Planet Rugby Forum

sorCrer wrote:His mind is gone.

Backwoodsman1 wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

Backwoodsman1 wrote:We think its disappointing that there are rugby follower types gullible enough to believe the patently makey uppy stuff that elements of the Dem favoring meeja produce. Look, over there, a squirrel.

C'mon Woody, you were the one who posted the 'undisputed fact' that Biden’s son, Pelosi’s son, Romney’s son and Kerry’s son were all on the board of directors for energy companies doing business in Ukraine

Well, it isn't too difficult to read the company fillings listing them as Directors and the salaries they received - any Duck Duck Go search will give links to articles listing them.
Here's Nancy doing her bit for son Paul.
http://www.floppingaces.net/most-wanted ... in-ukrain/

6.Jones wrote:

Flockwitt wrote:Sorry, neither a Trump bashing nor fluffing post... an interesting article here about there are now more woman employed in the USA than men.

https://us.yahoo.com/money/women-workfo ... 11122.html

But do the living outnumber the dead?

BokJock wrote:fudge me - Trump's latest Pelosi tweet

https://metro.co.uk/2020/01/13/donald-t ... -12051511/

#BeBest

BokJock wrote:Amazingly Mark Esper, the secretary of defense has not seen the same intel as Trump.

No specific evidence that Suleimani was planning an attack on four US Embassies.

Trump lies again, no imminent threat, almost starts a war over nothing, no one cares/nothing matters.







*Suleimani is a bad guy and does not deserve any sympathy - before I get accused of defending the scumbag

piquant wrote:

BokJock wrote:Amazingly Mark Esper, the secretary of defense has not seen the same intel as Trump.

No specific evidence that Suleimani was planning an attack on four US Embassies.

Trump lies again, no imminent threat, almost starts a war over nothing, no one cares/nothing matters.







*Suleimani is a bad guy and does not deserve any sympathy - before I get accused of defending the scumbag

No eminent threat if you don't mind

BokJock wrote:Amazingly Mark Esper, the secretary of defense has not seen the same intel as Trump.

fishfoodie wrote:

BokJock wrote:Amazingly Mark Esper, the secretary of defense has not seen the same intel as Trump.

Why ?



Doesn't he get Fox ?

6.Jones wrote:Has anyone seen Lev Parnas's document dump? In it, Parnas and Robert Hyde (a congressional GOP candidate from Connecticut) apparently discuss assassinating Marie Yovanovitch.

Hyde to Parnas: "They are willing to help if you would like a price" and "Guess you can do anything in the Ukraine with money...what I was told."
Hyde to Parnas: "If you want her out they need to make contact with security forces."

This while they're tracking her movements, with Hyde giving Parnas real time updates on her security and electronic access.

And after Trump said to Zelenskiy: "She's going to go through some things."

Parnas's lawyers now disavowing any part by their client in this 'plot'.

Bored Trumpers: is this okay?

6.Jones wrote:Has anyone seen Lev Parnas's document dump? In it, Parnas and Robert Hyde (a congressional GOP candidate from Connecticut) apparently discuss assassinating Marie Yovanovitch.

Hyde to Parnas: "They are willing to help if you would like a price" and "Guess you can do anything in the Ukraine with money...what I was told."
Hyde to Parnas: "If you want her out they need to make contact with security forces."

This while they're tracking her movements, with Hyde giving Parnas real time updates on her security and electronic access.

And after Trump said to Zelenskiy: "She's going to go through some things."

Parnas's lawyers now disavowing any part by their client in this 'plot'.

Bored Trumpers: is this okay?

fishfoodie wrote:

BokJock wrote:Amazingly Mark Esper, the secretary of defense has not seen the same intel as Trump.

Why ?



Doesn't he get Fox ?

Rinkals wrote:

6.Jones wrote:Has anyone seen Lev Parnas's document dump? In it, Parnas and Robert Hyde (a congressional GOP candidate from Connecticut) apparently discuss assassinating Marie Yovanovitch.

Hyde to Parnas: "They are willing to help if you would like a price" and "Guess you can do anything in the Ukraine with money...what I was told."
Hyde to Parnas: "If you want her out they need to make contact with security forces."

