The harangued into apologising thread

All things Rugby
User avatar
fatcat
Posts: 14333
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

The harangued into apologising thread

Post by fatcat »

Chris Hoy is the latest.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-41092831
Cyclist Sir Chris Hoy has apologised for saying Lycra looked "awful" on anyone weighing more than 8st (49kg).

The six-time Olympic gold medallist took to Twitter to say he was "really sorry" for the comment, which he described as "tongue-in-cheek"

It followed a GQ article in which he said amateur cyclists did not have to pull on a pair of tight-fitting shorts to look good.

That led to criticism that he was "body shaming" larger cyclists.

In his article, Sir Chris said Lycra was not the most elegant material and that professional cycling gear generally looked bad on anyone heavier than 8st.
'14+stone Mamil'

He also said the desire of so-called "mamils" - middle-aged men in Lycra - to be seen in the latest high-performance Team Sky cycling kit all too often led to ridiculous results.

"Personally, I feel sorry for mamils," he wrote. "When they walk into a cafe dressed head-to-toe in Lycra, you always spot people sniggering at them."

However, in an apparent change of heart, Sir Chris said: "As a 14+stone MAMIL myself, this was a tongue-in-cheek article that wasn't meant to offend.

"I'm really sorry; reading it back it looks harsh & that wasn't my intention. Whatever ur age/build, if ur on a bike u have my respect."
User avatar
Duff Paddy
Posts: 34874
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Duff Paddy »

The mamil market is highly lucrative. These eejits think nothing of spending €200+ on a pair of castelli cycling shorts. It is bonkers. A sport designed to part middle class men from their disposable income.
User avatar
theo
Posts: 13023
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by theo »

Duff Paddy wrote:The mamil market is highly lucrative. These eejits think nothing of spending €200+ on a pair of castelli cycling shorts. It is bonkers. A sport designed to part middle class men from their disposable income.
Taking over from golf.

It is daft. The cost of the clothing is just bonkers.

With regards to Chris Hoy - he has nothing to apologise for.
User avatar
Mullet 2
Posts: 27203
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Mullet 2 »

On the rare occasions I take to a bike I wear a pair of rugby shorts and an old jersey

Making it clear that I am in fact a fat rugby player and not a fat cyclist.
User avatar
SamShark
Posts: 20522
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by SamShark »

Up north where I'm from originally you'd ordinarily use your car to show how sucessful you are.

A few of my mates now seem to want to spend £3k on a bike to ride round the park.
User avatar
Shrekles
Posts: 4420
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Shrekles »

Why should he have to apologise for being right? I would like to point out that every male looks f**king ridiculous in lycra. Wake up to yourselves you tossers.
User avatar
Gospel
Posts: 13707
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: West of Londinium

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Gospel »

Who gives a fudge what someone else is wearing when they're riding a bike? You lot sound like a bunch of old women down the hair salon.

I live out in the sticks down a single lane road slap bang in the middle of a popular cycling route and I just think 'fair-play big lad' when some lycra clad lard arse is grinding his big-ring to try and keep up with the sexy young things in front. If spending £200 on ill-fitting shorts is the excuse people need to do strenuous exercise then it's a good thing IMO.
User avatar
danny_fitz
Posts: 11894
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Mostly London........Mostly

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by danny_fitz »

Duff Paddy wrote:The mamil market is highly lucrative. These eejits think nothing of spending €200+ on a pair of castelli cycling shorts. It is bonkers. A sport designed to part middle class men from their disposable income.
I have just come back from a few weeks in the south of France and cycling is huge down there. Interestingly it does not seem to be mostly middle aged men on expensive bikes but retired 60 somethings in lycra on very expensive bikes. In fairness, there was nothing flabby about these blokes, apart from looking a bit leathery they all looked stupendously fit.
User avatar
croyals
Posts: 7886
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: London

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by croyals »

I have no idea why someone would spend £200 on a pair of lycra shorts when, for what they're doing, a normal pair of sports shorts for a tenner would do the same job.
User avatar
Lenny
Posts: 6484
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Darkest deepest northwest

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Lenny »

SamShark wrote:Up north where I'm from originally you'd ordinarily use your car to show how sucessful you are.

