Planet Rugby Forum

Oh dear - looks like this national emergency, bypass congress thing doesn’t always work after all:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48406296

Sinkers wrote:Oh dear - looks like this national emergency, bypass congress thing doesn’t always work after all:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48406296

Judge's name is Haywood Gilliam. Sounds suspiciously like an immigrant.

kiwinoz wrote:In Adams Schiffs own words

He calls for transparency and uses the term cover up. They are getting what they wanted.

Trump has now called out Australia, Downer will go down along with Clapper, Brennan, Comey and McCabe. Don't worry DT they are all white.

I would explain it to you but you are of the Glenn GRUenwald mold. You are safe from the anarchy so you think it is what is needed. If you were part of the vulnerable populations in the world, you would hold a different view of the world. You live in Australia but pretend you live Eq. Guinea.

Kiwias wrote:

merry! wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

kiwinoz wrote:In Adams Schiffs own words

He calls for transparency and uses the term cover up. They are getting what they wanted.

Trump has now called out Australia, Downer will go down along with Clapper, Brennan, Comey and McCabe. Don't worry DT they are all white.

Hmmm... the cover up would be the stonewalling, the dangerous phase would be the thoughtless declassification carte blanche handed out, the way I read it.

Maybe he could have thought to more clearly classify each phase of the amoral undermining by Trump?

You're jumping the gun quite a bit predicting that all those people will 'go down' - that's QAnon sealed indictment territory there.

what, like the mueller report?

you clowns are all over the place.

Schiff's English is not that hard to understand

While Trump stonewalls the public from learning the truth about his obstruction of justice,

Trump and Barr conspire to weaponize law enforcement and classified information against their political enemies.

The first part refers to Trump refusing even legal requests for information and is stopping all witnesses from answering subpoenas, the second to Trump's decision to declassify all information in the Mueller report in order to attack his political enemies.

They are not linked.

Maybe KiO listened to the remixed version like the Nasty Pelosi remix.

Turbogoat wrote:

Taranaki Snapper wrote:Boss Tweet of Trumpanny Hall...

Trump has personally and repeatedly urged the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to award a border-wall contract to a specific construction firm in North Dakota run by a GOP donor. The company's CEO is a frequent guest on conservative media and has courted Washington officials by arranging meetings at congressional offices and inviting officials to review border-wall prototypes. (Washington Post)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigrat ... 873d88a376

Never turn down an opportunity for a bit of good old pork barrel self-enrichment and corruption there, Don.

Not so much draining the swamp as diving in head first

houtkabouter wrote:Good ol Merry, back for a visit with his lying ways. PR’s current snake oil merchant.

sad ol' hoot.

nowt to say apart from stalking bollox.

Turbogoat wrote:

merry! wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

kiwinoz wrote:In Adams Schiffs own words

He calls for transparency and uses the term cover up. They are getting what they wanted.

Trump has now called out Australia, Downer will go down along with Clapper, Brennan, Comey and McCabe. Don't worry DT they are all white.

Hmmm... the cover up would be the stonewalling, the dangerous phase would be the thoughtless declassification carte blanche handed out, the way I read it.

Maybe he could have thought to more clearly classify each phase of the amoral undermining by Trump?

You're jumping the gun quite a bit predicting that all those people will 'go down' - that's QAnon sealed indictment territory there.

what, like the mueller report?

you clowns are all over the place.

You do know that the demands for the public release of the full Mueller report are with the ever-present caveat that it not include items that breach national security protocols, right?

I'd really like for you to be able to understand this point, it'd give me a spark of hope for you yet. Please tell me you can grasp this simple point.

you're so funny when you attempt to patronise.

you want it both ways, when it suits...

http://forum.planetrugby.com/viewtopic. ... 0#p6035457

don't you ever get tired of being played?

merry! wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

merry! wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

kiwinoz wrote:In Adams Schiffs own words

He calls for transparency and uses the term cover up. They are getting what they wanted.

Trump has now called out Australia, Downer will go down along with Clapper, Brennan, Comey and McCabe. Don't worry DT they are all white.

