Re: Balance in the modding.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 12:51 am
We got ourselves a slow learner here.
The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
That's a handy list, cheers.Croft wrote: Santa of the Night, Dr Dre2, Dai, Jambanja, Mick Mannock, Wilsons Toffee, Rugby2023, Calculus. Any other good solid patriot can throw his hat in the ring.
For consideration by the ruling council.
waguser wrote:i HAVE BEEN BANNED 3 FVCKING TIMES IN 3 FVCKING DAYS BY THE NEW COMEDY MODS
18 MINUTES CUMULATIVELY
BASTARDS I AM SOOOOOOOOO ANGRY...
Thomas, do you have the banhammer handy?waguser wrote:i HAVE BEEN BANNED 3 FVCKING TIMES IN 3 FVCKING DAYS BY THE NEW COMEDY MODS
18 MINUTES CUMULATIVELY
BASTARDS I AM SOOOOOOOOO ANGRY...
Duterte detenteFarva wrote:Im happy to throw my hat in the ring as the right wing mod
Duterte is a socialst.RuggaBugga wrote:Duterte detenteFarva wrote:Im happy to throw my hat in the ring as the right wing mod
out of the banter, our forum might well be the only one like this on the internet... very free, very much, but not savage nor mental.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
Clearly it should be me.Croft wrote:I might be wrong but is Thomas going to be donning the baggy green? No problem with it if he is he's a good poster but he's also yet another lefty. Any chance of some balance and a good robust, red blooded right wing fella getting a chance? At the moment it's like a university on the mod cloud, only lock step lefties in a private lib club.
So in the interests of balance and at least one cool head in times of strife I nominate any of the following.
Santa of the Night, Dr Dre2, Dai, Jambanja, Mick Mannock, Wilsons Toffee, Rugby2023, Calculus. Any other good solid patriot can throw his hat in the ring.
For consideration by the ruling council.
Tough. Go and post on the Embroiderer's Guild site. The lads do their best.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
Yep, you and Rodney Regis. You'd be about as welcome as a reggae band at a Klan rally so it'd be great. A good breath of fresh air.dr dre2 wrote:Clearly it should be me.Croft wrote:I might be wrong but is Thomas going to be donning the baggy green? No problem with it if he is he's a good poster but he's also yet another lefty. Any chance of some balance and a good robust, red blooded right wing fella getting a chance? At the moment it's like a university on the mod cloud, only lock step lefties in a private lib club.
So in the interests of balance and at least one cool head in times of strife I nominate any of the following.
Santa of the Night, Dr Dre2, Dai, Jambanja, Mick Mannock, Wilsons Toffee, Rugby2023, Calculus. Any other good solid patriot can throw his hat in the ring.
For consideration by the ruling council.
I'm pretty sure I've only been banned twice here in nearly 20 years of posting. Once by sefton when he had his meltdown and once for posting a picture of a penis. While I choose to walk a fine line for my own ammusment, I can say that the mods must actually consider what is actually said in it's context with nuance. They seem to take the time to distinguish what was actually said because, I deliberately blur the lines on some antagonistic topics.Jake wrote:Tough. Go and post on the Embroiderer's Guild site. The lads do their best.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
I'll take them all on. Woooooooo.Croft wrote:Yep, you and Rodney Regis. You'd be about as welcome as a reggae band at a Klan rally so it'd be great. A good breath of fresh air.dr dre2 wrote:Clearly it should be me.Croft wrote:I might be wrong but is Thomas going to be donning the baggy green? No problem with it if he is he's a good poster but he's also yet another lefty. Any chance of some balance and a good robust, red blooded right wing fella getting a chance? At the moment it's like a university on the mod cloud, only lock step lefties in a private lib club.
So in the interests of balance and at least one cool head in times of strife I nominate any of the following.
Santa of the Night, Dr Dre2, Dai, Jambanja, Mick Mannock, Wilsons Toffee, Rugby2023, Calculus. Any other good solid patriot can throw his hat in the ring.
For consideration by the ruling council.
dr dre2 wrote:I'll take them all on. Woooooooo.Croft wrote:Yep, you and Rodney Regis. You'd be about as welcome as a reggae band at a Klan rally so it'd be great. A good breath of fresh air.dr dre2 wrote:Clearly it should be me.Croft wrote:I might be wrong but is Thomas going to be donning the baggy green? No problem with it if he is he's a good poster but he's also yet another lefty. Any chance of some balance and a good robust, red blooded right wing fella getting a chance? At the moment it's like a university on the mod cloud, only lock step lefties in a private lib club.
