Page 2200 of 3657

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:24 am
by CM11
paddyor wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:19 pm
CM11 wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:40 pm
paddyor wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:35 pm
CM11 wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:37 pm :lol:

Anyway, here it is:

https://www.newstalk.com/news/one-coupl ... es-1083963
I call BS.
Why?

Here's the IT article with other examples

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/ ... -1.4368824

They've started to ask more questions, finally, so can start linking cases.
Can you post the IT article please. The newstalk one is like something Kitty Holland would write.

Love to go on a trip away and return to a house party while staying with a family.
Just open in incognito.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:24 am
by CM11
Gavin Duffy wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:07 pm Has CM11 suffered massive head trauma recently?
:?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:05 am
by Duff Paddy
Botha Boy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:56 am
rfurlong wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:27 pm Can any of the "NPHET are shit" crew, explain to the rest of us, how they intend to stop hospitalizations doubling every fortnight?
There is 4X rise in respiratory illness from Summer to Winter every year.

We are naturally inclined to PCR test everyone this year with a cough or fever symptom.While only 3% are coming back as positive, as the False Positive Rate is comparatively high at 0.8 to 4.0%, then a high proportion of the positive tests are actually false positives, ie no Covid virus present in the sample.

So we need to test every positive test a second time to confirm it as 2 false positives in a row is highly unlikely. This will drop the numbers being diagnosed as Covid cases and avoid the spiralling use case stats NPHET are fixated by. And this will also significantly reduce the reported level of Covid hospitalisations such that we can all go down the pub for a cabal. Simples.

NPHET are shit.
It’ll rise and plateau as is the case with all infectious diseases. We had the 6 months to get our track and trace up to scratch, we had the 6 months to get out hospital capacity up to scratch. NPHET hitting the panic button when hospital cases are still so low means that they have failed to do what they were supposed to. Lockdowns should be a last resort.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:08 am
by rfurlong
Botha Boy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:56 am
rfurlong wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:27 pm Can any of the "NPHET are shit" crew, explain to the rest of us, how they intend to stop hospitalizations doubling every fortnight?
There is 4X rise in respiratory illness from Summer to Winter every year.

We are naturally inclined to PCR test everyone this year with a cough or fever symptom.While only 3% are coming back as positive, as the False Positive Rate is comparatively high at 0.8 to 4.0%, then a high proportion of the positive tests are actually false positives, ie no Covid virus present in the sample.

So we need to test every positive test a second time to confirm it as 2 false positives in a row is highly unlikely. This will drop the numbers being diagnosed as Covid cases and avoid the spiralling use case stats NPHET are fixated by. And this will also significantly reduce the reported level of Covid hospitalisations such that we can all go down the pub for a cabal. Simples.

NPHET are shit.

So you're saying that there are people are being admitted into hospital with covid, who don't actually have covid, or who aren't sick?

This is a new departure ...... and forgive me for saying so, sounds like total nonsense

Not one person on here who has been criticizing the government/NPHET has a remotely credible answer to the question of ongoing hospitalizations ..... which are doubling every two weeks, coming into the winter season

People don't end up in hospitals because of false positives ffs

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:10 am
by rfurlong
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:05 am
Botha Boy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:56 am
rfurlong wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:27 pm Can any of the "NPHET are shit" crew, explain to the rest of us, how they intend to stop hospitalizations doubling every fortnight?
There is 4X rise in respiratory illness from Summer to Winter every year.

We are naturally inclined to PCR test everyone this year with a cough or fever symptom.While only 3% are coming back as positive, as the False Positive Rate is comparatively high at 0.8 to 4.0%, then a high proportion of the positive tests are actually false positives, ie no Covid virus present in the sample.

So we need to test every positive test a second time to confirm it as 2 false positives in a row is highly unlikely. This will drop the numbers being diagnosed as Covid cases and avoid the spiralling use case stats NPHET are fixated by. And this will also significantly reduce the reported level of Covid hospitalisations such that we can all go down the pub for a cabal. Simples.

NPHET are shit.
It’ll rise and plateau as is the case with all infectious diseases. We had the 6 months to get our track and trace up to scratch, we had the 6 months to get out hospital capacity up to scratch. NPHET hitting the panic button when hospital cases are still so low means that they have failed to do what they were supposed to. Lockdowns should be a last resort.
What if it doesn't plateau?