Hmmm... the cover up would be the stonewalling, the dangerous phase would be the thoughtless declassification carte blanche handed out, the way I read it.

Maybe he could have thought to more clearly classify each phase of the amoral undermining by Trump?

You're jumping the gun quite a bit predicting that all those people will 'go down' - that's QAnon sealed indictment territory there.

what, like the mueller report?

you clowns are all over the place.

You do know that the demands for the public release of the full Mueller report are with the ever-present caveat that it not include items that breach national security protocols, right?

I'd really like for you to be able to understand this point, it'd give me a spark of hope for you yet. Please tell me you can grasp this simple point.

you're so funny when you attempt to patronise.

you want it both ways, when it suits...

http://forum.planetrugby.com/viewtopic. ... 0#p6035457

don't you ever get tired of being played?

Seeing as you were good enough to make a link to it, but unfortunately not clever enough to read the whole post, I'll make one phrase a little bit more obvious for you to concentrate on.

Turbogoat wrote:
Nope. It's not the "wholly unredacted" report - it's just less redacted than the public version... still heavily redacted.

In fact they're demanding the entire report (minus the asset protection bits), rather than settling for that weak-ass version... in fact, they've subpoenaed it.

You're welcome

idiot.

the only people calling for wholly unredacted releases are the democrats.

course, if barr complied with their subpoena, he'd be breaking the law.

you're welcome.

merry! wrote:idiot.

the only people calling for wholly unredacted releases are the democrats.

course, if barr complied with their subpoena, he'd be breaking the law.

you're welcome.

Which makes you wonder why you linked to MY post then really, that would be quite contradictory to your attempt at an argument.

The Dems have been pretty careful when spelling it out for the hard of thinking like yourself, that they respect the Intel requirements and that un-redacting the report should not impact on this at all. Granted, they may not repeat that proviso out every single damn time as it's a bit of a mouthful, but when they use the long form demand, it's always included.

One thing that really strikes as being out-of-the-ordinary about Barr getting full un-classifying privileges is that he isn't, and has never been part of the Intel community.

Anyone who is going to be responsible for sanitizing classified intelligence to be released into a wider audience - especially the general public - is virtually always someone who is part of the Intel community, as they will have a much better appreciation of what raw info will risk lives, methods or other sensitive parts of their intel collection processes.

Someone not familiar with this (like some lawyer who looks like Steve Bannon got Queer-eyed) may well miss something very pertinent and quite seriously balls things up.

It's hard to describe just how unusual/suspect it is to have Barr suddenly given the key to the chamber of secrets.

Turbogoat wrote:

merry! wrote:idiot.

the only people calling for wholly unredacted releases are the democrats.

course, if barr complied with their subpoena, he'd be breaking the law.

you're welcome.

Which makes you wonder why you linked to MY post then really, that would be quite contradictory to your attempt at an argument.

The Dems have been pretty careful when spelling it out for the hard of thinking like yourself, that they respect the Intel requirements and that un-redacting the report should not impact on this at all. Granted, they may not repeat that proviso out every single damn time as it's a bit of a mouthful, but when they use the long form demand, it's always included.

the dems aren't interested in anything beyond spinning a narrative of bluff, that's why none were interested in looking at the unredacted mueller report (minus the asset protection bits ) in the scif.

and guys like you keep falling for it, like the muppets you are.

potus and barr know exactly what's in the mueller report (and in the russiagate classified stuff). there's only going to be one side winning here, which is why potus/barr are cool as cucumber while nadler is having seizures.

i'm stocking up on popcorn. suggest you stock up on the lube.

Hmmm... you only have your own version of other people's motives there, no actual facts to back them up. (Not even your imaginative and wildly inaccurate description of the report on offer)

We are going to need something a little better than your own emotive descriptions of what's going through other people's minds to support your theory.

Turbogoat wrote:Hmmm... you only have your own version of other people's motives there, no actual facts to back them up.

We are going to need something a little better than your own emotive descriptions of what's going through other people's minds to support your theory.

look in the mirror, muppet.

merry! wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:Hmmm... you only have your own version of other people's motives there, no actual facts to back them up.