This while they're tracking her movements, with Hyde giving Parnas real time updates on her security and electronic access.

And after Trump said to Zelenskiy: "She's going to go through some things."

Parnas's lawyers now disavowing any part by their client in this 'plot'.

Bored Trumpers: is this okay?

I'm not a bored Trumper, but I'm not sure that, even if the exchange were about assassination, it would have been seriously entertained.

Surely it would be easier and less risky to simply have her recalled?

Seneca of the Night wrote:

Rinkals wrote:

6.Jones wrote:Has anyone seen Lev Parnas's document dump? In it, Parnas and Robert Hyde (a congressional GOP candidate from Connecticut) apparently discuss assassinating Marie Yovanovitch.

Hyde to Parnas: "They are willing to help if you would like a price" and "Guess you can do anything in the Ukraine with money...what I was told."
Hyde to Parnas: "If you want her out they need to make contact with security forces."

This while they're tracking her movements, with Hyde giving Parnas real time updates on her security and electronic access.

And after Trump said to Zelenskiy: "She's going to go through some things."

Parnas's lawyers now disavowing any part by their client in this 'plot'.

Bored Trumpers: is this okay?

I'm not a bored Trumper, but I'm not sure that, even if the exchange were about assassination, it would have been seriously entertained.

Surely it would be easier and less risky to simply have her recalled?

I talk about assassinating people all the time. Doesn't mean I'm going to do it.

piquant wrote:Is Hyde still running for Congress? If so at what point will the GOP say we can't stop you, but not as our candidate?

6.Jones wrote:

piquant wrote:Is Hyde still running for Congress? If so at what point will the GOP say we can't stop you, but not as our candidate?

In defense of the administration, it seems this Hyde might be a marginal nutjob. He was once arrested at a Trump resort and brought to a medical facility under a state law that allows for involuntary confinement of people who might pose a risk to themselves. Although that might've been a deep state intervention.

BokJock wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

piquant wrote:Is Hyde still running for Congress? If so at what point will the GOP say we can't stop you, but not as our candidate?

In defense of the administration, it seems this Hyde might be a marginal nutjob. He was once arrested at a Trump resort and brought to a medical facility under a state law that allows for involuntary confinement of people who might pose a risk to themselves. Although that might've been a deep state intervention.

fudge me - you have to be the nuttiest of jobs to be considered the craziest one in that particular rogues gallery

6.Jones wrote:

BokJock wrote:

6.Jones wrote:

piquant wrote:Is Hyde still running for Congress? If so at what point will the GOP say we can't stop you, but not as our candidate?

In defense of the administration, it seems this Hyde might be a marginal nutjob. He was once arrested at a Trump resort and brought to a medical facility under a state law that allows for involuntary confinement of people who might pose a risk to themselves. Although that might've been a deep state intervention.

fudge me - you have to be the nuttiest of jobs to be considered the craziest one in that particular rogues gallery

We're setting sail to the place on the map
from which no one has ever returned
Drawn by the promise of the joker and the fool
by the light of the crosses that burned.
Drawn by the promise of the women and the lace
and the gold and the cotton and pearls
It's the place where they keep all the darkness you need.
You sail away from the light of the world on this trip, baby.
You will pay tomorrow
You're gonna pay tomorrow
You will pay tomorrow

MungoMan wrote:I just knew you must have been a junior officer on Das Narrenschiff.

President Trump signed a landmark trade agreement with China, heralding a period of detente in a trade war between the world's two largest economies fueled by decades of complaints that Beijing was manipulating its currency and stealing trade secrets from American firms.

The pact, detailed in a 94-page document, is only the initial phase of a broader deal that Trump has said may come in as many as three sections. "Together, we are righting the wrongs of the past," Trump said in a pomp-filled signing ceremony. "It doesn't get any bigger than this."

The agreement will help grow the U.S. economy in 2020 and 2021 by “at least a half a point of additional GDP” and “probably translate into another million jobs on top of what we’ve already done,” Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, told FOX News' "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday.

Pelosi names Adam Schiff as lead impeachment manager for Senate trial

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyilMLw ... e=youtu.be

saffer13 wrote:More winning.