By the time we find out you're wrong on this it would be 4-6 weeks too late ...... and the health service would keel over

Do you think that's a risk any sane government should take?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:11 am
by Duff Paddy
What if it doesn't plateau?
That’s not how viruses behave

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:13 am
by danthefan
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:11 am
What if it doesn't plateau?
That’s not how viruses behave
On what timescale?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:13 am
by Botha Boy
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:08 am
Botha Boy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:56 am
rfurlong wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:27 pm Can any of the "NPHET are shit" crew, explain to the rest of us, how they intend to stop hospitalizations doubling every fortnight?
There is 4X rise in respiratory illness from Summer to Winter every year.

We are naturally inclined to PCR test everyone this year with a cough or fever symptom.While only 3% are coming back as positive, as the False Positive Rate is comparatively high at 0.8 to 4.0%, then a high proportion of the positive tests are actually false positives, ie no Covid virus present in the sample.

So we need to test every positive test a second time to confirm it as 2 false positives in a row is highly unlikely. This will drop the numbers being diagnosed as Covid cases and avoid the spiralling use case stats NPHET are fixated by. And this will also significantly reduce the reported level of Covid hospitalisations such that we can all go down the pub for a cabal. Simples.

NPHET are shit.

So you're saying that there are people are being admitted into hospital with covid, who don't actually have covid, or who aren't sick?

This is a new departure ...... and forgive me for saying so, sounds like total nonsense

Not one person on here who has been criticizing the government/NPHET has a remotely credible answer to the question of ongoing hospitalizations ..... which are doubling every two weeks, coming into the winter season

People don't end up in hospitals because of false positives ffs
There are thousands in hospital getting Covid tested and a certain number are guaranteed to be false positives. We do around 13000 tests a day so even a 1% FPR on completely negative samples will return at least 130 positives.

Go read the paper I linked to last night from The Lancet and explain why it is inaccurate.

NPHET is

A) Infallible

B) Shit

You choose ...

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:15 am
by Duff Paddy
Sorry furlong bit of a glib reply. Exponential growth is the fear and you know what shape an exponential curve is, you’ve seen it a thousand times. This virus isn’t new anymore. Your arguments were appropriate in March when we feared this would be Spanish flu mark II. It’s not, it’s fairly well characterised now and we know how it spreads and who is vulnerable.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:16 am
by Duff Paddy
danthefan wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:13 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:11 am
What if it doesn't plateau?
That’s not how viruses behave
On what timescale?
Since we started studying them? I don’t know what you mean by this. You’re an engineer you know what exponential curves look like.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:21 am
by rfurlong
Botha Boy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:13 am
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:08 am
Botha Boy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:56 am
rfurlong wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:27 pm Can any of the "NPHET are shit" crew, explain to the rest of us, how they intend to stop hospitalizations doubling every fortnight?
There is 4X rise in respiratory illness from Summer to Winter every year.

We are naturally inclined to PCR test everyone this year with a cough or fever symptom.While only 3% are coming back as positive, as the False Positive Rate is comparatively high at 0.8 to 4.0%, then a high proportion of the positive tests are actually false positives, ie no Covid virus present in the sample.

So we need to test every positive test a second time to confirm it as 2 false positives in a row is highly unlikely. This will drop the numbers being diagnosed as Covid cases and avoid the spiralling use case stats NPHET are fixated by. And this will also significantly reduce the reported level of Covid hospitalisations such that we can all go down the pub for a cabal. Simples.

NPHET are shit.

So you're saying that there are people are being admitted into hospital with covid, who don't actually have covid, or who aren't sick?

This is a new departure ...... and forgive me for saying so, sounds like total nonsense

Not one person on here who has been criticizing the government/NPHET has a remotely credible answer to the question of ongoing hospitalizations ..... which are doubling every two weeks, coming into the winter season

People don't end up in hospitals because of false positives ffs
There are thousands in hospital getting Covid tested and a certain number are guaranteed to be false positives. We do around 13000 tests a day so even a 1% FPR on completely negative samples will return at least 130 positives.

Go read the paper I linked to last night from The Lancet and explain why it is inaccurate.

NPHET is

A) Infallible

B) Shit

You choose ...
Which hospitals are admitting people who have falsely tested positive for covid ?

The hospital admissions numbers are totally independent of the number of false positives ..... you have to be genuinely sick to get admitted to hospital ...... a positive test result (false or otherwise) is not enough to get you into hospital

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:23 am
by rfurlong
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:16 am
danthefan wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:13 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:11 am
What if it doesn't plateau?
That’s not how viruses behave
On what timescale?
Since we started studying them? I don’t know what you mean by this. You’re an engineer you know what exponential curves look like.