So in the interests of balance and at least one cool head in times of strife I nominate any of the following.
Santa of the Night, Dr Dre2, Dai, Jambanja, Mick Mannock, Wilsons Toffee, Rugby2023, Calculus. Any other good solid patriot can throw his hat in the ring.
For consideration by the ruling council.
blackblackblack wrote:So, waguser as a mod huh...
And the time you posted the monkey on the EU referendum thread....and another time IIRCdr dre2 wrote:I'm pretty sure I've only been banned twice here in nearly 20 years of posting. Once by sefton when he had his meltdown and once for posting a picture of a penis. While I choose to walk a fine line for my own ammusment, I can say that the mods must actually consider what is actually said in it's context with nuance. They seem to take the time to distinguish what was actually said because, I deliberately blur the lines on some antagonistic topics.Jake wrote:Tough. Go and post on the Embroiderer's Guild site. The lads do their best.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
He'd take one look at all the nasty things Zappa writes about him in the mod forum and we'd have a civil war brewing.paddyor wrote:blackblackblack wrote:So, waguser as a mod huh...
blindcider wrote:He'd take one look at all the nasty things Zappa writes about him in the mod forum and we'd have a civil war brewing.paddyor wrote:blackblackblack wrote:So, waguser as a mod huh...
The occasional leak is required to keep zappa honestEnzedder wrote:blindcider wrote:He'd take one look at all the nasty things Zappa writes about him in the mod forum and we'd have a civil war brewing.paddyor wrote:blackblackblack wrote:So, waguser as a mod huh...
Oi. What's written in the mods forum stays in the mod forum.
(Did you find the Dozy files?)
A monkey, did I do that? In what contextpaddyor wrote:And the time you posted the monkey on the EU referendum thread....and another time IIRCdr dre2 wrote:I'm pretty sure I've only been banned twice here in nearly 20 years of posting. Once by sefton when he had his meltdown and once for posting a picture of a penis. While I choose to walk a fine line for my own ammusment, I can say that the mods must actually consider what is actually said in it's context with nuance. They seem to take the time to distinguish what was actually said because, I deliberately blur the lines on some antagonistic topics.Jake wrote:Tough. Go and post on the Embroiderer's Guild site. The lads do their best.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
A monkey, did I do that? In what context no recollection of that sorry.paddyor wrote:And the time you posted the monkey on the EU referendum thread....and another time IIRCdr dre2 wrote:I'm pretty sure I've only been banned twice here in nearly 20 years of posting. Once by sefton when he had his meltdown and once for posting a picture of a penis. While I choose to walk a fine line for my own ammusment, I can say that the mods must actually consider what is actually said in it's context with nuance. They seem to take the time to distinguish what was actually said because, I deliberately blur the lines on some antagonistic topics.Jake wrote:Tough. Go and post on the Embroiderer's Guild site. The lads do their best.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
I'm fairly certain (as I have access to the logs of these things) that you've had one login perma banned after attempting to register a multi, posing as a woman I might add (Hi Jessica) whilst on a ban and have also had your current login banned as well. So that's at least 5 since the last bored wipe, I'm going to be calling bullshit.dr dre2 wrote:I'm pretty sure I've only been banned twice here in nearly 20 years of posting. Once by sefton when he had his meltdown and once for posting a picture of a penis. While I choose to walk a fine line for my own ammusment, I can say that the mods must actually consider what is actually said in it's context with nuance. They seem to take the time to distinguish what was actually said because, I deliberately blur the lines on some antagonistic topics.Jake wrote:Tough. Go and post on the Embroiderer's Guild site. The lads do their best.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
How do you make that 5? I'm not accepting a multi while banned as a double ban. I make it 3 (one of which I've apparently forgotten about).blackblackblack wrote:I'm fairly certain (as I have access to the logs of these things) that you've had one login perma banned after attempting to register a multi, posing as a woman I might add (Hi Jessica) whilst on a ban and have also had your current login banned as well. So that's at least 5 since the last bored wipe, I'm going to be calling bullshit.dr dre2 wrote:I'm pretty sure I've only been banned twice here in nearly 20 years of posting. Once by sefton when he had his meltdown and once for posting a picture of a penis. While I choose to walk a fine line for my own ammusment, I can say that the mods must actually consider what is actually said in it's context with nuance. They seem to take the time to distinguish what was actually said because, I deliberately blur the lines on some antagonistic topics.Jake wrote:Tough. Go and post on the Embroiderer's Guild site. The lads do their best.Insane_Homer wrote:The modding has never been balanced, never will be balanced.
