
Didn’t they play a match together for Auckland?Jay Cee Gee wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 8:45 pm Jeremy Stanley's debut for the All Blacks was only 6 years after Joe Stanley's last match for them.
Tevita Sio was in my Canterbury university club team - along with Warwick Taylor. I felt really old watching Scotts Brumbies play Tom's Crusaders a couple of seasons ago.
Ron Giteau was a handy league player, and if you're going that way you can throw in Tyrel (John) Lomax, Tane (Steve) Edmed and Ben (Phil) Daley.
Yep.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
Although that no doubt makes a fair bit of difference, there are other factors I reckon. Firstly, if you're the son of a multi-multi millionaire, I'm not sure you are going to have the drive to succeed at the highest level of anything, let alone in a competitive field as football.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
Shit!
Really!
Fair to say that a lot of rugby stars come from privileged backgrounds. I'd wager the same can be said about tennis and golf stars. There are barriers to entry for these sports - most rugby stars played it at school, and most schools that play rugby cost a few bucks.Jeff the Bear wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:17 amAlthough that no doubt makes a fair bit of difference, there are other factors I reckon. Firstly, if you're the son of a multi-multi millionaire, I'm not sure you are going to have the drive to succeed at the highest level of anything, let alone in a competitive field as football.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
Also, rugby needs physical specimens, and one quick/lazy way to unearth them is to look at the sons of dads who were specimens (there are loads out there, but one of the more interesting ones that is just coming through here in Wales, and will no doubt pull on a red jersey in the near future, is the lock sized centre Max Llewellyn, who is son of ex-Wales lock Gareth Llewellyn. 6 foot 5 and 105kg)
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rug ... e-20467831
For a man who revels in such things, I imagine his thighs make you moist.
There are plenty of sons of players in the NFL.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
Another sport with barriers to entry? Very technical game so growing up with an expert is possibly a big advantage. I don't know. Definitely will give you good genes.Zakar wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:06 pmThere are plenty of sons of players in the NFL.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
It's almost like having good genes, connections and plenty of money gives you an advantage in life
I googled a list, but to be honest I don't think I could name a full XI of famous soccer players. What does David Beckham's son do? Probably a singer.towny wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:13 pmAnother sport with barriers to entry? Very technical game so growing up with an expert is possibly a big advantage. I don't know. Definitely will give you good genes.Zakar wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:06 pmThere are plenty of sons of players in the NFL.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
It's almost like having good genes, connections and plenty of money gives you an advantage in life
But where are the sons of the soccer players and 100m sprinters? Money, genes and connections doesn't appear to be a factor in the sports that (may?) have the most level playing fields.
I think its more that there is less need of natural ability for rugbyMrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
I think it just boils down to the size of player pools.Jeff the Bear wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:17 amAlthough that no doubt makes a fair bit of difference, there are other factors I reckon. Firstly, if you're the son of a multi-multi millionaire, I'm not sure you are going to have the drive to succeed at the highest level of anything, let alone in a competitive field as football.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
Also, rugby needs physical specimens, and one quick/lazy way to unearth them is to look at the sons of dads who were specimens (there are loads out there, but one of the more interesting ones that is just coming through here in Wales, and will no doubt pull on a red jersey in the near future, is the lock sized centre Max Llewellyn, who is son of ex-Wales lock Gareth Llewellyn. 6 foot 5 and 105kg)
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rug ... e-20467831
For a man who revels in such things, I imagine his thighs make you moist.
Lets keep an eye on Sergio Agueros kid, his grandad was also Diego MaradonaWinnie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:13 pmI think its more that there is less need of natural ability for rugbyMrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
If you are surrounded by it from a young age and are taught correctly there is a strong chance you can make it.
Football however is a god given talent, you either have it or you dont
Correct, and the right school and/or parents will open rugby doors.Winnie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:13 pmI think its more that there is less need of natural ability for rugbyMrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
If you are surrounded by it from a young age and are taught correctly there is a strong chance you can make it.
Football however is a god given talent, you either have it or you dont
Quick attempt of a Sons XI:Zakar wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 1:07 pmI googled a list, but to be honest I don't think I could name a full XI of famous soccer players. What does David Beckham's son do? Probably a singer.towny wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:13 pmAnother sport with barriers to entry? Very technical game so growing up with an expert is possibly a big advantage. I don't know. Definitely will give you good genes.Zakar wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:06 pmThere are plenty of sons of players in the NFL.MrDominator wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:01 am There are far too many sons of players in ruggers. Cricket (in England at any rate) has the same problem.
It's a classic sign of a narrow gene/talent pool and a corresponding lack of access to the finest physical specimens.
You get barely any sons of pro soccer players who also make it as a pro, because the level of competition in soccer is much higher and the size of the talent pool is much bigger.
It's almost like having good genes, connections and plenty of money gives you an advantage in life
But where are the sons of the soccer players and 100m sprinters? Money, genes and connections doesn't appear to be a factor in the sports that (may?) have the most level playing fields.