Page 2708 of 3658

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:26 pm
by camroc1
The socially distanced funeral ?

He had a long life, more sorry for Betty.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:30 pm
by alliswell
EverReady wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:06 pm
Mullet 2 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:54 am
EverReady wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:42 am
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:02 am No point talking to you about this anymore BB. You're off the reservation.

I don't know whether I should be happy or sad that all of a sudden, for the first time ever, the Minister for Health has so much power on his own. Hopefully, like spiderman, he'll realise that with great power comes great responsibility and he'll sort out the HSE.
:lol: Good one. The sort of personality that gets drawn to politics doesn't do that particularly well.
Perhaps personal abuse doesnt attract the cream
You're only delighted with the headline 'Coveney has to backdown' and think Donnelly has big hairy balls now. Fact is I am going on holidays and you lot can fück off
That was ballsy to be fair. But I'm sure Coveney was apoplectic and will have him Poloniumed or something for it.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:36 pm
by Duff Paddy
EverReady wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:24 pm Prince Phillip should be a good laugh
Watching the beeb tip toe around the racism will be full value.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:26 pm
by ticketlessinseattle
Hugh Dennis had it down.....there was one where Philip does this random arm stretch/nazi salute as he's meeting some foreign dignitary that I can't find but .....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o60W286cm-E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmYluz3wKVg

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:38 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:05 pm
Blackrock Bullet wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:36 am
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:26 am Months after what being 'opened'?

That article is about a month after it started to hit the US.

And yes it was a throwaway comment in the context of you being your usual callous self.
Yes a month after, a pretty good period of time to assess the evidence. As pointed out to you at the time, there wasn't kids keeling over and dying in Iceland or Sweden who kept schools open. Your response "what's a few dead kids?".

You want to call me callous, when all I did at the time is talk about relative risk. Something you have done again in recent months. You have an interesting approach here when called out. You have called me as bad as people threatening Stephen Donnelly and now callous. You reach for those things when hassled and harried on here, it's always quite textbook on here with you.

My view is that politicians and governments also have a responsibility to govern with proportion and not abandon people. Whilst I disagree with the economic shutdowns, the Irish Government have clearly not just abandoned people with state supports. There is no state support for locking people out of their country, that's just the reality. My firm view is that it goes beyond the pale of acceptability or reasonableness as a country, and I will call someone a scumbag for threatening it. Similarly I (like you), have no issue with calling Shinners scumbags for their actions.
You do know the condition is post viral and can appear over a month after initial infection? It was not enough information at the time to draw any conclusions. Even now the science on it is unclear.

Yes I have talked about risk. As the risk has become more clear. You were talking about it without even knowing the risk.
It seems you are incapable of reading it.

What yourself and Liath were squealing about either was prevalent or it wasn't. The study was from May 8th, months after Covid emerged in China and over two months after the likes of New York. Widespread infection and death was already observed. But not in children. This was noted as a rare occurrence. You went hysterical and went on about a few deaths. You were in the same league as the Zero Coviders going on about Long Covid, until you changed your mind, which is fine in itself. I was hysterical in March 2020 about the risks of Covid as well, we all were and some took longer than others to observe relative risk. That doesn't make me callous, nor does you now wanting schools open now. In fact, after a couple of months you then claimed that you had supported kids going back to school for a few hours at the time, would you have called yourself "callous" for ignoring "a few dead children"?

You want to paint me as having a strop, when time after time on here when flustered you resort to nonsense like that.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm
by de_Selby
Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:58 pm
by alliswell
de_Selby wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument
I trust that stats will be at rolly eyed smileys by close of business today.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:03 pm
by CM11
Blackrock Bullet wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:38 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:05 pm
Blackrock Bullet wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:36 am
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:26 am Months after what being 'opened'?

That article is about a month after it started to hit the US.

And yes it was a throwaway comment in the context of you being your usual callous self.
Yes a month after, a pretty good period of time to assess the evidence. As pointed out to you at the time, there wasn't kids keeling over and dying in Iceland or Sweden who kept schools open. Your response "what's a few dead kids?".

You want to call me callous, when all I did at the time is talk about relative risk. Something you have done again in recent months. You have an interesting approach here when called out. You have called me as bad as people threatening Stephen Donnelly and now callous. You reach for those things when hassled and harried on here, it's always quite textbook on here with you.

My view is that politicians and governments also have a responsibility to govern with proportion and not abandon people. Whilst I disagree with the economic shutdowns, the Irish Government have clearly not just abandoned people with state supports. There is no state support for locking people out of their country, that's just the reality. My firm view is that it goes beyond the pale of acceptability or reasonableness as a country, and I will call someone a scumbag for threatening it. Similarly I (like you), have no issue with calling Shinners scumbags for their actions.
You do know the condition is post viral and can appear over a month after initial infection? It was not enough information at the time to draw any conclusions. Even now the science on it is unclear.