WHEN does it plateau?

If it plateaus in December and the health service has keeled over in November then we'll have a disaster on our hands

Tell us when ?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:24 am
by Duff Paddy
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:23 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:16 am
danthefan wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:13 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:11 am
What if it doesn't plateau?
That’s not how viruses behave
On what timescale?
Since we started studying them? I don’t know what you mean by this. You’re an engineer you know what exponential curves look like.

WHEN does it plateau?

If it plateaus in December and the health service has keeled over in November then we'll have a disaster on our hands

Tell us when ?
It’s October now with schools back. We have 120 people on hospital in the entire country. Stop panicking.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:31 am
by rfurlong
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:24 am
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:23 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:16 am
danthefan wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:13 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:11 am

That’s not how viruses behave
On what timescale?
Since we started studying them? I don’t know what you mean by this. You’re an engineer you know what exponential curves look like.

WHEN does it plateau?

If it plateaus in December and the health service has keeled over in November then we'll have a disaster on our hands

Tell us when ?
It’s October now with schools back. We have 120 people on hospital in the entire country. Stop panicking.
I'm not panicking ..... I'm being prudent and I'm glad the government is too

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:35 am
by rfurlong
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:15 am Sorry furlong bit of a glib reply. Exponential growth is the fear and you know what shape an exponential curve is, you’ve seen it a thousand times. This virus isn’t new anymore. Your arguments were appropriate in March when we feared this would be Spanish flu mark II. It’s not, it’s fairly well characterised now and we know how it spreads and who is vulnerable.
It doesn't have to go exponential to overwhelm the health service

A steady linear rise, coupled with the amount of time it takes to get a patient out of ICU, is all it takes for our capacity to get used up very quickly

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:45 am
by Duff Paddy
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:35 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:15 am Sorry furlong bit of a glib reply. Exponential growth is the fear and you know what shape an exponential curve is, you’ve seen it a thousand times. This virus isn’t new anymore. Your arguments were appropriate in March when we feared this would be Spanish flu mark II. It’s not, it’s fairly well characterised now and we know how it spreads and who is vulnerable.
It doesn't have to go exponential to overwhelm the health service

A steady linear rise, coupled with the amount of time it takes to get a patient out of ICU, is all it takes for our capacity to get used up very quickly

Sorry this is all wrong. Infectious diseases spread exponentially when the R0 is above 1. Linear growth is a set increase with time. Linear growth is easily dealt with and planned for. Linear growth would not justify any panic or restrictions at all. The whole point is the threat of exponential growth.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:00 am
by rfurlong
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:45 am
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:35 am
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:15 am Sorry furlong bit of a glib reply. Exponential growth is the fear and you know what shape an exponential curve is, you’ve seen it a thousand times. This virus isn’t new anymore. Your arguments were appropriate in March when we feared this would be Spanish flu mark II. It’s not, it’s fairly well characterised now and we know how it spreads and who is vulnerable.
It doesn't have to go exponential to overwhelm the health service

A steady linear rise, coupled with the amount of time it takes to get a patient out of ICU, is all it takes for our capacity to get used up very quickly

Sorry this is all wrong. Infectious diseases spread exponentially when the R0 is above 1. Linear growth is a set increase with time. Linear growth is easily dealt with and planned for. Linear growth would not justify any panic or restrictions at all. The whole point is the threat of exponential growth.
The pattern of growth is somewhat irrelevant if the rate of new people in need of ICU, outstrips the rate at which ICU beds can be freed up ... this is the equation the government are concerned about.

The volume of growth, in terms of absolute numbers requiring ICU, is the issue for the health service

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:09 am
by CM11
It's not just ICU. The more covid patients you have in hospital, the harder it is for other functions to work properly

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:11 am
by CM11
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:57 am On the admitted only if genuinely sick that is not entirely the case. People will be admitted if it is suspected they may get sick e.g. some lad with face AIDS
As was pointed out way back, doctors will use a test to confirm covid not to diagnose it when patients present with symptoms. It's ridiculous to suggest that people walking and quacking like ducks aren't actually ducks because statistical analysis of a population wide, unbiased testing regime shows X percentage of false positives.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:16 am
by rfurlong
CM11 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:09 am It's not just ICU. The more covid patients you have in hospital, the harder it is for other functions to work properly
Exactly

The anti NPHET grouping have no answer to this issue ..... they are in the dark as to the potential effect on the overall system, but are gung ho nonetheless

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:18 am
by Mullet 2
paddyor wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:35 pm
CM11 wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:37 pm :lol:

Anyway, here it is:

https://www.newstalk.com/news/one-coupl ... es-1083963
I call BS.
I see the anti professor cabal have gone full Fake News!!!

