Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Sexton and Faz
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
That's what they should bring.
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
That's what they should bring.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
DragsterDriver wrote:Not that highly- how many times have you watched him play nz?Hareaway wrote: You guys clearly all rate him highly , i have watched him against us for a few years now and cant share your enthusiasm.
Are we doing the 2012 dance ?
If so no worries , he was great that day
As good as he was bad last weekend .
- Margin_Walker
- Posts: 12938
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Last played the ABs in 2014. He really is a much better player than he was then.Hareaway wrote:DragsterDriver wrote:Not that highly- how many times have you watched him play nz?Hareaway wrote: You guys clearly all rate him highly , i have watched him against us for a few years now and cant share your enthusiasm.
Are we doing the 2012 dance ?
If so no worries , he was great that day
As good as he was bad last weekend .
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Ummmslick wrote:Should read this, makes you remember that they are all just people trying to do their best, we could do with remembering that sometimes.dargotronV.1 wrote:Yeah, the argument of win the test and it'll all be forgotten seems at this stage an unlikely scenario.Duff Paddy wrote:Bottom line is that we're going to lose no matter who he picks. But he is all over the shop.
Despite everything - in particular the utter farce over the back up picks and the lack of Scots - I still hope they can do it. Gatland is a tough man to like though, and common sense says the AB's will fancy asserting their control in a big way
http://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/story/_/id/ ... per-abroad
Although I still want to kick his shins.
and you think this makes Gatland MORE appealing?"We all like to think we influence selection, but of course we don't," Trudi says. "Sam Warburton's always been a favourite of mine because he's just a good guy right across the board -- he doesn't have any bad behaviours, he's a gentleman, he's a professional, he's a great player and his family are lovely.
"Before the Lions four years ago, we went out for dinner and I said to Warren, 'can I have a selection'. And he said yeah, and at that stage Sam was captain of Wales, so I said he'd be good on the tour and Warren said okay, I'll keep that in mind. And then I said 'okay, can he be captain?', and he said 'well now you're pushing it'. So for this one, he said 'suppose you want a selection' and I said 'yep, I'll have Sam'."

-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
sonny parker anyone?JM2K6 wrote:Ummmslick wrote:Should read this, makes you remember that they are all just people trying to do their best, we could do with remembering that sometimes.dargotronV.1 wrote:Yeah, the argument of win the test and it'll all be forgotten seems at this stage an unlikely scenario.Duff Paddy wrote:Bottom line is that we're going to lose no matter who he picks. But he is all over the shop.
Despite everything - in particular the utter farce over the back up picks and the lack of Scots - I still hope they can do it. Gatland is a tough man to like though, and common sense says the AB's will fancy asserting their control in a big way
http://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/story/_/id/ ... per-abroad
Although I still want to kick his shins.
and you think this makes Gatland MORE appealing?"We all like to think we influence selection, but of course we don't," Trudi says. "Sam Warburton's always been a favourite of mine because he's just a good guy right across the board -- he doesn't have any bad behaviours, he's a gentleman, he's a professional, he's a great player and his family are lovely.
"Before the Lions four years ago, we went out for dinner and I said to Warren, 'can I have a selection'. And he said yeah, and at that stage Sam was captain of Wales, so I said he'd be good on the tour and Warren said okay, I'll keep that in mind. And then I said 'okay, can he be captain?', and he said 'well now you're pushing it'. So for this one, he said 'suppose you want a selection' and I said 'yep, I'll have Sam'."
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
I actually think the only way for the Lions to win, is to start lots of fights, cheat, and hope the AB's have an off day. With that line up, and current form, I just don't see much other hope
(and for the fighting I would have kept Teo & POM on)
(and for the fighting I would have kept Teo & POM on)
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
All this selection stuff is subjective, the arguments are in the margins everyone selected is a deserved Lion.
The issue going in to the 2nd test and the one sure thing that everybody being honest has to agree with - The drafting in of the Welsh nobodies to the Lions in a pre arranged style was the worst decision since 2005.
It: 1. hurt the lions brand and tradition 2. damaged the ability of the team to perform to its potential with 80 min full game appearances mid week for players selected in the 23 today 3. Hurt the poor players brought in. 4. Left the lions short of man power by then not playing these players as subs (but then did for some anyway when he had to)
You have to question Garland's decision making ability when he made such a bad decision that was just bad but blatantly obviously so beforehand.
The issue going in to the 2nd test and the one sure thing that everybody being honest has to agree with - The drafting in of the Welsh nobodies to the Lions in a pre arranged style was the worst decision since 2005.
It: 1. hurt the lions brand and tradition 2. damaged the ability of the team to perform to its potential with 80 min full game appearances mid week for players selected in the 23 today 3. Hurt the poor players brought in. 4. Left the lions short of man power by then not playing these players as subs (but then did for some anyway when he had to)
You have to question Garland's decision making ability when he made such a bad decision that was just bad but blatantly obviously so beforehand.
