Izzy, what the HELL!!

All things Rugby
onejuicyone
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by onejuicyone »

Izzy is at it again,

I guess he won't be going to Japan?
Yer Man
Posts: 20617
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Yer Man »

RWC to be moved to hell?
User avatar
Akkerman
Posts: 11939
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Yemen

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Akkerman »

:thumbdown:
Rugby Australia has described an Israel Folau social media post, in which the full-back says "hell awaits" gay people, as "unacceptable".

Folau, 30, escaped punishment for similar comments last year, with the governing body saying it accepted - but did not support - his "position".

On Wednesday, he posted on Instagram that "drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists and idolaters" should "repent" because "only Jesus saves", and made similar remarks on Twitter.

He sent a tweet criticising the Tasmanian parliament, which has become the first Australian state to make it legally optional to list gender on birth certificates.

In a statement, Rugby Australia said the post "does not represent the values of the sport and is disrespectful to members of the rugby community", adding that its integrity unit had been "engaged on the matter".

Folau's posts were made exactly one year after he met rugby chiefs to limit his use of social media.

He was widely criticised for his anti-gay posts in April 2018 and was also involved in a disagreement with the national team in 2017 after saying that he was opposed to same-sex marriage.

Folau signed a four-year deal with Super Rugby side Waratahs in March.
User avatar
Mullet 2
Posts: 28804
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Mullet 2 »

Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
User avatar
binge90
Posts: 7792
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: A Glass Cage Of Emotion

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by binge90 »

Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
User avatar
Rowdy
Posts: 2252
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Rowdy »

God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.
User avatar
unseenwork
Posts: 17805
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:28 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by unseenwork »

binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
Ah sure some would go so far as to argue that binary and fixed sex is also a societal construct! I've been reading my Judy Butler.

Anyways, fúck Folau, tosser.
bimboman
Posts: 66447
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by bimboman »

unseenwork wrote:
binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
Ah sure some would go so far as to argue that binary and fixed sex is also a societal construct! I've been reading my Judy Butler.

Anyways, fúck Folau, tosser.

Go on argue that fixed sex is a cocietal construct ....
User avatar
Mog The Almighty
Posts: 12277
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 11:33 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Mog The Almighty »

I just don't understand why people care on either thing.

Firstly, it says they made the listing of gender optional. To my understanding, that doesn't mean they can pick and choose. They can list it or not. I don't give a shit if they don't.

Secondly, my response to Folau's comments on gay people is exactly the same as if someone told me, "I believe in a giant purple snail who will slime you forever in the hereafter if you have blue eyes". That response being ... "umm ... okay mate. I'll leave you to it.".

I just don't understand all the outrage about either thing.
Last edited by Mog The Almighty on Wed Apr 10, 2019 2:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:35 am
Location: England

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by sockwithaticket »

binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
As on the other thread, the issue here is a semantic one of people having conflated sex and gender for so long.

The latter, a social construct, has no medical relevance and so can be excluded. The former, no matter what you may later identify as, has medical implications for the entirety of your life and needs to be recorded.
User avatar
Turbogoat
Posts: 21769
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Middle East

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Turbogoat »

Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
User avatar
unseenwork
Posts: 17805
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:28 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by unseenwork »

bimboman wrote:
unseenwork wrote:
binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
Ah sure some would go so far as to argue that binary and fixed sex is also a societal construct! I've been reading my Judy Butler.

Anyways, fúck Folau, tosser.

Go on argue that fixed sex is a cocietal construct ....
Why?
User avatar
nardol
Posts: 19714
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by nardol »

Turbogoat wrote:
Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
But as an atheist you dont believe in hell anyway. So he might as well say all gays should be exiled to the unicorns.


Is it a good thing? is it a bad thing? is it a thing?
User avatar
Raggs
Posts: 18569
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:49 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Raggs »

So drunks aren't allowed in a religion where one of the big things the main dude is famous for, is turning water into wine...
User avatar
Turbogoat
Posts: 21769
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Middle East

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Turbogoat »

nardol wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
But as an atheist you dont believe in hell anyway. So he might as well say all gays should be exiled to the unicorns.


Is it a good thing? is it a bad thing? is it a thing?
Yup, that's why I had to add "hell of his" as it was inevitable this was going to come up. (PR is getting very very predictable)
He's still judging me, whether I believe in his particular form of retribution or not. It doesn't have to be effective "punishment" for it to still equate to judgement.
User avatar
Laurent
Posts: 17470
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: balbriggan
Contact:

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Laurent »

Raggs wrote:So drunks aren't allowed in a religion where one of the big things the main dude is famous for, is turning water into wine...
all in moderation (except pedophilia)
sockwithaticket
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:35 am
Location: England

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by sockwithaticket »

nardol wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
But as an atheist you dont believe in hell anyway. So he might as well say all gays should be exiled to the unicorns.


Is it a good thing? is it a bad thing? is it a thing?
If someone who sincerely believes in it tells you that according to their belief system some of your innocuous behaviours warrant being tortured for eternity, that's a lot of ill will and bad intent on their part which I would reciprocate whole-heartedly. Doesn't matter if there's a reality behind it.
User avatar
Mullet 2
Posts: 28804
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Mullet 2 »

sockwithaticket wrote:
binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
As on the other thread, the issue here is a semantic one of people having conflated sex and gender for so long.