The modes are either
Nonexistent
Idiotic
knee jerk
Reactionary abuse of power
Final breaking point ban, reversal, debate, controversy, Reban, debate, lawyers, perm ban and eventually return of banned party via 'alternate' login whereby nonexistent takes over again.
I'll be away for this week, very busy at work.
You may want to start with your parents.dr dre2 wrote:Jake, one of your mods has just released my personal information. My name is Jessica, how do I make a formal complaint?
I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you go now, that'll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don't, I will look for you, I will find you, and...dr dre2 wrote:
How do you make that 5? I'm not accepting a multi while banned as a double ban. I make it 3 (one of which I've apparently forgotten about).
Jake, one of your mods has just released my personal information. My name is Jessica, how do I make a formal complaint? Do I have to do it through the main site? Where is the sites privacy policy in case I want to take things further?
You've set out clear forum rules on personal information, which are on top of your company's own rules which forbid what he did. I demand you deal with this in a consistant manner to your promises. This person should not be in a position of trust any longer. Volunteer or not, this person should be trained to deal with these things in line with the data protection act. If anybody puts two and two together and comes up with my identity and anything comes of that, I will be holding PR responsible.
Get beaten up by a dude called Jessica.......AD345 wrote:I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you go now, that'll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don't, I will look for you, I will find you, and...dr dre2 wrote:
How do you make that 5? I'm not accepting a multi while banned as a double ban. I make it 3 (one of which I've apparently forgotten about).
Jake, one of your mods has just released my personal information. My name is Jessica, how do I make a formal complaint? Do I have to do it through the main site? Where is the sites privacy policy in case I want to take things further?
You've set out clear forum rules on personal information, which are on top of your company's own rules which forbid what he did. I demand you deal with this in a consistant manner to your promises. This person should not be in a position of trust any longer. Volunteer or not, this person should be trained to deal with these things in line with the data protection act. If anybody puts two and two together and comes up with my identity and anything comes of that, I will be holding PR responsible.
Don't even go there, the older members with be waving their zimmer frames in the air like they really do careJM2K6 wrote:I have a solution that my extraordinarily large brain has come up with. I think everyone will appreciate this is a perfect fix:
Spoiler: show
Just seen this, what the fuck have I ever done to deserve this sort of shit, nominated as a mod for fucksakes you complete prickCroft wrote:I might be wrong but is Thomas going to be donning the baggy green? No problem with it if he is he's a good poster but he's also yet another lefty. Any chance of some balance and a good robust, red blooded right wing fella getting a chance? At the moment it's like a university on the mod cloud, only lock step lefties in a private lib club.
So in the interests of balance and at least one cool head in times of strife I nominate any of the following.
Santa of the Night, Dr Dre2, Dai, Jambanja, Mick Mannock, Wilsons Toffee, Rugby2023, Calculus. Any other good solid patriot can throw his hat in the ring.
For consideration by the ruling council.
Dude, what a redundant post, we all knew that anywayThai guy wrote:Ok, that's good, he deserves it. Can I suggest a 'currently suspended' list as a stickied thread? I know it's more effort but it would help inform posters and diffuse tension.blindcider wrote:I've banned him twice in the last two days, been drinking a bit more and my balance is shot.Thai guy wrote:That's never happened though, despite waguser being at the very centre of a number of flame-points where others have been banned. If you were a decent moderator you'd probably go read over a few past threads.blindcider wrote:I always try to stand on one leg whenever I make a moderating decision to ensure balance.
If I fall over waguser gets banned.
Which prick are you anyway? Razor, Psychologist or Hairybird/Muttonweapon.
Also, in this era of reconciliation around the new legitimacy of Jeremy Corbyn, I don't mind outing my past logins; Muttonbird, Hairyweapon, Eaglescrum, and Don, and maybe one other short-lived one which I've forgotten.
Anyone else got the balls to do the same?
Right that's it I'm off to see my solicitorsmaxbox wrote:Jambanja is nicknamed "Mugabe" for good reason, he would be a shit mod
Reported.jambanja wrote:Right that's it I'm off to see my solicitorsmaxbox wrote:Jambanja is nicknamed "Mugabe" for good reason, he would be a shit mod
Mr Mike wrote:You may want to start with your parents.dr dre2 wrote:Jake, one of your mods has just released my personal information. My name is Jessica, how do I make a formal complaint?