B Barrett vs Mo'unga

All things Rugby
User avatar
jdogscoop
Posts: 14372
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Melbourne

B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by jdogscoop »

Quick question: Is the Beauden Barrett vs. Richie Mo'unga debate for the All Blacks 10 jersey still a thing?

The reason I ask is that surely, beyond any doubt, Mo'unga is the best first five in the country. Even among Hurricanes fans.

Mo'unga made Barrett look second rate in the Crusaders' 32-8 win over the Hurricanes tonight.
Wilderbeast
Posts: 6008
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by Wilderbeast »

Debating who will start for the AB's is over. You're not going to change this close to the RWC.

Debating their form will never go out of fashion. BB has been better up to this week. Mo'unga definitely better tonight.
User avatar
jdogscoop
Posts: 14372
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by jdogscoop »

Wilderbeast wrote:Debating who will start for the AB's is over. You're not going to change this close to the RWC.

Debating their form will never go out of fashion. BB has been better up to this week. Mo'unga definitely better tonight.
Mo'unga will be in the squad, that's for sure. Unless Hansen has a stroke, I expect Mo'unga to leapfrog Barrett during the RWC at 10, if not before it.
Wilderbeast
Posts: 6008
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by Wilderbeast »

Only way he leapfrogs BB is through injury or a serious drop in form from BB (worse than his standard fluctuations). Not many coaches would swap their ten on the eve of the RWC, and Hansen is more loyal than most. Mo'unga playing better in soup won't be enough (he did that last year).
User avatar
jdogscoop
Posts: 14372
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by jdogscoop »

Wilderbeast wrote:Only way he leapfrogs BB is through injury or a serious drop in form from BB (worse than his standard fluctuations). Not many coaches would swap their ten on the eve of the RWC, and Hansen is more loyal than most. Mo'unga playing better in soup won't be enough (he did that last year).
I will live with Mo'unga replacing Barrett at half time, if that's what has to happen at this late stage. I'm sure their hand will be forced if it comes to the kind of display Barrett put on today.

Barrett is clearly better at 15, it's just a shame it's taking the NZ coaches so long to realise it.

They're only just waking up to the Mckenzie failure.
Last edited by jdogscoop on Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wilderbeast
Posts: 6008
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by Wilderbeast »

They are very stubborn. They can afford to be (they win an awful lot). It's that stubbornness that makes me think BB is safe at 10, and for longer than 40 minutes every game.
User avatar
UncleFB
Posts: 13769
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by UncleFB »

Mo'unga/Sopoanga the names are close enough I guess.

JDog has island fever.

:D


I'd probably prefer Mo'unga to BB TBH.
brat
Posts: 4625
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by brat »

Saders foward pack helped Mounga tonight

But barrett generally struggles under pressure.. Doesn't have the extra few milliseconds/. Decision making ability that the greats have

Agree he plays his best rugby at 15
User avatar
jdogscoop
Posts: 14372
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by jdogscoop »

UncleFB wrote:Mo'unga/Sopoanga the names are close enough I guess.

JDog has island fever.

:D


I'd probably prefer Mo'unga to BB TBH.
Merit is the only passport to 10 stardom in my book.

Mo'unga should be wearing 20 for the All Blacks, cos he's twice the 10 Barrett is.
User avatar
jdogscoop
Posts: 14372
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: B Barrett vs Mo'unga

Post by jdogscoop »

brat wrote:Saders foward pack helped Mounga tonight

But barrett generally struggles under pressure.. Doesn't have the extra few milliseconds/. Decision making ability that the greats have

Agree he plays his best rugby at 15
The difference is Mo'unga doesn't shit himself when the defence is in his face. The Crusaders don't always have it their way, but when they don't Mo'unga has the ability to hammer the percentages. You know, like any test worthy 10 tends to f**king do.

The slow as fudge braindead AB coaches seem to be coming around to the fact McKenzie is not a 10. How long until they do the same with Barrett? After we lose the World Cup?
User avatar
Ali's Choice
Posts: 31894
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Queensland

The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Ali's Choice »

There, I've said it.

Beauden Barrett is not a great first-five and his inability to control a tight match, or manage a tight contest against a strong defensive team, will cost us the RWC.

