Chat Forum
It is currently Sat May 30, 2020 4:04 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112850 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 2136, 2137, 2138, 2139, 2140, 2141, 2142 ... 2822  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Bowens wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Saint wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Saint wrote:
Looks like James Mattis has disagreed with Donny one time too often.

"I think he's sort of a Democrat"


Is he a Globalist?


He's anti Russia and pro NATO, which I think is the problem

Once upon a time that would have made him a Republican


One of the few adults left in the room.
What the hell caused Trump to call him 'sort of a Democrat?' That's a really, really odd thing to say.


Trump has been a Democrat. Not sure why you view it as an insult.


No, not necessarily an insult, just a really, really odd thing to say.
Trump isn't ever going to use 'sort of a Democrat' as a compliment of course, but it does show how he views independents.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 9527
Turbogoat wrote:
Saint wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Saint wrote:
Looks like James Mattis has disagreed with Donny one time too often.

"I think he's sort of a Democrat"


Is he a Globalist?


He's anti Russia and pro NATO, which I think is the problem

Once upon a time that would have made him a Republican


One of the few adults left in the room.
What the hell caused Trump to call him 'sort of a Democrat?' That's a really, really odd thing to say.


CBS have explicitly asked him about Mattis leaving. Response was.

Quote:
Well, I don't know. He hasn't told me that.

I have a very good relationship with him. I had lunch with him two days ago. I have a very good relationship with him. It could be that he is. I think he's sort of a Democrat, if you want to know the truth,

But General Mattis is a good guy. We get along very well. He may leave. I mean, at some point, everybody leaves. Everybody. People leave. That's Washington.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
He just can't ever give a short answer can he? There's a silence so he just has to fill it. It's where so many of his odd quotes come from.

The first line "Well I don't know. He hasn't told me that" was all he needed to say. All good, perfectly fine answer. But he just ploughs on....

No wonder his lawyers are so shit scared of him being questioned by Mueller.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:05 pm
Posts: 12060
SNL Trump-Kanye skit been posted yet? It's not bad. :)

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status ... 7938023425


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 5:46 am
Posts: 10974
That’s the worst Kanye impression I have seen. Jay Pharoah was way better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:05 pm
Posts: 12060
Bowens wrote:
That’s the worst Kanye impression I have seen. Jay Pharoah was way better.

Yeah, I wasn't high on the Kanye. The "black me" part was funny tho.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 37132
Rugby2023 wrote:
SNL Trump-Kanye skit been posted yet? It's not bad. :)

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status ... 7938023425


That show needs to be shot into the sun.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 8:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 1080
Turbogoat wrote:
He just can't ever give a short answer can he? There's a silence so he just has to fill it. It's where so many of his odd quotes come from.

The first line "Well I don't know. He hasn't told me that" was all he needed to say. All good, perfectly fine answer. But he just ploughs on....

No wonder his lawyers are so shit scared of him being questioned by Mueller.

especially since, from what i've read about him, the one thing Mueller does really well is silence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
pigaaaa wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
He just can't ever give a short answer can he? There's a silence so he just has to fill it. It's where so many of his odd quotes come from.

The first line "Well I don't know. He hasn't told me that" was all he needed to say. All good, perfectly fine answer. But he just ploughs on....

No wonder his lawyers are so shit scared of him being questioned by Mueller.

especially since, from what i've read about him, the one thing Mueller does really well is silence.


It was quite telling to see FBI agents on the receiving end of the strategic silence. When both Comey and Strzok were being questioned by Congress, they'd often be given a question that they'd answer in one or two words. There'd then be an awkward silence that a less well prepared interviewee would generally feel obliged to fill, but they'd just sit and wait for Congress to move on to the next question.

It's surprising to see how susceptible Trump is to the strategic silence though, during one on one interviews or similar they can just sit back and let him fill in the silence with whatever ad lib he wants to add on to even well prepared answers. It's what's caused so many of his foot-in-mouth moments and opportunities for his haterz to snicker at ill-formed sentences and thoughts that he's simply used as filler so much of the time.
It's cheap copy, and a genuine distraction from more pressing issues, but makes for an easy headline. That's probably why none of his handlers have seen fit to coach him how to give short, succinct answers and enjoy the following silence, he makes such a good distraction from his own issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:01 am
Posts: 8316
It rather highlights a problem interviewing Trump with a view to prosecution if he rambles and bullshits as the norm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
piquant wrote:
It rather highlights a problem interviewing Trump with a view to prosecution if he rambles and bullshits as the norm



