Re: Romain Poite
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 4:18 am
At the end of the day Poite changed his mind and also went against the TMO recommendation. He made Rugby the winner.
Good on you Romain
Good on you Romain
The definitive rugby union forum. Talk to fans from around the world about your favourite team
https://forum.planetrugby.com/
Enzedder wrote:Hey Clogsy - going well?
Given that Poite was very pedantic in reffing a penalty for a deliberate throw by the scrummie into out our prop (who was also in an accidental offside position having extricated himself from a ruck) do you think he should have remained consistent when reffing the very next decision?
Enzedder wrote:Hey Clogsy - going well?
Given that Poite was very pedantic in reffing a penalty for a deliberate throw by the scrummie into out our prop (who was also in an accidental offside position having extricated himself from a ruck) do you think he should have remained consistent when reffing the very next decision?
I thought the same initially and was shouting roll away (and worse). The replay showed he was pinned around the shoulders and head, so not that simple. Webb milked it.Sundy wrote:Enzedder wrote:Hey Clogsy - going well?
Given that Poite was very pedantic in reffing a penalty for a deliberate throw by the scrummie into out our prop (who was also in an accidental offside position having extricated himself from a ruck) do you think he should have remained consistent when reffing the very next decision?
Haha love it, if he had got out of there properly it wouldn't have been a penalty. Lying on the wrong side of the ruck is liable to be penalised all day and the player knows that.
You're a ref at heart.guy smiley wrote:mr bungle wrote:I thought the same initially and was shouting roll away (and worse). The replay showed he was pinned around the shoulders and head, so not that simple. Webb milked it.Sundy wrote:Enzedder wrote:Hey Clogsy - going well?
Given that Poite was very pedantic in reffing a penalty for a deliberate throw by the scrummie into out our prop (who was also in an accidental offside position having extricated himself from a ruck) do you think he should have remained consistent when reffing the very next decision?
Haha love it, if he had got out of there properly it wouldn't have been a penalty. Lying on the wrong side of the ruck is liable to be penalised all day and the player knows that.
You see that all the time though... he was in the wrong place. Got pinged. Fair enough.
guy smiley wrote:mr bungle wrote:I thought the same initially and was shouting roll away (and worse). The replay showed he was pinned around the shoulders and head, so not that simple. Webb milked it.Sundy wrote:Enzedder wrote:Hey Clogsy - going well?
Given that Poite was very pedantic in reffing a penalty for a deliberate throw by the scrummie into out our prop (who was also in an accidental offside position having extricated himself from a ruck) do you think he should have remained consistent when reffing the very next decision?
Haha love it, if he had got out of there properly it wouldn't have been a penalty. Lying on the wrong side of the ruck is liable to be penalised all day and the player knows that.
You see that all the time though... he was in the wrong place. Got pinged. Fair enough.
Enzedder wrote:Hey Clogsy - going well?
Given that Poite was very pedantic in reffing a penalty for a deliberate throw by the scrummie into out our prop (who was also in an accidental offside position having extricated himself from a ruck) do you think he should have remained consistent when reffing the very next decision?
Agree it wasn't a knock-on. Doesn't matter though, Red 16 was offsideDOB wrote:It wasn't a knock on, therefore no offside.
Williams dropped the ball backwards, but the contact with Read pushed him towards his goal line faster than the ball. All the "ball momentum" forward-pass-allowing, motion-of-the-hands cnuts are conveniently ignoring basic physics. Again.
The daft Welsh hooker should've held onto the ball, because if Poite hadn't blown his whistle (which he shouldn't have for anything except maybe Read's contact with the man in the air) then ABs collected the loose ball and were charging toward the line.
In general play a player is offside if the player is in front of a team-mate who is carrying the ball, or in front of a team-mate who last played the ball.
To win you need to score more points than the opposition and get your kicks over.Tehui wrote:This.Toro wrote:I thought he was good and the All Blacks only have themselves to blame.
Obviously forgotten the eye gouge and headbutt on McCaw I seemiladiou wrote:Oh the joy of seeing NZ outrage.