Yes I have talked about risk. As the risk has become more clear. You were talking about it without even knowing the risk.
It seems you are incapable of reading it.

What yourself and Liath were squealing about either was prevalent or it wasn't. The study was from May 8th, months after Covid emerged in China and over two months after the likes of New York. Widespread infection and death was already observed. But not in children. This was noted as a rare occurrence. You went hysterical and went on about a few deaths. You were in the same league as the Zero Coviders going on about Long Covid, until you changed your mind, which is fine in itself. I was hysterical in March 2020 about the risks of Covid as well, we all were and some took longer than others to observe relative risk. That doesn't make me callous, nor does you now wanting schools open now. In fact, after a couple of months you then claimed that you had supported kids going back to school for a few hours at the time, would you have called yourself "callous" for ignoring "a few dead children"?

You want to paint me as having a strop, when time after time on here when flustered you resort to nonsense like that.
I didn't go hysterical. I took a swipe at you. You then went off on one and have continued to bring this up, nearly a year later.

Btw, covid only took off in NY at the end of March. So these were the first cases that were starting to be seen, given it's post viral. Not sure where you're getting it was widespread for two months in NY when their total number of cases two months prior was a couple of hundred.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:04 pm
by CM11
alliswell wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:58 pm
de_Selby wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument
I trust that stats will be at rolly eyed smileys by close of business today.
:roll: :P

I've already rolled my eyes at him, btw!

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:17 pm
by Mullet 2
alliswell wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:58 pm
de_Selby wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument
I trust that stats will be at rolly eyed smileys by close of business today.
:lol:

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:24 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:03 pm

I didn't go hysterical. I took a swipe at you. You then went off on one and have continued to bring this up, nearly a year later.

Btw, covid only took off in NY at the end of March. So these were the first cases that were starting to be seen, given it's post viral. Not sure where you're getting it was widespread for two months in NY when their total number of cases two months prior was a couple of hundred.
There was no going off one. Read the original post, read my response and read yours. Who was the hysterical one? I talked about relative risk, something you do here now almost daily - but because it is you, you think you are the reasonable middle ground.
CM11 wrote:
Blackrock Bullet wrote:
Liathroidigloine wrote:Speaking with a friend of mine who’s a GP yesterday. Younger people who’ve had it are presenting with some weird outcomes including skin i
ssues and kidney problems. It’s not as simple as oh, get the flu and get over it. We are still learning about the consequences of this virus.

Herd immunity is one thing but we wouldn’t try a vaccine to achieve this without knowing what the side effects are. Same with letting the virus run through the community.
You mean it’s extremely rare and of the children presenting with the issues since they’ve started to get a handle on it, the vast vast majority are treated fine for it.

https://discoveries.childrenshospital.o ... -children/
What's a few dead children in the greater scheme of things?

New York's first case was on March 1st. It spread like wildfire. What I said at the time was correct and based on the science. Kids weren't dropping dead in places that had large scale Covid outbreaks. Where schools had remained open, there wasn't huge outbreaks amongst children. The reaction was observed to be very rare. It wasn't callous, it was an argument about why Ireland was amongst the slowest in Europe to reopen its schools.

Again, now you are here daily talking about relative risk and children in schools. You claimed that you had actually wanted schools open for a bit then. The description of me as callous for that was bizarre, but again, keep on going with that stuff if it makes you feel better.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:52 pm
by CM11
You have a strange definition of hysterical, BB.

If anything I would think the person constantly bringing it up is the hysterical one but I guess that's just me.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:32 pm
by ticketlessinseattle
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:04 pm
alliswell wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:58 pm
de_Selby wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument
I trust that stats will be at rolly eyed smileys by close of business today.
:roll: :P

I've already rolled my eyes at him, btw!
the baby faced assassin (the boxer not the footie lad) ; one thing you can never fault stats on is stamina

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:33 pm
by iarmhiman
ticketlessinseattle wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:32 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:04 pm
alliswell wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:58 pm
de_Selby wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument
I trust that stats will be at rolly eyed smileys by close of business today.
:roll: :P

I've already rolled my eyes at him, btw!
the baby faced assassin (the boxer not the footie lad) ; one thing you can never fault stats on is stamina
LeinsterLion would take him in a stamina battle.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:36 pm
by The Sun God
EverReady wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:24 pm Prince Phillip should be a good laugh
FHHD

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:38 pm
by CM11
iarmhiman wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:33 pm
ticketlessinseattle wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:32 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:04 pm
alliswell wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:58 pm
de_Selby wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument
I trust that stats will be at rolly eyed smileys by close of business today.
:roll: :P

I've already rolled my eyes at him, btw!
the baby faced assassin (the boxer not the footie lad) ; one thing you can never fault stats on is stamina
LeinsterLion would take him in a stamina battle.
Pah. He's basically flounced cause he couldn't handle it!

