Planet Rugby Forum

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:Bimbo has completely gone off the deep end. He can't bare to rationalise anything. There is only his side righty on everything and anything that does not fall into that description is some babyish "disgusting" lumping everyone who wants hospitals and schools to be funded properly to fascist dictators as left and therefore wrong. And that is literally all he reasoning he can muster. He does frequently embarrassing himself by bringing in random examples of various failures whose case literally has nothing to do with the debate being had.

I've quite rightly described Corbyn as a terrorist supporter, that is all.


You're butt hurt over the ludicrous posts you made about education funding paying for itself though seems to be an issue with you.

I totally rationalised everything I posted with examples, you posted absolutly no examples.

I think the veneration of the black September terrorists disgusting, some people don't it appears. That's frightning considering we have elections coming in the UK.

Rationalised is using non-connected examples? Venesuela went broke because it invested in education did it? F#cking hell

Once again I'll repeat the simple explaination , the markets do not care what you overspend the money on leading to bankruptcy.

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo you were taking the high ground that people should not vote for Cornyn because of his support for terrorists.
It's a reasonable position tbh. There is a logical progression that you would treat each politician the same if they supported mass murderers or terrorists.

There is no argument that Thatcher did exactly that.
Did you use the same moral compass for her that you use for Corbyn?


I'm too bored to continue...

Bye

Only a child would make that equivalence. It's idiotic.

Comparing two leaders of major parties in the UK, both embracing terrorists is childish? I'd say it's pefectly relevant. It's a direct comparrsion. Both their positions, roles and actions here are directly the same.

But go on, I'm sure you'll answer with Venesuela or something.

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:Bimbo has completely gone off the deep end. He can't bare to rationalise anything. There is only his side righty on everything and anything that does not fall into that description is some babyish "disgusting" lumping everyone who wants hospitals and schools to be funded properly to fascist dictators as left and therefore wrong. And that is literally all he reasoning he can muster. He does frequently embarrassing himself by bringing in random examples of various failures whose case literally has nothing to do with the debate being had.

I've quite rightly described Corbyn as a terrorist supporter, that is all.


You're butt hurt over the ludicrous posts you made about education funding paying for itself though seems to be an issue with you.

I totally rationalised everything I posted with examples, you posted absolutly no examples.

I think the veneration of the black September terrorists disgusting, some people don't it appears. That's frightning considering we have elections coming in the UK.

Rationalised is using non-connected examples? Venesuela went broke because it invested in education did it? F#cking hell

Once again I'll repeat the simple explaination , the markets do not care what you overspend the money on leading to bankruptcy.

Who claimed we should overspend? I'm against such a policy as my posting history shows. Are all business start-up loans now overspend? Are all Mortgages overspend?

I await your next hysterical and non-relevant counter-reply.

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:So I suppose those who rightly find terrorist suppost "disgusting" would never actually vote for people that supported Pinochet or the Khymer Rouge and Pol Pot. It would be somewhat hypocritical if they voted for someone that funded actually funded real terrorists and perpetrators of genocide.

Whataboutery ! Well done.

Geopolitics through a child's eye.

Oh as long as it's the right sort of terrorist or mass murderer than it's OK.
I remember a quote from Thatcher about Suharto the former Indonesian leader that killed a million of his people according to Amnesty International.

“One of our very best and most valuable friends,”

"It's Thatchers fault"

What all Thatcher's fault? Who said that?

Who claimed we should overspend? I'm against such a policy as my posting history shows. Are all business start-up loans now overspend? Are all Mortgages overspend?

I await your next hysterical and non-relevant counter-reply.

As I initially pointed out the manifesto and the following promises stated overspending. You cannot treat the "bit you like" independantly to the other parts either.

I've not been hysterical, your the one shouting and smiley posting.

"You can pay the interest by borrowing more" ....

eldanielfire wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo you were taking the high ground that people should not vote for Cornyn because of his support for terrorists.
It's a reasonable position tbh. There is a logical progression that you would treat each politician the same if they supported mass murderers or terrorists.

There is no argument that Thatcher did exactly that.
Did you use the same moral compass for her that you use for Corbyn?


I'm too bored to continue...

Bye

We both know he won't. He has no moral compass. He's just a shrill for right wing political positions.

This is beyond f*ckin stupid and just makes Bimbo's point about phony equivalence.

