Well, we all know the senate isn't voting on the facts or the law, any more than the house did.

Nothing gets past you Jonesy.

he claimed to have 'overwhelming evidence'..

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-schiff/schiff-focus-on-overwhelming-evidence-in-trump-impeachment-idUSKBN1YC0GP

we're still waiting though.

I'm the Greek chorus.

Or the sans culottes , knitting furiously below the guillotine, getting their vicarious rocks off at no danger to themselves !

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/480207-bolton-raised-concerns-that-trump-did-favors-for-autocrats-book?amp=1&amp_recirculation=1

Bolton and his complicists going full out against Trump.


Now, first step is for Trump to call them liars. May be tomorrow, Trump will pretend he doesn't know Bolton.

And last step is to prevent Bolton's testimony under oath, just in case...

Or the sans culottes , knitting furiously below the guillotine, getting their vicarious rocks off at no danger to themselves !

While Schifty's little dog and pony show , look over there , a squirrel , runs its course, unreported by the corporate media , the FBI / DOJ have been fessing up to Fisa court irregularities and have agreed to list information obtained illegally and its uses. Mueller report now in the cross hairs !

'' The DOJ/FBI previously agreed to “sequester” all information and evidence received as an outcome of all four FISA warrants issued against Carter Page. Meaning, all material, in any court proceeding or subsequent secondary warrant on another target, application, filing, motion, prosecution or downstream use of the information gathered and obtained.

The DOJ and FBI stated they will now assemble all materials, from any location, that stemmed from the Carter Page FISA warrants. In essence, the FBI will now look and retrieve any evidence that stemmed as an outcome of the Carter Page FISA warrant. Some of this material *may* (perhaps likely) will be in the Special Counsel Mueller investigation.

[ie. a proverbial search for the fruit of a poisonous tree. Where is it?]

Once the sequestration has taken place, the DOJ will then be able to determine to the court what collateral impacts they have identified.

Worth noting in the second paragraph of the original order: “pending further review of the OIG report and the outcome of any investigations or litigation.” This was a statement made by the DOJ in response to the FISC. It is possible the ongoing investigation by U.S.

It's ironic. Bolton and his neo-coven is the closest thing to a deep state America has.

It's ironic. Bolton and his neo-coven is the closest thing to a deep state America has.

After Bannon who finally decided it wasn't God behind Trump's election and that he'd better jump the wagon before being taken to hell with the lot of them, another iconic neo-con is distancing himself from Trump.

The last ones remaining behind him are guys like Lindsay Graham who took it up their backside (in his case during the primaries) and now are willing to suck his stinking ccok... in other words, the worst of the worst of the swamp, those willing to compromise anything so long as they can stay in power.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/480207-bolton-raised-concerns-that-trump-did-favors-for-autocrats-book?amp=1&amp_recirculation=1

Bolton and his complicists going full out against Trump.


Now, first step is for Trump to call them liars. May be tomorrow, Trump will pretend he doesn't know Bolton.

And last step is to prevent Bolton's testimony under oath, just in case...

At some point Trump will deny having ever met himself.

It's true. My only immediate concern is the disposition of the nuclear football. Slowly, one by one, Trump is replacing anyone with the tossle to stop him using it.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Seriously?

Leaving aside I don't know what tossle means the people Trump is replacing he appointed, so it's a both a weird and convoluted system he's employing

Tossle is old Australian slang for a little boy's penis.

So, the rigorous attorney you are supposed to be seems to make inaccurate statements at times.... ALL the evidence not being overwhelming evidence of course.

But which decent lawyer or prosecutor would indulge in exaggerations and emphatic overstatement?

Now... why would an innocent President prohibit his staff from making statements under oaths if there is nothing wrong with his behavior?

Anyway, it seems that Bolton, the latest to jump the ship, is embarked on a crusade to discredit the man. May backfire though as people who voted Trump may perceive this as more of the swamp trying to swallow its next victim.

Bondi the one who took money from the now disbanded and disgraced Trump Foundation not to investigate Trump University, is that correct?

All the best people! Fill the swamp!

For my part, I believe Seneca is on a wind up. He is just enjoying himself here, while watching the Trump show in awe at what human stupidity can achieve.

The one who just listed the numerous factual concerns raised by press and prosecutors into the Bidens and Burisma. You might find it instructive to watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kqmojRRqB0

So basically used as say cojones would be in that context? (or cajones if you're as thick as Trump)

I've been called some things in my time here, but that's beyond the pale.

If she can take down Biden so the USA doesn't suffer an old man president I'd be happy with that. But whether Biden is guilty or not is irrelevant to the proceedings she's part of

All the Dem contenders will be sunk by the Bloomberg.

Do you see what I did there?

Suggest an old man president for all he'd be far superior to Trump

The one who just listed the numerous factual concerns raised by press and prosecutors into the Bidens and Burisma. You might find it instructive to watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kqmojRRqB0

what a coincidence..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/guess-who-was-charge-reviewing-boltons-leaked-book-nsc

no doubt the leakers' accounts of what's inside the draft are as accurate as schifty's account of the phone call.

I can't figure out why someone wrote that story.

what or who is zerohedge?

what a coincidence..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/guess-who-was-charge-reviewing-boltons-leaked-book-nsc

no doubt the leakers' accounts of what's inside the draft are as accurate as schifty's account of the phone call.

I can't figure out why someone wrote that story.

what or who is zerohedge?

EDIT: the "article" was written by someone calling themselves Tyler Durden - I am an idiot for clicking on a link from Merry

Bolton's probably going to deny this before the day is out. His lawyer and publishers are not happy. If he has any wriggle room on the content I reckon he'll take it. He won't want to be associated with the loser chuckle brothers, who are probably headed for the guillotine now.

I can't figure out why someone wrote that story.

what or who is zerohedge?

EDIT: the "article" was written by someone calling themselves Tyler Durden - I am an idiot for clicking on a link from Merry

breitbart better for you..?

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/26/source-alexander-vindmans-brother-yevgeny-clears-publications-by-nsc-officials/

doesn't change the fact that those ukrainian twins are well dodgy..

Bolton's probably going to deny this before the day is out. His lawyer and publishers are not happy. If he has any wriggle room on the content I reckon he'll take it. He won't want to be associated with the loser chuckle brothers, who are probably headed for the guillotine now.

the fat brothers

yep, while I can see Bolton wanting to have a dig at trump, I can't see him wanting to be seen as a man who betrayed the president.

too much of a patriot for that, I reckon.