Winnie wrote: PornDog wrote: Winnie wrote: Toulon's Not Toulouse wrote:
I wish him all the best and a speedy recovery. We may have differences in opinion but at the end of the day he's a human being and I'm sure he'd be good fun to chat with over a pint.
Have to say I'm absolutely shocked by the lack of empathy shown by some fellow posters in this tread.
If you are likening this to the BoJo thread that saw unseenworks demise I dont really think you can compare the two in terms of crimes against humanity
Well now I'm just confused.
So you can behave like a plum to some people, but not to others? Who decides who is in which category? Is there a regularly updated list I can consult? I'd hate to just wing it and fall foul of some mod is all.
Id suggest the mods would be a bit more sympathetic if the person has overseen the starvation of his people and the odd family murder etc
Personally I wouldn’t wish death on anyone some I’d weep less for than others
Well undoubtedly Kim Jong Un is a properly evil plum on a global scale. However, I severely doubt any one of us can say he has directly had any negative effect on any of us. The same cannot be said by a great many people about Boris - particularly those in the LGBTQ community.
I don't think its unreasonable for some people to hold extreme negative views about someone that is perceived to have had a strong negative effect against an entire community.
But again - what are the rules? Who can or can't I be a horrible plum to?
Boris - no
Kim Jong Un - yes
Trump - ????
can you fill out the list for me please? Some reasoning would be nice too to help me understand the system