President Trump signed a landmark trade agreement with China, heralding a period of detente in a trade war between the world's two largest economies fueled by decades of complaints that Beijing was manipulating its currency and stealing trade secrets from American firms.

The pact, detailed in a 94-page document, is only the initial phase of a broader deal that Trump has said may come in as many as three sections. "Together, we are righting the wrongs of the past," Trump said in a pomp-filled signing ceremony. "It doesn't get any bigger than this."

The agreement will help grow the U.S. economy in 2020 and 2021 by “at least a half a point of additional GDP” and “probably translate into another million jobs on top of what we’ve already done,” Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, told FOX News' "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday.

The US has dropped plans to impose tariffs on an additional US$160 billion in Chinese imports, and it cut in half, to 7.5 per cent, existing tariffs on US$110 billion of goods from China.

n advance of the signing, the US Treasury Department dropped its designation of China as a currency manipulator.

Chinese exporters responded to Trump's tariff hikes by shipping goods to the United States through other countries and by stepping up sales to Asia, Europe and Africa. The government reported double-digit gains in 2019 exports to France, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Southeast Asia.

Ted. wrote:

saffer13 wrote:More winning.

President Trump signed a landmark trade agreement with China, heralding a period of detente in a trade war between the world's two largest economies fueled by decades of complaints that Beijing was manipulating its currency and stealing trade secrets from American firms.

The pact, detailed in a 94-page document, is only the initial phase of a broader deal that Trump has said may come in as many as three sections. "Together, we are righting the wrongs of the past," Trump said in a pomp-filled signing ceremony. "It doesn't get any bigger than this."

The agreement will help grow the U.S. economy in 2020 and 2021 by “at least a half a point of additional GDP” and “probably translate into another million jobs on top of what we’ve already done,” Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, told FOX News' "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday.

If abject back down and delivering nothing more than a minor deficit improvement with China (a debatable benefit).

The US has dropped plans to impose tariffs on an additional US$160 billion in Chinese imports, and it cut in half, to 7.5 per cent, existing tariffs on US$110 billion of goods from China.

n advance of the signing, the US Treasury Department dropped its designation of China as a currency manipulator.

Chinese exporters responded to Trump's tariff hikes by shipping goods to the United States through other countries and by stepping up sales to Asia, Europe and Africa. The government reported double-digit gains in 2019 exports to France, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Southeast Asia.

BillW wrote:If you had a real job and you turned up for work in that state you'd rightly get the sack.

Appalling.
Cringe-worthy.

BillW wrote:If you had a real job and you turned up for work in that state you'd rightly get the sack.

Appalling.
Cringe-worthy.

Kiwias wrote:

BillW wrote:If you had a real job and you turned up for work in that state you'd rightly get the sack.

Appalling.
Cringe-worthy.

Not even close to as bad as Trump looks

EDIT: What FOG said

BillW wrote:

Kiwias wrote:

BillW wrote:If you had a real job and you turned up for work in that state you'd rightly get the sack.

Appalling.
Cringe-worthy.

Not even close to as bad as Trump looks

EDIT: What FOG said

You didn't watch it then?

saffer13 wrote:More winning.

President Trump signed a landmark trade agreement with China, heralding a period of detente in a trade war between the world's two largest economies fueled by decades of complaints that Beijing was manipulating its currency and stealing trade secrets from American firms.

The pact, detailed in a 94-page document, is only the initial phase of a broader deal that Trump has said may come in as many as three sections. "Together, we are righting the wrongs of the past," Trump said in a pomp-filled signing ceremony. "It doesn't get any bigger than this."

The agreement will help grow the U.S. economy in 2020 and 2021 by “at least a half a point of additional GDP” and “probably translate into another million jobs on top of what we’ve already done,” Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, told FOX News' "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday.

Flockwitt wrote:

Ted. wrote:

saffer13 wrote:More winning.

President Trump signed a landmark trade agreement with China, heralding a period of detente in a trade war between the world's two largest economies fueled by decades of complaints that Beijing was manipulating its currency and stealing trade secrets from American firms.