Last edited by nardol on Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
The six shirt really is a poison chalice. Everyone who has played blindside on this tour has been roundly trashed. This piano lifting malarky is a thankless task.
- Mr. Very Popular
- Posts: 20523
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
For JTB
Maro Itoje says he will calling the Lions' lineout on Saturday. Big test for his ability in that area.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
You look at the team and then you realise the players that HAVEN'T been picked. Gatland was a FOOL not to take Jamie Roberts on tour!!!!
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Same thing really but this explains it better....Double wrote:You forgot the part where England get Rob Howley involved.Ivor wrote:If England were to play the AB's on Saturday Eddie Jones would probably pick a side with current available and fit players that could look something like..
Brown,Watson, JJ, Farrell, Daly, Ford, Care, Mako, George, Cole, Launchbury, Lawes, Itoje, Haskell, Hughes.
Swap Liam Williams for Brown
JD2 for Joseph
Sexton for Ford
Murray for Care
Furlong for Cole
AWJ for Launchbury![]()
SOB for Itoje
Warburton for Haskell
Toby for Hughes
I think most of the replacements are upgrades so this Lions team have a better chance than England would have.
- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 24986
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
4 times he's played them in total, last time 3yrs ago.Hareaway wrote:DragsterDriver wrote:Not that highly- how many times have you watched him play nz?Hareaway wrote: You guys clearly all rate him highly , i have watched him against us for a few years now and cant share your enthusiasm.
Are we doing the 2012 dance ?
If so no worries , he was great that day
As good as he was bad last weekend .
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
No. What did you see there that made you think Sexton/Farrell will work?CM11 wrote:You missed the Crusaders game?Homer wrote:Kruis deserved to get binned after last week,but I think AWJ is lucky to keep his place - Itoje, Lawes and Henderson have been better IMO.
I can just about understand trying a slightly different back row, but Warburton really hasn't shown any form.
I haven't seen any evidence that Sexton/Farrell will work. When they have been on the pitch together they looked like they were on different wavelengths.
Based on the limited time they have had on the pitch together, I disagree.There's more evidence that it'll work rather than not but little for either case.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
That was written before the 1st test though.Hawk97 wrote:Sexton and Faz
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
That's what they should bring.
A time of great hope and innocence.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
The link has been posted above but here you go again:Homer wrote:No. What did you see there that made you think Sexton/Farrell will work?CM11 wrote:You missed the Crusaders game?Homer wrote:Kruis deserved to get binned after last week,but I think AWJ is lucky to keep his place - Itoje, Lawes and Henderson have been better IMO.
I can just about understand trying a slightly different back row, but Warburton really hasn't shown any form.
I haven't seen any evidence that Sexton/Farrell will work. When they have been on the pitch together they looked like they were on different wavelengths.
Based on the limited time they have had on the pitch together, I disagree.There's more evidence that it'll work rather than not but little for either case.
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
I like the team, there I said it. On AWJ apparently he got a knock early in the first test. I thought he went well against the Crusaders which was our best game on tour. He needs to massively up his game but so do all the tight 5 if we're being honest.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
My worry about AWJ is that he's not sharp and has not looked sharp all tour even in the games he supposedly played well. Fingers crossed for the guy because obviously he's quality on his best days.hermie wrote:I like the team, there I said it. On AWJ apparently he got a knock early in the first test. I thought he went well against the Crusaders which was our best game on tour. He needs to massively up his game but so do all the tight 5 if we're being honest.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
jezzer wrote: Tipuric should be starting with Stander and Toby. SOB'S slowness to breakdown and handling errors not compensated by his occasional line break and poach.

- DragsterDriver
- Posts: 24986
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
- Location: Big Willi Style
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
He's looked tired. Modern rugby is for young men and freaks only.CM11 wrote:My worry about AWJ is that he's not sharp and has not looked sharp all tour even in the games he supposedly played well. Fingers crossed for the guy because obviously he's quality on his best days.hermie wrote:I like the team, there I said it. On AWJ apparently he got a knock early in the first test. I thought he went well against the Crusaders which was our best game on tour. He needs to massively up his game but so do all the tight 5 if we're being honest.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
And what's changed? We haven't seen the SexyFaz axis since the Crusaders match.de_Selby wrote:That was written before the 1st test though.Hawk97 wrote:Sexton and Faz
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
That's what they should bring.
A time of great hope and innocence.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
We saw it at the end of the 1st testHawk97 wrote:And what's changed? We haven't seen the SexyFaz axis since the Crusaders match.de_Selby wrote:That was written before the 1st test though.Hawk97 wrote:Sexton and Faz
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
That's what they should bring.