By the way, it was a Labour Govt that protected Pinochet. F'all to do with the Tories.

Still nice to know that, if you really think it's comparable, none of you buggers will vote for Labour while Corbyn is in charge.

bimboman wrote:

Who claimed we should overspend? I'm against such a policy as my posting history shows. Are all business start-up loans now overspend? Are all Mortgages overspend?

I await your next hysterical and non-relevant counter-reply.

As I initially pointed out the manifesto and the following promises stated overspending. You cannot treat the "bit you like" independantly to the other parts either.

Err yes you can. Especially when my entire argument was some bits of the manifesto was brilliant. I never claimed I liked or accepted all of it. In fact I am on record criticising it's fantasy bollocks and spending billions just to renationalise the railways for nothing but ego.

None of which is relevant to my statements that the policies on education and infrastructure would pay for themselves and were important to the skills gap needed post Brexit. I never claimed the rest would or should be implemented. But like I stated, you will respond with irrelevant bollocks and examples and you have.

I've not been hysterical, your the one shouting and smiley posting.

"You can pay the interest by borrowing more" ....

Yes, because I'm laughing at your hysterics.

zzzz wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo you were taking the high ground that people should not vote for Cornyn because of his support for terrorists.
It's a reasonable position tbh. There is a logical progression that you would treat each politician the same if they supported mass murderers or terrorists.

There is no argument that Thatcher did exactly that.
Did you use the same moral compass for her that you use for Corbyn?


I'm too bored to continue...

Bye

We both know he won't. He has no moral compass. He's just a shrill for right wing political positions.

This is beyond f*ckin stupid and just makes Bimbo's point about phony equivalence.

By the way, it was a Labour Govt that protected Pinochet. F'all to do with the Tories.

Still nice to know that, if you really think it's comparable, none of you buggers will vote for Labour while Corbyn is in charge.

Certainly not, that fucker's pro Brexit.

zzzz wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo you were taking the high ground that people should not vote for Cornyn because of his support for terrorists.
It's a reasonable position tbh. There is a logical progression that you would treat each politician the same if they supported mass murderers or terrorists.

There is no argument that Thatcher did exactly that.
Did you use the same moral compass for her that you use for Corbyn?


I'm too bored to continue...

Bye

We both know he won't. He has no moral compass. He's just a shrill for right wing political positions.

This is beyond f*ckin stupid and just makes Bimbo's point about phony equivalence.

By the way, it was a Labour Govt that protected Pinochet. F'all to do with the Tories.

Still nice to know that, if you really think it's comparable, none of you buggers will vote for Labour while Corbyn is in charge.

I've never voted for Corbyn, why would I start now?

Meanwhile the facts are the facts.

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Who claimed we should overspend? I'm against such a policy as my posting history shows. Are all business start-up loans now overspend? Are all Mortgages overspend?

I await your next hysterical and non-relevant counter-reply.

As I initially pointed out the manifesto and the following promises stated overspending. You cannot treat the "bit you like" independantly to the other parts either.

Err yes you can. Especially when my entire argument was some bits of the manifesto was brilliant. I never claimed I liked or accepted all of it. In fact I am on record criticising it's fantasy bollocks and spending billions just to renationalise the railways for nothing but ego.

None of which is relevant to my statements that the policies on education and infrastructure would pay for themselves and were important to the skills gap needed post Brexit. I never claimed the rest would or should be implemented. But like I stated, you will respond with irrelevant bollocks and examples and you have.

I've not been hysterical, your the one shouting and smiley posting.

"You can pay the interest by borrowing more" ....

Yes, because I'm laughing at your hysterics.

"You can pay the interest by borrowing more"

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Who claimed we should overspend? I'm against such a policy as my posting history shows. Are all business start-up loans now overspend? Are all Mortgages overspend?

I await your next hysterical and non-relevant counter-reply.

As I initially pointed out the manifesto and the following promises stated overspending. You cannot treat the "bit you like" independantly to the other parts either.

Err yes you can. Especially when my entire argument was some bits of the manifesto was brilliant. I never claimed I liked or accepted all of it. In fact I am on record criticising it's fantasy bollocks and spending billions just to renationalise the railways for nothing but ego.

None of which is relevant to my statements that the policies on education and infrastructure would pay for themselves and were important to the skills gap needed post Brexit. I never claimed the rest would or should be implemented. But like I stated, you will respond with irrelevant bollocks and examples and you have.