They'd go into extra time for sure :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:01 am
Posts: 8316
Turbogoat wrote:
piquant wrote:
It rather highlights a problem interviewing Trump with a view to prosecution if he rambles and bullshits as the norm



They'd go into extra time for sure :lol:


Getting him to nail his colours to the mast whilst receiving legal advice would be problematic, and if he did seemingly admit to anything how would one know that was genuine?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 37132
Troll hunter, keeping us safe from bots:

https://edition-m.cnn.com/2018/08/13/po ... term=image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7118
Location: the Confederacy of Dunces
Turbogoat wrote:
Taranaki Snapper wrote:
Image


:lol:
In most American hospitals, wearing your stethoscope round your neck is gonna get you being termed 'Med student', at best. Wearing one outside of your workplace? 'Actor'.


in fairness i think he was there to do El Doritto's physical exam and proclaim him the healthiest POTUS of all time with a body fat % = Christiano Ronaldo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 7118
Location: the Confederacy of Dunces
Turbogoat wrote:
Saint wrote:
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Saint wrote:
Looks like James Mattis has disagreed with Donny one time too often.

"I think he's sort of a Democrat"


Is he a Globalist?


He's anti Russia and pro NATO, which I think is the problem

Once upon a time that would have made him a Republican


One of the few adults left in the room.
What the hell caused Trump to call him 'sort of a Democrat?' That's a really, really odd thing to say.


didnt realize he was still there....must be a record


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5576
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Troll hunter, keeping us safe from bots:

https://edition-m.cnn.com/2018/08/13/po ... term=image


Got to admire a man for realising he was being lied to by the alt right and then doing something about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Elizabeth Warren has released her DNA test, and yup she actually is part Native American.

Will Trump persist in calling her Pocahontas??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 37132
Turbogoat wrote:
Elizabeth Warren has released her DNA test, and yup she actually is part Native American.

Will Trump persist in calling her Pocahontas??


I'm sub-saharan African too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5455
Location: Front and centre.
Drumpf goes full Partridge:

http://uk.businessinsider.com/trump-han ... se-2018-10

Spoiler: show
Image


What. A. Twat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25704
Rinkals wrote:
FairWeather_Aussie wrote:
Is this thread still going? What is the current theme, Kavanaugh being a bit rapey when he was younger and a serial liar when under oath when older, or something else? Or just personal attacks, that would be better?

You'd think so.

However, the loudest and most vocal on here are pushing their conviction that CBF is a liar who is quite happy to ruin an innocent man's life with her baseless and partisan accusations. The real victims here are the men and boys who have to live with these types of accusations. If they weren't lies, why didn't she report them at the time?

But yes, the insults have been flowing thick and fast; those who don't support Trump and his Supreme Court pick are morons, libtards, fckwits and stupid cvnts
.

What a bunch of BS...so typical from the libs/socialists who outnumber the rational people on this thread about 10/1 :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25704
Turbogoat wrote:
He just can't ever give a short answer can he? There's a silence so he just has to fill it. It's where so many of his odd quotes come from.

The first line "Well I don't know. He hasn't told me that" was all he needed to say. All good, perfectly fine answer. But he just ploughs on....

No wonder his lawyers are so shit scared of him being questioned by Mueller.

She asked a lot of "just answer yes or no" questions. That's BS. All she was trying to do was pin him into a corner...most of these questions do not have simplistic yes/no answers to them... :thumbdown:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 24408
Turbogoat wrote:
Elizabeth Warren has released her DNA test, and yup she actually is part Native American.

Will Trump persist in calling her Pocahontas??



Somebody said the old Voortrekkers were all part indigenous African. I am descended from them (the old Voortrekkers, and thus, by implication, also from the old indigenous Africans)

Does that mean The Don will start calling me uChaka, now ?

:lol: @ Warren. Trump goaded her into it ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am
Posts: 4818
Short Man Syndrome wrote:
Drumpf goes full Partridge:

http://uk.businessinsider.com/trump-han ... se-2018-10

Spoiler: show
Image


What. A. Twat.


Not that the lamestream media will tell you - but his poll numbers are better than all those guys combined, believe me!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
saffer13 wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
He just can't ever give a short answer can he? There's a silence so he just has to fill it. It's where so many of his odd quotes come from.

The first line "Well I don't know. He hasn't told me that" was all he needed to say. All good, perfectly fine answer. But he just ploughs on....

No wonder his lawyers are so shit scared of him being questioned by Mueller.