The latter, a social construct, has no medical relevance and so can be excluded. The former, no matter what you may later identify as, has medical implications for the entirety of your life and needs to be recorded.

:lol: :lol:

Fúck off hippy
bimboman
Posts: 66447
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by bimboman »

unseenwork wrote:
bimboman wrote:
unseenwork wrote:
binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
Ah sure some would go so far as to argue that binary and fixed sex is also a societal construct! I've been reading my Judy Butler.

Anyways, fúck Folau, tosser.

Go on argue that fixed sex is a cocietal construct ....
Why?

Well it’s the equivalent of claiming the moon is made of cheese, so it’d be great to see the logic.
User avatar
Gazzamonster
Posts: 6958
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Gazzamonster »

Mog The Almighty wrote:I just don't understand why people care on either thing.

Firstly, it says they made the listing of gender optional. To my understanding, that doesn't mean they can pick and choose. They can list it or not. I don't give a shit if they don't.

Secondly, my response to Folau's comments on gay people is exactly the same as if someone told me, "I believe in a giant purple snail who will slime you forever in the hereafter if you have blue eyes". That response being ... "umm ... okay mate. I'll leave you to it.".

I just don't understand all the outrage about either thing.
I agree with this - except - you have to take into account the crimes that have been committed against homosexuals in the past (and present). Folau uses his belief in the sky wizard to further put homosexualaity into an 'evil' category - thus dehumanizing folk who are gay.

And that is dangerous - and that deserves outrage.

I still don't understand why Folau has such strong attitudes against people he classes as sinners - yet openly flaunts tattoo's (which are apparently against God) and has indulged in pre-marital sex.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:35 am
Location: England

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by sockwithaticket »

Mullet 2 wrote:
sockwithaticket wrote:
binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
As on the other thread, the issue here is a semantic one of people having conflated sex and gender for so long.

The latter, a social construct, has no medical relevance and so can be excluded. The former, no matter what you may later identify as, has medical implications for the entirety of your life and needs to be recorded.

:lol: :lol:

Fúck off hippy
I'm still saying male or female should be listed, just under a different word.

Now go eat a pie or summat.
bimboman
Posts: 66447
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by bimboman »

Turbogoat wrote:
nardol wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
But as an atheist you dont believe in hell anyway. So he might as well say all gays should be exiled to the unicorns.


Is it a good thing? is it a bad thing? is it a thing?
Yup, that's why I had to add "hell of his" as it was inevitable this was going to come up. (PR is getting very very predictable)
He's still judging me, whether I believe in his particular form of retribution or not. It doesn't have to be effective "punishment" for it to still equate to judgement.

Why on earth would you give a f uck if you’re being judged on a metric you don’t even believe exists ?
User avatar
Raggs
Posts: 18569
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:49 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Raggs »

Mog The Almighty wrote:I just don't understand why people care on either thing.

Firstly, it says they made the listing of gender optional. To my understanding, that doesn't mean they can pick and choose. They can list it or not. I don't give a shit if they don't.

Secondly, my response to Folau's comments on gay people is exactly the same as if someone told me, "I believe in a giant purple snail who will slime you forever in the hereafter if you have blue eyes". That response being ... "umm ... okay mate. I'll leave you to it.".

I just don't understand all the outrage about either thing.
And your response if some guy came upto your and called you a m*therf***ing c**t? I mean those things are also likely not true, but I suspect you'd take offence over it?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:35 am
Location: England

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by sockwithaticket »

Gazzamonster wrote:
Mog The Almighty wrote:I just don't understand why people care on either thing.

Firstly, it says they made the listing of gender optional. To my understanding, that doesn't mean they can pick and choose. They can list it or not. I don't give a shit if they don't.

Secondly, my response to Folau's comments on gay people is exactly the same as if someone told me, "I believe in a giant purple snail who will slime you forever in the hereafter if you have blue eyes". That response being ... "umm ... okay mate. I'll leave you to it.".

I just don't understand all the outrage about either thing.
I agree with this - except - you have to take into account the crimes that have been committed against homosexuals in the past (and present). Folau uses his belief in the sky wizard to further put homosexualaity into an 'evil' category - thus dehumanizing folk who are gay.

And that is dangerous - and that deserves outrage.


I still don't understand why Folau has such strong attitudes against people he classes as sinners - yet openly flaunts tattoo's (which are apparently against God) and has indulged in pre-marital sex.
Bet he eats shellfish and wears clothes made of two different types of fabric too, the hypocrite.
User avatar
kiap
Posts: 19923
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by kiap »

Turbogoat wrote:
Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
Ah.

But do you believe there is a hell? :twisted:


<edit> Too slow!!!
User avatar
nardol
Posts: 19714
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by nardol »

Should we not be blaming Islam who teaches this? Follywolly is just doing what his religion tells him to.