Myself and LL's discussions were like arguing over the exact shade of blue. We largely agreed on the most things but got caught up on the minutiae.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:59 pm
by Nolanator
iarmhiman wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:33 pm
ticketlessinseattle wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:32 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:04 pm
alliswell wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:58 pm
de_Selby wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 1:49 pm Which is likely to happen sooner

1) the end of covid restrictions in Ireland
2) the end of the CM11-Blackrock Bullet argument
I trust that stats will be at rolly eyed smileys by close of business today.
:roll: :P

I've already rolled my eyes at him, btw!
the baby faced assassin (the boxer not the footie lad) ; one thing you can never fault stats on is stamina
LeinsterLion would take him in a stamina battle.
Or JM.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:06 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:52 pm You have a strange definition of hysterical, BB.

If anything I would think the person constantly bringing it up is the hysterical one but I guess that's just me.
I'll say the same to you. I hope you don't end up in this position, and someone doesn't call you as bad as someone petrol bombing a house.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:09 pm
by CM11
Blackrock Bullet wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:52 pm You have a strange definition of hysterical, BB.

If anything I would think the person constantly bringing it up is the hysterical one but I guess that's just me.
I'll say the same to you. I hope you don't end up in this position, and someone doesn't call you as bad as someone petrol bombing a house.
I think you're as bad as the people harassing Donnelly given that you are condoning their attitude that it's personal, even if you put a 'but I wouldn't go as far as making it personal'.

People like you give these people the oxygen they need to take the actions they're taking.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:13 pm
by HighKingLeinster
Johnson and Johnson now being investigated for blood clots x(

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:15 pm
by CM11
HighKingLeinster wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:13 pm Johnson and Johnson now being investigated for blood clots x(
Is J&J an mRNA or not?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:16 pm
by Nolanator
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:15 pm
HighKingLeinster wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:13 pm Johnson and Johnson now being investigated for blood clots x(
Is J&J an mRNA or not?
Deactivated virus?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:17 pm
by HighKingLeinster
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:15 pm
HighKingLeinster wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:13 pm Johnson and Johnson now being investigated for blood clots x(
Is J&J an mRNA or not?
:lol: the fùck if i know

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:19 pm
by CM11
Nolanator wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:16 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:15 pm
HighKingLeinster wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:13 pm Johnson and Johnson now being investigated for blood clots x(
Is J&J an mRNA or not?
Deactivated virus?
Yep, just confirmed. Interesting that both of the vaccines in trouble for rare clots are this type.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:19 pm
by ticketlessinseattle
HighKingLeinster wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:17 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:15 pm
HighKingLeinster wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:13 pm Johnson and Johnson now being investigated for blood clots x(
Is J&J an mRNA or not?
:lol: the fùck if i know
dont shoot the messenger.....boom tish ! is it as many as Astra Zeneca ? like 15 out of 20 million doses administered ?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:20 pm
by Leinsterman
Nolanator wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:59 pm Or JM.

Never go Full JM

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:28 pm
by themaddog

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:33 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:09 pm
Blackrock Bullet wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:06 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:52 pm You have a strange definition of hysterical, BB.

If anything I would think the person constantly bringing it up is the hysterical one but I guess that's just me.
I'll say the same to you. I hope you don't end up in this position, and someone doesn't call you as bad as someone petrol bombing a house.
I think you're as bad as the people harassing Donnelly given that you are condoning their attitude that it's personal, even if you put a 'but I wouldn't go as far as making it personal'.

People like you give these people the oxygen they need to take the actions they're taking.
All right so, as I mentioned before, this is your only tactic.

My opinion is that the people doing this to Donnelly are scum, and my opinion is that Donnelly is scum given what he is proposing oversteps what a "respectable" nation would do. You are apparently allowed to call other politicians scum, like those in Sinn Féin who have no history of violence. I don't say the same about you, similar to how I don't go around calling you "callous" now that you talk about relative risk.