Barrett plays like a God against weak teams and poor defences, but as we've seen time and time again he struggles badly against quality opposition. We saw it against the B&I Lions, we saw it against Ireland and we've seen it against the Crusaders in recent years; against a committed, well-structured defense he's got no answers. Unless he's making line breaks he's doesn't add to a performance. He may as well not be there. He doesn't create time or space for his outside players with his passing game, and his general play kicking game (whilst it's getting better as he matures) is only average.
User avatar
Grandpa
Posts: 903
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Yorkshire

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Grandpa »

I agree...

Beauden at fullback... Ben Smith and Rieko Ioane as the wingers...

Mo'unga at 10. Sorted.
User avatar
naki
Posts: 14209
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by naki »

It’s been clear for the best part of 18 months now that Mo’unga should be the one, with BB at fullback or the bench. Barrett is arguably the most talented player in the country but is not suited to a tight contest at first-five.

The problem is that Mo’s recent form is not compelling enough to put pressure on his spot, and Barrett has improved enough in his major work-ons (goalkicking, tactical kicking and defence) since last season that Hansen will feel entirely justified in retaining him. Which he was probably going to do regardless of form.

The areas where RM has clear superiority (passing, conducting a backline, temperament) would be crucial for the RWC but he hasn’t done enough to usurp Barrett in his goalkicking or defence. It’s a real shame as I also can’t see us wining it with BB at pivot.
User avatar
not_english
Posts: 1836
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: London

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by not_english »

Well we won in 2011 with Donald at 10, so I wouldn't rule anything out.
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 20942
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: End of the road, turn right and first house on the left

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Enzedder »

not_english wrote:Well we won in 2011 with Donald at 10, so I wouldn't rule anything out.
A bit unfair of us to use the big guns like that.

Re the topic - I think we have almost no show at the RWC with our current number 10s. Mo was very average last night as well
User avatar
naki
Posts: 14209
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by naki »

not_english wrote:Well we won in 2011 with Donald at 10, so I wouldn't rule anything out.
We only needed the Beaver to not completely shit the bed for about an hour then, after Carter, Slade and Cruden had got us there.

We’ll need BB to do the same for the entire tournament. Not confident
User avatar
Ali's Choice
Posts: 31894
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Queensland

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Ali's Choice »

Enzedder wrote:
not_english wrote:Well we won in 2011 with Donald at 10, so I wouldn't rule anything out.
A bit unfair of us to use the big guns like that.

Re the topic - I think we have almost no show at the RWC with our current number 10s. Mo was very average last night as well



I disagree. I thought he controlled the match much more effectively than his opposing no.10. He kicked well, out of hand and from the tee, and he tackled really well as well.
User avatar
Turbogoat
Posts: 21770
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Middle East

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Turbogoat »

It'll be a true underdog story if the ABs manage to win the RWC this time round.

Too many questions about the team, starting with who is our best 10. The balance of our loose forwards is all outta whack, Read injured yet again may be struggling for match fitness, Cane with a long term injury, God knows who at 6, where to slot in Savea etc...
We don't have the top level depth at this point to cover for inevitable injuries to key players without losing too much quality... it's going to take some careful player management to get to the semis with a full strength team. Having Mo'unga and BBarrett fighting it out is probably a good thing here, they'll both be getting some quality playing time in the earlier games, but we're going to be looking for immediate cover for either of them if they pick up an injury and that'll mean DMac likely getting on the field in knockout rounds...
User avatar
guy smiley
Posts: 34467
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: in transit

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by guy smiley »

The Chiefs are reinvigorated with Marty MacKenzie at 10.

If that doesn’t thrown conventional thinking on its head then I politely suggest you’re thinking at the opposite end of the spine.
User avatar
Turbogoat
Posts: 21770
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Middle East

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Turbogoat »

guy smiley wrote:The Chiefs are reinvigorated with Marty MacKenzie at 10.

If that doesn’t thrown conventional thinking on its head then I politely suggest you’re thinking at the opposite end of the spine.
MMac for AB bolter?
Heads would implode, Cats would chase dogs, Planets would collide.
User avatar
naki
Posts: 14209
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by naki »

Turbogoat wrote:It'll be a true underdog story if the ABs manage to win the RWC this time round.