I've not been hysterical, your the one shouting and smiley posting.

"You can pay the interest by borrowing more" ....

Yes, because I'm laughing at your hysterics.

"You can pay the interest by borrowing more"

Which is perfectly true.

But carry on ignoring all the other points

Which is perfectly true.

Do you borrow it from the people you owe the interest too ?

bimboman wrote:

Which is perfectly true.

Do you borrow it from the people you owe the interest too ?

if you want. The UK has been doing it the entire period under this Tory government.

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Which is perfectly true.

Do you borrow it from the people you owe the interest too ?

if you want. The UK has been doing it the entire period under this Tory government.

Oh dear. It's been able to do that by reducing the deficit and paying the debt interest from the current account borrowing less and less money, not more and more.

Simple idea

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Which is perfectly true.

Do you borrow it from the people you owe the interest too ?

if you want. The UK has been doing it the entire period under this Tory government.

Oh dear.

It's true. Though I have no doubt the reality is beyond your comprehension.

f**king SHUT UP THE PAIR OF YOU

slick wrote:f**king SHUT UP THE PAIR OF YOU

I'm not talking mate.

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

bimboman wrote:

Which is perfectly true.

Do you borrow it from the people you owe the interest too ?

if you want. The UK has been doing it the entire period under this Tory government.

Oh dear.

It's true. Though I have no doubt the reality is beyond your comprehension.

"Its true"...... "comprehension" ......


Your understanding of governemnt debt is certainly differant that's for sure.

slick wrote:f**king SHUT UP THE PAIR OF YOU

You'd never see this on a thread about the Greens.

Brazil wrote:

slick wrote:f**king SHUT UP THE PAIR OF YOU

You'd never see this on a thread about the Greens.

Like there would be posts on a thread about the greens

c69 wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

Brazil wrote:

slick wrote:f**king SHUT UP THE PAIR OF YOU

You'd never see this on a thread about the Greens.

Like there would be posts on a thread about the greens

10 pages with 9 of them filled with bimbo calling them disgusting and evil with the odd "terrorists" thrown in for good measure.

It's funny because it's true!

c69 wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

Brazil wrote:

slick wrote:f**king SHUT UP THE PAIR OF YOU

You'd never see this on a thread about the Greens.

Like there would be posts on a thread about the greens

10 pages with 9 of them filled with bimbo calling them disgusting and evil with the odd "terrorists" thrown in for good measure.

That's silly, unless of course Caroline Lucas has :

Supported the IRA and was anti the good Friday agreement being signed.

Been the British conveyner for a holocuast denial organisation.

Liked anti semetic commentary and art by the dozen.

Called Hamas and Hezbollah their friends,

Laid wreaths at the graves of terrorists and then lied about it.

Constantly spent time with Jihadists.

Been paid to appear on Iranian state TV.

Etc etc.

The reason I call Corbyn a supporter of terrorists is that he is.

Could someone change the tape in the bimbobot, its stuck in a loop.

sewa wrote:Could someone change the tape in the bimbobot, its stuck in a loop.

Uncomfortable with facts ?

sewa wrote:Could someone change the tape in the bimbobot, its stuck in a loop.

No, this is actually his free material .

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:

eldanielfire wrote:

Brazil wrote:

slick wrote:f**king SHUT UP THE PAIR OF YOU

You'd never see this on a thread about the Greens.

Like there would be posts on a thread about the greens

10 pages with 9 of them filled with bimbo calling them disgusting and evil with the odd "terrorists" thrown in for good measure.

That's silly, unless of course Caroline Lucas has :

Supported the IRA and was anti the good Friday agreement being signed.

Been the British conveyner for a holocuast denial organisation.

Liked anti semetic commentary and art by the dozen.

Called Hamas and Hezbollah their friends,

Laid wreaths at the graves of terrorists and then lied about it.

Constantly spent time with Jihadists.

Been paid to appear on Iranian state TV.

Etc etc.

The reason I call Corbyn a supporter of terrorists is that he is.

She was involved in the support for the Smash EDO campaign campaign? Wasn't that to stop arms supplies to Israel?

She was involved in the support for the Smash EDO campaign campaign? Wasn't that to stop arms supplies to Israel?