We are going to need something a little better than your own emotive descriptions of what's going through other people's minds to support your theory.

look in the mirror, muppet.

OK, you got nothing but your own imagination and a repetitive stream of kindergarten level name-calling. That's still not enough to support your fantasy version of events.

your pathetic attempts to patronise are straight out of kindergarten.

like I said, look in the mirror, muppet.

While we wait to see if poor merry has exhausted his supply of insults, lets see if anyone has been loyal enough to Trump to buy any of these:



$45 only to get your very own Trump coin! It's a bit unfortunate that they were minted before the Iran situation exploded, as associating Trump with Cyrus may not be quite so marketable anymore, but hell, it's $45 to prove your loyalty! Buy one for each family member! Get one for the dog!

Deadtigers wrote:

kiwinoz wrote:In Adams Schiffs own words

He calls for transparency and uses the term cover up. They are getting what they wanted.

Trump has now called out Australia, Downer will go down along with Clapper, Brennan, Comey and McCabe. Don't worry DT they are all white.

I would explain it to you but you are of the Glenn GRUenwald mold. You are safe from the anarchy so you think it is what is needed. If you were part of the vulnerable populations in the world, you would hold a different view of the world. You live in Australia but pretend you live Eq. Guinea.

Dude if you were to explain it, start by telling me what the hell you are on about in this rant. Safe from what anarchy? You aren't in a vulnerable population so stop projecting. Your one sided view of the world reeks of hypocrisy.

I love how Merry thinks Trump is some alpha genius when he can't even wear pants that fit.

It’s lying Merry, or Marry if you spell spell like his stable genius.

Merry: another Trumpler gone to pieces. RIP.
Who is next up?

Has any of Trump's supporters ever offered an even half-way convincing explanation for the large number of died-in-the-wool republicans who openly oppose Trump or have left the party in protest?

George Will was probably the first, the day Trump was announced as the GOP candidate.

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

If you insist on lowering the tone of this thread like this, can you please add a spark of originality to your insults? It's a bit sad seeing you just repeat the same narrow options over and over like this. Entertain us, don't just bore us.

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

So that would be a convincing No. Thanks

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

Oh Jesus that is bad

Kiwias wrote:Has any of Trump's supporters ever offered an even half-way convincing explanation for the large number of died-in-the-wool republicans who openly oppose Trump or have left the party in protest?

George Will was probably the first, the day Trump was announced as the GOP candidate.

tbh it's going to be harder and harder for Republicans to explain why they haven't abandoned Trump as more and more details of his amoral dealings come out, his mental state continues to decline with every tweet, and the numbers of registered GOP members keep declining.
https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-america ... -shrinking

Turbogoat wrote:

Kiwias wrote:Has any of Trump's supporters ever offered an even half-way convincing explanation for the large number of died-in-the-wool republicans who openly oppose Trump or have left the party in protest?

George Will was probably the first, the day Trump was announced as the GOP candidate.

tbh it's going to be harder and harder for Republicans to explain why they haven't abandoned Trump as more and more details of his amoral dealings come out, his mental state continues to decline with every tweet, and the numbers of registered GOP members keep declining.
https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-america ... -shrinking

Fake news spread by libtard leftie media[/merry!]

Turbogoat wrote:

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

If you insist on lowering the tone of this thread like this, can you please add a spark of originality to your insults? It's a bit sad seeing you just repeat the same narrow options over and over like this. Entertain us, don't just bore us.

this may come as a surprise to you, but i'm not here to entertain you.

you and your shallow mates need to up your game (parroting msm or circle jerking doesn't cut it i'm afraid).

EverReady wrote:

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

Oh Jesus that is bad

you were entertaining once.

now you're just another circle jerker.

sad.

merry! wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

If you insist on lowering the tone of this thread like this, can you please add a spark of originality to your insults? It's a bit sad seeing you just repeat the same narrow options over and over like this. Entertain us, don't just bore us.

this may come as a surprise to you, but i'm not here to entertain you.

you and your shallow mates need to up your game (parroting msm or circle jerking doesn't cut it i'm afraid).