She asked a lot of "just answer yes or no" questions. That's BS. All she was trying to do was pin him into a corner...most of these questions do not have simplistic yes/no answers to them... :thumbdown:



Most reporters are quite deliberate with their use of the strategic silence, they actually want their subject to run their mouth. Set them up with a series of short answer only questions, then let the floodgates open.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25704
Turbogoat wrote:
saffer13 wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
He just can't ever give a short answer can he? There's a silence so he just has to fill it. It's where so many of his odd quotes come from.

The first line "Well I don't know. He hasn't told me that" was all he needed to say. All good, perfectly fine answer. But he just ploughs on....

No wonder his lawyers are so shit scared of him being questioned by Mueller.

She asked a lot of "just answer yes or no" questions. That's BS. All she was trying to do was pin him into a corner...most of these questions do not have simplistic yes/no answers to them... :thumbdown:


Most reporters are quite deliberate with their use of the strategic silence, they actually want their subject to run their mouth. Set them up with a series of short answer only questions, then let the floodgates open.

Not in this case. She was deliberate in her yes/no questions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
saffer13 wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
saffer13 wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
He just can't ever give a short answer can he? There's a silence so he just has to fill it. It's where so many of his odd quotes come from.

The first line "Well I don't know. He hasn't told me that" was all he needed to say. All good, perfectly fine answer. But he just ploughs on....

No wonder his lawyers are so shit scared of him being questioned by Mueller.

She asked a lot of "just answer yes or no" questions. That's BS. All she was trying to do was pin him into a corner...most of these questions do not have simplistic yes/no answers to them... :thumbdown:


Most reporters are quite deliberate with their use of the strategic silence, they actually want their subject to run their mouth. Set them up with a series of short answer only questions, then let the floodgates open.

Not in this case. She was deliberate in her yes/no questions.


I'm sure she was. That's kinda the point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 24408
And Trump was deliberate in giving a "Ja, well, no, fine, I dunno but I reckon it will all come right, hopefully, or maybe it won't" answer. He's been at it for fifty years ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 17027
Interesting (™ Santa) piece on Trump's economic policies, such as they are:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/swamp-chronicles/will-trumponomics-collapse?utm_source=quora&utm_medium=referral

While I despise Trump as a narcissistic conman and crook, the economic health of the US implies that, economically at least, he is doing pretty well. Of course, Trump is right when he talks about the US' trading power; it's a buyer's market and the US is the biggest market on the planet, so playing hardball and driving a particularly hard bargain is obviously going to be successful, even if using ludicrous security concerns to shaft the Canadians is not the sort of behaviour designed to win friends.

And it's quite clear that Trump views other Nations as business competitors and rivals, there to be bilked, short-changed and swindled in any way necessary to turn a quick buck.

Certainly, China has a history of rampant disregard for IP and a reputation for questionable economic practices, but Trump has turned his trade war guns on erstwhile allies as well.

Anyway, FTA:

Quote:
Trumponomics is not a steady state. It is, by its nature, constant turmoil.

This is, of course, deeply self-serving. Trump gets to enrich his cronies and, one supposes, himself. He gets to distract the media and the public when there is unfavorable news about him. But I believe it is not right to assume that Trump—in his own experience—is solely cynical. His mentality, apparently, allows him to pay little heed to the forces leading him to prefer one action over another. Is he pitching Adelson and attacking the Fed because he wants to help himself or because it’s good for America? Who cares? They’re the same. If he wants to do it, it’s good for America, then it’s good for Trump, and vice versa.

Trump is no longer a mystery. He is among the most transparent of public figures. The mystery is that it all works. The stock market, even with this week’s drop, has been at record highs. Unemployment is at record lows. Consumer and business confidence is robust. How can this be? According to basic economic theory, businesspeople should look at this chaos and realize it is unsustainable.

G.O.P. politicians and some sympathetic economists argue that the tax cuts and deregulation are spurring business. But there is one idea that Keynesians and Chicago School thinkers have long agreed upon: It is always possible to give an economy a sugar rush, a short-term boost, by flushing huge amounts of government money through the system. One can do this through tax cuts or government spending. Or, in a sense, by weakening regulation. (When the government removes consumer protections, it makes it cheaper for banks to do business and operates like a tax cut or a subsidy.) This creates a promise of near-term profits for companies, which leads to higher stock prices, which can lead to business expansion and new hiring. The newly employed buy more things, increasing the rate of expansion. It can be exciting and self-reinforcing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5576
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
saffer13 wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
FairWeather_Aussie wrote:
Is this thread still going? What is the current theme, Kavanaugh being a bit rapey when he was younger and a serial liar when under oath when older, or something else? Or just personal attacks, that would be better?