Anyone get castrated ?

bimboman wrote:

She was involved in the support for the Smash EDO campaign campaign? Wasn't that to stop arms supplies to Israel?

Anyone get castrated ?

I'll be sure to ask

https://mobile.twitter.com/Channel4News ... 75/video/1

Latest in, Jezza did lay a wreath on the graves, but he wasn't commemorating them at that time he was commentating all victims of terrorists.....

Genuinly he's just trolling now isn't he ?

bimboman wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/Channel4News ... 75/video/1

Latest in, Jezza did lay a wreath on the graves, but he wasn't commemorating them at that time he was commentating all victims of terrorists.....

Genuinly he's just trolling now isn't he ?

What exactly do you think is the trolling going on here. What he said in that interview should be good enough for anyone

Anonymous. wrote:

bimboman wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/Channel4News ... 75/video/1

Latest in, Jezza did lay a wreath on the graves, but he wasn't commemorating them at that time he was commentating all victims of terrorists.....

Genuinly he's just trolling now isn't he ?

What exactly do you think is the trolling going on here. What he said in that interview should be good enough for anyone

Enough for what. ?

c69 wrote:Bimbo if you knew that Thatcher had funded not just supported but funded training for Pol Pot and the Khymer Rouge would you have voted for her.
Would this make you feel disgust towards her?

Depends, was she still going to f uck the miners and unions ? It'd cloud my judgement.

Are you against United Nations actions btw ? Or just those that politically don't suit ?

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo if you knew that Thatcher had funded not just supported but funded training for Pol Pot and the Khymer Rouge would you have voted for her.
Would this make you feel disgust towards her?

Depends, was she still going to f uck the miners and unions ? It'd cloud my judgement.

You get it then! It's just like that with Corbyn except rather than screwing honest decent miners it's seizing your ill gotten gains!

unseenwork wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo if you knew that Thatcher had funded not just supported but funded training for Pol Pot and the Khymer Rouge would you have voted for her.
Would this make you feel disgust towards her?

Depends, was she still going to f uck the miners and unions ? It'd cloud my judgement.

You get it then! It's just like that with Corbyn except rather than screwing honest decent miners it's seizing your ill gotten gains!

Ill gotten ? I represent that comment ....

bimboman wrote:

unseenwork wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo if you knew that Thatcher had funded not just supported but funded training for Pol Pot and the Khymer Rouge would you have voted for her.
Would this make you feel disgust towards her?

Depends, was she still going to f uck the miners and unions ? It'd cloud my judgement.

You get it then! It's just like that with Corbyn except rather than screwing honest decent miners it's seizing your ill gotten gains!

Ill gotten ? I represent that comment ....

represent??

bimboman wrote:

unseenwork wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo if you knew that Thatcher had funded not just supported but funded training for Pol Pot and the Khymer Rouge would you have voted for her.
Would this make you feel disgust towards her?

Depends, was she still going to f uck the miners and unions ? It'd cloud my judgement.

You get it then! It's just like that with Corbyn except rather than screwing honest decent miners it's seizing your ill gotten gains!

Ill gotten ? I represent that comment ....

I represent it as well. I want miners money like that Corbyn fella

Frodder wrote:

bimboman wrote:

unseenwork wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:Bimbo if you knew that Thatcher had funded not just supported but funded training for Pol Pot and the Khymer Rouge would you have voted for her.
Would this make you feel disgust towards her?

Depends, was she still going to f uck the miners and unions ? It'd cloud my judgement.

You get it then! It's just like that with Corbyn except rather than screwing honest decent miners it's seizing your ill gotten gains!

Ill gotten ? I represent that comment ....

I represent it as well. I want miners money like that Corbyn fella

Sadly Skargill and his family stole a lot of that, you'll find a nice apartment in the Barbican in their books though.

c69 wrote:Stole? Can you provide evidence of this illegal activity?

Another hero of your ?

c69 wrote:

bimboman wrote:

c69 wrote:Stole? Can you provide evidence of this illegal activity?

Another hero of your ?

No not a great fan of Stalinist demagogues.
About this theft...

Theft? Nothing so gauche .....

He made himself homeless (by selling his house to his daughter) to force through a "right to buy" on the flat in his name even though the rent had been paid by the NUM during his tenancy he then borrowed money from her to purchase the flat 1/2 price.
Pedancy suits you though you're a little snivler.