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:30 am
by Duff Paddy
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:16 am
CM11 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:09 am It's not just ICU. The more covid patients you have in hospital, the harder it is for other functions to work properly
Exactly

The anti NPHET grouping have no answer to this issue ..... they are in the dark as to the potential effect on the overall system, but are gung ho nonetheless
Stop with this anti NPHET stuff you’re trying to polarise a debate into black and white. We can disagree with some of NPHET’s approaches without being anti NPHET. Similarly, blindly following NPHET, as the government are, is also not ideal as it’s not looking at the bigger picture. It’s like a surgeon being asked to cut out a tumour, if he has to kill the patient to get it all out it’s not exactly a result

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:34 am
by CM11
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:16 am
CM11 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:09 am It's not just ICU. The more covid patients you have in hospital, the harder it is for other functions to work properly
Exactly

The anti NPHET grouping have no answer to this issue ..... they are in the dark as to the potential effect on the overall system, but are gung ho nonetheless
I don't agree with their glib dismissal of the situation but there is nothing wrong with questioning if the measures are too severe. The example of the couple above shows that it's people not businesses that are primarily at fault. Between them that couple went to 4 different social events over two nights, I mean cop on people! I'm not saying don't meet people but maybe not meet so many over a weekend? Most of the spread is people ignoring basic common sense and business is suffering as a result.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:37 am
by CM11
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:36 am Here I can be that man. NPHET have been a disaster. Utterly wasted the summer and are now actively destroying the economy aided and abetted by a running scared FF
:lol:

Never one to shirk your duty.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:40 am
by ticketlessinseattle
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:30 am
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:16 am
CM11 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:09 am It's not just ICU. The more covid patients you have in hospital, the harder it is for other functions to work properly
Exactly

The anti NPHET grouping have no answer to this issue ..... they are in the dark as to the potential effect on the overall system, but are gung ho nonetheless
Stop with this anti NPHET stuff you’re trying to polarise a debate into black and white. We can disagree with some of NPHET’s approaches without being anti NPHET. Similarly, blindly following NPHET, as the government are, is also not ideal as it’s not looking at the bigger picture. It’s like a surgeon being asked to cut out a tumour, if he has to kill the patient to get it all out it’s not exactly a result
no, no, no its all black and white ; its the Dubya/Trump doctrine - if you're not with us 100% you're against us ; dissension and questioning are not allowed ; as I've said before the UK actually carried out a study in terms of lives saved and lives lost due to lockdown ; very clinical, slightly 1984'ish ; they had a specify want of calculating number of "life" days ; all very actuarial but it was an actual analysis taking everything from a medical standpoint into account ; the result is irrelevant to an extent (there were marginally more lives saved) the fact is they actually looked at everything and come to a conclusion - when I say they looked at everything ....they didn't look at the economic cost ; this seems very rational but apparently we're all anti science, no mask wearers for even suggesting it

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:50 am
by rfurlong
There are people on here saying that NPHET are total spoofers and complete villains, who are single handedly destroying the economy while also riding our wives and girlfriends

yet when myself, mullet, stats and a few others call out this bullshit, we're accused of lacking nuance, empathy, intelligence and being hysterical Karen's :lol:

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:53 am
by Mullet 2
"You're trying to polarise the debate" :lol:

Its actually a full on Trump discussion now

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:55 am
by Blackrock Bullet
rfurlong wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:27 pm Can any of the "NPHET are shit" crew, explain to the rest of us, how they intend to stop hospitalizations doubling every fortnight?
I'll answer you in a second, but you continue to ignore the question asked of you, are you happy for industries to be shut down until the end of 2021 at least?

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:00 am
by Mullet 2
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:58 am
Mullet 2 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:53 am "You're trying to polarise the debate" :lol:

Its actually a full on Trump discussion now
I'm Kayleigh McFanny

Fixed

And a sweet burn it is too

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:01 am
by Blackrock Bullet
rfurlong wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:50 am There are people on here saying that NPHET are total spoofers and complete villains, who are single handedly destroying the economy while also riding our wives and girlfriends

yet when myself, mullet, stats and a few others call out this bullshit, we're accused of lacking nuance, empathy, intelligence and being hysterical Karen's :lol:
Nope.