You'd think so.

However, the loudest and most vocal on here are pushing their conviction that CBF is a liar who is quite happy to ruin an innocent man's life with her baseless and partisan accusations. The real victims here are the men and boys who have to live with these types of accusations. If they weren't lies, why didn't she report them at the time?

But yes, the insults have been flowing thick and fast; those who don't support Trump and his Supreme Court pick are morons, libtards, fckwits and stupid cvnts
.

What a bunch of BS...so typical from the libs/socialists who outnumber the rational people on this thread about 10/1 :lol:


Because rational people normally make up 1/10th of a discussion.

Less rational and more national. ist


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 17027
houtkabouter wrote:
saffer13 wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
FairWeather_Aussie wrote:
Is this thread still going? What is the current theme, Kavanaugh being a bit rapey when he was younger and a serial liar when under oath when older, or something else? Or just personal attacks, that would be better?

You'd think so.

However, the loudest and most vocal on here are pushing their conviction that CBF is a liar who is quite happy to ruin an innocent man's life with her baseless and partisan accusations. The real victims here are the men and boys who have to live with these types of accusations. If they weren't lies, why didn't she report them at the time?

But yes, the insults have been flowing thick and fast; those who don't support Trump and his Supreme Court pick are morons, libtards, fckwits and stupid cvnts
.

What a bunch of BS...so typical from the libs/socialists who outnumber the rational people on this thread about 10/1 :lol:


Because rational people normally make up 1/10th of a discussion.

Less rational and more national. ist

Thanks, I didn't see Yank's comment.

The insults I've referred to have all been posted by Seneca. In contrast, I can't remember any retaliatory insults returned and in the main Trump's detractors have been a lot less inclined to resort to that sort of invective.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am
Posts: 4818
Quote:
Donald J. Trump
(@realDonaldTrump)

Just spoke to the King of Saudi Arabia who denies any knowledge of whatever may have happened “to our Saudi Arabian citizen.” He said that they are working closely with Turkey to find answer. I am immediately sending our Secretary of State to meet with King!


I don't see any reason why it WOULD be [insert authoritarian dictatorship here].


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 37132
Rinkals wrote:
Interesting (™ Santa) piece on Trump's economic policies, such as they are:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/swamp-chronicles/will-trumponomics-collapse?utm_source=quora&utm_medium=referral

While I despise Trump as a narcissistic conman and crook, the economic health of the US implies that, economically at least, he is doing pretty well. Of course, Trump is right when he talks about the US' trading power; it's a buyer's market and the US is the biggest market on the planet, so playing hardball and driving a particularly hard bargain is obviously going to be successful, even if using ludicrous security concerns to shaft the Canadians is not the sort of behaviour designed to win friends.

And it's quite clear that Trump views other Nations as business competitors and rivals, there to be bilked, short-changed and swindled in any way necessary to turn a quick buck.

Certainly, China has a history of rampant disregard for IP and a reputation for questionable economic practices, but Trump has turned his trade war guns on erstwhile allies as well.

Anyway, FTA:

Quote:
Trumponomics is not a steady state. It is, by its nature, constant turmoil.

This is, of course, deeply self-serving. Trump gets to enrich his cronies and, one supposes, himself. He gets to distract the media and the public when there is unfavorable news about him. But I believe it is not right to assume that Trump—in his own experience—is solely cynical. His mentality, apparently, allows him to pay little heed to the forces leading him to prefer one action over another. Is he pitching Adelson and attacking the Fed because he wants to help himself or because it’s good for America? Who cares? They’re the same. If he wants to do it, it’s good for America, then it’s good for Trump, and vice versa.

Trump is no longer a mystery. He is among the most transparent of public figures. The mystery is that it all works. The stock market, even with this week’s drop, has been at record highs. Unemployment is at record lows. Consumer and business confidence is robust. How can this be? According to basic economic theory, businesspeople should look at this chaos and realize it is unsustainable.

G.O.P. politicians and some sympathetic economists argue that the tax cuts and deregulation are spurring business. But there is one idea that Keynesians and Chicago School thinkers have long agreed upon: It is always possible to give an economy a sugar rush, a short-term boost, by flushing huge amounts of government money through the system. One can do this through tax cuts or government spending. Or, in a sense, by weakening regulation. (When the government removes consumer protections, it makes it cheaper for banks to do business and operates like a tax cut or a subsidy.) This creates a promise of near-term profits for companies, which leads to higher stock prices, which can lead to business expansion and new hiring. The newly employed buy more things, increasing the rate of expansion. It can be exciting and self-reinforcing.