A time of great hope and innocence.

I like the selection of the two of them btw
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
True. But the unfortunate thing for the Lions is that Kruis was a bag of shite on Saturday as well. Very difficult to drop both of them, particularly when you're making changes elsewhere.CM11 wrote:My worry about AWJ is that he's not sharp and has not looked sharp all tour even in the games he supposedly played well. Fingers crossed for the guy because obviously he's quality on his best days.hermie wrote:I like the team, there I said it. On AWJ apparently he got a knock early in the first test. I thought he went well against the Crusaders which was our best game on tour. He needs to massively up his game but so do all the tight 5 if we're being honest.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Oh yeah, but the game was gone. I'm quite excited to see it from the get-go. I don't think SBW will monster it, like some are suggesting. Farrell hits harder than Te'o, and Sexton is a tough defender.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
He's got a lot of miles on the clock but he's only 31. Still young for a lock forward.DragsterDriver wrote:He's looked tired. Modern rugby is for young men and freaks only.CM11 wrote:My worry about AWJ is that he's not sharp and has not looked sharp all tour even in the games he supposedly played well. Fingers crossed for the guy because obviously he's quality on his best days.hermie wrote:I like the team, there I said it. On AWJ apparently he got a knock early in the first test. I thought he went well against the Crusaders which was our best game on tour. He needs to massively up his game but so do all the tight 5 if we're being honest.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Sexton came on for Teo in the 56th minute when the score was 20-8. Still plenty of chances to pull it back.de_Selby wrote:We saw it at the end of the 1st testHawk97 wrote:And what's changed? We haven't seen the SexyFaz axis since the Crusaders match.de_Selby wrote:That was written before the 1st test though.Hawk97 wrote:Sexton and Faz
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
That's what they should bring.
A time of great hope and innocence.The game was long lost at that stage and they weren't getting any real ball to work with but they did get some time together.
I like the selection of the two of them btw
- dargotronV.1
- Posts: 4625
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
the bored wouldn't be the bored without a bit of shin kickingslick wrote:Should read this, makes you remember that they are all just people trying to do their best, we could do with remembering that sometimes.dargotronV.1 wrote:Yeah, the argument of win the test and it'll all be forgotten seems at this stage an unlikely scenario.Duff Paddy wrote:Bottom line is that we're going to lose no matter who he picks. But he is all over the shop.
Despite everything - in particular the utter farce over the back up picks and the lack of Scots - I still hope they can do it. Gatland is a tough man to like though, and common sense says the AB's will fancy asserting their control in a big way
http://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/story/_/id/ ... per-abroad
Although I still want to kick his shins.
Last edited by dargotronV.1 on Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Mr. Very Popular wrote:For JTB
Maro Itoje says he will calling the Lions' lineout on Saturday. Big test for his ability in that area.

- Willie Falloon
- Posts: 8801
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Well Henderson called the lineout in the matches he has played in, including the 1st match when he was partnered by AWJ.Jeff the Bear wrote:It's the nature of the beast. Not all locks can call lineouts (it does, after all, require a modicum of intellect), and others don't want to. Our two lineout callers in the squad are AWJ and Kruis. One of them had to start this week. Which one would you have preferred?Rumham wrote:So we are carrying a passenger to call lineouts after they cleaned us out at ruck time last week? That is not very smart.Jeff the Bear wrote:Not one of them can call a lineout though.Rumham wrote:Last Saturday would have been a good time to do that.DiscoHips D'Arcy wrote:
In fairness to AWJ he has form for pulling out big games. Hopefully he goes well
Itoje, Lawes and Henderson are the 3 best locks on tour. All impact players.
There are clearly some Hail Mary's in the choices, but then at this stage, I expected nothing less. AWJ's selection, Warburton's, Stander's, Farrells at 12, Nowell's are alll rolling of the dice.
Personally, although I might not agree with all of them, I at least understand them. As you note, we got cleaned out at the ruck last week. Specifically Sam Cane did a number on us. This time last year Warburton was keeping Cane largely in check during Wales' summer tour. I imagine Warburton's major task will be to try and do the same again.
As noted previously, we need to score tries to win, and this setup gives us the best chance in the backs.
However, it all still comes down to the tight 5. Never mind AWJ, if the other 4 of them have shite games as well then it won't matter who was picked as that last member of the 5...we'll get absolutely shafted once again.
You're arguement is pure and utter horseshit.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
It sounds like you were more optimistic than I was about where the game was goingtheo wrote:Sexton came on for Teo in the 56th minute when the score was 20-8. Still plenty of chances to pull it back.de_Selby wrote:We saw it at the end of the 1st testHawk97 wrote:And what's changed? We haven't seen the SexyFaz axis since the Crusaders match.de_Selby wrote:That was written before the 1st test though.Hawk97 wrote:Sexton and Faz
http://www.the42.ie/analysis-sexton-far ... 7-Jun2017/
That's what they should bring.