Your head is a weird and wonderful place, where as your thoughts start to align on something, that is reasonable centre. I'm entitled to hold my view on Donnelly.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:35 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
HighKingLeinster wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:13 pm Johnson and Johnson now being investigated for blood clots x(
And both vaccines are likely just as effective against the SA variant for a similar reason, however the media have misreported the efficacy of both vaccines and done enormous damage to AZ.

The media are as bad for propagating an anti vax narrative out there.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:43 pm
by ticketlessinseattle
about 3.5 million J&J administered in USA.....no chicken licken news flashes so far ; looks like they ballsed up a few million doses by putting AZ ingredients in with j&j ingredients (now there's a bad day at the office) but not seeing anything about blood clots

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:44 pm
by CM11
And now we're comparing Donnelly to politicians who won't condemn terrorist acts.

:((

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:55 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
6,000 in a week. 3,000 capacity.
6,000 people flew in last week from countries health experts want on hotel quarantine list
https://www.independent.ie/world-news/c ... 94385.html

No wonder the scumbag wants to ground flights, he designed a system that couldn't cope.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:56 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:44 pm And now we're comparing Donnelly to politicians who won't condemn terrorist acts.

:((
You have routinely called SF scum on here for their approach to Covid-19.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:14 pm
by cfm93
Blackrock Bullet wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:55 pm 6,000 in a week. 3,000 capacity.
6,000 people flew in last week from countries health experts want on hotel quarantine list
https://www.independent.ie/world-news/c ... 94385.html

No wonder the scumbag wants to ground flights, he designed a system that couldn't cope.
Cabinet meeting tonight to put the US, France, Germany, Italy and others on to the list. It's going to be so funny when this collapses within a week. The fucking cowards.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:17 pm
by anonymous_joe
Duff Paddy wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:23 pm
anonymous_joe wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:11 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:59 am
anonymous_joe wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 11:53 pm
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Apr 08, 2021 9:36 pm

Wrong
:lol:
Are you suggesting that GSK knew about the risk of Pandemrix causing narcolepsy? You must have been privy to the very highest level GSK meetings back in the 2000’s - you should go straight to the Times with your groundbreaking insider information.
You what?

If a patient is aware that a medicine is potentially dangerous and is informed of those risks, then there can be no negligence if the danger manifests itself.

Rather basic principle of med neg and one of the many protections for doctors and related professions built into it.
Absolute grade A Colombian 100% horseshit
Ah, Duff, you're a clown.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:26 pm
by CM11
Blackrock Bullet wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:56 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:44 pm And now we're comparing Donnelly to politicians who won't condemn terrorist acts.

:((
You have routinely called SF scum on here for their approach to Covid-19.
I've called them fence sitters because they're trying to appease diametrically opposite parts of their support.

A brief search of my history shows one comment. One. Let that sink in. The comment was "fence sitting scum".

Away with you, you eejit.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:27 pm
by CM11
EverReady wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:14 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:44 pm And now we're comparing Donnelly to politicians who won't condemn terrorist acts.

:((
Tbf Donnelly is all over quarantining as he is trying to save his seat from the Shinners. Do you think he gives an actual fück about it?
I don't think he is the only person involved here. It's not a solo run because if it was it wouldn't get off the ground.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:28 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
EverReady wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:14 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:44 pm And now we're comparing Donnelly to politicians who won't condemn terrorist acts.

:((
Tbf Donnelly is all over quarantining as he is trying to save his seat from the Shinners. Do you think he gives an actual fück about it?
Quite.

You lads flagged him using provocative language about a school a couple of weeks ago against as a Shinner defense tactic and now he has gone all native on the island with flight caps threatened. Apparently mentioning that means that you want his home attacked and apparently that is normal reasonable behaviour.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:30 pm
by CM11
Expect you compared him to the people threatening violence against him. That's the only fúcking problem here.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:32 pm
by Blackrock Bullet
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:27 pm
EverReady wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:14 pm
CM11 wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 4:44 pm And now we're comparing Donnelly to politicians who won't condemn terrorist acts.

:((
Tbf Donnelly is all over quarantining as he is trying to save his seat from the Shinners. Do you think he gives an actual fück about it?
I don't think he is the only person involved here. It's not a solo run because if it was it wouldn't get off the ground.
Did you fail to notice the reaction from every other government department to this?

The guy’s department devised the system. They failed to provide for enough beds in it and he resorted to saying he might put a cap on people entering the country. That’s why I called him a scumbag. If he gave a shit about the rest of cabinet he’d have designed a proper system in the first place and then signposted in the media the issue if it was expanded. Instead of acknowledging the issue, he proposed that he might leave people stranded abroad. He cares about being re-elected and has a track record of leaving others in the lurch. My firm belief is that only a scumbag would show such self promotion and preservation.