Quote:
According to basic economic theory, businesspeople should look at this chaos and realize it is unsustainable.


That's a pretty definitive judgment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 17027
Seneca of the Night wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
Interesting (™ Santa) piece on Trump's economic policies, such as they are:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/swamp-chronicles/will-trumponomics-collapse?utm_source=quora&utm_medium=referral

While I despise Trump as a narcissistic conman and crook, the economic health of the US implies that, economically at least, he is doing pretty well. Of course, Trump is right when he talks about the US' trading power; it's a buyer's market and the US is the biggest market on the planet, so playing hardball and driving a particularly hard bargain is obviously going to be successful, even if using ludicrous security concerns to shaft the Canadians is not the sort of behaviour designed to win friends.

And it's quite clear that Trump views other Nations as business competitors and rivals, there to be bilked, short-changed and swindled in any way necessary to turn a quick buck.

Certainly, China has a history of rampant disregard for IP and a reputation for questionable economic practices, but Trump has turned his trade war guns on erstwhile allies as well.

Anyway, FTA:

Quote:
Trumponomics is not a steady state. It is, by its nature, constant turmoil.

This is, of course, deeply self-serving. Trump gets to enrich his cronies and, one supposes, himself. He gets to distract the media and the public when there is unfavorable news about him. But I believe it is not right to assume that Trump—in his own experience—is solely cynical. His mentality, apparently, allows him to pay little heed to the forces leading him to prefer one action over another. Is he pitching Adelson and attacking the Fed because he wants to help himself or because it’s good for America? Who cares? They’re the same. If he wants to do it, it’s good for America, then it’s good for Trump, and vice versa.

Trump is no longer a mystery. He is among the most transparent of public figures. The mystery is that it all works. The stock market, even with this week’s drop, has been at record highs. Unemployment is at record lows. Consumer and business confidence is robust. How can this be? According to basic economic theory, businesspeople should look at this chaos and realize it is unsustainable.

G.O.P. politicians and some sympathetic economists argue that the tax cuts and deregulation are spurring business. But there is one idea that Keynesians and Chicago School thinkers have long agreed upon: It is always possible to give an economy a sugar rush, a short-term boost, by flushing huge amounts of government money through the system. One can do this through tax cuts or government spending. Or, in a sense, by weakening regulation. (When the government removes consumer protections, it makes it cheaper for banks to do business and operates like a tax cut or a subsidy.) This creates a promise of near-term profits for companies, which leads to higher stock prices, which can lead to business expansion and new hiring. The newly employed buy more things, increasing the rate of expansion. It can be exciting and self-reinforcing.


Quote:
According to basic economic theory, businesspeople should look at this chaos and realize it is unsustainable.


That's a pretty definitive judgment.

It is?

How so?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 37132
I'm starting to think that trump isn't just slinging insults at the media, he genuinely actually is destroying them. Remember the massive NYT tax expose of oh, ten days ago that was going to bring down the Presidency? No, me neither.

I watched CNN for half an hour last night as I was in a hotel room and that fat bald thirty something gimp who.has a more mysterious career than James corden was on. Holy crap he is shit. Trevor Noah without the laughter track.

And the New yorker has immolated itself in the space of a couple of weeks. It's pretty amazing really.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm
Posts: 9286
Rinkals wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
saffer13 wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
FairWeather_Aussie wrote:
Is this thread still going? What is the current theme, Kavanaugh being a bit rapey when he was younger and a serial liar when under oath when older, or something else? Or just personal attacks, that would be better?

You'd think so.

However, the loudest and most vocal on here are pushing their conviction that CBF is a liar who is quite happy to ruin an innocent man's life with her baseless and partisan accusations. The real victims here are the men and boys who have to live with these types of accusations. If they weren't lies, why didn't she report them at the time?

But yes, the insults have been flowing thick and fast; those who don't support Trump and his Supreme Court pick are morons, libtards, fckwits and stupid cvnts
.

What a bunch of BS...so typical from the libs/socialists who outnumber the rational people on this thread about 10/1 :lol:


Because rational people normally make up 1/10th of a discussion.

Less rational and more national. ist

Thanks, I didn't see Yank's comment.

The insults I've referred to have all been posted by Seneca. In contrast, I can't remember any retaliatory insults returned and in the main Trump's detractors have been a lot less inclined to resort to that sort of invective.


