You Fall In Love You Lose (NSFW)

Dumbledore · Post by **Dumbledore** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:46 am

Right, let's get this going.

Will. · Post by **Will.** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:48 am

who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

freewheelan · Post by **freewheelan** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:50 am

Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

fudge off noob.

Ewinkum · Post by **Ewinkum** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:50 am

Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

Get out.

karahi · Post by **karahi** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:50 am

Yup, even with the new format it's still the crappest thread title on PR.

You can't polish a turd, evidently, though some of the content helps you forget the dreadful feyness of the colours it sails under. For a while.

Will. · Post by **Will.** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:52 am

Ewinkum wrote:
Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

Get out.

Ah, I see - they lose a sense of self respect...

Working Class Rugger · Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:52 am

Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

You're not too bright are you?

Dumbledore · Post by **Dumbledore** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:53 am

karahi wrote:Yup, even with the new format it's still the crappest thread title on PR.

You can't polish a turd, evidently, though some of the content helps you forget the dreadful feyness of the colours it sails under. For a while.

fudge off n00b.

Will. · Post by **Will.** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:53 am

Working Class Rugger wrote:
Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

You're not to bright are you?

No - I'm not too bright

Dewet Pisser · Post by **Dewet Pisser** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:53 am

Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

My sentiments exactly. The thread title on the original board irritated me beyond description. Seeing it here is a test of my resolve to try to be nice.

Change the title immediately. "Some pictures of pretty women", should do the trick.

freewheelan · Post by **freewheelan** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:54 am

karahi wrote:Yup, even with the new format it's still the crappest thread title on PR.

You can't polish a turd, evidently, though some of the content helps you forget the dreadful feyness of the colours it sails under. For a while.

Why would care about the thread title when you know the quality of the thread is going to be high? It's not meant to be taken seriously.

At any rate aren't you at work? Whose going to get billed for the current 6 minute unit?

Working Class Rugger · Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:55 am

Will. wrote:
Working Class Rugger wrote:
Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

You're not to bright are you?

No - I'm not too bright

Ah fudge...missed that.

fudge off Noob. :lol:

Ewinkum · Post by **Ewinkum** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:55 am

Will. wrote:
Ewinkum wrote:
Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

Get out.

Ah, I see - they lose a sense of self respect...

Don't overthink it. Get out.

Dumbledore · Post by **Dumbledore** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:58 am

Dewet Pisser wrote:
Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

My sentiments exactly. The thread title on the original board irritated me beyond description. Seeing it here is a test of my resolve to try to be nice.

Change the title immediately. "Some pictures of pretty women", should do the trick.

How about 'Pretty women and absolutely no fatties' ?

Will. · Post by **Will.** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:00 am

I'd still like to know what those, who have previously fallen in love with some pictures, have lost?

Hobo Hooker · Post by **Hobo Hooker** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:01 am

Will. wrote:
Stupid thread.

So. Is. Your. Face.

Working Class Rugger · Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:02 am

Will. wrote:I'd still like to know what those, who have previously fallen in love with some pictures, have lost?

It's a totty thread. Stop over analyzing it.

Cymro · Post by **Cymro** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:03 am

Will. wrote:I'd still like to know what those, who have previously fallen in love with some pictures, have lost?

It is better to have loved a short girl than never to have loved at all.

Will. · Post by **Will.** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:03 am

So call it what it is. 'The Totty Thread' is an improvement.

Dewet Pisser · Post by **Dewet Pisser** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:04 am

Dumbledore wrote:
Dewet Pisser wrote:
Will. wrote:who's going to 'fall in love' with a picture on a forum. And what could they possibly lose?

Stupid thread.

My sentiments exactly. The thread title on the original board irritated me beyond description. Seeing it here is a test of my resolve to try to be nice.

Change the title immediately. "Some pictures of pretty women", should do the trick.

How about 'Pretty women and absolutely no fatties' ?

That would be a lot better than your original title, which suggests you are an introverted teenager whose entire sexual experience consists of masturbation.