Too many questions about the team, starting with who is our best 10. The balance of our loose forwards is all outta whack, Read injured yet again may be struggling for match fitness, Cane with a long term injury, God knows who at 6, where to slot in Savea etc...
We don't have the top level depth at this point to cover for inevitable injuries to key players without losing too much quality... it's going to take some careful player management to get to the semis with a full strength team. Having Mo'unga and BBarrett fighting it out is probably a good thing here, they'll both be getting some quality playing time in the earlier games, but we're going to be looking for immediate cover for either of them if they pick up an injury and that'll mean DMac likely getting on the field in knockout rounds...
I think backrow will be fine. Savea is probably putting pressure on Cane’s starting spot anyway, and if Sam returns in time to get fully up to speed we’ll have genuine options. Read’s injury is not serious.

Blindside is a mystery but, again, we have options. I don’t either one of Frizell, Fifita or Hemopo will let the side down but personally I’d love to see a Cane-Savea-Read backrow. Cane already has the workrate and tackle efficiency of a blindside, Ardie is in incredible form and a menace at the breakdown and carrying, and Read gives us aerial options and - when in form - a huge attacking threat.

More concerned with injuries to the tight five.
User avatar
guy smiley
Posts: 34467
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: in transit

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by guy smiley »

Turbogoat wrote:
guy smiley wrote:The Chiefs are reinvigorated with Marty MacKenzie at 10.

If that doesn’t thrown conventional thinking on its head then I politely suggest you’re thinking at the opposite end of the spine.
MMac for AB bolter?
Heads would implode, Cats would chase dogs, Planets would collide.
:lol:

It’d be great :lol:
User avatar
Turbogoat
Posts: 21770
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Middle East

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Turbogoat »

Agreed on a Savea/Cane/Read trio (whichever order as required) as our strongest option.
User avatar
Ali's Choice
Posts: 31894
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Queensland

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Ali's Choice »

Turbogoat wrote:Agreed on a Savea/Cane/Read trio (whichever order as required) as our strongest option.
This is an anti-Beauden Barrett troll thread. Please stay on topic.
User avatar
Grandpa
Posts: 903
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Yorkshire

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Grandpa »

We don't want BB at 10 in the world cup.. end of topic...

Now the loose forward mix. I'd get Akira Ioane playing 8 for the Blacks asap.. put Read at 6.... and Cane/Savea/Todd at 7....
User avatar
JB1981
Posts: 7371
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:14 am
Location: NZ

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by JB1981 »

Barrett's limitations have been clear for a couple of years yet the coaching team talked down Mo'unga's form and have given him very limited opportunities. They have painted themselves into a corner and now have the choice of inexperience but promise or known fraility against decent teams. I would go with Mo'unga but can't see Hansen making that choice. The only way I see Mo'unga taking the spot is injury or Barrett missing a flight.

What will people think of Hansen if Barrett goes missing and costs us a knock out game? Is this the biggest call of his tenure?
Last edited by JB1981 on Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 14205
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Coalfalls

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by MungoMan »

Ali's Choice wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:Agreed on a Savea/Cane/Read trio (whichever order as required) as our strongest option.
This is an anti-Beauden Barrett troll thread. Please stay on topic.
:lol:
User avatar
CrazyIslander
Posts: 20410
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:34 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by CrazyIslander »

Beauden is ace by me :thumbup:
User avatar
JB1981
Posts: 7371
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:14 am
Location: NZ

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by JB1981 »

CrazyIslander wrote:Beauden is ace by me :thumbup:
The prosecution rests its case.
User avatar
CrazyIslander
Posts: 20410
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:34 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by CrazyIslander »

JB1981 wrote:
CrazyIslander wrote:Beauden is ace by me :thumbup:
The prosecution rests its case.
Drop him if you want. I prefer not to have him in the opposition.
User avatar
JB1981
Posts: 7371
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:14 am
Location: NZ

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by JB1981 »

CrazyIslander wrote:
JB1981 wrote:
CrazyIslander wrote:Beauden is ace by me :thumbup:
The prosecution rests its case.
Drop him if you want. I prefer not to have him in the opposition.
But put yourself into South Africa, Ireland, England or Wales shoes, then I think the opinion reverses.
User avatar
Salient
Posts: 3768
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Queensland!

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Salient »

Turbogoat wrote:
guy smiley wrote:The Chiefs are reinvigorated with Marty MacKenzie at 10.

