join the Planet Network
Would have to agree, have you caught The Autopsy of Jane Doe, very Italian 80s feeling to it.Floppykid wrote:Just watched The Witch again, bloody excellent movie.
Apology accepted.Kid A wrote:Erm ok.SecretAgentMan wrote:You really are trying way too hard now.
Cinematography was great, soundtrack was good. Plot was more tropey than a tropey thing.UncleFB wrote:I'm not a horror movie fan but I thought Get Out was really good. It seemed more thriller-ish than horror-ish to me but one scene made me almost jump out of my seat.comets wrote:Is Get Out the best horror movie of the year or what? its one of those genres where ppl churn out more movies cause its a cheaper (lack of dialogues, lesser budget)..haven't watched a good horror in months :/
I went to a talk with the cinematographer (he's an Aussie) and that was really interesting too.
It just means we can expect a director's cut version of Covenant coming out on DVD...Salient wrote:Would have to agree, have you caught The Autopsy of Jane Doe, very Italian 80s feeling to it.Floppykid wrote:Just watched The Witch again, bloody excellent movie.
Interesting tidbit from the week, Ridley cut 23 minutes from Covenant, for mine he could have cut a further 30 minutes
Yep, I wasn't expecting much at all - that scene caused the whole cinema to jump!UncleFB wrote:I'm not a horror movie fan but I thought Get Out was really good. It seemed more thriller-ish than horror-ish to me but one scene made me almost jump out of my seat.comets wrote:Is Get Out the best horror movie of the year or what? its one of those genres where ppl churn out more movies cause its a cheaper (lack of dialogues, lesser budget)..haven't watched a good horror in months :/
I went to a talk with the cinematographer (he's an Aussie) and that was really interesting too.
Not exactly a difficult goal after the shite MOS & BVS.vh5150 wrote:Good to see DC universe getting better with each outing
Liked both those movies. In fact BVS sits in my top 10 ever. So does WW now. Some call the DC universe too dark. I say they are less emotionally and intellectually timid than other films of the genre.Jay Cee Gee wrote:Not exactly a difficult goal after the shite MOS & BVS.vh5150 wrote:Good to see DC universe getting better with each outing
They're shit and you have shit taste in movies.vh5150 wrote:Liked both those movies. In fact BVS sits in my top 10 ever. So does WW now. Some call the DC universe too dark. I say they are less emotionally and intellectually timid than other films of the genre.Jay Cee Gee wrote:Not exactly a difficult goal after the shite MOS & BVS.vh5150 wrote:Good to see DC universe getting better with each outing
Yes in the finest Marvel tradition. Actually the third act is the weakest bit but all before it carries it through.Nolanator wrote:Is the entire final third one giant overblown battle?
Yeah I loved the part in BvS where Superman, the symbol of all that is good, is helping people and he looks like he wants to slit his wrists. Miserable Superman best Superman.vh5150 wrote:Liked both those movies. In fact BVS sits in my top 10 ever. So does WW now. Some call the DC universe too dark. I say they are less emotionally and intellectually timid than other films of the genre.
Kid A wrote:Saw "Raw" last night. Beautiful film, although slightly predictable. As horror films go it absolutely pisses all over something shallow and stupid like "Get Out".
Stop quoting him please, at this point it's obvious he's a massive troll, both him and Dai are on my ignore listSecretAgentMan wrote:Kid A wrote:Saw "Raw" last night. Beautiful film, although slightly predictable. As horror films go it absolutely pisses all over something shallow and stupid like "Get Out".
OKUlsters Red Hand wrote:Stop quoting him please, at this point it's obvious he's a massive troll, both him and Dai are on my ignore list
Dude have the four disc Blu of Prometheus so bring it on, unfort Fox interfered hence the pile of shite Covenant cinematic version turned out to be.mikerob wrote:It just means we can expect a director's cut version of Covenant coming out on DVD...Salient wrote:Would have to agree, have you caught The Autopsy of Jane Doe, very Italian 80s feeling to it.Floppykid wrote:Just watched The Witch again, bloody excellent movie.
Interesting tidbit from the week, Ridley cut 23 minutes from Covenant, for mine he could have cut a further 30 minutes
i thot it was an intentional slap on androids/iphones lol cause no matter how advanced they are, they break easily..assassins who get involved in hand-to-hand combats would rather carry a Nokia 3315, than an iPhone 7 ..paddyor wrote:Watched John Wick over the weekend. Why do all the assasins have shit phones?
I'm not sure if he's a troll, but I like his comical value on this thread. He's that 'movie snob' we all come across in our lives - if something is popular with the masses he'll automatically hate it, if something is popular with a few snobbish critics he'll automatically love it.Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Stop quoting him please, at this point it's obvious he's a massive troll, both him and Dai are on my ignore listSecretAgentMan wrote:Kid A wrote:Saw "Raw" last night. Beautiful film, although slightly predictable. As horror films go it absolutely pisses all over something shallow and stupid like "Get Out".
He's snide - if you don't like something, fair enough. Trying to be the Arbiter of what is a good film is TryhardismFloppykid wrote:Kid A's opinion on films seems pretty sound and non-trolly really.
He just doesn't like Superhero movies, no biggie.
Pat the Ex Mat wrote:He's snide - if you don't like something, fair enough. Trying to be the Arbiter of what is a good film is TryhardismFloppykid wrote:Kid A's opinion on films seems pretty sound and non-trolly really.
He just doesn't like Superhero movies, no biggie.