Rinkals wrote:
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
Anything that runs contrary to one's own opinion should be considered fake news. That bar was long set by the libs.


You're the c unt who quotes the Onion as a serious resource., just to counter that little bit of fiction.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 17027
Santa wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
saffer13 wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
You'd think so.

However, the loudest and most vocal on here are pushing their conviction that CBF is a liar who is quite happy to ruin an innocent man's life with her baseless and partisan accusations. The real victims here are the men and boys who have to live with these types of accusations. If they weren't lies, why didn't she report them at the time?

But yes, the insults have been flowing thick and fast; those who don't support Trump and his Supreme Court pick are morons, libtards, fckwits and stupid cvnts
.

What a bunch of BS...so typical from the libs/socialists who outnumber the rational people on this thread about 10/1 :lol:


Because rational people normally make up 1/10th of a discussion.

Less rational and more national. ist

Thanks, I didn't see Yank's comment.

The insults I've referred to have all been posted by Seneca. In contrast, I can't remember any retaliatory insults returned and in the main Trump's detractors have been a lot less inclined to resort to that sort of invective.


Rinkals wrote:
Wilson's Toffee wrote:
Anything that runs contrary to one's own opinion should be considered fake news. That bar was long set by the libs.


You're the c unt who quotes the Onion as a serious resource., just to counter that little bit of fiction.

:blush:

My bad!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 17027
Well, apart from the occasional small and totally understandable slip.

Mostly I do try not to indulge in rampant invective.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 25704
Rinkals wrote:
houtkabouter wrote:
saffer13 wrote:
Rinkals wrote:
FairWeather_Aussie wrote:
Is this thread still going? What is the current theme, Kavanaugh being a bit rapey when he was younger and a serial liar when under oath when older, or something else? Or just personal attacks, that would be better?

You'd think so.

However, the loudest and most vocal on here are pushing their conviction that CBF is a liar who is quite happy to ruin an innocent man's life with her baseless and partisan accusations. The real victims here are the men and boys who have to live with these types of accusations. If they weren't lies, why didn't she report them at the time?

But yes, the insults have been flowing thick and fast; those who don't support Trump and his Supreme Court pick are morons, libtards, fckwits and stupid cvnts
.

What a bunch of BS...so typical from the libs/socialists who outnumber the rational people on this thread about 10/1 :lol:


Because rational people normally make up 1/10th of a discussion.

Less rational and more national. ist

Thanks, I didn't see Yank's comment.

The insults I've referred to have all been posted by Seneca. In contrast, I can't remember any retaliatory insults returned and in the main Trump's detractors have been a lot less inclined to resort to that sort of invective.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 5576
Location: A gaf in Bracknell
Seneca of the Night wrote:
I'm starting to think that trump isn't just slinging insults at the media, he genuinely actually is destroying them. Remember the massive NYT tax expose of oh, ten days ago that was going to bring down the Presidency? No, me neither.

I watched CNN for half an hour last night as I was in a hotel room and that fat bald thirty something gimp who.has a more mysterious career than James corden was on. Holy crap he is shit. Trevor Noah without the laughter track.

And the New yorker has immolated itself in the space of a couple of weeks. It's pretty amazing really.

You should probably think about why this is a stupid idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Posts: 21779
Location: Middle East
Seneca of the Night wrote:
I'm starting to think that trump isn't just slinging insults at the media, he genuinely actually is destroying them. Remember the massive NYT tax expose of oh, ten days ago that was going to bring down the Presidency? No, me neither.

I watched CNN for half an hour last night as I was in a hotel room and that fat bald thirty something gimp who.has a more mysterious career than James corden was on. Holy crap he is shit. Trevor Noah without the laughter track.

And the New yorker has immolated itself in the space of a couple of weeks. It's pretty amazing really.


Ooooh, thanks for reminding us about this, after all, if it's not in the immediate attention span of the public, it's surely a nothingburger. Apparently the Art of the Deal is to simply be propped up by Daddies money over and over and over. :thumbup:

It's a shame it's over so quickly, just after we learned that Weisselberg (Trump's chief Financial Exec) was granted immunity too. Imagine what secrets he would have had to tell, if only the ephemeral interest of the public hadn't been dragged off to the hurricane-of-the-day.

Mueller must be kicking himself for letting this one slip through.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112850 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 2136, 2137, 2138, 2139, 2140, 2141, 2142 ... 2822  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CrazyIslander, Google Adsense [Bot], LandOTurk, Nieghorn, sonic_attack and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group