If that doesn’t thrown conventional thinking on its head then I politely suggest you’re thinking at the opposite end of the spine.
MMac for AB bolter?
Heads would implode, Cats would chase dogs, Planets would collide, AC would lose it completely.
User avatar
kiwinoz
Posts: 6917
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by kiwinoz »

When does Shag pull the pin on the experiment? RM got very little game time as the "15s at 10" played out. Shag defended DMac at 10 when it was obvious that he was not a real 10. He won't throw BB out easily.
User avatar
Ali's Choice
Posts: 31894
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Queensland

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Ali's Choice »

JB1981 wrote:Barrett's limitations have been clear for a couple of years yet the coaching team talked down Mo'unga's form and have given him very limited opportunities. They have painted themselves into a corner and now have the choice of inexperience but promise or known fraility against decent teams. I would go with Mo'unga but can't see Hansen making that choice. The only way I see Mo'unga taking the spot is injury or Barrett missing a flight.

What will people think of Hansen if Barrett goes missing and costs us a knock out game? Is this the biggest call of his tenure?
Given current evidence, it's hard not to think that if Steve Hansen was coach during the Merthen/Spencer era he would have selected Carlos Spencer as his first choice 10. He clearly values x factor and flair over solidity and game management.
User avatar
trapper
Posts: 2621
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Gippsland

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by trapper »

RM looked more suited to playing against the NH teams with their constant offside rush defence but I do believe that SH teams really worry about BB more so than RM. I reckon it’ll be horses for courses selection most of the time but RM has got to get more time in the saddle before the big show in Japan.
obelixtim
Posts: 6314
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by obelixtim »

Shag has had two years to study the rush defence. I think he has a cunning plan but is keeping his powder dry right now. The ABs generally have a way of surprising their opponents. It'll all be cool.

Barrett will be fine, he will tear up the WC. But Read needs to be replaced as captain. Crotty or Bender would be the man.
User avatar
Salient
Posts: 3768
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am
Location: Queensland!

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by Salient »

Ali's Choice wrote:
Turbogoat wrote:Agreed on a Savea/Cane/Read trio (whichever order as required) as our strongest option.
This is an anti-Beauden Barrett troll thread. Please stay on topic.
OOohhhh AC coming out of the closet on this one :D

Currently not confident of a threepeat, but hey as someone said the Duck in 2011, stranger things ....
User avatar
UncleFB
Posts: 13769
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by UncleFB »

Turbogoat wrote:
guy smiley wrote:The Chiefs are reinvigorated with Marty MacKenzie at 10.

If that doesn’t thrown conventional thinking on its head then I politely suggest you’re thinking at the opposite end of the spine.
MMac for AB bolter?
Heads would implode, Cats would chase dogs, Planets would collide.
We live in a world where Cameron is an AB, MMac would just raise a slight shrug. He actually looked good sticking to the basics last week, with DMac playing as a 10 from 15 better than he does when playing as a 10 from 10.

Poor jdog, his anti BB thread has been overshadowed by this one.
User avatar
naki
Posts: 14209
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:05 am

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by naki »

obelixtim wrote:But Read needs to be replaced as captain. Crotty or Bender would be the man.
So you want to replace the established, to-the-manor born leader with a soft-spoken fullback or an injury prone sick note who will be lucky to make it on the field? Instead of, say, the most statistically successful captain of the pro era and commanding presence in the trenches Sam Whitelock?

Image
rett
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:53 am
Location: LHI

Re: The All Blacks won't win the RWC with Barrett at no.10

Post by rett »

Turbogoat wrote:It'll be a true underdog story if the ABs manage to win the RWC this time round.

Too many questions about the team, starting with who is our best 10. The balance of our loose forwards is all outta whack, Read injured yet again may be struggling for match fitness, Cane with a long term injury, God knows who at 6, where to slot in Savea etc...
We don't have the top level depth at this point to cover for inevitable injuries to key players without losing too much quality... it's going to take some careful player management to get to the semis with a full strength team. Having Mo'unga and BBarrett fighting it out is probably a good thing here, they'll both be getting some quality playing time in the earlier games, but we're going to be looking for immediate cover for either of them if they pick up an injury and that'll mean DMac likely getting on the field in knockout rounds...

Yeah. But who’s looking any better? Wales? A lot can happen between now and Japan.

I do agree with the BB dilemma though. And I also thought RM was fairly ordinary in a great Sadist display last night. Unless Shag does something really stupid (unlikely) then the back row issues will sort themselves.
Post Reply