No, Rugga, both you and Kid A have got personal over towards people that do like superhero movies which there isn't a need for. Fair enough if you don't like them but there's no reason it should go beyond thatRuggaBugga wrote:Pat the Ex Mat wrote:He's snide - if you don't like something, fair enough. Trying to be the Arbiter of what is a good film is TryhardismFloppykid wrote:Kid A's opinion on films seems pretty sound and non-trolly really.
He just doesn't like Superhero movies, no biggie.
As opposed to not liking shit superhero and action movies and being called a movie snob?
Given my favourite films of all time include 'Jaws' and 'Alien' I think you're incorrect.UncleFB wrote:I'm not sure if he's a troll, but I like his comical value on this thread. He's that 'movie snob' we all come across in our lives - if something is popular with the masses he'll automatically hate it, if something is popular with a few snobbish critics he'll automatically love it.Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Stop quoting him please, at this point it's obvious he's a massive troll, both him and Dai are on my ignore listSecretAgentMan wrote:Kid A wrote:Saw "Raw" last night. Beautiful film, although slightly predictable. As horror films go it absolutely pisses all over something shallow and stupid like "Get Out".
But it's good, you can follow him like clockwork on this thread.
It's cool for movie snobs to like the 70s blockbusters and early Ridely Scott thoughKid A wrote:Given my favourite films of all time include 'Jaws' and 'Alien' I think you're incorrect.UncleFB wrote:I'm not sure if he's a troll, but I like his comical value on this thread. He's that 'movie snob' we all come across in our lives - if something is popular with the masses he'll automatically hate it, if something is popular with a few snobbish critics he'll automatically love it.Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Stop quoting him please, at this point it's obvious he's a massive troll, both him and Dai are on my ignore listSecretAgentMan wrote:Kid A wrote:Saw "Raw" last night. Beautiful film, although slightly predictable. As horror films go it absolutely pisses all over something shallow and stupid like "Get Out".
But it's good, you can follow him like clockwork on this thread.
Precious people on this forum,. It seems if you have an opinion that doesn't suit the PR agenda, you're a troll.
. I think what that stems from is the fact I'd love the film "Raw" to get a bigger audience. Because loads and loads of people have seen 'Get Out', because it's been marketed the hell out of, yet a film like 'Raw' isn't. I think that's disappointing as it's far better.UncleFB wrote:
Maybe if you just said you didn't like Get Out and then left it at that instead of bringing it up again then people would take you at face value.
"Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water..." Jaws had massive marketing in its day. Didn't have much artistic merit, though.Kid A wrote:I think what that stems from is the fact I'd love the film "Raw" to get a bigger audience. Because loads and loads of people have seen 'Get Out', because it's been marketed the hell out of, yet a film like 'Raw' isn't. I think that's disappointing as it's far better.UncleFB wrote:
Maybe if you just said you didn't like Get Out and then left it at that instead of bringing it up again then people would take you at face value.
Maybe you'd get more people to go to it if you didn't tell people a movie they really liked was shit beforehand?Kid A wrote:I think what that stems from is the fact I'd love the film "Raw" to get a bigger audience. Because loads and loads of people have seen 'Get Out', because it's been marketed the hell out of, yet a film like 'Raw' isn't. I think that's disappointing as it's far better.UncleFB wrote:
Maybe if you just said you didn't like Get Out and then left it at that instead of bringing it up again then people would take you at face value.
Bit unfair. I liked the small minded business association angle.SecretAgentMan wrote:"Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water..." Jaws had massive marketing in its day. Didn't have much artistic merit, though.Kid A wrote:I think what that stems from is the fact I'd love the film "Raw" to get a bigger audience. Because loads and loads of people have seen 'Get Out', because it's been marketed the hell out of, yet a film like 'Raw' isn't. I think that's disappointing as it's far better.UncleFB wrote:
Maybe if you just said you didn't like Get Out and then left it at that instead of bringing it up again then people would take you at face value.
I think this is a grand thread where, uniquely for this place, nobody bothers trolling.Ulsters Red Hand wrote:No, Rugga, both you and Kid A have got personal over towards people that do like superhero movies which there isn't a need for. Fair enough if you don't like them but there's no reason it should go beyond thatRuggaBugga wrote:Pat the Ex Mat wrote:He's snide - if you don't like something, fair enough. Trying to be the Arbiter of what is a good film is TryhardismFloppykid wrote:Kid A's opinion on films seems pretty sound and non-trolly really.
He just doesn't like Superhero movies, no biggie.
As opposed to not liking shit superhero and action movies and being called a movie snob?
Plus Kid A is a massive troll when it comes to rugby as well, which doesnt help
Why am I not allowed to say that I think a movie is shit?UncleFB wrote:Maybe you'd get more people to go to it if you didn't tell people a movie they really liked was shit beforehand?Kid A wrote:I think what that stems from is the fact I'd love the film "Raw" to get a bigger audience. Because loads and loads of people have seen 'Get Out', because it's been marketed the hell out of, yet a film like 'Raw' isn't. I think that's disappointing as it's far better.UncleFB wrote:
Maybe if you just said you didn't like Get Out and then left it at that instead of bringing it up again then people would take you at face value.
Really terriblebessantj wrote:Watched the new pirates film yesterday, ugh what a pile of garbage.
It is generally terrible from start to finish. There was a scene that stuck with me where one of the British officers demands information or will beat the pirate captain to death, which is played for laughs but would be more at home in Casino.Ulsters Red Hand wrote:Really terriblebessantj wrote:Watched the new pirates film yesterday, ugh what a pile of garbage.
I thought it couldn't get much worse when a bunch of horses managed to drag the massive building along
How wrong was I
It's one of those franchises where it's best to forget that there were ever any sequels: same with The Matrix.Nolanator wrote:One of the lads in the office is re-watching the Pirates movies before going to see the new one this weekend.