The poor quality of job in some sectors can be called out.

i.e. the total failure to do proper contact tracing over the summer. The minutes of their summer meetings show that their concern over pubs came from their own biases and using one off examples. Basically rather than do the hard work, they were a talking shop that wanted things easy.

- Ireland were one of the only countries in Europe that kept indoor pubs closed because they are pioneers that have always wanted them shut down
- the country with the strictest aviation rules in Europe, as they wanted to shut down all headaches from abroad

Ronan Glynn's Oireactas statement yesterday was absurd, it revealed the thinking. He is shitting it because traffic isn't back down to March and April levels. This is not going to happen with schools open, construction ongoing, retailers open etc. It's more "blame the public" from the guy with the guaranteed job and ignorant of what people need to do to earn a living.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:15 am
by lorcanoworms
Not going to bother putting them on ignore but there are a few people I am not talking/posting to anymore.
You know who you are.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:26 am
by Duff Paddy
lorcanoworms wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:15 am Not going to bother putting them on ignore but there are a few people I am not talking/posting to anymore.
You know who you are.
It’s mullet isn’t it

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:35 am
by Nolanator
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:24 am Go to work
I'm in work. You lot have gone the full Trump, just in time for him to be booted out.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:37 am
by Nolanator
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:36 am
Nolanator wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:35 am
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:24 am Go to work
I'm in work. You lot have gone the full Trump, just in time for him to be booted out.
Nah
Image

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:40 am
by Nolanator
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:39 am His cognition has sufferingered in the last few years while I remain whip smart
:lol: :thumbup:

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:44 am
by Blackrock Bullet
From Varadkar this morning;
But we have to say to public health experts that it can’t be public health only – that we will not have a health service if there is no economy.

Definitely, one thing that we need to look at and be more aware of is the approach around the rest of Europe. We have among the strictest rules in Europe when it comes to Covid but we do not have the highest incidences of Covid by any means.

What we are seeing across Europe, and it is being replicated in Ireland, is a huge increase in the amount of cases, but only a modest increase in the number of people who are in hospital, and also thankfully, the amount of people who are passing away. Any death is regrettable, and our sympathies go to the families affected, but this second wave which is happening across Europe and Ireland is very different.

As we speak now, only 1 per cent of our hospital beds have Covid patients in them and maybe 10 or 15 per cent of ICU. If it got three or four times worse, it would still be only using up a relatively small amount of our health service capacity.

What I see other countries doing – Belgium is the most recent example – is that they are no longer using case numbers to make their decisions on restrictions and on policy. They are looking at hospitalisations, ICU capacity and on deaths. It is a job for us as politicians to say to the public health people that maybe we should be focusing on that. The objective was to make sure our health service did not get overwhelmed, not to lock down the country and the economy until there was no Covid at all. That is not realistic.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:58 am
by anonymous_joe
Nolanator wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:40 am
EverReady wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:39 am His cognition has sufferingered in the last few years while I remain whip smart
:lol: :thumbup:
https://old.reddit.com/r/science/commen ... ping_less/

Rather fascinating really.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:05 am
by lorcanoworms
If we increase hospital capacity including ICU and critical care can we bring in or find more staff here in Ireland?
Or are we just exposing existing staff to more risk.

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:07 am
by CM11
Good to see Varadkar starting the conversation (or continuing, I suppose, he's been the most vocal on this).

Re: Rugby NAMA thread Revisited Rugby

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:15 am
by Blackrock Bullet
lorcanoworms wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:05 am If we increase hospital capacity including ICU and critical care can we bring in or find more staff here in Ireland?
Or are we just exposing existing staff to more risk.
Good question, the HSE claim they'll be overran, but didn't bother to hire the vast majority of the healthcare heroes they called to come home.

https://www.thejournal.ie/on-call-for-i ... 5-Aug2020/
Be On Call For Ireland: Only 209 workers given role in health service while 1,600 remain in a 'pool'


OF THE 73,000 people who applied for the government’s Be On Call For Ireland campaign to recruit healthcare workers, only 209 of them have been placed into a role in the health service.

Figures from the HSE show that 2,773 people passed an interview and indicated they were available for work since the initiative was launched in March.

Of these, 1,639 people remain available within the “pool” to take up a role in the health service, and a further 720 are “job-ready” after passing the clearance procedure.

Separately, a further 1,975 were recruited across four of the seven hospital groups in Ireland to assist in combating Covid-19.