You lot didn't seem to mind when Joubert bottled it in the 2011 RWC final? I distinctly remember Joubert ignoring Kaino playing the ball with his hands in a ruck in a very kickable position.
Anyway Poite got it wrong its obvious but I think it was the right outcome nonetheless. Refs are human and will make errors. Imagine the pressure of that moment. Like it or not our laws are open to interpretation and a ref has to make a decion. Its not like Poite can be accused of bias. He was fair to both teams throughout (unlike Joubert). Rather be reffed by a fair tef who makes the odd mistake.
Whats more concerning is why Southern Hemisphere refs and TMOs seem highly motivated to assist other SH teams. The TMO in the second test was outrageous. And Peyper was a disgrace. Whats the story there?
A draw was what this series deserved and seeing both team line up for the photo warmed the cockles. What a great advert for rugby. I'll bet the guys had a brilliant night out together.
And the anger at Webb throughing the ball into an offside player is a bit rich given that Aaron Smuth did it a few times on the last end of year tour and got pens each time.
I think you are going out of your way to be holier than thou. It's a crock of shit mate - show some f**king passion. Poite stuffed it. Let is out son.guy smiley wrote:Old Man by the Sea wrote:It's a shame that the referee is getting the more attention then any of the players. Poite was the MOTM but not in a positive way.
This is his legacy.
What a crock of shit.
I think Poite had a jolly reasonable game...Enzedder wrote:I think you are going out of your way to be holier than thou. It's a crock of shit mate - show some f**king passion. Poite stuffed it. Let is out son.guy smiley wrote:Old Man by the Sea wrote:It's a shame that the referee is getting the more attention then any of the players. Poite was the MOTM but not in a positive way.
This is his legacy.
What a crock of shit.
Those Lie Ons twats led one game for 3 minutes in all the freaking series and get a draw on the back of two monumental French Fuck Ups. (insert one of those Copy write thingies here)
Show some passion - you're a Kiwi bloke working in a mine FFS, show some spirit
Really? Never knew that, thanks.Sards wrote:To win you need to score more points than the opposition and get your kicks over.
SecretAgentMan wrote:Really? Never knew that, thanks.Sards wrote:To win you need to score more points than the opposition and get your kicks over.
Grow some balls man. Your tits are getting int he way of your manlioness. (sic)guy smiley wrote:Enzedder wrote:I think you are going out of your way to be holier than thou. It's a crock of shit mate - show some f**king passion. Poite stuffed it. Let is out son.guy smiley wrote:Old Man by the Sea wrote:It's a shame that the referee is getting the more attention then any of the players. Poite was the MOTM but not in a positive way.
This is his legacy.
What a crock of shit.
Those Lie Ons twats led one game for 3 minutes in all the freaking series and get a draw on the back of two monumental French Fuck Ups. (insert one of those Copy write thingies here)
Show some passion - you're a Kiwi bloke working in a mine FFS, show some spirit
What a crock of shit.
No the eye gouge was horrendous and Gougerie should have been cited and banned for a long time. That had nothong to do with Joubert who didnt see it.merlin the happy pig wrote:
Obviously forgotten the eye gouge and headbutt on McCaw I see
Of course you did being a Lions fan (although what the hell the Scots have to do with the Lions is anyone's guess.)Hong Kong wrote:I think Poite had a jolly reasonable game...Enzedder wrote:I think you are going out of your way to be holier than thou. It's a crock of shit mate - show some f**king passion. Poite stuffed it. Let is out son.guy smiley wrote:Old Man by the Sea wrote:It's a shame that the referee is getting the more attention then any of the players. Poite was the MOTM but not in a positive way.
This is his legacy.
What a crock of shit.