A few of my mates now seem to want to spend £3k on a bike to ride round the park.
Yeah, every one of them seems to believe that splashing huge sums of money on a carbon framed bike is going to make feel less fcuked going up a hill. :lol:

I have a friend who has been a dedicated cyclist for years (he loves food and therefore cycles in order to be able to indulge his gluttony), but always cycles on his own, with a light weight high vis jacket being his only concession to cycling gear, and refuses to have anything to do with the gangs who clog up the roads. He did spend €4k on his bike though, but balanced this by spending €2k on a Weber bbq.
User avatar
fatcat
Posts: 14333
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by fatcat »

Shrekles wrote:Why should he have to apologise for being right? I would like to point out that every male looks f**king ridiculous in lycra. Wake up to yourselves you tossers.
Because people like to be outraged. People are always trying to see how they can become a victim, or to look out for people that they think may be being victimised. These people are usually very active on social media.
ovalball
Posts: 11285
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by ovalball »

croyals wrote:I have no idea why someone would spend £200 on a pair of lycra shorts when, for what they're doing, a normal pair of sports shorts for a tenner would do the same job.
Quite.

TBH - even slim, fit, male cyclists look ridiculous in Lycra. Big fat ones just look a whole lot worse.

Hoy shouldn't have apologised.
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 13055
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Coalfalls

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by MungoMan »

croyals wrote:I have no idea why someone would spend £200 on a pair of lycra shorts when, for what they're doing, a normal pair of sports shorts for a tenner would do the same job.
Fark. Me. Dead.

I've got two pair of lycra shorts mouldering away in a bottom drawer somewhere. One of the padded crotch cycling syle, the other unpadded and used with a longsleeved rashie when kayaking in cooler weather.

Both cost 3/5 of SFA.

Then again, Strayan lycra come from petrochemical shite whereas NH lyrcra is clearly handspun from the cocoons of the endangered merovingian moon moth.
User avatar
guy smiley
Posts: 32871
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: in transit

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by guy smiley »

fatcat wrote:
Shrekles wrote:Why should he have to apologise for being right? I would like to point out that every male looks f**king ridiculous in lycra. Wake up to yourselves you tossers.
Because people like to be outraged. People are always trying to see how they can become a victim, or to look out for people that they think may be being victimised. These people are usually very active on social media.

Like this thread, for instance.

croyals wrote:I have no idea why someone would spend £200 on a pair of lycra shorts when, for what they're doing, a normal pair of sports shorts for a tenner would do the same job.
Well, let's assume 'what they're doing' is riding for at least an hour on a regular basis. A pair of your sports shorts would be a disaster, you'd end up covered in saddle sores at best.

I don't agree with the need to go top level gear unless you're really getting into it, but for perspective have a look at what a weekend hacker spends on golf. We all like to spend up a bit on our gear whatever we do.

Let's not get the skirts too bunched up over it, eh...

lads.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 28499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Chickenrunning...

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Sandstorm »

It's not the arse that's the problem, it's the meat and two veg that comes through the door of the coffee shop first. x(
Crash_12
Posts: 12875
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:30 pm

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Crash_12 »

SamShark wrote:Up north where I'm from originally you'd ordinarily use your car to show how sucessful you are.

A few of my mates now seem to want to spend £3k on a bike to ride round the park.
It's proper mental.

A mate of mine has just spent the same on a road bike as I've just spent on a new Husqvarna motorbike.
Nolanator
Posts: 37857
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Dublin

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Nolanator »

Sandstorm wrote:It's not the arse that's the problem, it's the meat and two veg that comes through the door of the coffee shop first. x(
The belly often enters first.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 37186
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by JM2K6 »

croyals wrote:I have no idea why someone would spend £200 on a pair of lycra shorts when, for what they're doing, a normal pair of sports shorts for a tenner would do the same job.
I tried a normal pair of sports shorts for cycling and very very quickly moved on to lycra. It's not a fashion statement.
User avatar
Bullettyme
Posts: 14567
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Bullettyme »

Duff Paddy wrote:The mamil market is highly lucrative. These eejits think nothing of spending €200+ on a pair of castelli cycling shorts. It is bonkers. A sport designed to part middle class men from their disposable income.
As someone who got into the sport this year it's insane the type of money you can drop, which isn't going to make much difference to your performance.