You've got some f**king gall to preach like that when you avoid uncomfortable questions. But that is really not a surprise

Now, I’m not saying they are one of the same but has anyone seen sneaker and merry in the same room? The timing of the former’s flounce and the letter’s appearance in this thread is surely just a coincidence, isn’t it?

Seneca has a proper brain.

Merry has the brain from young Frankenstein.

merry! wrote:

Turbogoat wrote:

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

If you insist on lowering the tone of this thread like this, can you please add a spark of originality to your insults? It's a bit sad seeing you just repeat the same narrow options over and over like this. Entertain us, don't just bore us.

this may come as a surprise to you, but i'm not here to entertain you.

you and your shallow mates need to up your game (parroting msm or circle jerking doesn't cut it i'm afraid).

Welp, you're doing a fine job of not being entertaining right now, well done. If that was your goal, I can confirm that you're the least original, most repetitive, confirmation-bias seeking, Dunning-Kruger exhibiting, gullible, information-free zone poster here.

I'm sure you'll continue to plumb new depths as you cycle through your incredibly limited repertoire of responses from now on, but there's no point in responding to you any further if you don't provide any entertainment.

Hong Kong wrote:Now, I’m not saying they are one of the same but has anyone seen sneaker and merry in the same room? The timing of the former’s flounce and the letter’s appearance in this thread is surely just a coincidence, isn’t it?

Sneaker (eventually) had the self-awareness to realize that this thread was not doing him any good, and culled first his alter-ego Santa, and then flounced completely from PR (leaving the door to return). For his sake I hope he isn't poor merry, that'd not be a good sign for his wellbeing.

houtkabouter wrote:Seneca has a proper brain.

Merry has the brain from young Frankenstein.

I figured Merry to be a middle aged stoner, flat out hooking up on conspiracy based youtube channels and wandering the streets of suburbia sneering at housewives who can't see the shit that's really going down.

guy smiley wrote:

houtkabouter wrote:Seneca has a proper brain.

Merry has the brain from young Frankenstein.

I figured Merry to be a middle aged stoner, flat out hooking up on conspiracy based youtube channels and wandering the streets of suburbia sneering at housewives who can't see the shit that's really going down.

I thought stoners were supposed to be mellow? I've only seen them this agitated when their dog has wolfed down all their edibles.

In the mean time, has Trump's tweet about North Korea been mentioned amid all this? Without using msm or any other trigger for the World's angriest stoner, just using Trumps very own twitter feed, we get a handy insight into the mind of... well what a North Korean dictator would call a dotard:

Donald J. Trump wrote:‏
Verified account

@realDonaldTrump

North Korea fired off some small weapons, which disturbed some of my people, and others, but not me. I have confidence that Chairman Kim will keep his promise to me, & also smiled when he called Swampman Joe Biden a low IQ individual, & worse. Perhaps that’s sending me a signal?

So... just a "small" weapon. Jesus H Christ. The size of the missile is immaterial if it's a test, it only has to reach South Korea after having a nuclear device bolted on to it. But yeah, lets excuse their flouting of all empty promises to lots of people as it's "just a small one". Thank God Trump never claimed to be great at the military or know more than anyone about Nuclear.

Kim will keep his promise to Trump? Ummm.... that test launch is promise broken. You can't un-ring that bell now. Well, if you don't know anything about making deals, and want to look incredibly weak on the World stage I guess you could...

He smiled when he insulted Biden? Oh no. Donald, you're siding with evil dictators of foreign countries over your fellow American? Just because you think he likes you (he's just using you, you're like the desperate fat chick trying to get the town drunk to fuck you to boost your self esteem at this point), doesn't mean you should ever side with him over a political rival from your own country. That's a beautiful illustration of your lack of patriotism right there - siding with vile dictators over a partisan domestic adversary.

Swampman? OK, does Trump have poor merry writing his generic insults for him?

Is he sending you a signal? Yes. He finds you easier to manipulate than your political rivals.

EverReady wrote:

merry! wrote:

there's your kindergarten, turbo.

..your mates.

Oh Jesus that is bad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEQcsuXnnnc

you're getting hysterical again, turboi..