Those Lie Ons twats led one game for 3 minutes in all the freaking series and get a draw on the back of two monumental French Fuck Ups. (insert one of those Copy write thingies here)
Show some passion - you're a Kiwi bloke working in a mine FFS, show some spirit
miladiou wrote:No the eye gouge was horrendous and Gougerie should have been cited and banned for a long time. That had nothong to do with Joubert who didnt see it.merlin the happy pig wrote:
Obviously forgotten the eye gouge and headbutt on McCaw I see
Dont recall a headbut but i do remember McCaw kneeing Parra (our only half decent kicker) in the face thereby ending his match. Or are you suggesting Parra headbutted McCaw's knee?
Anyway I dont think NZ should have any complaints. You've benefited from plenty of iffy decisions over the years.
This is truly bizarre. The score at full time is all that matters. As for calling them twatsThose Lie Ons twats led one game for 3 minutes in all the freaking series and get a draw
It would only have been realistic if Sanjay wasn't there - which is why we think it was a lions penalty in the first placeJay Cee Gee wrote:What's the relevance of this? He's allowed to slap the ball back and almost did so. It's a legitimate, realistic attempt at playing the ball which by IRB guidelines is not a penalty.Crazy Ed wrote:Read was only ever going to try and slap ball back where as Williams was lifted to take a 2 handed catch..
Enzedder wrote:Firstly the leap into Charlie F and then the deliberate throwing of the ball into a player on the ground to score a penalty. You're right mate, they not twats, they're unsporting plums. And then they get the Frenchies to come on board. Despicable sports
Too bad that even the monumental idiots reffing the game still couldn't find a penalty for you on that one. Read was jumping just as high as your fellows.Duff Paddy wrote:It would only have been realistic if Sanjay wasn't there - which is why we think it was a lions penalty in the first placeJay Cee Gee wrote:What's the relevance of this? He's allowed to slap the ball back and almost did so. It's a legitimate, realistic attempt at playing the ball which by IRB guidelines is not a penalty.Crazy Ed wrote:Read was only ever going to try and slap ball back where as Williams was lifted to take a 2 handed catch..
Nah most of them have been grand.wamberal99 wrote:Enzedder wrote:Firstly the leap into Charlie F and then the deliberate throwing of the ball into a player on the ground to score a penalty. You're right mate, they not twats, they're unsporting plums. And then they get the Frenchies to come on board. Despicable sports
Oh how sweet it is to hear the Keewees whinge like little girls.
your turn in a few weeks sweetcheeks. Lube upwamberal99 wrote:Enzedder wrote:Firstly the leap into Charlie F and then the deliberate throwing of the ball into a player on the ground to score a penalty. You're right mate, they not twats, they're unsporting plums. And then they get the Frenchies to come on board. Despicable sports
Oh how sweet it is to hear the Keewees whinge like little girls.
Yes, there's gifs and still shots all over twitter showing he was well onside.Nabberuk wrote:Was Read even onside from the kick off? Sure didn't look like it.
So Owens was fine?? CoolEnzedder wrote:When did being onside become necessary in this series?
Hong Kong wrote:So Owens was fine?? CoolEnzedder wrote:When did being onside become necessary in this series?
Turns out he was though eh?Nabberuk wrote:Hong Kong wrote:So Owens was fine?? CoolEnzedder wrote:When did being onside become necessary in this series?
rugga. wrote:Yes, there's gifs and still shots all over twitter showing he was well onside.Nabberuk wrote:Was Read even onside from the kick off? Sure didn't look like it.
Imagine what we'd be like if we lost to Scotland.wamberal99 wrote:Enzedder wrote:Firstly the leap into Charlie F and then the deliberate throwing of the ball into a player on the ground to score a penalty. You're right mate, they not twats, they're unsporting plums. And then they get the Frenchies to come on board. Despicable sports
Oh how sweet it is to hear the Keewees whinge like little girls.
And that the ball didnt go farwardsNabberuk wrote:rugga. wrote:Yes, there's gifs and still shots all over twitter showing he was well onside.Nabberuk wrote:Was Read even onside from the kick off? Sure didn't look like it.
Your right.
https://twitter.com/thedeadballarea/sta ... 0188753921
Looking back at it, it's borderline him taking the man out in the air.