You see old dudes, with the latest gear; oakleys (€100+), premium branded bib shorts and jersey (€400+), top end helmet (€200+), top end Shimano shoes (€200+), Garmin (€100+). And that's before you get into their bikes which would be generally well into the thousands with fkn tribars and all the works.

All for commuting or going out for 2 or 3 hours on a weekend.

EDIT: I agree with some of the stuff above though, you need Lycra shorts and a decent jersey, but you don't have to be spending hundreds on it.
Nolanator
Posts: 37857
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Dublin

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Nolanator »

Do normal lycra undershorts that you buy for a tenner work as well as really expensive cycling branded stuff?
User avatar
Bullettyme
Posts: 14567
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Bullettyme »

Nolanator wrote:Do normal lycra undershorts that you buy for a tenner work as well as really expensive cycling branded stuff?
They (both cheap and expensive) usually have a chamois (fancy padding) as well. I've bought shorts for a tenner, or bib shorts for twenty, and they've been perfectly functional and I haven't chafed. I don't have any expensive stuff to really compare it to though. Maybe they feel nicer but I doubt it.
Crash_12
Posts: 12875
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:30 pm

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Crash_12 »

Gospel wrote:Who gives a fudge what someone else is wearing when they're riding a bike? You lot sound like a bunch of old women down the hair salon.

I live out in the sticks down a single lane road slap bang in the middle of a popular cycling route and I just think 'fair-play big lad' when some lycra clad lard arse is grinding his big-ring to try and keep up with the sexy young things in front. If spending £200 on ill-fitting shorts is the excuse people need to do strenuous exercise then it's a good thing IMO.
The thing is he's been attacked by the type of idiots who sport #FatPride hashtags, endlessly blog about the heroics of being overweight and thus castigate dissenters as “fat shamers”.

Meanwhile men women are now fatter than ever.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 28499
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Chickenrunning...

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Sandstorm »

JM2K6 wrote:
croyals wrote:I have no idea why someone would spend £200 on a pair of lycra shorts when, for what they're doing, a normal pair of sports shorts for a tenner would do the same job.
I tried a normal pair of sports shorts for cycling and very very quickly moved on to lycra. It's not a fashion statement.
Please wear the normal shorts over the lycra item. Mountain bikers do. :thumbup:
User avatar
Dobbin
Posts: 3149
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Dobbin »

the correct response from hoy should have been....i was having a bit of a light hearted laugh at big blokes who dress up in all the expensive cycling gear and if youre offended by that then tough

apologising simply emboldens these tedious cnuts
Nolanator
Posts: 37857
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Dublin

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Nolanator »

Bullettyme wrote:
Nolanator wrote:Do normal lycra undershorts that you buy for a tenner work as well as really expensive cycling branded stuff?
They (both cheap and expensive) usually have a chamois (fancy padding) as well. I've bought shorts for a tenner, or bib shorts for twenty, and they've been perfectly functional and I haven't chafed. I don't have any expensive stuff to really compare it to though. Maybe they feel nicer but I doubt it.
Oh yeah, I forgot about the crotch padding in proper cycling shorts. Presume that starts to make a difference when you're in a low profile saddle for hours.
Denirostaxidriver
Posts: 1505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Denirostaxidriver »

JM2K6 wrote:
croyals wrote:I have no idea why someone would spend £200 on a pair of lycra shorts when, for what they're doing, a normal pair of sports shorts for a tenner would do the same job.
I tried a normal pair of sports shorts for cycling and very very quickly moved on to lycra. It's not a fashion statement.
I dread to think what a normal pair of shorts would do to you after even a 40km ride.
User avatar
theo
Posts: 13023
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by theo »

Bullettyme wrote:
Nolanator wrote:Do normal lycra undershorts that you buy for a tenner work as well as really expensive cycling branded stuff?
They (both cheap and expensive) usually have a chamois (fancy padding) as well. I've bought shorts for a tenner, or bib shorts for twenty, and they've been perfectly functional and I haven't chafed. I don't have any expensive stuff to really compare it to though. Maybe they feel nicer but I doubt it.
I agree. I always laugh at a tits in their Rapha tops and shorts. They saw you coming son.
User avatar
Bullettyme
Posts: 14567
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Bullettyme »