Or does Islam get a free pass?
User avatar
DragonKhan
Posts: 4567
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:01 pm

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by DragonKhan »

Turbogoat wrote:
Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
Image
User avatar
DragonKhan
Posts: 4567
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:01 pm

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by DragonKhan »

Also he needs help. He clearly is someone who has issues if he believes such hateful rhetoric.

Take it from someone who was raised as a Jehovahs Witness, religious people are the most intolerant and judgemental dickheads around
User avatar
Mullet 2
Posts: 28804
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Mullet 2 »

sockwithaticket wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:
sockwithaticket wrote:
binge90 wrote:
Mullet 2 wrote:Optional to list gender on a birth cert?

FFS
Should just list sex, male or female.

Gender is just a societal construct playa. :thumbup:
As on the other thread, the issue here is a semantic one of people having conflated sex and gender for so long.

The latter, a social construct, has no medical relevance and so can be excluded. The former, no matter what you may later identify as, has medical implications for the entirety of your life and needs to be recorded.

:lol: :lol:

Fúck off hippy
I'm still saying male or female should be listed, just under a different word.

Now go eat a pie or summat.

Gender is a construct.

It's clear sausage is what you like eating.
User avatar
nardol
Posts: 19714
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by nardol »

DragonKhan wrote:Also he needs help. He clearly is someone who has issues if he believes such hateful rhetoric.

Take it from someone who was raised as a Jehovahs Witness, religious people are the most intolerant and judgemental dickheads around
Bless you
User avatar
Mullet 2
Posts: 28804
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Mullet 2 »

DragonKhan wrote:Also he needs help. He clearly is someone who has issues if he believes such hateful rhetoric.

Take it from someone who was raised as a Jehovahs Witness, religious people are the most intolerant and judgemental dickheads around

A whobie whatie?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:35 am
Location: England

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by sockwithaticket »

nardol wrote:Should we not be blaming Islam who teaches this? Follywolly is just doing what his religion tells him to.

Or does Islam get a free pass?
You appear to have mixed up your Antipodean dickheads. Money Bill is the Muslim. Folau's a Christian.
Nolanator
Posts: 38535
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Dublin

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Nolanator »

DragonKhan wrote:Also he needs help. He clearly is someone who has issues if he believes such hateful rhetoric.

Take it from someone who was raised as a Jehovahs Witness, religious people are the most intolerant and judgemental dickheads around
Raised as a Jehovah's Witness in Longford and mover to Hull?


Fuck me, that's unlucky.
User avatar
nardol
Posts: 19714
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by nardol »

Damn.

My whole plan for this was to go down the route: well keewees have lost their ability to criticise Islam of late ..
User avatar
DragonKhan
Posts: 4567
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:01 pm

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by DragonKhan »

Nolanator wrote:
DragonKhan wrote:Also he needs help. He clearly is someone who has issues if he believes such hateful rhetoric.

Take it from someone who was raised as a Jehovahs Witness, religious people are the most intolerant and judgemental dickheads around
Raised as a Jehovah's Witness in Longford and mover to Hull?


Fuck me, that's unlucky.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

f**king tell me about it!!!
User avatar
BokJock
Posts: 5337
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by BokJock »

bimboman wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
nardol wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:
Rowdy wrote:God help anyone who disagrees with The Narrative.

I dunno, as a card-carrying fornicator and atheist, being told by some twat that I'm going to burn in some hell of his isn't very endearing. Who I choose not to believe in, or who I give multiple orgasms to, is none of his business and really not grounds for him to be judging people upon.
But as an atheist you dont believe in hell anyway. So he might as well say all gays should be exiled to the unicorns.


Is it a good thing? is it a bad thing? is it a thing?
Yup, that's why I had to add "hell of his" as it was inevitable this was going to come up. (PR is getting very very predictable)
He's still judging me, whether I believe in his particular form of retribution or not. It doesn't have to be effective "punishment" for it to still equate to judgement.

Why on earth would you give a f uck if you’re being judged on a metric you don’t even believe exists ?
Because the demonization of gay people is a real thing.

Folau might be a hero to a kid going through some pretty confusing times and then to see your sporting idol say that the way you are is inherently evil can not be a good thing.

But of course the usual contrarians will be contrarian
User avatar
happyhooker
Posts: 23122
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by happyhooker »

Check out joe marler's tweet on the matter.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JoeMarler/st ... 7458217984
User avatar
BokJock
Posts: 5337
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:30 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by BokJock »

happyhooker wrote:Check out joe marler's tweet on the matter.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JoeMarler/st ... 7458217984
:lol: :thumbup:
User avatar
kiwigreg369
Posts: 5307
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by kiwigreg369 »

BokJock wrote:
happyhooker wrote:Check out joe marler's tweet on the matter.

https://mobile.twitter.com/JoeMarler/st ... 7458217984
:lol: :thumbup:
Which of you is
- Will Davy, or
- Lee Behjet
User avatar
Poshprop
Posts: 998
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 1:31 pm
Location: In the Diff

Re: Izzy, what the HELL!!

Post by Poshprop »

Laurent wrote:
Raggs wrote:So drunks aren't allowed in a religion where one of the big things the main dude is famous for, is turning water into wine...
all in moderation (except pedophilia)
and Morris dancing
Post Reply