The pact, detailed in a 94-page document, is only the initial phase of a broader deal that Trump has said may come in as many as three sections. "Together, we are righting the wrongs of the past," Trump said in a pomp-filled signing ceremony. "It doesn't get any bigger than this."

The agreement will help grow the U.S. economy in 2020 and 2021 by “at least a half a point of additional GDP” and “probably translate into another million jobs on top of what we’ve already done,” Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, told FOX News' "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday.

If abject back down and delivering nothing more than a minor deficit improvement with China (a debatable benefit).

The US has dropped plans to impose tariffs on an additional US$160 billion in Chinese imports, and it cut in half, to 7.5 per cent, existing tariffs on US$110 billion of goods from China.

n advance of the signing, the US Treasury Department dropped its designation of China as a currency manipulator.

Chinese exporters responded to Trump's tariff hikes by shipping goods to the United States through other countries and by stepping up sales to Asia, Europe and Africa. The government reported double-digit gains in 2019 exports to France, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Southeast Asia.

And in the meantime a country not 2/3rds the size of California and only a fraction of the population of the USA has over taken the USA to be the biggest exporter to the largest agricultural produce market on the planet which is China.

Flockwitt wrote:

Ted. wrote:

saffer13 wrote:More winning.

President Trump signed a landmark trade agreement with China, heralding a period of detente in a trade war between the world's two largest economies fueled by decades of complaints that Beijing was manipulating its currency and stealing trade secrets from American firms.

The pact, detailed in a 94-page document, is only the initial phase of a broader deal that Trump has said may come in as many as three sections. "Together, we are righting the wrongs of the past," Trump said in a pomp-filled signing ceremony. "It doesn't get any bigger than this."

The agreement will help grow the U.S. economy in 2020 and 2021 by “at least a half a point of additional GDP” and “probably translate into another million jobs on top of what we’ve already done,” Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, told FOX News' "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday.

If abject back down and delivering nothing more than a minor deficit improvement with China (a debatable benefit).

The US has dropped plans to impose tariffs on an additional US$160 billion in Chinese imports, and it cut in half, to 7.5 per cent, existing tariffs on US$110 billion of goods from China.

n advance of the signing, the US Treasury Department dropped its designation of China as a currency manipulator.

Chinese exporters responded to Trump's tariff hikes by shipping goods to the United States through other countries and by stepping up sales to Asia, Europe and Africa. The government reported double-digit gains in 2019 exports to France, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Southeast Asia.

And in the meantime a country not 2/3rds the size of California and only a fraction of the population of the USA has over taken the USA to be the biggest exporter to the largest agricultural produce market on the planet which is China.

6.Jones wrote:

Flockwitt wrote:

Ted. wrote:

saffer13 wrote:More winning.

President Trump signed a landmark trade agreement with China, heralding a period of detente in a trade war between the world's two largest economies fueled by decades of complaints that Beijing was manipulating its currency and stealing trade secrets from American firms.

The pact, detailed in a 94-page document, is only the initial phase of a broader deal that Trump has said may come in as many as three sections. "Together, we are righting the wrongs of the past," Trump said in a pomp-filled signing ceremony. "It doesn't get any bigger than this."

The agreement will help grow the U.S. economy in 2020 and 2021 by “at least a half a point of additional GDP” and “probably translate into another million jobs on top of what we’ve already done,” Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, told FOX News' "America's Newsroom" on Wednesday.

If abject back down and delivering nothing more than a minor deficit improvement with China (a debatable benefit).

The US has dropped plans to impose tariffs on an additional US$160 billion in Chinese imports, and it cut in half, to 7.5 per cent, existing tariffs on US$110 billion of goods from China.

n advance of the signing, the US Treasury Department dropped its designation of China as a currency manipulator.

Chinese exporters responded to Trump's tariff hikes by shipping goods to the United States through other countries and by stepping up sales to Asia, Europe and Africa. The government reported double-digit gains in 2019 exports to France, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Southeast Asia.

And in the meantime a country not 2/3rds the size of California and only a fraction of the population of the USA has over taken the USA to be the biggest exporter to the largest agricultural produce market on the planet which is China.

Surely that's between Russia, Canada, Brazil and [at a stretch] Australia?