A time of great hope and innocence.The game was long lost at that stage and they weren't getting any real ball to work with but they did get some time together.
I like the selection of the two of them btw
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Which players are adept at calling the lineout; something no PRist can claim to be an expert in. So many nuances and training moves involved that it's impossible for a fan to know.
-
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
I know jiffy junior played well last sat but would still prefer Joseph for that try scoring ability which we desperately need.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
AWJ is a weird one. You probably could make a decent case that he's been the least impressive second row in the entire squad but has started both tests. Hopefully he can pull a big game from out of somewhere.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Could be said of all of JTB's attempts to deflect criticism of his idol on this tourWillie Falloon wrote:Well Henderson called the lineout in the matches he has played in, including the 1st match when he was partnered by AWJ.Jeff the Bear wrote: It's the nature of the beast. Not all locks can call lineouts (it does, after all, require a modicum of intellect), and others don't want to. Our two lineout callers in the squad are AWJ and Kruis. One of them had to start this week. Which one would you have preferred?
There are clearly some Hail Mary's in the choices, but then at this stage, I expected nothing less. AWJ's selection, Warburton's, Stander's, Farrells at 12, Nowell's are alll rolling of the dice.
Personally, although I might not agree with all of them, I at least understand them. As you note, we got cleaned out at the ruck last week. Specifically Sam Cane did a number on us. This time last year Warburton was keeping Cane largely in check during Wales' summer tour. I imagine Warburton's major task will be to try and do the same again.
As noted previously, we need to score tries to win, and this setup gives us the best chance in the backs.
However, it all still comes down to the tight 5. Never mind AWJ, if the other 4 of them have shite games as well then it won't matter who was picked as that last member of the 5...we'll get absolutely shafted once again.
Your argument is pure and utter horseshit.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
To be fair, all he's said is that AWJ is intellectually bereft compared to the other locks on tour.Lobby wrote:Could be said of all of JTB's attempts to deflect criticism of his idol on this tourWillie Falloon wrote:Well Henderson called the lineout in the matches he has played in, including the 1st match when he was partnered by AWJ.Jeff the Bear wrote: It's the nature of the beast. Not all locks can call lineouts (it does, after all, require a modicum of intellect), and others don't want to. Our two lineout callers in the squad are AWJ and Kruis. One of them had to start this week. Which one would you have preferred?
There are clearly some Hail Mary's in the choices, but then at this stage, I expected nothing less. AWJ's selection, Warburton's, Stander's, Farrells at 12, Nowell's are alll rolling of the dice.
Personally, although I might not agree with all of them, I at least understand them. As you note, we got cleaned out at the ruck last week. Specifically Sam Cane did a number on us. This time last year Warburton was keeping Cane largely in check during Wales' summer tour. I imagine Warburton's major task will be to try and do the same again.
As noted previously, we need to score tries to win, and this setup gives us the best chance in the backs.
However, it all still comes down to the tight 5. Never mind AWJ, if the other 4 of them have shite games as well then it won't matter who was picked as that last member of the 5...we'll get absolutely shafted once again.
Your argument is pure and utter horseshit.
- RodneyRegis
- Posts: 15618
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
As he did during the 6NMargin_Walker wrote:Well Maro is calling it on Saturday...Jeff the Bear wrote:Not one of them can call a lineout though.Rumham wrote:Last Saturday would have been a good time to do that.DiscoHips D'Arcy wrote:In fairness to AWJ he has form for pulling out big games. Hopefully he goes wellRumham wrote:Jeepers.
Is he seriously considering Jack Nowell to come on to save the game?
If this is true then AWJ then definitely has the pictures.
Itoje, Lawes and Henderson are the 3 best locks on tour. All impact players.

- RodneyRegis
- Posts: 15618
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Jd2Peaches wrote:Where is the pace?
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
We haven't seen the line busting SOB for 2 years now. He's more intelligent a player than Stander but he wastes a lot of go forward with handling errors these days and he's not the breakdown guy he was. He's basically an 8 now, who can play 6 but shouldn't play 7. Most of his best rugby was at 6 imo.hermie wrote:jezzer wrote: Tipuric should be starting with Stander and Toby. SOB'S slowness to breakdown and handling errors not compensated by his occasional line break and poach.
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
7 posts
fook off noob
and dont come back
fook off noob
and dont come back
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Joined 2 weeks after you, plumnardol wrote:7 posts
fook off noob
and dont come back
Re: Teo gone, Kruis gone, O Mahoney gone
Marvellously inclusive sport, rugby union.nardol wrote:7 posts
fook off noob
and dont come back