Nolanator wrote:
Bullettyme wrote:
Nolanator wrote:Do normal lycra undershorts that you buy for a tenner work as well as really expensive cycling branded stuff?
They (both cheap and expensive) usually have a chamois (fancy padding) as well. I've bought shorts for a tenner, or bib shorts for twenty, and they've been perfectly functional and I haven't chafed. I don't have any expensive stuff to really compare it to though. Maybe they feel nicer but I doubt it.
Oh yeah, I forgot about the crotch padding in proper cycling shorts. Presume that starts to make a difference when you're in a low profile saddle for hours.
Having started out with sports and rugby shorts on the bike it makes a huge difference. There's only so long the padding makes a difference for too :lol:
polyallstar
Posts: 2190
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by polyallstar »

Thought this would be about Keith Earls :smug:
Market Square Hero
Posts: 1063
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Market Square Hero »

Duff Paddy wrote:The mamil market is highly lycrative. These eejits think nothing of spending €200+ on a pair of castelli cycling shorts. It is bonkers. A sport designed to part middle class men from their disposable income.
Fixed.
Denirostaxidriver
Posts: 1505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Denirostaxidriver »

Bullettyme wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:The mamil market is highly lucrative. These eejits think nothing of spending €200+ on a pair of castelli cycling shorts. It is bonkers. A sport designed to part middle class men from their disposable income.
As someone who got into the sport this year it's insane the type of money you can drop, which isn't going to make much difference to your performance.

You see old dudes, with the latest gear; oakleys (€100+), premium branded bib shorts and jersey (€400+), top end helmet (€200+), top end Shimano shoes (€200+), Garmin (€100+). And that's before you get into their bikes which would be generally well into the thousands with fkn tribars and all the works.

All for commuting or going out for 2 or 3 hours on a weekend.

EDIT: I agree with some of the stuff above though, you need Lycra shorts and a decent jersey, but you don't have to be spending hundreds on it.
That must be a shitty Garmin :lol:
User avatar
Bullettyme
Posts: 14567
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Bullettyme »

I was conservative there, it's true. Power meter and Garmin will set you back €400+.
User avatar
paddyor
Posts: 18404
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:51 pm

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by paddyor »

theo wrote:
Duff Paddy wrote:The mamil market is highly lucrative. These eejits think nothing of spending €200+ on a pair of castelli cycling shorts. It is bonkers. A sport designed to part middle class men from their disposable income.
Taking over from golf.

It is daft. The cost of the clothing is just bonkers.

With regards to Chris Hoy - he has nothing to apologise for.
His sponsors? His job was to shut up and smile.
User avatar
Mullet 2
Posts: 27203
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Mullet 2 »

I have a bigger problem at the moment with grown men who seem to carry school bags everywhere these days.

Work, rugby matches etc.
backrow
Posts: 21432
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by backrow »

Mullet 2 wrote:I have a bigger problem at the moment with grown men who seem to carry school bags everywhere these days.

Work, rugby matches etc.
the Poster Slick did that to the xmas cabal about ten years ago - he still gets the bantz as 'the man with the man-bag'
le chat
Posts: 3777
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by le chat »

it's not just the lyrca, some overweight twat paying a few thousand to get a bike a couple of pounds lighter is absolutely ridiculous
Last edited by le chat on Wed Aug 30, 2017 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Denirostaxidriver
Posts: 1505
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Denirostaxidriver »

Bullettyme wrote:I was conservative there, it's true. Power meter and Garmin will set you back €400+.
I would suggest that power meters are not necessary for the vast majority of punters out there. The vast, vast majority. But they are awesome to use when you are training for a race or a triathlon.
User avatar
Mullet 2
Posts: 27203
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by Mullet 2 »

Always very nerdy types.

Often with a flag sticking out of the bag if it's a rugby match.
ukjim
Posts: 1943
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by ukjim »

its not like he has his own brand of clothing or anything to flog...
User avatar
paddyor
Posts: 18404
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:51 pm

Re: The harangued into apologising thread

Post by paddyor »

ukjim wrote:its not like he has his own brand of clothing or anything to flog...
In other news: Area man shouts at cloud!
Post Reply