The Entertaining Pics Thread (definitely with NSFW content)

6roucho · Post by **6roucho** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:21 am

zippy wrote:

More plane porn

Spooky

I had a car do that once, except it was pistons and conrods coming out.

6roucho · Post by **6roucho** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:31 am

RATTLER wrote:
Cymro wrote:
RATTLER wrote:if this is real, these people need to be sterilised, for the good of the race.

Do you deny the right of free speech to fundamentalists?
No I dont, but they're so f**king stupid they should not be allowed contribute to future generations

That should include people who are merkd by a mock sign from a protest demanding an apology from GB to Alan Turing.

frillage · Post by **frillage** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:46 am

RATTLER wrote:if this is real, these people need to be sterilised, for the good of the race.

I think Turing, if he was alive, would be absolutely disgusted by your comment, especially considering what he went through.
If you genuinely think that, you are as bad, or worse than the wierdo holding the sign.

Killer Rabbit · Post by **Killer Rabbit** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:46 am

RATTLER wrote:if this is real, these people need to be sterilised, for the good of the race.

She has a very nice sign.
I'm not convinced that she could have made such a nice sign without a little help from computers. Even if she got someone else to make the sign (on a computer), it is clear to me that she supports homo devils.

KR

True Blue · Post by **True Blue** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:57 am

The sign is clearly fake. The "...who cares if he cracked the code and helped win WW2" should be a dead giveaway I would have thought. Why would she put that part on the sign.

Plus she's holding a gay pride flag.

And looks like a lezzer.

Jays Myth · Post by **Jays Myth** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:47 am

guy smiley wrote:Back in 1967, Kathrine Switzer ran the Boston marathon. She was the first woman to do so. The man in black is a race official who tried to remover her forcefully from the race in disgust but she was shielded by other runners and completed the run.

1967 folks.

Marathon for women wasn't included in the Olympics until 1984!

CanNZ · Post by **CanNZ** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:01 am

These photos are making the rounds on NHL websites

original

photoshopped

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:04 am

Always a good idea to check the thread every now and then... just in case, y'know, someone else beat you to it.

CanNZ · Post by **CanNZ** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:07 am

Ah shit, I only checked two pages back, still pretty funny though.

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 6:12 am

I just went back 4 pages checking actually, before the bored started hanging again... and didn't see it. I'm sure it's here somewhere... no matter, on with the show.

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:33 am

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:34 am

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:34 am

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:35 am

6roucho · Post by **6roucho** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:36 am

Jays Myth wrote:
guy smiley wrote:Back in 1967, Kathrine Switzer ran the Boston marathon. She was the first woman to do so. The man in black is a race official who tried to remover her forcefully from the race in disgust but she was shielded by other runners and completed the run.

1967 folks.

Marathon for women wasn't included in the Olympics until 1984!

It was never in our interests to teach them to run.

guy smiley · Post by **guy smiley** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:47 am

6roucho wrote:
It was never in our interests to teach them to run.

We've done our thing
We have evolved
We're up on our hind legs
The problem's solved

We are artists
We are mathematicians
Some of us hold extremely
High positions

But we are tired
We're hardly breathing
And we're free
Go tell the women that we're leaving

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:11 am

Hellraiser wrote:
Nolanator wrote:The A-10 is basically a massive Gatling gun with a fuselage, a few wings, a couple of engines and a cockpit strapped around it.

Remember reading that the gun always points slightly down even when the plane is flying level and the shape of the plane means it can have pretty low airspeed and still be manoeuvrable and stable.
Wouldn't fancy seeing one of them if it was coming to get you on the ground.

The GAU-8 Avenger.

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:00 am

Taranaki Snapper · Post by **Taranaki Snapper** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:00 am

guy smiley wrote:

Chaptastic!

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:03 am

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:04 am

Taranaki Snapper · Post by **Taranaki Snapper** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:04 am

Oh, sweet merciful cheeses...I need to move somewhere Nordic...

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:05 am

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:08 am

theo · Post by **theo** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:09 am

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:12 am

Fat Old Git · Post by **Fat Old Git** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:31 am

etherman · Post by **etherman** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:24 am

Fat Old Git wrote:
Hellraiser wrote:
Nolanator wrote:The A-10 is basically a massive Gatling gun with a fuselage, a few wings, a couple of engines and a cockpit strapped around it.

Remember reading that the gun always points slightly down even when the plane is flying level and the shape of the plane means it can have pretty low airspeed and still be manoeuvrable and stable.
Wouldn't fancy seeing one of them if it was coming to get you on the ground.

The GAU-8 Avenger.

It can only fire in short bursts as the recoil would effectively stall the plane. The A-10 is desigened so that it can lose parts engine, tail fin etc. and still fly, and the parts are interchangeable on either side for ease of maintenance... I think. Also the high engine position means it can be rearmed with its engines still running.

All the flight systems control systems, including the landing gear can be controled 'mechanically' even if all the computers and hydrualics got tits up.

etherman · Post by **etherman** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:25 am

Fat Old Git wrote:

We have 3 airhorns in the office. And lots of gaffer tape.

Akkerman · Post by **Akkerman** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:28 am

Taranaki Snapper wrote:Oh, sweet merciful cheeses...I need to move somewhere Nordic...

Iceland apparently, Aníta Marín Óskarsdóttir.

earl the beaver · Post by **earl the beaver** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:29 am

She's the spitting image of a nanny that works out here, she's Swedish though.

Nieghorn · Post by **Nieghorn** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:34 am

Taranaki Snapper wrote:Oh, sweet merciful cheeses...I need to move somewhere Nordic...

... added to the list of potential future homes: Scandinavia.

xbgo1 · Post by **xbgo1** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:34 am

Akkerman wrote:
Taranaki Snapper wrote:Oh, sweet merciful cheeses...I need to move somewhere Nordic...

Iceland apparently, Aníta Marín Óskarsdóttir.

One could really gaze into those eyes for hours, before finally leaving her face looking like a plasterers radio.

Nieghorn · Post by **Nieghorn** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:35 am

guy smiley wrote:

Huh? My parents' neighbours seem to have put in a roller coaster! (Looks very much like the creek that runs behind their houses, which is going to make for some tricky canoeing ... )

hp18 · Post by **hp18** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:36 am

Gavin Duffy wrote:An oldie

hp18 · Post by **hp18** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:38 am

Taranaki Snapper wrote:Oh, sweet merciful cheeses...I need to move somewhere Nordic...

Think I might join you.......

Taranaki Snapper · Post by **Taranaki Snapper** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:26 pm

"No time to explain, get in the boat!"

Taranaki Snapper · Post by **Taranaki Snapper** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:27 pm

Nolanator · Post by **Nolanator** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:28 pm

Fewer people.

Peanut · Post by **Peanut** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:44 pm

RATTLER wrote:And my favourite plane of the modern era, (looks wise at least), the A-10 Tankbuster. There's just something mean looking about it

Fantastic, almost prehistoric looking and even more frightening when being flown by someone who has done no recognition training and is looking to blast anything that moves