Dumbledore · Post by **Dumbledore** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:07 am

DP, it's a thread title as old as the internet. If it really, really bothers you that much I'll change it.

Anyway

Dewet Pisser · Post by **Dewet Pisser** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:09 am

Dumbledore wrote::roll: DP, it's a thread title as old as the internet. If it really, really bothers you that much I'll change it.

Anyway

It really does bother me. It's irrational, I know, but I question the maturity of anyone who could "fall in love" with a picture, and what do you lose anyway?

I'm with Will on this ...

Will. · Post by **Will.** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:10 am

Hobo Hooker wrote:
Will. wrote:
Stupid thread.

So. Is. Your. Face.

Wicked...

Ewinkum · Post by **Ewinkum** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:11 am

Take it outside. This is a balls of a start to one of the greatest threads on the entire internet Mark II.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Will. · Post by **Will.** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:13 am

This is a balls of a start to one of the greatest threads on the entire internet Mark II.

Start a different thread, with a proper title, and make it the greatest thread Mark I

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:20 am

Rank preciousness from old names and new...

here's a tip... if you don't like it, don't open it. Pretty simple really... even your limited imagination should be able to handle the concept.

Dumbledore · Post by **Dumbledore** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:21 am

There you go you precious plum. Now start posting.

globus · Post by **globus** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:23 am

guy smiley wrote:Rank preciousness from old names and new...

here's a tip... if you don't like it, don't open it. Pretty simple really... even your limited imagination should be able to handle the concept.

Oh yes. +1 GS

colonel · Post by **colonel** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:23 am

Ewinkum · Post by **Ewinkum** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:23 am

Nieghorn · Post by **Nieghorn** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:24 am

freewheelan · Post by **freewheelan** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:49 am

Working Class Rugger · Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:53 am

Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious plum. Now start posting.

Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:54 am

Working Class Rugger wrote:
Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious plum. Now start posting.

Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.

I was going to say that, then I thought there's a reasonable chance of confining the totty to one thread this way. Faint though the chance is, it's worth a try.

Morgan14 · Post by **Morgan14** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:56 am

Working Class Rugger · Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:58 am

guy smiley wrote:
Working Class Rugger wrote:
Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious plum. Now start posting.

Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.

I was going to say that, then I thought there's a reasonable chance of confining the totty to one thread this way. Faint though the chance is, it's worth a try.

Isn't 'Tits 101' already back up and running, that pretty much ensures that goal has already fallen by the wayside.

Dumbledore · Post by **Dumbledore** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:10 am

Working Class Rugger wrote:
guy smiley wrote:
Working Class Rugger wrote:
Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious plum. Now start posting.

Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.

I was going to say that, then I thought there's a reasonable chance of confining the totty to one thread this way. Faint though the chance is, it's worth a try.

Isn't 'Tits 101' already back up and running, that pretty much ensures that goal has already fallen by the wayside.

Much lower class thread that one. This is where the good stuff is :thumbup:

Working Class Rugger · Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:14 am

Dumbledore wrote:
Working Class Rugger wrote:
guy smiley wrote:
Working Class Rugger wrote:
Dumbledore wrote:There you go you precious plum. Now start posting.

Change it back. Who cares what a f**king noob thinks. We all know what it is.

I was going to say that, then I thought there's a reasonable chance of confining the totty to one thread this way. Faint though the chance is, it's worth a try.

Isn't 'Tits 101' already back up and running, that pretty much ensures that goal has already fallen by the wayside.

Much lower class thread that one. This is where the good stuff is

True. Still prefer the original name though.

karahi · Post by **karahi** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:51 am

guy smiley wrote:Rank preciousness from old names and new...

here's a tip... if you don't like it, don't open it. Pretty simple really... even your limited imagination should be able to handle the concept.

Actually it's not that simple. As any fule kno, if it's the thread title that's annoying, not clicking on the thread isn't likely to help, is it?

Dumbledore · Post by **Dumbledore** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:25 am

Working Class Rugger wrote:True. Still prefer the original name though.

Changed it back. They bitches can all stop crying.